NENAs 1Q06 Technical Committee Status PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 40
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NENAs 1Q06 Technical Committee Status


1
NENAs 1Q06 Technical Committee Status
  • Roger Hixson
  • NENA Technical Issues Director

2
Status ReportNetwork Technical Committee
  • Internetworking WG - Jim Winegarden
  • Dormant since publishing tandem-to-tandem direct
    standard.
  • Need to address transfers of 9-1-1 calls through
    the PSTN
  • SS7 Landline/VoIP Interconnection Guide WGSelena
    MacArthur Dick Dickinson
  • SS7 TID 03-503 published October 2005
  • In 2006 they will assess any impacts
  • to TID from i2.5

3
Status ReportNetwork Technical Committee
  • Functional Entity WG Sandra Lott
  • Reviewing impact of VoIP to 9-1-1 Functional
    Entity Model
  • Voice Circuit Standards WG - Joe Marino
  • Address trunk group sizing guidelines
  • This document will recommend a simple Poisson
    based method for calculating P.01 and
    sizing trunk groups accordingly.

4
Status ReportNetwork Technical Committee
  • Network Quality Assurance and Design WGKen
    Maynard Jim Winegarden
  • Goal is to publish a NENA Standard detailing
    Network Quality Assurance Design, including a
    section on contingency planning and
    survivability.
  • Work still focuses on survivability and
    contingency planning, which is getting greater
    attention in the wake of Hurricane Katrina
  • Default Call Path WG Bernard Brabant
  • Goal is to develop a TID identifying various
    network arrangements for all types of default
    routing and overflow treatment in landline, VoIP
    and wireless technologies
  • Work in progress by Bernard

5
Status ReportNetwork Technical Committee
  • Geographic Number Portability WG vacant
  • Goal is to identify all impacts of GNP on 9-1-1
  • Paul Stoffels has compiled a preliminary list,
    but cannot continue to serve as Leader
  • We need a new WG Leader some interestedvoluntee
    rs to complete this important activity

6
Status ReportNetwork Technical Committee
  • Rate Center Consolidation WG (re-opened)Tom
    Hinkelman
  • WG was idled in 2005 because we thought
    1000s-group pooling eased the explosion in area
    codes and removed the need for anyone to
    consolidate rate centers. We were wrong!
  • Goal is to publish a TID exposing the potential
    impacts of RCC to reliable E9-1-1 service if
    appropriate precautions arent taking during the
    planning stages
  • We welcome participation from those involvedin
    any pending or recently completed rate center
    consolidations

7
Status ReportData Technical Committee
  • NENA 02-010 Data Exchange reissue approved
    02/25/2006
  • Established 7 new classes of service for VoIP
  • Added COS I for Wireless Phase II - Tells the
    PSAP the call is from a Phase II capable service,
    but only phase I information was available.
    Re-bid ALI for phase II information. Note,
    re-bid will not guarantee phase II information
    will be provided.
  • XML Release 4.1 to accommodate I2 standard which
    was developed by NENA to handle VoIP calls in the
    current E9-1-1 system. The I2
    directory includes schemas used
    by the I2 web services definitions (WSDLs) as
    well as the I2 WSDLs.
    http//www.nena.org/xml_schemas/nena.htm

8
  • NENA 02-011 in review process
  • Section 2.27 FX/DPA/OPX Standard
  • Section 4.15 Jurisdictions access to DBMS
  • Section 6.9 Fictitious Addresses
  • Section 22 General LNP standards
  • The Unlock function code expires after 90 days,
    at which time the Unlocked TN record in the DBMS
    and ALI databases will be removed.
  • NPAC/LERG validation
  • Statistical reports identifying by NENA ID
    stranded unlocks more than 30 days old
    sent to the 911 database
    stakeholder
  • NPDI Standards modified to include VoIP
  • LNP Exhibit Flow charts revised

9
  • NENA 02-502
  • NENA Company ID Registration Service Technical
    Information Document (TID)
  • Approved 12/2005

10
Status of Existing Issues
  • VDB/MSAG WG Delaine Arnold
  • Almost complete with first release of DRAFT NENA
    02-013 standard on how the VDB and ERDB should
    process and interface with todays MSAG Sources.

