Cognitive therapeutic issues in the management of complex documents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Cognitive therapeutic issues in the management of complex documents

Description:

On second time around for the gaps in the translation of your thoughts to the stuff on ... Igor Stravinsky. The appetite is in the eating. -- Chinese proverb ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: crodolf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cognitive therapeutic issues in the management of complex documents


1
Cognitive therapeutic issues in the management of
complex documents
  • Technical Writing
  • Arcadia University
  • Professor Rodolfo Celis

2
Things I have learned
  • Argue the conclusion
  • Chop the sentences down later. But do chop them
    down.
  • Dynamic outlining and prewriting
  • On second time around for the gaps in the
    translation of your thoughts to the stuff on the
    page
  • Look at it as a puzzle to induce fun
  • Think clearly every day - raking leaves, doing
    dishes, and sitting in cafes not only does not
    equal writing, but will, in fact, do great harm
    to you if not tempered with daily writing.
  • To remove coffee from shirts you cannot use
    bleach on, pour boiling water on them from a
    height of approximately 3-4 feet. For white
    shirts, pre-soak using 4 denture tablets in the
    wash.

3
Problems inherent in natural language
  • Clarity and John Wilkins.
  • Inference management
  • Management of face

4
Problems
5
Bad redundancy and long sentences
  • In chapter four, The elusive nature of harm, I
    will adduce a sociolinguistic theory of this harm
    that suggests that certain microsociological
    actions involving the management of anothers
    behavior in face-to-face encounters come, in a
    process of grammaticization (etymologically
    considered in the sense of Meillet 1912) or
    idiomaticization (in the sense of Sadock 1979),
    to be formalized and incorporated into the
    meaning conventions of lexical items to the
    extent that this claim about certain actions
    being selected and made part of the semantic
    structure of words can be verified using tests
    for conventional versus conversational
    implicature.

6
Problem of Quantity
  • These theories confuse various emotional and
    physiological reflexes (glossed as harm or
    injury in the legal literature) that are
    inconsistently associated with some uncooperative
    speech acts with the socially coercive role I
    will suggest they play in affecting the behavior
    of another within an occasion of interaction.

7
  • YOU ARE ONLY AUTHORIZED TO RECOMMEND THE DEATH
    SENTENCE,
  • IF, AFTER THIS HEARING, YOU UNANIMOUSLY FIND EACH
    OF THE
  • FOLLOWING
  • FIRST, THE GOVERNMENT HAS PROVEN BEYOND A
    REASONABLE DOUBT
  • THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS AT LEAST 18 YEARS OF AGE
    AT THE TIME HE
  • COMMITTED THE OFFENSES AND
  • SECOND, THE GOVERNMENT HAS PROVEN BEYOND A
    REASONABLE DOUBT
  • THE EXISTENCE OF AT LEAST ONE "THRESHOLD
    ELIGIBILITY FACTOR"
  • AND
  • THIRD, THE GOVERNMENT HAS PROVEN BEYOND A
    REASONABLE DOUBT
  • THE EXISTENCE OF AT LEAST ONE STATUTORY
    AGGRAVATING FACTOR AND
  • FOURTH, THAT THE AGGRAVATING FACTOR OR FACTORS
    WHICH YOU
  • FOUND TO EXIST SUFFICIENTLY OUTWEIGH ANY
    MITIGATING FACTOR OR
  • FACTORS WHICH YOU FOUND TO EXIST TO JUSTIFY
    IMPOSITION OF A
  • SENTENCE OF DEATH, OR, IN THE ABSENCE OF A
    MITIGATING FACTOR OR
  • FACTORS, YOU FIND THAT THE AGGRAVATING FACTOR OR
    FACTORS ALONE
  • ARE SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY IMPOSITION OF A
    SENTENCE OF DEATH.

8
  • THREE TERMS THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY HEARD AND WILL
    HEAR
  • THROUGHOUT THIS PHASE OF THE CASE ARE "THRESHOLD
    ELIGIBILITY
  • FACTORS," "AGGRAVATING FACTORS" AND "MITIGATING
    FACTORS." THESE
  • FACTORS HAVE TO DO WITH THE DEFENDANT'S INTENT
    AND ROLE IN THE
  • OFFENSES, THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CRIME, OR THE
    PERSONAL
  • TRAITS, CHARACTER OR BACKGROUND OF THE DEFENDANT
    AND THE VICTIM.
  • I WILL NOW BRIEFLY EXPLAIN THESE THREE SPECIAL
    TERMS.
  • FIRST, A "THRESHOLD ELIGIBILITY FACTOR" IS ONE OR
    MORE OF
  • FOUR FACTORS LISTED IN THE STATUTE WHICH CONCERN
    THE DEFENDANT'S
  • INTENT AND ROLE IN COMMITTING THE OFFENSE FOR
    WHICH HE MAY HAVE
  • BEEN CONVICTED. BEFORE YOU CONSIDER THE
    IMPOSITION OF A
  • SENTENCE OF DEATH, YOU MUST UNANIMOUSLY FIND ONE
    OR MORE OR MORE
  • "THRESHOLD ELIGIBILITY FACTORS" TO EXIST BEYOND A
    REASONABLE
  • DOUBT.

