Title: Preserving the outputs of research
1 Preserving the outputs of research
Warwick Cathro Assistant Director-General,
Innovation National Library of Australia Archivi
ng Web Resources Conference 9-11 November 2004
2Research outputs in digital form
- Primary outputs (such as data sets, images, video
files, sound recordings) - Secondary outputs (such as books, journal
articles, pre-prints, technical reports,
conference papers, theses, unpublished papers)
3The issues investigations
- University of California Santa Barbara survey
(2003) - UK e-science curation report (2003)
- Canadas National Research Data Archive
Consultation Needs Assessment Report (2001) - Clifford Lynchs observations (2003)
4Key issues
- Many academics are unaware of (or underestimate
the need for) long term preservation of their
research outputs - Academics are not equipped to deal with the
problem - Universities are not providing support in this
area - Research funding bodies place insufficient
emphasis on this issue - There are no national-level structures to support
data retention and curation
5Research data with long term value examples
- Most quality research in the humanities
- Social science research where future time series
analysis will be beneficial - Epidemiology
- Ecological studies of particular regions
- Most geoscience and meteorological data
6Institutional repositories
- Only an institutionally based approach can
provide a comprehensive preservation mechanism
Clifford Lynch - The emergence of software tools (such as
E-prints, DSpace, Fedora) - The OAIS Reference Model
- Work of OCLC and RLG on Trusted digital
repositories - The Australian situation
7National responses the UK
- Digital Curation Centre
- The e-science curation report advocated long term
funding for data curation - House of Commons Science and Technology Committee
report - Supported institutional repositories
- Proposed incentives
- Drew attention to role of British Library
8National responses USA
- The NDIIPs announcement of US14.9 million
funding for eight projects - US National Science Boards Task Force on
Long-lived Data Collection (February 2004)
9National responses Australia
- The Systemic Infrastructure Initiative
- Australian Partnership for Sustainable
Repositories (APSR) Project - NLA role in this project
10Collaboration
- We need a new set of partnerships Abby Smith
- Cooperation is hard
- The volume, diversity and complexity of digital
content compels a distributed, collaborative
approach that enables individual organisations to
manage content while also sharing best practices
for preservation Beth Dulabahn
11Collaboration stakeholders
- Academics
- University libraries
- University computing centres (where they exist)
- Discipline-based data centres
- National libraries
- Other institutions with a preservation mission
and with relevant skills and experience
12Collaboration issues
- How to constructively engage academics in this
endeavour? - Is it the role of university libraries to develop
and support institutional repositories? - What is the role of the central university IT
service? What if none exists? - What are appropriate roles for national libraries?
13Role of university libraries
- No consensus on this issue (UK e-science curation
report) - Potential resourcing, skills and attitudinal
constraints - University of Sydneys role in APSR (library,
academics, cross faculty support services) - Major strategic challenge for university libraries
14Role of national libraries
- Preserve digital resources within the sphere of
our selection policies - Establish partnership agreements with other
organisations to ensure that the information
landscape is covered - Offer support and advice to these partners based
on our preservation skills and experience
15Conclusions
- Our aim is to give researchers a sound
infrastructure to manage their research outputs
into the future - We need recognition and support from government
- We need to build a collaborative framework
linking researchers, university libraries,
university computing centres, national libraries
and other stakeholders