Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project JATAP for the MaricopaPinal Urban Area PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 13
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project JATAP for the MaricopaPinal Urban Area


1
Joint Air Toxics Assessment Project (JATAP) for
the Maricopa/Pinal Urban Area
  • Presented by
  • To
  • Date

2
What is JATAP?
  • Joint effort between state, county, tribal and
    EPA officials to address the risk from air toxics
    in the Maricopa/Pinal Urban Area
  • Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
  • Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation
  • Gila River Indian Community
  • Maricopa County Air Quality Department
  • Arizona DEQ
  • Pinal County Air Quality Control District
  • EPA Region 9 Air Division
  • EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
  • JATAP is guided by a steering committee of
    stakeholder representatives that plans joint
    activities
  • Logistical and technical support from the
    Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals
    (ITEP) at Northern Arizona University

3
Air Toxics
  • EPA uses the term air toxics to describe a broad
    category of air pollutants that cause cancer (or
    other serious health effects) or have adverse
    ecological consequences.
  • Examples include
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), e.g., benzene,
    1, 3-butadiene and tetrachloroethylene
  • Aldehydes, e.g., formaldehyde and acetaldehyde
  • Metals found in particulate matter, e.g.,
    chromium and mercury
  • This category does not include pollutants (such
    as lead and ozone) that are regulated as
    criteria pollutants under the Clean Air Act

4
Objectives of JATAP
  • To develop an effective collaboration between
    federal, state, tribal and local environmental
    agencies
  • To build technical capacity, especially for
    tribal agencies
  • Through monitoring, emission inventories and
    computer modeling, to develop a comprehensive
    understanding of the risk from air toxics across
    the metro area, including possible hot spots and
    environmental justice issues
  • To effectively communicate these risks to
    affected communities
  • To develop strategies that can reduce the risk
    from exposure to air toxics

5
JATAP Study Area
Maricopa County
Pinal County
6
Accomplishments of JATAP(2000-2005)
  • Completion of a detailed review of existing
    knowledge of air toxics in the region
  • Development of a blueprint for a multi-year
    comprehensive study of air toxics in the
    Maricopa/Pinal Urban area
  • Planning and implementation of a 12 month pilot
    project for monitoring of air toxics and emission
    inventory in South Phoenix and the Gila River
    Indian Community
  • Successful in competition for Community Air
    Toxics Assessment Grant
  • monitoring started in January 2005

7
Previous Studies of Air Toxics
  • 1993 Arizona DEQ study implicated transportation
    related sources. Three compounds contributed 80
    of the calculated cancer risk
  • 1,3-butadiene (49), formaldehyde (18), and
    benzene (17)
  • 1996 EPA assessment found both transportation and
    industrial sources to be significant, with
    benzene being the biggest component of cancer
    risk, overall

8
Uncertainties in Previous Studies
  • The estimates of cancer risk potency for key air
    toxics (e.g., 1, 3-butadiene and formaldehyde)
    have been revised dramatically downward in the
    last several years and are still highly
    uncertain.
  • The previous risk assessments were based on
    little monitoring data and somewhat rough
    estimates of emissions

9
Results from JATAP Pilot Study
  • Concentrations of many VOC species were below the
    limit of detection for our analytical techniques.
    Unfortunately, so were some of the benchmark
    concentrations at which risks may be significant
  • Need for improved analytical techniques
  • Annual average concentrations of formaldehyde,
    acetaldehyde, benzene and 1,3-butadiene at three
    sites in Phoenix were in the highest 25 of the
    range reported in a recent EPA funded assessments
    of 10 other US cities.

10
Where Are We Going From Here?
  • Continue development of a more comprehensive
    assessment of air toxics in the Maricopa/Pinal
    Urban Area
  • A full year of an expanded monitoring network
  • Detailed emission inventory
  • Dispersion modeling of air toxics
  • Risk assessment
  • Public outreach
  • Early action risk reduction

11
Urban Boundary
JATAP HAP Monitoring Network, 2005
12
JATAP Funding
  • To date, JATAP has been supported with about 1.5
    million of direct funding from EPA, of which
    about 1.3 million has gone for air toxics
    monitoring
  • Blueprint for comprehensive assessment projected
    a total project cost of 3.4 million
  • Immediate needs are for continued funding for
    project coordination and new funding for emission
    inventory and air quality model development

13
For More Information
  • Your Contact Info here
  • Dr. Jack Herring
  • Environmental Studies Program
  • Prescott College
  • 928-350-2227
  • jherring_at_prescott.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com