Introduction to the Law of Searches

About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to the Law of Searches

Description:

... right to be secure in their houses, papers, and effects. ... in the house across the ... back lanai hear Soprano confess to stealing a tractor-trailer. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Bre9154
Learn more at: http://ruby.fgcu.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to the Law of Searches


1
Introduction to the Law of Searches
2
4th Amendment
  • People have the right to be secure in their
    houses, papers, and effects.
  • No unreasonable search and seizures.
  • Applicable to the States through the Due Process
    clause in the 14th Amendment.
  • Generally only applies to governmental conduct.

3
The Means to Search
  • Search Warrant issued by a neutral and detached
    magistrate/judge.
  • Based on probable cause.
  • Has to be fresh.
  • Valid on its face.

4
Execution of the Warrant
  • After being issued
  • Executed without unreasonable delay.
  • After announcement (unless officers/evidence
    would be endangered.)
  • Person/Place seized within scope of warrant.

5
Execution Cont.
  • 10 day rule
  • Normally done in the daytime.
  • Special exception for search warrant during later
    hours.
  • Inventory.
  • High-Dollar/Special Items.

6
Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement
  • Incident to Lawful Arrest.
  • Automobile Search
  • Plain View
  • Consent
  • Stop Frisk
  • Hot Pursuit
  • Protective Sweep

7
What Agents are allowed to Seize
  • Instrumentalities of the crime.
  • Fruits of the crime.
  • Contraband.
  • The mere evidence of a crime (e.g. blood stained
    clothing, bloody knife, etc)

8
What is Constitutionally Protected?
  • Police record conversation inside a home.
  • Police record a conversation in a public
    telephone booth.
  • Police record a conversation in a persons car.
  • Police record a conversation in a restaurant.
  • Police record a conversation in a mall.

9
People are Protected, Not Places
  • Person must have a reasonable expectation of
    privacy, and
  • that the expectation be one that society as a
    whole recognizes as reasonable.

10
Katz v. U.S. (1967)
  • Originally 4th Amendment dealt with property.
  • Katz made it more of a privacy issue.
  • It is a search where a person has a reasonable
    justifiable expectation of privacy.
  • What a person knowingly exposes is not a subject
    of 4th Amendment protection.

11
Scenario 1
  • Mr. Rip Off is sitting in his home creating false
    investment statements.
  • Police are in the house across the street.
  • Using a high-powered telescope, the police see
    Rip Off using white-out to change investment
    returns.
  • Police use this information to get a search
    warrant.
  • Will the evidence from the resulting search
    warrant be suppressed?

12
Scenario 2
  • Police do surveillance of Herb Grower from across
    the street.
  • Police use a telescopic photo lens to see through
    the open window of Grower.
  • Police see fifteen marijuana plants and use this
    as a basis for their search warrant.
  • Does the evidence from the resulting search
    warrant get suppressed?

13
What is Reasonable/Unreasonable?
  • Objects in plain view.
  • Objects in plain view readable only through
    enhancement.
  • Objects seen through open windows.
  • Would a reasonable person have an expectation of
    privacy?

14
Plain View and Natural Senses
  • Pat down searches of a person reveals a weapon.
  • Officer smells marijuana.
  • Officers sees contraband in plain view.

15
Scenario 3
  • After receiving an anonymous tip, officers board
    a public bus and find an individual who is
    allegedly a courier for cocaine.
  • The individual identifies his duffel bag.
  • Officers feel all around the outside of the bag.
  • When they feel a hard substance, they open the
    bag to find 2 kilos of cocaine.
  • Is this evidence admissible?

16
Plain Touch
  • Plain touch is not analogous to plain view.
  • Touching or seizing something can be more
    intrusive than plain view.
  • The Plain View Doctrine authorizes seizure of
    items visible to the officer only if the
    officers access to the evidence has a 4th
    amendment justification.
  • Depends on the expectation of privacy.

17
Scenario 4
  • After receiving an anonymous tip, officers board
    a public bus and find an individual who is
    allegedly a courier for cocaine.
  • The individual identifies his duffel bag.
  • The officers call a drug dog to the scene.
  • The dog hits on the bag and a subsequent search
    reveals two kilos of cocaine.
  • Why is this evidence admissible?

18
How Probable Cause was Obtained
  • There was no intrusive search of the bag.
  • Dogs, drug-testing kits only verify the presence
    of an illegal substance.
  • After the hit by the dog, enough probable cause
    was present to make a valid search/seizure.

19
Scenario 5
  • Mr. Jewel Thief pulls a heist the previous night.
  • Thief checks out of his hotel and leaves behind a
    blueprint of the jewelry store.
  • Police search the hotel room without a warrant
    and find the blueprint.
  • Will this evidence be suppressed?