11
  • LNP WG Judy Graham
  • Developing portability testing scenarios for
    porting to from VoIP services.
  • Currently discussing the pros cons of the
    Unlock Migrate FOC codes vs. Delete Insert
  • GIS WG Erica Aubut
  • Information being assimilated for GIS data
    collection and maintenance standard 02-014.
  • Convert GIS data model Version 1.0 to
    GML

12
  • XML Data Exchange WG - Kim Leigh
  • Once the industry signs off on a modified ACN
    (Automatic Collision Notification) format the XML
    schema will be updated.
  • Convert the WAC (Wireless ALI Content) data field
    elements to an XML schema.
  • Review and ensure ALI Response data format is
    correct and in XML schema.
  • XML Namespace naming issues is essentially about
    agreeing on a standard naming syntax. 
  • eGov Initiatives The DOJ compliance issue is
    about reusing DOJ type definitions in NENA
    schemas (if required).  Additionally there are
    other initiatives on resource messaging and EDXL
    At some point we may be asked to use the same
    field names and definitions unknown
    at this time.
  • XML Transport OBF looking at possible changes to
    Service Order Formats in the future
    which will
    impact our standards. WG monitoring.

13
  • Wireless ALI Discrepancy
    Paul Binder/Bill Horn
  • Establishment of data management standards
    related to Wireless ALI Discrepancies.
  • Joint Data Technical/Operations Quality Assurance
    WG Maria Jacques/Ron Bloom
  • Primary focus is the OID document and gathering
    information for a PSAP Quality Assurance
    Document.

14
Future Issues for VDB/MSAG WG
  • ALI discrepancy procedures will need to be
    modified to account for VoIP.
  • Review existing quality measurements and audits
    to determine what is applicable for VDB/ERDB
    Operators.
  • End game MSAG format, transaction number, real
    time updates, AKA, switch issues V2 interface.
  • Who is responsible for liaising with the SR
    operators in the area of coverage to assist the
    SR operators in determining which ESRN values
    correspond to the ESZ allocations. Waiting on
    ESQK/ESRN WG to finalize.
  • Reports Statistical, Log of queries, Worst case
    busy hour, ERDB Queries that fail, Report of MSAG
    and Alternates, Mismatches between alternates,
    postal and MSAG.
  • The ERDB query should be made to the same
    VDB/ERDB where initial address
    validation occurred.
  • Processes on how the LIS will interface with VDB.

15
Future Issue for DBM WG
  • Need to develop a new process for distributing
    9-1-1 data. Currently being done by NPA/NXX.
    Doesnt work for LNP, Static VoIP, or GNP.

16
Future Issues for LNP WG
  • Which NENA ID goes on UNE-P service?
  • Porting of a pilot/main number

17
  • CPE Technical Committee Status Report
  • Who are we?
  • CPE Vendors
  • PSAP Staff
  • Service Providers
  • Database Providers
  • What do we do?
  • Produce and maintain technical standards
    documents.
  • Produce Technical Information Documents
  • Participate in joint working groups with other
    committees
  • Monitor development of related standards in other
    organizations

18
NENA 04-001 Review Working Group Leader Glenn
Bowers (Generic Standards for E9-1-1 PSAP
Equipment) 
  • Update Complete

19
ALI Standard Interface Working Group Leaders
Gary Hutchins, John Sines
  • Legacy Interface (Gary Hutchins)
  • Create new standard document
  • Describe ALI communications states.
  • Clarify legacy interface operation
  • Timing of interface events
  • Status Document Complete, Approvals in Process
  • XML Interface (John Sines)
  • Define method for transmitting ALI Responses to
    PSAPs from current ALI database nodes using XML.
  • Add XML section to new standard document.
  • Status Document Nearing Completion

20
CPE Security Working Group Leader Jeremy Smith
  • Expertise to be NENAs authority on security
    issues
  • Working on enhancing relationships with other
    committees
  • Ahead
  • Develop NENA Security Standards
  • Participate in characterizing security aspects of
    NENAs next generation network.
  • Status TID Completed and Published

21
CPE IP Capable PSAP Working Group Leader Glenn
Bowers
  • CPE Specifications to support IP data and voice.
  • Status NENA Standard Document in Development

22
  • Non-Traditional Technical Committee Status
    Report
  • Telematics Interface to E9-1-1
  • Reopened
  • TID Authoring Workshop
  • Medical Help Desk
  • Data Only Devices
  • Review New Initiatives

23
VoIP Technical Committee Status Report
  • Interim Solution (i2) standard completed
  • Long Term (i3) Architecture Document Nearly
    Complete
  • VLWG work zeroing in on solutions
  • SDO document updated

24
Interim Solution (i2) Standard
  • Standard is entitled Interim 9-1-1 Solution for
    VoIP Service Providers - NENA 08-001
  • Was completely ratified in late fall of 2005
  • Several lingering issues to be addressed by the
    authoring working group (migratory definition) to
    be covered under the i2.5
  • Appendix D and others