9
Professional advice from Robert Boice
  • How writers journey to comfort and fluency A
    psychological adventure

10
Boice writing rules for longer writing projects
  • Wait, actively.
  • Begin early
  • Work with constancy and moderation
  • Stop, in a timely fashion
  • Work with balance
  • Moderate negative thinking
  • Moderate emotions
  • Moderate attachments and reactions
  • Let others do some of the work
  • Moderate wasted effort

11
Rule 1 Wait actively
  • Avoid the romantic notion of the inspired poet.
    Sometimes the task before you may not be poetry.
    Sometimes it may not be especially inspiring (at
    least at first).
  • Unless you live in a cave, it may be too hard for
    this inspiration out there and waiting to leap
    into your brain to compete with the comparative
    thrill of television or detailing the molding in
    your study with a q-tip.

12
Rule 1 Wait actively
  • Active waiting requires patience - You must force
    yourself to slow down and prepare for writing
    rather than doing more comforting things (like
    detailing the molding of your office with a q
    tip).
  • Active waiting requires suspending disbeliefs -
    This may be new and counterintuitive. You may
    have to suspend, e.g., feelings of inadequacy or
    doubt, or probably most importantly, the natural
    tendency to question if slowing down and waiting
    slowly, patiently, and planfully will actually
    help you. It will.

13
Rule 1 Wait actively
  • Active waiting means pausing reflectively -
    Reflective pausing is the opposite of plunging
    impulsively into firm decisions and formal prose.
    Active waiting and its awakeness temper
    impatience by putting off pressures for quick
    results. Active waiting brings an observant and
    wakeful tentativeness, often of a playful sort,
    while we get writing organized.
  • Its clear seeing helps make sure that the right
    question will be answered once the formal writing
    is underway.
  • More gradual, planful beginnings prove enjoyable
    because of their calm, reflective, and engaging
    nature.
  • Studies (that I have looked at and appear
    reliable) have shown that motivation based on
    active waiting and its patience/readiness works
    more reliably than drive rooted in impulsive
    impatience, in anxious shame, in looming
    deadlines.
  • The best thing about active waiting, in my
    experience, is that it gets you started writing
    effortlessly, before you realize you are writing.
  • Emotion management, not time management.

14
Rule 2 - Begin early (before feeling ready)
  • When inspiration does not come to me, I go
    halfway to meet it. -- Sigmund Freud
  • Work brings inspiration if inspiration is not
    discernable in the beginning. -- Igor Stravinsky
  • The appetite is in the eating. -- Chinese proverb

15
Rule 2 - Begin early (before feeling ready)
  • Only the trust and patience that come from active
    waiting enable the beneficial preliminaries known
    as prewriting.
  • Do the following prewriting things
  • Talk aloud about what you might write.
  • Read aloud what youve begun to write.
  • Take notes - within reason - about what else you
    might write.

16
Rule 2 - Begin early (before feeling ready)
  • The trust, and some would say, compassion, that
    comes from active waiting provides the tolerance
    necessary to abide the tentativeness,
    imperfection, and slow, seemingly wasteful, pace
    of preliminary work.

17
Problems of trust
  • Procrastination. Im way behind on lots of
    other pressing things and I cant afford the time
    to deal with this project at all until the
    deadline forces me to work on it.
  • Perfectionism. I dont want to be in the habit
    of producing a lot of second-rate material, not
    even as so-called preliminary writing I want to
    write well or not at all.

18
Problems of trust
  • Elitism. I believe that really brilliant
    writers write quickly, in a single draft, without
    much of a struggle or a plan they are
    born-writers and I doubt that they need to waste
    much time on preliminaries.
  • Blocking. Want to know why the begin-early rule
    wont work for me? Im the kind of writer who
    cant write at all until I am in the mood and
    then I write as much as I can and try to finish
    in one sitting because I may never write again.

19
Rule 2 - Begin early (before feeling ready)
  • Early starts mean practice at launching a project
    without quite having figured out what you will
    say.
  • Early starts mean letting things happen ,
    including surprises, by experimenting and playing
    instead of rushing into deathless prose.
  • Early starts rely on process orientations that
    keep you in the moment, mindfully seeing what
    needs doing, and focused on what can be done now
    (in contrast to a product mode that focuses your
    attention, impatiently and perfectionistically,
    on the eventual outcome of your work.

20
Rule 2 - Begin early (before feeling ready)
  • Early starts mean letting go of mindless
    inhibitions or impulses and allowing calm
    motivation, inspiration, and ideas to appear in
    their stead.

21
Dynamic outlining
  • After you get a few main ideas going from
    prewriting, and you have the roughest skeleton of
    an outline going, ask yourself the following
    questions (next slide)

22
Dynamic outlining
  • Does it make sense to begin with this point. Am
    I answering the right question?
  • Do the next main points follow from the first and
    each other do they say all that I need to say?
  • Am I trying to do too much could I make my
    essential message clearer by abbreviating or
    removing some of the points around it?
  • Do the same subpoints appear in two or more
    places?
  • Are some essential subpoints missing or
    underdeveloped?

23
Dynamic outlining
  • Once you get going on this outlining, you will
    probably find that you have begun to
    unconsciously elide into actual prose writing.

24
Freewriting
  • Traditional freewriting versus imagistic
    freewriting
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com