Title: ResultsBased Governance: Governance through Measurement
1Results-Based GovernanceGovernance through
Measurement?
In Exploring Evaluation and Collaborative
Government
- John Mayne
- Office of the Auditor General of Canada
- john.mayne_at_oag-bvg.gc.ca
2Outline
- challenges to traditional governance
- elements of new governance
- monitoring outcomes as governance
- some implications
3challenges to governance
- complexity in society
- information flood, interconnectedness, better
educated citizens, rapid feedback - collaborative arrangements becoming the norm
- to deal with complexity and reduced capacity of
government - citizen engagement, public reporting and
accountability - demands for and requirements for greater direct
involvement of citizens in governance
4challenges to governance
- traditional organizations cant cope, need for
learning an adaptability - traditional accountability concepts
incompatible with the need for learning and
adapting - traditional characteristics of effective
leadership, control, evaluation/audit may add to
rather than help solve the problems
5elements of new governance
- resilient organizations and arrangements (3Ds
focus rather than 3Es) - living with uncertainty and embracing errors
- government as a vehicle for societal learning
- focus on sustainability
- accountability as learning
6governing (learning) with outcomes
- results-based management a start, but ...
- need to go beyond the current measurement trend
in public administration - using the setting, agreeing on, monitoring and
reporting outcomes as a means of governance in
complex, collaborative situations - several potential benefits
7potential benefits
- sorting out roles and responsibilities
- coordination among governments and citizens
- encouragement of local and citizen involvement
- encouragement of learning
- enhancement of accountability
8examples of early outcome-based governance
- Australia Committee for the Review of
Commonwealth/State Service Provision - Canada Securing the Social Union
- Canada Outcome-based national standards as an
instrument of federalism (Labour Market
Agreements)
9Some implications
- for accountability
- for reporting
- for evaluation and audit
10some implications for accountability
- re-articulation of accountability
- accountability for outcomes
- shared accountability
11Traditional accountability
- Accountability is the obligation to answer for a
responsibility conferred - is exclusively hierarchical
- apportions blame
- aims at punishing wrongdoing
- focuses on compliance with procedures
- loved by auditors.
12Modernizing accountability
- The obligation to demonstrate and take
responsibility for performance in light of agreed
expectations. - works in collaborative government
- focuses on results not compliance
- supports learning
- http//www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/account/OAGTBS_E.html
13Accountability for results
- Requires
- credibly demonstrating
- results achieved
- contribution made (dealing with attribution)
- what has been learned
- taking responsibility for the strategies used
14Shared Accountability
- Requires reporting on
- overall performance of the arrangement
- the federal contribution
- what has been learned
- Requires taking responsibility for
- the arrangement framework
- federal actions and strategies
15some implications for reporting
- electronic publishing
- data bases replacing reporting
- comparative reporting
- providing audit assurance
- transparency replacing audit
16some implications for evaluation
- requires fuzzy measurement/evaluation
- measurement as argument (Majone 1989) or even
performance story telling (Mayne 1999) - measurement as reducing not eliminating
uncertainty - measurement as learning not control
- measurement of new things (trust, influence)
17New criteria of success
Success as adaptability and continued relevance
- Diagnosis
- identification and redefinition of problems
- Design
- formulation of new solutions, structures
strategies - Development
- implementation of solutions as a learning process
vs
- Economy, Efficiency, Effectiveness
backup
18traditional evaluation still needed
- Evaluation is also needed to measure
- attribution/contribution/influence
- unintended effects, including those related to
measuring and moving towards results-based
governance - the level and nature of learning going on in
public organizations
19Contribution Analysis
The results chain
inputs
under program control
I/O analysis
outputs
Information obtainable
immediate outcomes
- Contribution analysis
- program evaluation
- confirmation of logic
- evidence on
- outcomes occurring
- relationships between outcomes
- impact of other factors
- identification of knowledge gaps
outside factors
intermediate outcomes
final outcomes
20Measurement strategy
- agree on the vision/logic of the program
- agree on what ought to be measured to know how
well you are doing - identify which can be handled through ongoing
measures (indicators) - program evaluations are needed identify which
evaluations need to be carried out
21Theory-based Evaluation
- Reconstructing the theory of the program
- Assess/test the credibility of the micro-steps in
the theory (links in the program logic/story) - Developing confirming the results achieved by
the program - References
- Chen (1990). Theory-Driven Evaluation A
Comprehensive Perspective. Sage. - Chen (1994). Papers from a Panel. Evaluation
Practice. Vol. 1 - Weiss (1997). Theory-based Evaluation Past,
Present and Future. New Directions for
Evaluation. No. 76, Winter.
22Evaluators
- Foster the use of
- logic charts/results chains/performance
frameworks to understand manage performance - contribution analysis to examine attribution
- evaluations to assess attribution
- measurement strategies
- Consider using theory-based approaches to
evaluation
23some implications for performance audit
- perhaps even more of a challenge here
- audit does not deal well with uncertainty nor
errors it is expected to tell the truth - can audits have fuzzy conclusions?
- principle-based audit
24governance through results-based learning