Drought Impacts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Drought Impacts

Description:

Shortage Protection at Higher Elevations Equates to Higher Capacity & Energy ... In Shortage Years Davis Generation Is Reduced Almost Proportionally to Water ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: BYo9
Category:
Tags: drought | impacts

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Drought Impacts


1
Drought Impacts
Power Production for Boulder Canyon Project
Parker-Davis Project
2
  • Impacts To Date

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
  • Future Drought Impacts
  • Boulder Canyon Project

7
How Is Hoover Generation Impacted If Drought
Continues?
  • Reduced Head as Lake Mead Storage Decreases
  • Lake Mead Level Drops 10-15 ft. per year with
    min. objective release (8.23 MAF) from Powell
  • Reduced Water Releases When Shortages are
    Implemented
  • No Physical Restrictions But Turbine Output
    Decreases With Lower Elevation Water Releases

8
Hoover Key Elevations
9
Turbine Operation
  • Design Head for Turbine Equates to About 1160 ft.
    Elevation
  • Turbines Probably Able to Operate Below 1050 ft.
    (Minimum Power Pool) at Greatly Reduced Output
  • Increased Cavitation Maintenance at Lower
    Elevations. More Operational Limitations.

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
How Far Can Lake Mead Elevation Drop?
  • Shortage Protection Criteria Determine the
    Elevation(s) at Which Water Deliveries are
    Reduced
  • No Shortage Protection Criteria Adopted by
    Reclamation - Basin States Discussing
    Alternatives
  • Absolute Floor Probably 1000 ft. (Nevada Intakes)

13
Mitigation Measures
  • Turbine Replacements
  • Stainless Steel Wicket Gates
  • Involvement In Shortage Protection Criteria/Basin
    States Discussions
  • Operation of Desalter or Other Bypass
    Alternatives Reducing Over-Deliveries to Mexico

14
Turbine Replacements
  • Increased Capacity (10-15)
  • Small Increase In Efficiency Energy
  • Reduced OM Costs/Operational Limitations
  • Cost Approximately 1.3M per Turbine
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Quick Payback at Lower Elevations
  • USBR Doing Preliminary Evaluation
  • Replacements Done in Increments

15
Stainless Steel Wicket Gates
  • Increased Capacity (5)
  • Small Increase In Efficiency Energy
  • Reduced OM Costs
  • Cost Approximately 1.0M per Turbine
  • Cost Effectiveness
  • Quick Payback Not Dependent Upon Elevation
  • USBR Doing Preliminary Evaluation
  • Replacements Done in Increments

16
Shortage Protection Criteria
  • Shortage Protection at Higher Elevations Equates
    to Higher Capacity Energy
  • Same Amounts of Water is Delivered in Long Run
  • Storage Between 1000 1050 3 MAF

17
1100 ft. vs. 1050 ft. Avg Capacity 1573 MW vs
1409 MW (11.6 Diff) Avg Energy 3392 GWH vs
3174 MW (6.9 Diff) Same Total Water Deliveries
18
Other Measures
  • Reducing Bypass Flows to Mexico (Desalter or
    Fallowing)
  • Additional Storage in Yuma Area Would Reduce
    Over-Deliveries to Mexico
  • Combined Maximum Reduction in Releases Would be
    200 KAF or Less

19
  • Future Impacts
  • Parker-Davis Project

20
Impacts on Parker-Davis Generation
  • No Change in Lake Mohave Lake Havasu Target
    Elevations
  • Therefore Head is Not Affected at Parker Davis
    Dams and Generation Varies Only With Water
    Releases
  • Lake Mead Elevation Below 1125 ft. Results in
    Normal Water Year Releases
  • In Normal Water Years P-D Generates About Current
    Contract Levels of 1346 GWh (Slightly Less Than
    FY03)

21
Impacts on Parker-Davis Generation(Cont.)
  • In Shortage Years Davis Generation Is Reduced
    Almost Proportionally to Water Reductions
  • Parker Generation Should Be Unaffected Since Most
    or All Reductions are Above Parker
  • Davis Generation About 80, Parker Generation
    About 20 of Parker-Davis Generation
  • Example 10 Reduction In Water Deliveries 8
    Reduction In Parker-Davis Generation

22
  • Probable Future
  • Hoover Parker-Davis
  • Generation

23
Recent Generation Studies
  • Boulder Canyon Project Through 2017
  • Average Capacity 1637 MW
  • Average Energy 3889 MWh
  • (No Modifications to Units)

24
Recent Generation Studies
  • Parker-Davis Generation Through 2028
  • Average Energy Approx. 1380 GWh
  • (Reviewing Numbers)

25
Mead Filling
  • Requires Average or Greater Colorado River Basin
    Runoff
  • Lake Powell Fills First Until Volume Greater Than
    Lake Mead (Equalization)
  • Possible to Completely Refill in Few Years But
    Requires Very Unusual Runoff (Similar to Early
    80s)

26
Probable Future GenerationSummary
  • BCP Generation Between 3600 GWh and 4100 GWh Most
    Years
  • P-D Generation Near Current Contract Energy of
    1346 GWh Most Years
  • Lake Mead Must Fill Above Elevation 1145 ft. for
    Generation Significantly Above These Values
  • Generation Would be Significantly Below These
    Values Only in Water Shortage Years

27
  • For Additional Information
  • Contact Brian Young
  • byoung_at_wapa.gov
  • or 602-352-2594
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com