Title: Strategic Development of Bioenergy in the Western States
1Strategic Development of Bioenergy in the Western
States
- Task 3 Spatial Analysis and Supply Curve
Development
Bryan Jenkins, Nathan Parker, Peter Tittmann,
Quinn Hart, Joshua Cunningham, Mui LayUniversity
of California, Davis
2Objectives
- Assess the potential biofuel supply from biomass
resources in the Western United States - Develop facility cost and spatially-explicit
feedstock and product supply models to optimize
biofuel facility siting and scale - Quantify optimal biofuel amounts by feedstock and
conversion technology types and feedstock and
fuel prices - Examine sensitivity of supply to policy and
development alternatives
3Approach
Mixed Integer Linear
- Geographic Information System (GIS) model for
spatial analysis - Mixed-integer linear optimization model to solve
optimal biofuel system design using input from GIS
4Participants
- UC Davis
- Task lead
- GIS/Optimization modeling
- Input identification and analysis, quality
control - Antares Group, Inc
- Conversion technology costs
- Kansas State University
- Agricultural resource/energy crops
- US Forest Service
- Forest resource
- California Biomass Collaborative
- Municipal resource
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Infrastructure and database support
- WGA, USDA, USDOE, California Energy Commission
PIER Program, UC Davis STEPS Program, CSTARS - Project support
5Task Organization
Bio-refinery Site Selection
Mapping of Feedstock
Network Analysis of Transportation Costs
Optimization
Supply Curves
Mapping of Fuel Supply
6GIS Spatial Analysis
- Feedstock mapping
- Biorefinery location analysis
- Network Analysis
7Biomass Resource Procurement Cost
8Mapping Biomass Resources
9Siting Criteria for Potential Biorefineries
10GIS Network Analysis
- Methodology
- Develop road, rail and marine transportation
networks. - Calculate transportation cost matrix from
feedstock locations to potential biorefinery
locations - Calculate fuel transportation cost from
biorefinery to closest distribution terminal.
11GIS Network Analysis
- Network Nodes
- Supply
- County centroid
- Municipal/other facility point source
- Supply accumulation points
- Inter-Modal facilities equipped to transfer
biomass from road to rail and rail/road to
marine. - Potential biorefinery locations
- Product accumulation points
- Inter-Modal facilities equipped to transfer
liquid fuel from rail, road or pipeline to
marine. - Terminals
- Product endpoint for mixing with petroleum fuels
12GIS Network Analysis
- Network Connectivity
- Road
- Transport feedstock from source to inter-modal or
refinery. - Marine
- Transport feedstock from inter-modal facility to
refinery - Transport product from refinery to terminal
- Rail
- Transport feedstock from inter-modal facility to
refinery - Transport product from refinery to terminal
13Geographic Network
14GIS Network Analysis
Cities / Population from National Atlas
Inter-modal Facilities from BTS
Roads/Marine/Rail from BTS
Facilities from EPA EnviroFacts
Terminals from OPIS/STALSBY
15Matching Feedstocks and Technologies
16Matching Feedstocks and Technologies
17Optimization Model
- Methodology
- Mixed integer-linear programming model of biofuel
industry. - Objective minimize annual cost to produce a
given quantity of biofuels. - Single technology models and a separate
integrated model with all technologies - Reference assumptions
- Conversion costs are linearized functions
- All other costs are constant with scale
18Simple Model Schematic
Fuel Distribution Terminals
Potential Biorefinery Sites
Biomass Supply Points
Biomass Types
Price Levels
Xjt Yfjt Ybjt
Fijfp
Sifp
Pifp
DCjk
TCij
k
i
j
f
p
19Model Formulation
- Minimize annual cost of production
- Sum of feedstock procurement, transportation,
conversion, and fuel distribution costs for
annual production. - Subject to
- Biomass leaving a supply point at a price level
must be less than the maximum supply. - Biofuel produced at a biorefinery must be less
than the biofuel potential of the biomass
entering the biorefinery. - Biofuel quantity produced at a biorefinery must
be less than the maximum biorefinery size for
that technology. - Biofuel cannot be produced at a location unless
the fixed cost has been paid. - The total biofuel produced must equal the biofuel
demanded for a given model run.
20Model Equations
Maximize
(1)
(2)
Subject to
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
21Linearized Conversion Costs
22Integrated Model Architecture
Modified routes, sources, destinations
Cities
ESRI Network Analyst
Facilities
Summaries
Simplified Costs
Maps
GAMS Modeling
Supply Curves
Supply Curves
23Results
- Individual Technology Supply Curves
- Combined Model Supply Curve
- Type of Biomass
- Maps
24Supply Curves for Individual Technologies
25Supply Curve for All Biofuels
26Type of Biomass Consumed
27Contributions to Cost
281.30 per GGE
291.50 per GGE
301.75 per GGE
312.00 per GGE
322.30 per GGE
332.50 per GGE
342.75 per GGE
353.05 per GGE
364.05 per GGE
37Sensitivity
- To be completed
- Capital Cost /- 25
- Coproduct Value
- Tax Incentives
- Required Fuel Mix
38Conclusions
- 4 billion gallons of gasoline equivalent
biofuels could be produced at approximately
2/GGE - 12 billion gallons of gasoline equivalent
biofuels could be produced at approximately
3/GGE - The base model costs favor LCE for cellulosic
biomass resources and FAHC for oil/grease
resources. - Costs used need further inspection and validation
- Sensitivity analysis needed to investigate range
of potential outcomes
39Future Analysis
- Completion of analysis for Western US
- Model extension to entire US
- Proposal in review by USDA
- Model extension to include Canada
- In discussion
- Incorporate analysis of potential changes to land
use based upon increased demand for feedstock - Incorporate seasonal and probabilistic effects,
add other sustainability and LCA aspects, explore
alternative economy of scale formulations
40Extra Slides
41(No Transcript)
42Target Price Analysis
43Transportation Costs
Trucking
Rail
44Transportation Costs (2)
Marine
Biomass Properties
45Conversion Costs