Imaging From Our Pristine Boston Skies Not - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Imaging From Our Pristine Boston Skies Not

Description:

Imaging From Our Pristine Boston Skies Not – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: neilfl3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Imaging From Our Pristine Boston Skies Not


1
Imaging From Our Pristine Boston Skies
(Not!) Thursday, September 13, 2007 Neil
Fleming (www.flemingastrophotography.com)
2
Why Even Try from Boston!?
3
What Types of Imaging Can We Do?
  • Planetary and lunar imaging with webcams
  • Narrowband Imaging
  • Traditional RGB imaging of Deep Sky Objects

4
Planetary and Lunar Imaging
  • Done with a simple, inexpensive, webcam
  • ToUcam Pro II
  • 100
  • Instead of long-term exposure of a few dozen
    shots, maximum, you take hundreds or thousands of
    frames from your AVI file
  • Each shot is no more than 1/10th to 1/33rd of a
    second in duration
  • The image stacking software will choose the
    best frames, from moments of better seeing, and
    give you quite a reasonable result

5
Sample Results
  • A single, raw, frame

6
(No Transcript)
7
What is RGB?
  • RGB stands for Red, Green, and Blue
  • This mix of primary colors is what our eyes use
    to interpret color
  • All imaging starts with a black and white CCD or
    CMOS sensor
  • Your DSLR cameras utilize tiny red/green/blue
    (RGB) filters over the individual pixels, placed
    in a Bayer matrix pattern
  • One-shot color CCD cameras utilize that same
    Bayer matrix

8
What is RGB? (continued)
  • Most CCD imaging is done with a black and white
    camera, and you use color filters to emulate the
    RGB results so you can obtain a color image
  • This takes longer than one-shot color, but gives
    you more resolution in the final result

9
What Does RGB From Boston Look Like?
  • Light pollution typically causes horrible
    gradients from our stacks of 3-8 minute
    exposures
  • A little processing in Photoshop helps, but still
    not great results
  • Bright objects are better

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
But Narrowband is Even Better!
  • RGB takes in the full spectrum, with each filter
    letting in about 200 nm of frequencies
  • Narrowband filters let through only the tiniest
    wavelength of light, typically 3 to 13 nm
  • These filters are manufactured to let in only the
    light associated with emission wavelengths Ha,
    OIII, and SII
  • Other wavelengths are blocked, and this includes
    the vast majority of light pollution
  • Typically I use 30-minute exposures
  • Result clearer and deeper images!

14
Typical Narrowband Pass-through
  • Doubly oxidized oxygen (OIII) has its main
    emission at 500.7 nm
  • Hydrogen-alpha (Ha) emission wavelength is 656.3
    nm
  • Sulfur (SII) emits at 672 nm

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
What Equipment do you Need for Planetary Work?
  • Telescope
  • Almost any scope will do
  • Mount
  • Can be very basic
  • Excellent, long-term tracking, is not required
  • However, stability is a definite plus
  • Webcam, like a ToUcam 80
  • An IR cut filter is very beneficial
  • Barlows / PowerMates
  • Software
  • Registax (free)
  • Adobe Photoshop (not cheap)

18
How About for Deep Sky Imaging?
  • Telescope
  • Almost any scope will do
  • 200
  • Sometimes a flattener or reducer is needed
  • Mount
  • Stability is critical
  • Low periodic error is a plus
  • Ability to accept autoguiding commands is
    required for best results
  • Cost 1,500 and up
  • DSLR or CCD Camera
  • DSLR
  • Canon, Nikon, etc.
  • Can be aftermarket-modified for better red and Ha
    response (Hutech)
  • 400 and up

19
How About for Deep Sky Imaging?
  • CCD Camera
  • Simple, like the Meade DSI or Orion Starshoot
    series, 129 to 599
  • One-shot color or monochrome
  • Wide range of other manufactures
  • Starlight Express
  • SBIG
  • FLI
  • Apogee
  • QSI
  • Costs range from less than 1,000 to 13,000
  • Additional guide scope guide camera / head
  • SBIG is self-guiding, but that has limitations
  • An advantage for narrowband work

20
How About for Deep Sky Imaging?
  • Filter Wheel
  • Come in 1.25, 2, and 2 square formats
  • Some are closely coupled to the camera itself,
    while others are standalone and can operate
    independently
  • Filters
  • For RGB imaging L, C, R, G, B, and sometimes a
    LPR or light pollution reduction filter (Hutech
    IDAS)
  • For narrowband imaging Ha, OIII, SII are the
    most common
  • Astrodon, Baader, Optec, Custom Scientific,
    Astronomik, Barr, etc.

