By: MaryMargaret Tomberlin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

By: MaryMargaret Tomberlin

Description:

Artificial sweeteners hinder ability to count calories ... WebMD 30 June 2004. 02 Nov 2005 http://my.webmd.com/content/article/89/100381 Anonymous. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Sil3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: By: MaryMargaret Tomberlin


1

Introduction
Sugar vs Artificial Sweeteners
By MaryMargaret Tomberlin Vanessa
DeRemer and Colleen Silcox
2

Types
  • Aspartame
  • 200x sweeter
  • Composition 2 amino acids, methanol
  • NutraSweet, Equal
  • Phenylketonuria
  • Saccharin
  • 200-700x
  • Sweet n Low
  • Sucralose
  • Sugar derivative
  • Splenda

3
Types Cont.
  • Asulfame K
  • Sunett, Sweet One
  • Stevia
  • 200-300x
  • Derived from plant
  • Not yet approved (sold as supplement)

4
The Sweetener Industry
The facts 1.4 Billion in sales Aspartame 556
million Sugar-free 5.7 billion in sales
5
Calorie Counting Disrupted?
Purdue University ResearchersBasic
findings Artificial sweeteners hinder ability to
count calories Example drinking a diet soda
reduces calorie count, but fools the body into
thinking similar food choices are lower in
calories as well. Begins early in life
The bodys natural ability to regulate food
intake and body weight may be weakened when this
natural relationship is impaired by artificial
sweeteners.
6
Aspartame and Cancer
  • American Cancer Society - What do the
    epidemiological studies show? - Animal
    StudiesThe American Cancer Society has
    confirmed through study that users of artificial
    sweeteners gain more weight than those who don't
    use the products, further undermining the
    supposed purpose for the existence of aspartame
    in food.
  • 2005 Study - Increased lymphoma and
    leukemia - Relatively low amounts

7
Aspartame Toxic?
  • Components are neurotoxins held by weak chemical
    bonds
  • - Aspartic Acid, Phenylalanine, Methanol
  • Break down at fairly low temperatures (86
    degrees F)
  • - Form formic acid and formaldehyde
  • Even a minute of over concentration of these
    chemicals causes the brain cells to become so
    over excited that they very quickly burn
    themselves out and die.

8
Saccharine and Cancer
1911 1972-1973 1977 2000
FDA attempts to ban Saccharine Studies raised
concern Canadian study showed bladder cancer FDA
proposed ban FDA requires warning label
9
Rodent Chronic Feeding Study
  • Rats and Mice fed human equivalent of saccharin
  • Study shows that saccharin caused an increase in
    bladder tumors in both genders

10
Sucralose
  • Sucralose a synthetic chemical compound
  • Our bodies cant metabolize
  • Sucralose trials
  • -only 6 human trials
  • -longest only 3 months
  • At least 15 is not excreted

11
Government lies?
Once upon a time, aspartame was listed by the
Pentagon as a biochemical warfare
agent.www.youngagain.com
MOST victims don't have a clue that aspartame
may be the cause of their many problems! Many
reactions to aspartame were very serious
including seizures and death. --www.aspartamekill
s.com
Many medical professionals and health activists
loudly proclaim that aspartame sweetener in diet
sodas causes symptoms that mimic, or accentuate
Parkinson's disease. sickofdoctors.com
Lying and deceit on the artificial sweetener
issue has been the FDA's Modus Operandi,
www.splendaexposed.com
12
Government Lies cont.
  • Just because its on the market doesnt mean
    its safe
  • Will Splenda still be safe in the future?
  • - Not sure of long term effects
  • - Example Vioxx arthritis medication

13
Conclusion
Natural Sugars are the Safer Choice

14
Bibliography
Doug Payne. Medical Post. Toronto July 27,
2004. Vol. 40, Iss. 29 pg. 17,1 pgs. Warner,
Jennifer. "Artificial Sweeteners May Damage Diet
Efforts." WebMD 30 June 2004. 02 Nov 2005

Anonymous. The Ecologist. Sturminster Newton
Sep 2005. Vol. 35, Iss 7 pg. 48, 1
pgs "Prevention and Early Detection Aspartame."
American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society.
02 Nov. 2005 . Henkel, John.
Sugar Substitutes Americans Opt for Sweetness
and Lite..November/December 1999. Sweeteners
Natural vs. Artificial. 04 July 2003. 20 Oct
2005 www.aussiebodies.com Platkin, Charles. When
it comes to safety, artificial sweeteners arent
equal. Honolulu Advertiser 19 Nov 2003. 20 Oct
2005 www.thehonoluluadvertiser.com Background on
Saccharin. 2005. 20 Oct 2005 rounder Wardlaw, Gordon. Contemporary
Nutrition. 4th ed. McGraw Hill, 2000 Hull,
Janet. Splenda Is it Safe or Not? 25 October
2005. 27 October 2005 http//www.prweb.com/release
s/25005/10/preweb301621.htm White Junod, Suzanne.
Sugar A Cautionary Tale. July 2003. Food and
Drug Administration. 22 Oct 2005
http//www.fda.gov/oc/history/makinghistory/sugar.
htm Artificial Sweeteners. National Cancer
Institute. 22 Oct. 2005 certopics/factsheet/risk/artificial-sweeteners A
rtificial Sweeteners and Health Harvard Medical
School, eat_033005.htm Consumption of High Intensity
Sweeteners Growing. US Department of Agriculture
Economic Research Service. /articals/mi_m3796/is_1991_Dec/ai_12040913/print
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com