Oral presentations

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Oral presentations

Description:

To change attitudes or behaviors, to sell, to get something. 3. To entertain ... The average dissipation rate ea was computed from the work measurements and an ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: CCEE

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Oral presentations


1
Oral presentations
2
Examples of talks
  • Lectures
  • Class presentations
  • Technical seminars
  • Training sessions workshops
  • Sermons
  • Speeches
  • Street preaching
  • Discussions in meetings
  • Sales pitches

3
Characteristics of good/bad talks?
  • Address the 4 rhetorical factors
  • Start and end on time
  • Communicate a few points well
  • Include only relevant material
  • Use effective graphics

4
Checklist for a talk
  1. Determine your purpose.
  2. Understand your audience.
  3. Understand the context.
  4. Determine the content.
  5. Practice your presentation.

5
Determine your purpose
What are some general purposes of presentations?
  • To inform
  • To tell about a problem or solution, to report
    research results, to educate
  • 2. To persuade
  • To change attitudes or behaviors, to sell, to get
    something
  • 3. To entertain
  • To provide enjoyment

6
Understand your audience
What are some questions one should answer about
the audience?
What does the audience expect? Who is the
audience? Are they friendly? Hostile? Why might
they want to listen? Is the topic of common
interest? What does the audience know about the
topic? What about topic is most relevant or
interesting? What media are most appropriate? How
long will they want to listen? Can the audience
read? Does the audience crave higher mathematics?
7
Understand your audience
Audience retention vs. time
100
75
Retention ()
50
25
0
0
25
50
8
Understand the context
What are some questions one should answer about
the context?
What is the occasion? What is the location? What
are room arrangements? What equipment is
required? What equipment is available?
9
Determine your content
Keep it simple!!
Focus on a few important points. Motivate the
talk well. Dont show every detail. Leave them
wanting more (and tell them how to get it).
10
Organize your content
What are some ways to organize the content?
By topic or flow of ideas By chronology or
time By space (such as for posters/displays) By
classification or categories By problem/solution
By cause/effect
11
Practice!
Fill in the blanks or choose the correct answer
  • The first version of a talk will likely be too
    ______.
  • 2. In 20 minutes, one can practice a 5-minute
    talk _____ times.
  • 3. Prof. Rehmann practices the longest/shortest
    talks most.
  • 4. The hardest parts of a talk are the ________
    and the _______.
  • 5. People who reach the end of the allotted time
    and have discussed only the motivation and
    methods look ________.
  • 6. After you practice the talk, dont forget to
    practice ______________.

12
Graphics
Identify possible problems in the following
slides and suggest improvements
13
  • stirring frequency
  • d rod size
  • N buoyancy frequency

14
Objectives
Determine the source of pollution in the Raccoon
River. Model effect of contamination on
downstream waters. Suggest methods to remove
the contamination.
15
(No Transcript)
16
Summary and Conclusions
  • We performed laboratory experiments to determine
    the conditions under which differential diffusion
    occurs and evaluate its effect on the mixing
    efficiency. Diffusively stable profiles of
    temperature and salinity were stirred steadily by
    horizontally oscillating vertical rods. The
    two-component stratification ensures that both
    scalars experience the same stratification and
    forcing, or Richardson and Reynolds numbers.
    Temperature and salinity profiles were obtained
    with a temperature-conductivity probe, and the
    work done by the rods on the water was measured
    with a force transducer. The eddy diffusivities
    KT and KS were estimated by fitting theoretical
    solutions of diffusion equations to the measured
    profiles for temperature and salinity, and the
    mixing efficiency was computed as the ratio of
    the potential energy change during a stirring
    interval to the work done in that interval. The
    average dissipation rate ea was computed from the
    work measurements and an integrated energy
    budget.
  • We observed differential diffusion and identified
    conditions for its occurrence. T-S diagrams
    qualitatively show the effects of differential
    diffusion. One can determine whether the
    diffusivity ratio d KS/KT is larger or smaller
    between two cases by comparing T-S diagrams, but
    care must be taken to compare equal time
    intervals made dimensionless by H2/KT.
    Differential diffusion occurred for ea/nN2 lt
    300-500 or for RiT gt 1. The diffusivity ratio
    varied between 0.5 and 1 in the range 50 lt ea/nN2
    lt 500. For similar values of ea/nN2 Barry et al.
    (2001) noted a change in the behavior of the
    turbulence, though they did not have data to
    evaluate Schmidt number effects.
  • In the present experiments, eddy diffusivities of
    temperature, salinity, and density collapsed well
    when normalized by the kinematic viscosity for
    large ea/nN2. The data did not collapse as well
    when differential diffusion occurred.
  • The experiments also illustrate the effect of
    differential diffusion on the mixing efficiency.
    When differential diffusion occurs, the density
    ratio will be important. If KT gt KS, then the
    mixing efficiency will be greater in cases in
    which more of the stratification is caused by
    temperature. We measured mixing efficiencies for
    cases with low density ratio (Rr 0.25) and high
    density ratio (Rr 5). In both cases, the
    efficiency increased from 0 to 1.5 as the
    Richardson number RiT increased from 0 to 1.
    However, for RiT gt 1, the efficiency for the high
    density ratio case exceeded that for the low
    density ratio case and increased more rapidly.
    The measurements show that effects of
    differential diffusion on the mixing efficiency
    can be significant.

17
Methods
We used the following formulas in our
calculations
Single Payment - Compound Amount Formula, (F/P,
i, n) F/P (1 i)n Single Payment - Present
Value (Worth) Formula, (P/F, i, n) P/F (1
i)-n Sinking Fund Formula, (A/F, i, n) A/F i
/ (1 i)n - 1 Capital Recovery Formula, (A/P,
i, n) A/P (i (1 i)n ) / ((1 i)n - 1)
Uniform Series - Compound Amount Formula, (F/A,
i, n) F/A ((1 i)n -1) / i Uniform Series -
Present Worth Formula, (P/A, i, n) P/A ((1
i)n -1) / (i (1 i)n ) where i is the interest
or discount rate (decimal fraction) per
accounting period. n is the number of accounting
periods from 0, there may be several n's. P is a
Present Value at time 0, may be positive or
negative. F is a Future Value at a time n, may
be positive or negative. A is a uniform amount
per period for n periods, may be positive or
negative.
18
Results
19
Affect of control on zebra mussels
Let 25 gt150 mm pass
Let 100 pass
Let 84 pass
20
Cash flows
Year Plan A Plan B Plan C Plan D
0 3,175.36 2,463.04 743.06 4,781.08
1 5,629.08 2,676.00 1,336.62 5,351.27
2 188.67 2,391.24 1,010.07 7,667.57
3 3,564.22 2,215.68 8,941.95 2,849.13
4 8,334.41 7,000.78 7,434.82 5,452.95
5 6,646.24 9,114.28 7,956.42 9,871.16
6 1,542.14 8,109.16 753.14 6,245.39
7 9,851.31 472.14 144.49 4,571.87
8 6,867.51 3,931.02 125.39 4,337.10
9 9,446.77 4,065.59 6,480.05 8,883.56
10 7,408.68 1,226.61 5,267.60 2,807.39
21
Net present worth
300
200
Net present worth (K)
100
0
Plan A
Plan B
Plan C
22
Source Sisk, Launer, Switky, Ehrlich 1994.
Identifying extinction threats. BioScience
44592-604
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)