21
How About for Deep Sky Imaging?
  • Image capture software
  • CCDSoft
  • MaxIM
  • CCDOps
  • Astro image processing software
  • CCDStack
  • MaxIM
  • PixInsightLE
  • Downstream image processing software
  • Photoshop
  • Many different plug-ins

22
My Equipment Progression
  • Started with
  • A refractor (Televue NP-127)
  • TAK NJP mount, but with no autoguiding
  • Meade DSI-C

23
My Equipment Progression
  • ..and a ToUcam

24
My Equipment Progression
  • Added a Meade DSI-Pro (monochrome)



25
More Meade DSI-Pro Shots
26
Added an SBIG ST-2000XM (Mono)
27
Then a TAK FSQ-106NSV
28
(No Transcript)
29
Started Playing with Narrowband/Ha
30
Full Narrowband Ha/OIII/SII with STL-6303
31
Added Paramount, TOA-150, then TMB 203 F/7
32
OK, So How Do You Do This?
  • Get set up for some quality imaging time!
  • start with an interminable wait for clear skies
  • Drag your mount and scope out
  • Set up your gear, and do your polar alignment
    (for a GEM)
  • Field rotation effects in non-polar aligned
    Alt/Az
  • Use MaxIM / CCDSoft to take your images
  • RGB/LRGB can be done in a couple of hours
  • Narrowband takes at least one night, if not
    longer
  • Dont forget your darks and flats

33
Huh? What are Darks!?
  • CCD chips are neither perfect nor uniform
  • Individual pixels can be hot
  • Clusters of minor defects
  • Potential column defects
  • There is dark current (thermal) noise in your
    chip
  • Thermal noise is associated with the build up of
    signal on the CCD chip, even when no light is
    present, due to heat
  • The amount of thermal noise drops off quickly
    with lower temperatures
  • By cooling a CCD chip, the dark current can be
    reduced to an acceptable level
  • Good astronomical CCDs have cooling systems that
    can lower chip temperatures by 35 degrees C or
    more
  • To mitigate this thermal noise, we take darks
    at the same CCD temperature and duration that we
    used for our light frames

34
(No Transcript)
35
What on Earth are Flats!?
  • We need to deal with dust on our filters, CCD
    chip, and telescope optics
  • Also, optic systems are hotter in the middle of
    the frame than they are at the edges
  • This is particularly apparent for fast, short
    focal length scopes like the FSQ
  • You take images of a uniform surface/sky, so as
    to capture these flaws
  • Flat lightbox
  • Dusk or dawn flats
  • These are divided into the lights during
    calibration

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
Processing Combine in CCDStack
  • Load the individual subexposures (subs)
  • Calibrate them (apply your darks and flats)
  • Do some bloom rejection, if necessary
  • Register or align the individual images
  • Apply normalization to appropriately weight the
    contribution of the individual subs
  • Perform advanced noise rejection for outliers and
    cosmic ray hits, airplane trails, etc.

41
Processing Combine in CCDStack
  • Stack or combine the subs into a channel master
  • Repeat for each filter or color
  • Further noise reduction
  • Deconvolution, if desired
  • Save as a scaled TIF (mono/narrowband)
  • For RGB, you probably want to do the color
    combine in CCDStack it has nice color
    adjustment tools

42
Processing Adobe Photoshop
  • For RGB, the color combine was already done in
    CCDStack
  • For narrowband, I recommend processing individual
    channels for maximum quality before the color
    combine. The OIII/SII is weak relative to the
    Ha. For each channel
  • Noise reduction (Either with PS tools, or
    NeatImage)
  • Contrast adjustments via adjustment layers like
    levels or curves
  • Do a channel merge to make your color image

43
Narrowband Palettes
Red (Ha) / Green (OIII) / Blue (SII) is
Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) palette
Red (SII) / Green (Ha) / Blue (OIII) is the
famous Hubble palette
Red (Ha) / Green (sG) / Blue (OIII) is the
Synthetic Green palette
44
Processing Adobe Photoshop
  • Color balancing
  • RGB is usually good to go
  • Narrowband
  • The Ha often overpowers the OIII and SII, so some
    balancing is required
  • Channel Mixer
  • Selective Color adjustments
  • Levels (use lightly)
  • Curves
  • Gradient removal
  • Russ Cromans Gradient XTerminator
  • Noise reduction, if not already done

45
Processing Adobe Photoshop
  • Contrast enhancements
  • Curves
  • Noel Carbonis Local Contrast Enhancement
    Photoshop Action
  • Shadow/Highlight adjustment
  • Sharpening
  • Convert to jpg and upload to web site

46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
Time for a Demo?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com