20
Abandoned Property
  • Again, ask yourself is there a reasonable
    expectation of privacy.
  • Not based on formal property rights.
  • What if a house is for sale and an officer gains
    entry with a realtor?

21
Scenario 9
  • Wile E. Coyote is a fugitive felon.
  • Police see Coyotes car parked in his brothers
    driveway.
  • The car does not move for two weeks.
  • Police search the vehicle under the abandonment
    principle and find evidence to support the
    charges.
  • Will this evidence be suppressed?

22
Look at the Situation
  • Where is the car placed?
  • How long has the vehicle been there?
  • What if police had walked onto the driveway and
    saw contraband through the window?

23
Scenario
  • Police respond to a domestic violence call.
  • The owners of the home voluntarily allow police
    into the home.
  • Police are given consent to search the house.
  • While searching a boarders room, police find
    four stolen guns.
  • Will the stolen guns be suppressed in the case
    against the boarder?

24
Standing
  • Person owned or had a right to possession of the
    place searched.
  • Place searched was the persons home.
  • Person was an overnight guest of the place
    searched.
  • What if the boarders wallet left in the kitchen
    contained false identification?

25
Items Held Out To The Public
  • Generally no reasonable expectation of privacy.
  • Garbage at the curb
  • Handwriting
  • Bank Records
  • Telephone Records
  • Paint on the outside of a car.
  • Sound of a voice.

26
Scenario 6
  • Officers position themselves outside Tony
    Sopranos front door and back lanai.
  • Officers near the front door hear Soprano admit
    to killing an associate.
  • Ten minutes later, officers in the back lanai
    hear Soprano confess to stealing a
    tractor-trailer.
  • Which, if any, of these statements is admissible
    evidence?

27
Curtilage vs. Open Fields
  • Open Fields Doctrine
  • Areas Outside Curtilage
  • Much less expectation of privacy in open fields.
  • Areas around the persons home
  • Can include some or all outbuildings such as
    garages and barns.
  • More of an expectation of privacy with curtilage.

28
Four Points to Outbuildings
  • Proximity of the area to the home.
  • Whether the area is included within an enclosure
    surrounding the home.
  • The nature of the uses to the area.
  • Steps taken to protect the area from observation.

29
Scenario
  • Police fly a helicopter in navigable airspace
    over Eric Cartmans home.
  • Police observe marijuana plants even though
    Cartman had a makeshift roof over the area in
    question.
  • The area is in space considered part of
    curtilage.
  • Will this evidence be suppressed?

30
Scenario 7
  • Police suspect Smokey Weed of having a marijuana
    grow operation in his home.
  • Police fly a plane over the home and use a
    thermal imager, which does not send rays into the
    home, to determine amounts of heat emanating from
    the home.
  • Based on the results, the police obtain a search
    warrant.
  • Is this evidence admissible?

31
Kylle v. U.S. (2001)
  • Reliance upon sense-enhancing devices.
  • More particularized version of the Katz test.
  • Information regarding the interior of the home
    which is not readily recognizable
  • Is the technology in question in general public
    use?

32
Scenario 8
  • Police are investigating Chemical Dump, Inc. for
    environmental crimes.
  • Police use an aircraft and take pictures of
    Chemical Dump, Inc.s fenced-in facility.
  • Police also take pictures from a public road
    showing the illegal packaging of chemicals
    through an open door in the factory.
  • Undercover police go into the sales office and
    find falsified paperwork in the trash can.
  • Which items are admissible if any?

33
Totality of the Circumstances
  • Each search stands on its own
  • Look at the technique used.
  • While some actions may constitute a search if
    done one way, they may not be considered a search
    if done another way.

34
Scenario
  • Police obtain a valid search warrant for the home
    of Sam Bookie, 1235 Vegas Lane.
  • The warrant is based on information from an
    informant.
  • Police delineate 1234 Vegas Lane as the place to
    be searched.
  • Realizing their mistake, police scratch out 1234
    and put 1235 in its place.
  • After the search warrant police find out the
    informant lied to them.
  • Will this evidence be suppressed and why?

35
Tainted Evidence
  • Was the mistake made in good faith?
  • Does the mistake have an impact on the Search
    itself?
  • Were there exigent circumstances?
  • Totality of the Circumstances.

36
Review
  • 4th Amendment applies to people more than
    property.
  • A search warrant based on probable cause is
    needed to search.
  • There are exceptions.
  • Was there a reasonable expectation of privacy?
  • Items held out to the public have no expectation
    of privacy.
  • Curtilage and the Open Fields Doctrine.

37
Dr. Pacini Video - Outside Curtilage
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)