25
Updated Interim Solution (i2.5)
  • Delivery of ESQK and CBN to SR (20 digit)
  • Signaling of geodetic info to SR
  • ERDB discovery using geodetic information
  • Root discovery mechanism update
  • ERDB steering mechanism
  • Allowing VDB to return MSAG formatted address to
    LIS
  • Requirements on Valid Emergency Service
    Authority (VESA) operator

26
Updated Interim Solution (i2.5)
  • Requirements on ERDB/VDB discovery operator
  • Delivery of Class of Service over V-E2 interface
  • Interface between Call Server and LIS
  • Geodetic location delivery issues
  • Should i2.5 support mobile users?
  • Inclusion of recommended methods for location
    determination and acquisition from the
    output of the Location WG
  • Others as submitted (V2, V3, V5, V7?)

27
i3 Architecture
  • The initial i3 requirements document is
    completed, ready for internal review
  • First Technical Requirements Document completed
    within NENA
  • Once fully ratified (awaiting complete committee
    review and admin input), it will be NENA
    08-751

28
More i3 Work
  • Mechanisms standard document development is in
    progress
  • Contributions and liaisons are being considered
    with several other industry SDOs

29
VLWG Goals Milestones
  • Requirements and Evaluation Criteria Defined
  • Example Scenarios and Use Cases Defined
  • Evaluation of Proposed Methods
  • Residential/Mass Market in progress
  • Wireless Access Enterprise next
  • Encourage standards development
  • Recommendations

30
Residential / Mass Market
  • Dynamic Host Control Protocol Option
  • Defined by IETF for endpoint clients to acquire
    location
  • Assumes provisioned wiremap of circuit
    identifiers to geographic location data (stored
    in a Location Information ServerLIS)
  • Intended for Ethernet wireline can also be used
    to obtain fixed location of wireless access point
  • RFC 3825, DHCP Option for Coordinate-based
    Location Configuration Information
  • Civil location in final stages

31
Residential / Mass Market
  • DHCP Option Concerns
  • DHCP not used in major DSL markets in North
    America
  • Would require significant equipment replacement
  • Technical questions remain on its deployment for
    mass market/residential
  • Cannot be adapted to obtain location information
    on-behalf-of endpoints that are not
    location-capable

32
Next Steps
  • Finalize NENA Requirements
  • Continue to contribute concerns/questions to IETF
    about proposed solutions
  • Finish TID Residential/Mass Market
  • Expect to need two solutions for residential /
    mass market

33
Next Steps
  • Provide NENA requirements to additional standards
    and industry forums to encourage standards for
    location determination and acquisition mechanisms
    for new (and existing) access technologies
  • ESIF
  • 3rd Generation Partnership Project (s)
  • Wi-Fi Alliance
  • DSL Forum
  • IEEE
  • Etc.

34
(No Transcript)
35
NENA 9-1-1 Center Operations Committee
  • VoIP E9-1-1 Planning and Implementation document
    in review
  • Provides info and guidelines to Public Safety
    Authorities
  • NG9-1-1 Funding Analysis document in final review

36
(No Transcript)
37
NENA NG E9-1-1 Partner Program Status
  • Objective is to enable NG9-1-1, via program to
    identify roadblock/enabling issues
  • 25 partners to date
  • 2005 Program report is out, available on the NENA
    website (www.nena.org)
  • Identifies results of the 2005 work
  • Covers objectives for 2006 program

38
NENA NG E9-1-1 Partner Program Status
  • Topic Areas for 2006 Program
  • Funding
  • Data and Access
  • Location/Call Routing
  • Requirements/Standards
  • Demos/Trials
  • Education
  • Interoperability
  • Disaster Planning

39
NENA NG E9-1-1 Partners
  • America Online
  • American Association of Poison
  • Control Centers
  • ATT
  • Cingular
  • COMCARE
  • HBF Group, Inc.
  • Intrado
  • L. Robert Kimball Associates
  • Level 3 Communications
  • MapInfo
  • MCI
  • Motorola
  • National Academies of
  • Emergency Dispatch

40
NENA NG E9-1-1 Partners
  • NeuStar
  • OnStar
  • Positron Public Safety Systems
  • Rosum
  • Sprint Nextel
  • TCI
  • TeleCommunication Systems
  • T-Mobile
  • Texas 9-1-1 Alliance
  • Texas Commission on State
  • Emergency Communications
  • TruePosition
  • Verizon
  • Vonage
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com