Strategic Development of Bioenergy in the Western States - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Strategic Development of Bioenergy in the Western States

Description:

25 wet tons. Moisture content varies with feedstock. Liquid. Bulk Solids. Loading/unloading ... 4,000 wet tons. Marine. Biomass type. Moisture Content ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: pet965
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategic Development of Bioenergy in the Western States


1
Strategic Development of Bioenergy in the Western
States
  • Task 3 Spatial Analysis and Supply Curve
    Development

Bryan Jenkins, Nathan Parker, Peter Tittmann,
Quinn Hart, Joshua Cunningham, Mui LayUniversity
of California, Davis
2
Objectives
  • Assess the potential biofuel supply from biomass
    resources in the Western United States
  • Develop facility cost and spatially-explicit
    feedstock and product supply models to optimize
    biofuel facility siting and scale
  • Quantify optimal biofuel amounts by feedstock and
    conversion technology types and feedstock and
    fuel prices
  • Examine sensitivity of supply to policy and
    development alternatives

3
Approach
Mixed Integer Linear
  • Geographic Information System (GIS) model for
    spatial analysis
  • Mixed-integer linear optimization model to solve
    optimal biofuel system design using input from GIS

4
Participants
  • UC Davis
  • Task lead
  • GIS/Optimization modeling
  • Input identification and analysis, quality
    control
  • Antares Group, Inc
  • Conversion technology costs
  • Kansas State University
  • Agricultural resource/energy crops
  • US Forest Service
  • Forest resource
  • California Biomass Collaborative
  • Municipal resource
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory
  • Infrastructure and database support
  • WGA, USDA, USDOE, California Energy Commission
    PIER Program, UC Davis STEPS Program, CSTARS
  • Project support

5
Task Organization
Bio-refinery Site Selection
Mapping of Feedstock
Network Analysis of Transportation Costs
Optimization
Supply Curves
Mapping of Fuel Supply
6
GIS Spatial Analysis
  • Feedstock mapping
  • Biorefinery location analysis
  • Network Analysis

7
Biomass Resource Procurement Cost
8
Mapping Biomass Resources
9
Siting Criteria for Potential Biorefineries
10
GIS Network Analysis
  • Methodology
  • Develop road, rail and marine transportation
    networks.
  • Calculate transportation cost matrix from
    feedstock locations to potential biorefinery
    locations
  • Calculate fuel transportation cost from
    biorefinery to closest distribution terminal.

11
GIS Network Analysis
  • Network Nodes
  • Supply
  • County centroid
  • Municipal/other facility point source
  • Supply accumulation points
  • Inter-Modal facilities equipped to transfer
    biomass from road to rail and rail/road to
    marine.
  • Potential biorefinery locations
  • Product accumulation points
  • Inter-Modal facilities equipped to transfer
    liquid fuel from rail, road or pipeline to
    marine.
  • Terminals
  • Product endpoint for mixing with petroleum fuels

12
GIS Network Analysis
  • Network Connectivity
  • Road
  • Transport feedstock from source to inter-modal or
    refinery.
  • Marine
  • Transport feedstock from inter-modal facility to
    refinery
  • Transport product from refinery to terminal
  • Rail
  • Transport feedstock from inter-modal facility to
    refinery
  • Transport product from refinery to terminal

13
Geographic Network
14
GIS Network Analysis
Cities / Population from National Atlas
Inter-modal Facilities from BTS
Roads/Marine/Rail from BTS
Facilities from EPA EnviroFacts
Terminals from OPIS/STALSBY
15
Matching Feedstocks and Technologies
16
Matching Feedstocks and Technologies
17
Optimization Model
  • Methodology
  • Mixed integer-linear programming model of biofuel
    industry.
  • Objective minimize annual cost to produce a
    given quantity of biofuels.
  • Single technology models and a separate
    integrated model with all technologies
  • Reference assumptions
  • Conversion costs are linearized functions
  • All other costs are constant with scale

18
Simple Model Schematic
Fuel Distribution Terminals
Potential Biorefinery Sites
Biomass Supply Points
Biomass Types
Price Levels
Xjt Yfjt Ybjt
Fijfp
Sifp
Pifp
DCjk
TCij
k
i
j
f
p
19
Model Formulation
  • Minimize annual cost of production
  • Sum of feedstock procurement, transportation,
    conversion, and fuel distribution costs for
    annual production.
  • Subject to
  • Biomass leaving a supply point at a price level
    must be less than the maximum supply.
  • Biofuel produced at a biorefinery must be less
    than the biofuel potential of the biomass
    entering the biorefinery.
  • Biofuel quantity produced at a biorefinery must
    be less than the maximum biorefinery size for
    that technology.
  • Biofuel cannot be produced at a location unless
    the fixed cost has been paid.
  • The total biofuel produced must equal the biofuel
    demanded for a given model run.

20
Model Equations
Maximize
(1)
(2)
Subject to
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
21
Linearized Conversion Costs
22
Integrated Model Architecture
Modified routes, sources, destinations
Cities
ESRI Network Analyst
Facilities
Summaries
Simplified Costs
Maps
GAMS Modeling
Supply Curves
Supply Curves
23
Results
  • Individual Technology Supply Curves
  • Combined Model Supply Curve
  • Type of Biomass
  • Maps

24
Supply Curves for Individual Technologies
25
Supply Curve for All Biofuels
26
Type of Biomass Consumed
27
Contributions to Cost
28
1.30 per GGE
29
1.50 per GGE
30
1.75 per GGE
31
2.00 per GGE
32
2.30 per GGE
33
2.50 per GGE
34
2.75 per GGE
35
3.05 per GGE
36
4.05 per GGE
37
Sensitivity
  • To be completed
  • Capital Cost /- 25
  • Coproduct Value
  • Tax Incentives
  • Required Fuel Mix

38
Conclusions
  • 4 billion gallons of gasoline equivalent
    biofuels could be produced at approximately
    2/GGE
  • 12 billion gallons of gasoline equivalent
    biofuels could be produced at approximately
    3/GGE
  • The base model costs favor LCE for cellulosic
    biomass resources and FAHC for oil/grease
    resources.
  • Costs used need further inspection and validation
  • Sensitivity analysis needed to investigate range
    of potential outcomes

39
Future Analysis
  • Completion of analysis for Western US
  • Model extension to entire US
  • Proposal in review by USDA
  • Model extension to include Canada
  • In discussion
  • Incorporate analysis of potential changes to land
    use based upon increased demand for feedstock
  • Incorporate seasonal and probabilistic effects,
    add other sustainability and LCA aspects, explore
    alternative economy of scale formulations

40
Extra Slides
41
(No Transcript)
42
Target Price Analysis
43
Transportation Costs
Trucking
Rail
44
Transportation Costs (2)
Marine
Biomass Properties
45
Conversion Costs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com