Title: SCMP Conference Hong Kong 2005
1SCMP Conference Hong Kong 2005
- John Foster
- Asia Pacific GST Counsel
- 3 March 2005
2Overview
- Australian GST in brief
- Key selling points to Australian Public
- Australian scorecard
- Reviewing the pre GST predictions
- General observations about Australias
implementation - What about the future?
- Financial services?
3Australian GST in brief
- Taxes the supply of most goods and services 10
rate - Multi-stage tax designed to flow through most
businesses and tax end consumer - Liability for GST rests with supplier but the
supplier usually adjusts price to include GST - An entity needs to hold a valid tax invoice to
claim an offset for GST on its acquisitions - Taxpayer pays net amount to ATO (output tax
input credits)
4Tax Reform in Australia
- Key selling point - Australians will be better
off because - GST will replace an existing antiquated wholesale
sales tax which in itself was complex with
multi-rates of tax making the economy more
efficient and reducing prices on many goods. - Many imports will be cheaper as GST rate is
generally less than import duties which were
applicable to many goods. - Income tax rates were lowered this was a huge
incentive to middle income earners. - State governments in exchange for receiving all
GST revenue agreed to phase out a number of state
taxes (FID tax, BAD tax and stamp duty). - There was much political maneuvering and several
policy shifts to appease lobby groups (education,
food, residential premises, financial services).
5Australias scorecard 6/10
- Revenue generated 10/10 A35 bill (2004)
- Economy 10 spike in prices for services
- Complexity very complex in certain sectors
- Compliance high cost to business
- Administration many rulings but still a great
deal of uncertainty - Efficient tax user pays
- Acceptance very few headline articles in the
press over 4 years
6Net GST Collections by Industry
7Reviewing the pre GST predictions
- Inflation? no long term effect (short term
spike 2) - Hardship/insolvency? minor effect
- Consumer spending ? there was a bring forward
of expenditure on residential construction,
services and delay in motor vehicle and retail
spending but no prolonged effect - Cash economy? GST has grown faster than GDP
- Business efficiency? large effect/compliance
burden - Economy? no long term effect (perhaps
luck/timing) - Employment? no effect (short term increase in
consulting ranks) tech crash had more impact
8Observation - 1
- Without doubt Australian Government did not learn
the key lesson from other countries simplicity! - Too many special rules food, education, health,
financial services, taxis, residential premises,
sale of freehold land rules, change of use rules,
value shifting rules, telecommunication rules,
imported services rules, reduced input tax credit
rules, financial regulations etc etc - The cost of implementation for businesses was
underestimated. Businesses spent millions
updating computer systems, analysing
transactions, reviewing contracts, and
documenting processes and procedures - The ATO and Treasury issued hundreds of private
rulings, views on treatment of certain supplies,
public rulings, questions answer booklets, and
implemented a massive full time help desk which
required training.
9A company needed approx. 18 months to implement
- Project initiation/stakeholder buy-in/project
set-up - Estimate cost of implementation, timelines and
seek approval from CEO - Understand legislation/lobby on specific issues
- Review all existing contracts for GST impact
- Organise valuations where necessary (real
property) - Analyse all business supplies for GST treatment
- Analyse all business expenses for GST treatment
- Develop apportionment methodology based on
product/cost centres - Initiate project to work out systems requirements
and reprogram in-house operating, finance and
procurement systems - implement apportionment - Test systems outcomes
- Document processes and procedures
- Educate and train all staff
- Risk management and external sign off
10Observation - 2
- The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) was careful
to use a softly, softly approach towards
implementation which greatly eased Australias
transition - Positives from this approach
- Defused public anxiety/backlash at time of
implementation - Helped open valuable dialogue between ATO and
business - Negatives from this approach
- Businesses have been lulled into false sense of
security (GST is off the radar) - Not all businesses are fully compliant and
actually face significant ATO audit risk - Many issues still not settled between ATO and
businesses
11Observation - 3
- Compliance burden was not properly thought
through - Original GST return was too detailed and
disclosure was onerous - Original GST return did not allow for differing
accounting systems and differing businesses - This became a hot political issue and GST returns
were quickly modified to have minimal disclosure
requirements - As a result, a lot of key data which the ATO
Government thought they would collect was lost
(reducing ability to model) - Electronic lodgment of GST return was not
efficient for large business group (e.g
investment funds, property companies)
12Observation - 4
- The Government set up the Australian Competition
and Consumer Commission (ACCC) watchdog to
monitor prices and where necessary issue very
hefty penalties for incorrect pricing or
profiteering from the introduction of GST. - ACCC guidelines included strict guidelines for
disclosure of GST - GST could not be separately disclosed in shop
prices - Benefits of this approach
- Australian consumers dont see GST every time
they purchase goods - Any consumer who wanted to complain could do so
to ACCC who would actively follow up the
complaints
13Observation - 5
- Impact of GST has been softened by the robust
economic climate experienced by Australia since
July 2000. - If businesses in Australia were not experiencing
some of the best economic times they have ever
had there may have been more noise. - The Labour State Governments are getting all the
GST revenue so they are quietly very happy with
the introduction of GST and do not really oppose
it.
14Observation - 6
- Australia had a number of transitional rules that
seemed to work quite well including - Long term contracts (grandfathered)
- Margin Scheme for property (only pay GST on
margin generated after 30 June 2000 but purchaser
can not claim input tax credit). - Trading stock on hand at 30 June 2000 (credit for
sales tax paid) - Rights reasonably expected to be exercised after
30 June 2000 - Construction contracts (pre post GST
components) - No input tax credits allowed for vehicles
acquired before 23 May 2001 (to smooth vehicles
sales)
15What about the Future?
- Australian GST revenue will not continue to grow
at a rate in excess of GDP - As Australias population ages there will be a
skew towards health care which does not earn GST
revenue and GST revenue will dip below GDP - Explosion in Audits, rulings and case law
- Beyond the everyday worldlies the world of VAT,
a kind of fiscal theme park in which factual and
legal realities are suspended or inverted Royal
Sun Alliance Insurance Group Plc v Customs and
Excise Commissioners 2001 STC 1476 at 54 per
Sedley LJ. - Corporate Governance - back taxes, penalties and
interest - ATO will go back 4 years and impose penalties and
interest. Areas that were uncertain at
implementation are now subject to a more ruthless
approach by the ATO in Australia with huge
potential for effecting corporate profits.
16What about the Future?
- Australian GST model does not easily address the
global economy - Australian GST model is predicated on an
assumption that end users will buy goods and
services domestically - Australian GST system does not handle virtual
services to domestic consumers - GST is not flexible enough to deal will a lot of
innovative transactions (barter transactions,
mixed supplies, hybrids etc) - Many services are starting to be provided from
regional service centers Australian GST does
not handle this efficiently - Australian taxpayers have yet to fully consider
sophisticated GST planning structures
17Financial Services?
- GST in respect of financial services in Australia
is scored 2/10 - Legal uncertainty due to exemption of financial
supplies (ATO still issuing apportionment rulings
in 2005) - RITC system has compounded the uncertainty
- Cost of compliance is high - maintaining computer
systems/continuous education/constant transaction
analysis/high use of external advisers - Corporate governance risks are high due to audit
risk/uncertainty/systemic risk - Incentive for domestic end users to source
financial services from offshore - Because GST becomes imbedded in cost of
Australian financial services it makes Australian
business less competitive with the rest of Asia
because unrecovered GST effectively cascades
through the supply chain - Financial service providers will have cut costs
in other areas to compensate for impact of GST on
bottom line (including employment)