Public Safety Wireless Communication PMR Systems in Turkey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Safety Wireless Communication PMR Systems in Turkey

Description:

Vehicle amount (patrol cars etc.): more than 3000. Hand held terminals : 5000 pcs approx. In Car-Radios : 2500 approx. Fixed wireless terminals : 300..350 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:275
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: tetr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Safety Wireless Communication PMR Systems in Turkey


1
Public Safety - Wireless Communication (PMR)
Systems in Turkey
  • Presented by Berk Üstündag
  • Istanbul Valiligi Afet Yönetim Merkezi / ITÜ
    Elektrik-Elektronik Fakültesi

2
Frequency Physical Resource
National Monitoring System Mobile Fixed
Licensing - Wireless Applications
Codes (2813) And Regulations
Reports
  • Turkish
  • Telecommunication Authority -TA

National spectrum regulations
Organization And Field Requirements
Surveys Applications
ETSI (European Telecom.Standards Inst.)
3
Frequency allocations
RF transmission method Frequency Defined by TA
Band assigned users
Licensed Operators
Power/Location Limited License-free Users
GSM PMR WiMAX Satellite etc.
Army Gendarme Intelligence etc.
433MHz ISM 2.4GHz IEEE 802.11 Etc.
Municipalities Licenced private users Police etc.
4
PMR in UHF (1)
5
PMR in UHF (2)
6
PMR in UHF (3)
7
Professional Radio Usage in Istanbul Wireless
Communication Equipment Usage in Istanbul
  • - Number of municipal organizations using
    wireless systems 70
  • Number of Governmental organizations running
    their own wilreless systems 96
  • - VHF channels used by the municipalities/m.units
    only 222

There is not any channel for additional wireless
devices even for public safety
8
Communication infrastructure of the Istanbul
Security Department
Officer population more than 30.000 Vehicle
amount (patrol cars etc.) more than 3000 Hand
held terminals 5000 pcs approx. In Car-Radios
2500 approx. Fixed wireless terminals
300..350 Relays for Wide area coverage 52 pcs
(2004) Relays in VHF 4 pcs (2004) Conventional
UHF Relays 19 units (2004)
Coverage problems are reported from concave
regions (valleys, river beds..)
9
Propagation problems
12 of the land 30population 50 of GDP appr.
10
Probable surface damage must be cared in design
of RF transmission systems
11
Problems
  • A. No or limited interoperability between
    Network and organizations
  • B. Limited functions
  • Mainly voice communication only, No priority
    calls, No, group calls, No selective calls for
    the security
  • C. No hierarchical architecture
  • D. Prone to interference and Easy-dropping,
    coverage area problem
  • E. Analogue legacy systems and frequency
    allocation problems

12
Communication matters the Management
Existing emergency management structure
Each Department utilizes their own
communication infrastructure
Conventional wireless communication systems is
inefficient in sharing the RF channels those are
the unique common resource
Governorship
Disaster Management Center
Other Municipal units
AKOM
No optimisation ability in resource managment
FireBr.Cnt..
Hospitals/112
Civil defense-SAR Center
Police Cnt
FireBr.Units
Polis Units
Ambulancesr
Civil defense Units
No Horizontal Communication Ability
Emergency Calls Operations (one on one for each
unit and call)
13
Integrated Public Security System for efficient
Disaster Emergency Management
National emergecny mng. (TEMAD)
Other municipal Units
Disaster Management Center
Call Management Sys.
AKOM
FireBr.center
Hospitals/112
Civil Defense Center
SDI
FireBr.Units
Police Units
Ambulances
Sivil Defense Units
Emergency Calls Operations
14
Ismep Solution strategy
Common(synchronized) information system
Service
Responsibility/ authorization
Infrastructrue
Disaster/Crisis Commandcontral Data
acquisition, risk managemt, knowledge sharing,
observability, controll.
Knowledege and data aggregation
Disaster-Crisis Info. System
Information
Common communication structure
Managable communication system
Coordination of Units and efficient Resource
management
Communication
Dinamik iletisim sistemi
15
TEMAD
TEMAD National Sys.
digital Trunk
4-TT Sattelite
Service Level Prg.
Call t./Dispatchers
IIS
TYS
DMC
1-TT Fiber VPN MW Link
UserG1
INTRANET
PSTN, GSM SatPhone, Analog Wireless gateways
10...20nokta
6- Gateways
2-TT DSL RF Modem
UserG2
80...150nokta
3-TTDigital WirelessBroadband digital?
Mobile units/community managers
25-70.000nokta
5-Radio broodcast/RDS pagers
16
Communication and Information Systems
Coordination Structure
CC Command Control CCCC CommandControl
Call Center DCC District command control center
DCC
TEMAD
4
3
DCC
DMC
CoastG
Türk Telekom Fiber ve Mikrodalga INTRANET
Inet
Inet-d
STel
DistSed
2
AKOM
CC
CCCC
CCCC
CCCC
CCCC
1
ISKI
IGDAS
P
F
H
Mission Group
Mission Group
Digital Wirless System
17
Call Takers
Events
Dispatchers
Switch
Call
Units/resources
D1
Health oriented
D2
Dx
Securiry oriented
Fire Br. oriented
Other emegices oriented
Mobese
DMC
Agency Management centers
MODE 1 Daily EMS
18
Dispatchers
Units/resources
Call Takers
switch
Call
D1
Additional capacity
Dx
D1
Health oriented
Dx
Disaster response
D1
Security oriented
Dx
D1
FireBr. oriented
Dx
D1
Other emerg.
Dx
Aid and external SAR capacity
Active Resource database
Event info.
MODE 2 DMS
19
Access to units
Dispatcher Access
Comm./Call taking
?3
µ3
?2
µ2
D1
?1
µ1
Dx
D1
tmax5sn
Dx
D1
TmaxT1T2T3
Dx
D1
1 1 1



