Title: Brain Tumours for Psychologists
1Brain Tumours for Psychologists
- Allan James
- Consultant Clinical Oncologist
- Beatson Oncology Centre
2(No Transcript)
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22Why suspect a Brain Tumour ?
- Headaches are common, very few caused by tumour
- Look for acute onset, particular pattern,
association with other symptoms / signs
- Although seizures are dramatic, very few are
caused by brain tumours
- Scan all with new onset seizures with no adequate
explanation of cause
- Personality changes are common in older age
- Brain tumours are a rare cause
- VIGILANCE
- is the key
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Some imaging is a little more accurate still
30Baseline
Week 6
Week 24
Week 40
Week 56
31(No Transcript)
32LOH 1p 19q is becoming A useful clinical marker
Both for prognosis
And therapeutic decisions
33There is no more Powerful prognostic Marker in
GBM
Than AGE
34THUS
35Introduction to GliomaTreatment
36Introduction to GliomaTreatment
37Introduction to GliomaTreatment
38Introduction to GliomaTreatment
39Introduction to GliomaTreatment
Frame based Image Guided Brain Biopsy 1980
40Introduction to GliomaTreatment
Image guidance has simplified the biopsy or ex
cision of supratentorial
lesions
41Introduction to GliomaTreatment
Awake craniotomy for brain mapping and tumour
excision cortical stimulation and
language testing during craniotomy
42Introduction to GliomaTreatment
A Biopsy only B Maximal debulking C Various p
ercentage debulking
43Introduction to GliomaTreatment
44Introduction to GliomaTreatment
- Glioma Historical perspective
- Situation around 2000
- HGG
- Age
- Age 70 PS 0 or 1
- Young but PS 1
- Age 70 WHO 1 Supportive care
- Chemotherapy at relapse
- Survival 12months (Gd IV) 1-4 years (Gd III
OOAA)
Highly palliative 6 XRT
45Introduction to GliomaTreatment
46Introduction to GliomaTreatment
47Introduction to GliomaTreatment
48Introduction to GliomaTreatment
- Radiotherapy of Primary Brain tumours
- What do we achieve
49Chemotherapy for Brain Tumours
50Chemotherapy for Brain Tumours
- Can we give chemotherapy with / after XRT to
improve outcome in High Grade Gliomas?
- Meta-analysis of several small trials in 1990s
suggested small survival advantage (6) at 1
year, halved, barely significant at 2 years, gone
by 3 years - Chemo was 9 months of 3 drug regimen with GI
side effects, marrow suppression, diet
restrictions
- Interpreted differently in UK (Europe), chemo
witheld until relapse in US, survival advantage,
therfore adjuvant PCV offered
- BUT, TIMES HAVE CHANGED
51Chemotherapy for Brain Tumours
52Chemotherapy for Brain Tumours
Concomitant TMZ/RT
Adjuvant TMZ
R
0
Weeks
6
10
14
18
22
26
30
RT Alone
Temozolomide 75 mg/m2 po qd for 6 weeks,
then 150200 mg/m2 po qd d15 every 28 days for 6
cycles
Focal RT daily 30 x 200 cGy Total dose 60 Gy
PCP prophylaxis was required for patients
receiving TMZ during the concomitant phase.
532001 2003 EORTC 26981Progression Free Survival
542001 2003 EORTC 26981Overall Survival
100
RT TMZ/RT Median OS, mo 12.1 14.6 2-yr surviva
l 10 26 HR 95 C.I. 0.63 0.52-0.75 p 0.0001
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
TMZ/RT
20
RT
10
0
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
42
months
RT
TMZ/RT
Stupp et al. N Engl J Med 2005, 352987-996
55Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
- Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
- First trial in 25 years to show significant
survival advantage (Walker, XRT, 1978)
- Temozolomide developed in UK
- Expensive - 15-18k per course
56Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
- Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
- First trial in 25 years to show significant
survival advantage (Walker, XRT, 1978)
- Temozolomide developed in UK
- Expensive - 15-18k per course
57Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
- Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
- First trial in 25 years to show significant
survival advantage (Walker, XRT, 1978)
- Temozolomide developed in UK
- Expensive - 15-18k per course
- There is a potential target population
- ie a way of identifying responders, thus
targetting resources and identifying patients in
whom we must take a different approach
58MGMT Promoter Methylation Predicts Benefit from
TMZ Treatment?
Unmethylated MGMT
Randomization RT TMZ/RT Median OS, mo 11.8 12
.7
2-yr survival 1.9 13.8
100
100
90
90
Logrank p 0.062
Logrank p 0.0074
80
80
70
70
TMZ/ RT
60
60
50
50
Overall Survival
TMZ/ RT
40
40
30
30
RT alone
RT alone
20
20
10
10
0
0
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
months
months
59Management of (High Grade) Glioma whats new
- MGMT (methyl guanine methyl transferase)
- Repairs damage inflicted on DNA by Temozolomide
(methyl group attached on Guanine)
- Suicide enzyme
- If MGMT expressed in cells, they can repair TMZ
damage, and thus are resistant to chemotherapy
- If MGMT gene promoter is methylated, it is not
expressed in those cells, therefore they will not
be able to repair TMZ damage, and thus will
respond to chemotherapy
60Management of (High Grade) Glioma whats new
- UK / Scottish History of Concomitant Therapy
- 2001-2003 Randomised Phase 3 study
- 2004 Results first presented at ASCO
- Late 2004 First cases treated in Glasgow
- March 2005 Definitive paper published in NEJM
with the MGMT paper
- Feb 2006 NICE fail to recommend use of regime in
any category. Use stops in Glasgow.
- April 2006 SMC follow suite but 8 point criticism
submitted to NICE
- December 2006 SMC and subsequently NICE finally
approve use in newly diagnosed GBM of PS 0 or 1
61(No Transcript)
62(No Transcript)
63Gliadel
But 2 year data less convincing
And compare with Stupp trial curve
64(No Transcript)
65Thus age remains the strongest prognostic factor
in
HGG survival, despite advances in therapy
66(No Transcript)
67Low Grade Glioma
68(No Transcript)
69(No Transcript)
70(No Transcript)
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73(No Transcript)
74(No Transcript)
75Compare with GBM data already given
76(No Transcript)
77(No Transcript)
78(No Transcript)
79(No Transcript)