RF Superconductivity and the Superheating Field Hsh - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

RF Superconductivity and the Superheating Field Hsh

Description:

and the Superheating Field Hsh. James P. Sethna, Gianluigi Catelani, and Mark Transtrum ... Decay of Y. Penetration depth: Decay of H. Energy cost. Energy. gain ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: lnsCo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RF Superconductivity and the Superheating Field Hsh


1
RF Superconductivityand the Superheating Field
Hsh
  • James P. Sethna, Gianluigi Catelani, and Mark
    Transtrum
  • Radio Frequency cavity
  • Oscillating E(t) to accelerate particle bunches
  • Maxwell implies oscillating H(t)
  • Best shaped cavities E/H 36 MV/(m G)
  • Superconducting RF cavity
  • Lower losses
  • Limited by maximum of H(t) in cycle
  • Each superconducting material
  • has maximum possible Hsh

2
Metastability and Nucleation
  • Raindrops the Liquid-Gas Transition

Metastable energy barrier B droplet nucleation R2
surface tension cost R3 bulk energy gain
Superheating like 110 humidity
Unstable spontaneous separation at Tsp linear
stability theory sinusoidal threshold dr e
exp(i k?z) lowers energy
Tsp
k
Tc
Gas phase metastable for Tc gt T gt Tsp, spinodal
temperature
3
Superconductors and magnetic fields
Type I (Pb)
  • Whats the superheating field?

Coherence length Decay of Y
Energy gain
Type II (Nb and Nb3Sn)
Energy cost
Penetration depth Decay of H
  • Type II superconductors
  • L gt x
  • Magnetic flux lattice H gt Hc1

RF cavity operating conditions already above
Hc1 Vortex nucleation slower than RF frequency
(GHz)
Can we calculate the phase diagram for Hsh?
4
Metastability threshold and Hsh
  • Why is there a barrier to vortex penetration?

How to calculate Hsh?
Why a superheating field?
  • Field where barrier vanishes
  • Linear stability analysis
  • determines nucleation
  • mechanism vortex array

x
  • Theories of superheating field
  • Line nucleation
  • HshHc /k
  • discouraging, but wrong
  • Ginsburg-Landau theory Hsh 0.745 Hc
  • Eilenberger equations Hsh 0.84 Hc
  • Eliashberg equations (hard!)

Barrier
Lgt x
Costly core x enters first gain from field L
later
5
Theories of superconductivity
  • Validity versus complexity

6
Theories of superconductivity
  • Validity versus complexity
  • Eilenberger Equations
  • Valid at all temperatures
  • Assumes D(r), H(r) vary slowly
  • Greens function f, g
  • Vortex core collapse??

Eilenberger equation results
  • Eliashberg equations
  • Needs electronic structure
  • Never done before for Hsh

7
Theories of superconductivity
  • Validity versus complexity

kF
  • Bogoliubov-deGennes equations
  • Pairs all k, -k
  • Local equations for quasiparticle eigenstates
  • We solved for vortex core states, predicted
    split peak
  • Sum over all quasiparticle states to get
    self-consistent y(r), H(r)

n
Experiment verified our theoretical prediction of
split peak away from vortex center
Quasiparticle density of states at different
distances from vortex center
Shore et al.
Hess et al.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com