n.µ1- ?1 m.µ2- ?2 p.µ3- ?3
Dx
D1
n number of call takers
m number of dispatchers
Dx
p number of units
20
Unit/resources
Communication Managment
D1
Saglik odakli
D2
Dx
Emniyet odakli
Dispatchers
Itfaiye odakli
Diger acil birimler
Mobese
Agency Management centers
AYM
Communication Supervisor
21
Concept of Communication System in ISMEP
22
Concept of Emergency Communication Network in
Istanbul Emergency Communication Network in
Istanbul proposed to be consisting of three
network layers core network, aggregation
network, and access network. 1) Core
network Core network is a backbone network
connecting AYM, Sub Center, AKOM, and important
organizations in Ankara. 2) Aggregation
network Aggregation network will certify the user
and aggregate and terminate the traffic from the
user terminals and connects to the core
network. 3) Access network Access network is
based on IP and Trunk network technologies. The
IP network will connect the organization and
Trunk network will cover the area of Istanbul.
23
Unification of the resources on digital
communication platforms
  • Multiple link on in a single channel
  • (TDMA, FDMA) x4data
  • Cellularization xn (frequency reuse)
  • Total gain ? x4xn
  • Possion process Gain x4xnxm
  • m statistical distribution and capacitiy
  • increment factor

24
Components Trends in Public Safety Future
HF wireless High reliability-low
bandwidth WiMAX 3.5GHz Licensed Two way
IP multicast radio ? Digital Wireless 380-400MHz
Gateways between existing convetnional
systems Softswitch for interoperability
25
Facilities to be provided by ISMEP
  • Coordination management of units of different
    agencies/auhorities for disaster/emergency
    response
  • Efficient evaluation of public resources
  • Horizantal communication ability and coordination
    at the operation field
  • Infrastructure for common call number oriented
    emergency management (112)
  • Continuous and automated observation of the field
    through redundant mobile data acquisition network
  • Reporting of work load and performence of public
    safety units for QoS and efficient capacity usage
  • Optimal resource management system by increasing
    the Controllability
  • Participation of relatively smaller sized high
    amount of groups those are not able to run their
    own communication infrastructures to the
    emergency response capcity.

26
WiMAX
Recent wireless networks in Turkey
  • Superonline in European Site of Istanbul
  • Doganonline in Asian site of Istanbul
  • Ministry application in Çankiri

Conventional APCO25
ASELSAN for Turkish Gendarme
27
Conclusions
Digital wireless is a must for Istanbul Special
considerations are needed to provide Redundancy
relaibility in case of an earthquake Commandcontr
ol Hardware Software is not independent from
communication system. They are optimized
together A hybrid solution is recommended for
better bandwidth efficiency, QoS and reliability
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com