PHENOLOGY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PHENOLOGY

Description:

CF (Flowering) UW-Milwaukee Geography. Proposed FLUXNET Phenological Phases (deciduous sites) ... BF (Beginning of flowering) FR (Fruit ripe) CL (Coloring of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:455
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: markd176
Learn more at: https://cheas.psu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PHENOLOGY


1
PHENOLOGY
  • Impacts of Spring Phenology on Carbon and Energy
    Fluxes in the Midwest and Northeast USA

2
Research Contributions
  • Phenology data from R. Ahas, J. Caprio, X. Chen,
    DWD, A. Menzel, J. OKeefe, and WPS
  • Flux data from S. Wofsy/Harvard Forest
    (1992-2000), Lamont ARM (1994-1998), K.
    Davis/Park Falls/ WLEF (1997-1999), S.
    Grimmond/H. Schmid/ Morgan Monroe (1999-2000) ,
    and D. Baldocchi/ K. Wilson/Oak Ridge
    (1996-2000)
  • Phenology compositing technique adapted from a
    method developed by X. Chen

3
RESEARCH GOALS
  • Dynamic Biosphere Models
  • Terrestrial Biosphere Change Detection
  • Improve Understanding of Atmosphere-Biosphere
    Interactions

4
Integrated Approach
  • Satellite Observations (AVHRR-NDVI)
  • Indicator Species Phenology
  • Native Species Phenology

5
Lilac First Leaf
6
Lilac First Bloom
7
Spring Indices (SI) Bloom Model Performance(3
plant average model output compared to lilac
bloom data)
8
SI Bloom Comparison to European Plant Data
9
Comparisons to Harvard Forest Native Trees
10
Comparisons to Harvard Forest Native Trees
11
Comparisons to UW-Milwaukee Native Trees
12
Spring Index Comparison to USA SOS Dates
13
Diurnal Range Change with First Leaf
14
Station Locations
15
Spring Index Model Output for Selected Stations
Composite Chill Date First Leaf Date First Bloom Date

Station n min mean max min mean max min mean max
P. Falls 3 -24 -21 -15 110 117 125 130 139 153
H. Forest 9 -21 -15 -9 97 111 118 133 140 148
MMonroe 2 4 8 11 70 80 90 111 113 115
Lamont 5 10 17 22 54 58 62 83 90 97
O. Ridge 5 8 24 50 50 59 77 76 89 102
16
Flux Changes Relative to First Bloom Spring
IndexHarvard Forest, MA 1992-2000
17
Net Ecosystem ExchangeHarvard Forest, MA
1992-2000
18
Comparative Latent minus Sensible Heat Flux
19
Comparative Net Ecosystem Exchange
20
Comparative Net Ecosystem ExchangeAnnual
Downturn Rates
21
Comparative Net Radiation
22
PAR Relative to First Bloom Spring IndexHarvard
Forest, MA 1992-2000
23
Flux Changes at UWM Field Station, WI 2002
24
Harvard Forest Native Species
  • Acer pensylvanicum striped maple
  • A. rubrum red maple
  • A. saccharum sugar maple
  • Amelanchier spp serviceberry, shadbush
  • Aronia spp chokeberry
  • Betula alleghaniensis yellow birch
  • B. lenta black birch
  • B. papyrifera paper birch
  • B. populifolia gray birch
  • Castanea dentata American chestnut
  • Cornus alternifolia alt.-leaved dogwood
  • Crataegus spp hawthorn
  • Fagus grandifolia American beech
  • Fraxinus americana white ash
  • Hamamelis virginiana witch-hazel
  • Ilex verticillata winterberry, black alder
  • Kalmia angustifolia sheep laurel
  • K. latifolia mountain laurel
  • Lyonia ligustrina maleberry
  • Nemopanthus mucronata mountain holly
  • Nyssa sylvatica black gum
  • Pinus strobus eastern white pine
  • Populus tremuloides trembling aspen
  • Prunus serotina black cherry
  • Quercus alba white oak
  • Q. rubra northern red oak
  • Q. velutina black oak
  • Rhododendron roseum mountain azalea
  • Sambucus pubens red elderberry
  • Tsuga canadensis eastern hemlock
  • Vaccinium corymbosum highbush blueberry
  • Viburnum alnifolium hobblebush
  • V. cassinoides witherod
  • also observed at UWM Field Station

25
Flux Changes Relative to First Bloom Spring
IndexHarvard Forest, MA
26
Harvard Forest Carbon Dioxide Flux
27
Phenological Changes near ChEAS sites
28
Phenological Regions in Wisconsin(Source Zhao
2002)
29
ISI First Bloom for NP Region, WI compared to SI
Indices for 475516(ISI from Zhao and Schwartz,
in progress)
30
Proposed FLUXNET Phenological Phases (coniferous
sites)
  • NA (Needle appearance)
  • CF (Flowering)

31
Proposed FLUXNET Phenological Phases (deciduous
sites)
  • SL (Sprouting of leaves)
  • UL (Beginning of the unfolding of leaves)
  • L95 (95 of leaves at 95 of final size)
  • BF (Beginning of flowering)
  • FR (Fruit ripe)
  • CL (Coloring of leaves)

32
Proposed FLUXNET Phenological Phases (grassland
sites)
  • IG (Initiation of growth, tiller emergence)
  • IF (Initiation of flowering, anthesis)
  • DF (Duration of flowering, anthesis)
  • PS (Peak seedheads)
  • LC (Leaves in canopy gt 90 dry)

33
Global Phenological Monitoring
  • European Phenology Network
  • FLUXNET phenology protocol
  • GLOBE phenology protocols
  • Canada Plantwatch
  • USA phenology network plans
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com