Legality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Legality

Description:

To be enforced in court, a contract must call for the performance of a legal act. No desire to allow parties to profit from wrongdoing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: willia65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Legality


1
Legality
  • The fourth required element of a K

2
Legality
  • To be enforced in court, a contract must call for
    the performance of a legal act
  • No desire to allow parties to profit from
    wrongdoing
  • But what if only one party is doing something
    illegal?

3
Legality
  • Statutes may prescribe the terms of a contract
  • Statutes may proscribe the terms of a contract
  • Public Policy considerations may preclude certain
    contracts from being enforced

4
Contracts Contrary to Statute
  • Usury - maximum APR
  • Gambling - form that gambling may take
  • Sabbath Laws - must be narrowly drawn so as not
    to promote the establishment of religion
  • Licensing - barbers, doctors, CPAs
  • Contracts - the mob

5
Contracts Contrary to Public Policy
  • Restraint of Trade
  • Covenants not to compete?
  • Exculpatory Clauses
  • Adhesion Contracts
  • Discrimination
  • Commission of Tort
  • Interference w. Public Duty/Process

6
Contrary to Statute v. Contrary to Public Policy
  • Contrary to Statute
  • Explicit prohibition or prescription
  • Details are statutorily defined
  • Easier to understand
  • K is never formed, b/c it is void from the start
  • Contrary to Public Policy
  • Viewed as having a negative impact on society
  • Not necessarily expressly prohibited by statute

7
Effect of Illegality
  • Whether contrary to policy or statute, end result
    is the same...
  • Contract is not enforced
  • Courts tend to take a hands off attitude....
    equitable maxims

8
But make sure its illegal...
  • Usury
  • generally corporate agreements will be exempt,
    given nature of risk taken, business purpose,
    competency of parties
  • Gambling
  • creation of risk for the purpose of assuming it
  • distinguish insurance, risk sharing...

9
Insurance Contracts
  • An agreement to compensate policy buyer under
    certain circumstances involving an existing risk
  • Why not illegal as gambling devices?
  • no creation of risk... it already exists
  • insurable interest concept...
  • you probably cant take out insurance on my life

10
Hmmmmmm....
  • Could Fr. Malloy therefore claim that a contract
    that he enters into that would pay the University
    money if the football team does not win a bowl
    game be considered valid as an insurance
    contract, rather than an illegal gambling
    contract?

11
Blue Laws
  • Why cant you buy alcoholic beverages in Indiana
    on Sunday?
  • Existence and enforcement varies significantly
    from state to state
  • What is wrong with book statement saying that
    these laws are contrary to the freedom of
    religion?

12
Licensing Laws
  • Enter into a K with a person not licensed to
    provide that service?
  • look to underlying purpose of the licensing
    statute
  • Protection of Public?
  • K will be illegal and unenforceable
  • Raise Revenues?
  • K will normally be enforceable
  • practitioner subject to sanction

13
Contracts to commit a crime...
  • Cement overshoes...
  • Sale of drugs...
  • spelling of drug on controlled substances
    schedule
  • But what if sale merely assists an illegal
    objective?
  • sale of knife to the killer of Nicole Simpson?

14
Agreements in Restraint of Trade
  • Contracts in Restraint of Trade
  • Price fixing
  • Universities and financial aid compact, shared
    admission forms...
  • Anti-trust
  • Airlines
  • Microsoft and deals with computer manufacturers
  • Covenants not to compete
  • Restrictive employment contracts

15
Covenant Not to Compete
  • Usually OK if it is ancillary (i.e., supplemental
    or auxiliary) to a legitimate business
    transaction
  • as in sale of business
  • employment K
  • But still must be reasonable in terms of
  • time (length)
  • geography

16
Restrictive Employment Contracts
  • Reasonable if
  • no greater than is necessary to protect the ER in
    legitimate business interest
  • not unduly harsh and oppressive in curtailing
    opportunities of the EE
  • Must be reasonable from a public policy
    standpoint such that public is not being denied
    an essential service
  • Subject to intense scrutiny by courts...

17
Illegality Based Upon Unequal Bargaining Power
  • Adhesion Contracts
  • Exculpatory Clauses
  • Unconscionable Ks

18
Adhesion Contracts
  • Always construed against ___________
  • Look for unequal bargaining power and/or
    unconscionability.... not all pre-printed form Ks
    are adhesion Ks!!!
  • but if it is... obligation to read and understand
    K might go away

19
Adhesion Ks... General Rule
  • Party seeking to enforce the K has burden of
    showing that provisions were explained to other
    party, came to her knowledge, and real and
    voluntary meeting of the minds took place... not
    merely an objective meeting of the minds

20
Unconscionability
  • Williams v. Walker Thomas, Jones v. Star Credit
    Corp.
  • UCC 2-302
  • ... might be procedural (inducement w/o
    meaningful choice) or substantive (unduly unfair,
    one-sided)
  • remember, though, court doesnt look at adequacy
    of consideration... cant rush to a determination
    of unconscionability

21
Exculpatory Clauses
  • Some key points
  • oppressive nature?
  • unconscionability?
  • absolves from negligence?
  • Classic clause on p. 251
  • usually cant exculpate responsibility for
    negligence. Why?

22
Exculpatory Clauses
  • Not usually enforced if business is important
    (public necessity) b/c that would amount to
    exercise of unfair bargaining power...
  • e.g., utilities, transportation services, etc.
  • But frequently will be enforced in some
    non-essential (amusement type) enterprises
  • batted ball at Coveleski?
  • bungee jumping?

23
Exculpatory Clauses
  • Will usually be enforced if exculpation is for
    harmful incident outside of the control of the
    operator
  • e.g., batted ball v. crashing airplane
  • Will usually not be enforced if exculpation is
    for incident within the control of the operator
  • e.g., batted ball v. crashing airplane v. assault
    in parking garage due to broken lights

24
Effect of Illegality
  • Remember general rule that illegal Ks are void
  • courts take a hands off attitude
  • in pari delicto
  • But remember exceptions, too
  • common sense for most part
  • Severable legal intentions will be enforced

25
Problem 13-2
  • Restraint of trade?
  • Unless ancillary to certain types of business k
  • Reasonableness
  • Two possibilities
  • Reasonable and therefore enforced
  • Illegal and unenforceable

26
Problem 13-3
  • K with unlicensed person
  • Purpose of licensing statute
  • regulatory
  • revenue raising
  • Enforceable if purpose is to raise revenue but
    problem for bartender

27
Sample Exam Question
  • 1. If Brian offers to sell Troy his bicycle but
    Troy learns prior to accepting Brian's offer that
    the bicycle was actually sold to Claudia, then
  • a. the sale of the bicycle will automatically
    revoke the offer made to Troy and Brian will bear
    no liability.
  • b. Brian will be able to avoid liability for
    damages only if he provides an acceptable
    substitute to Troy.
  • c. Brian will be liable for any damages resulting
    from his breach of his contract with Troy.
  • d. None of the above.

28
Sample Essay Question
  • Discuss and explain whether or not there is valid
    consideration for each of the following promises
  • (a) Al and Bob entered into a contract for the
    purchase and sale of goods. Al subsequently
    promised to pay a higher price for the goods when
    Bob refused to deliver at the contract price.
    (Provide the general rule under the common law,
    and if applicable, how the matter would be
    resolved under the UCC.)
  • (b) Carol executes a promissory note to pay
    Dave, her secretary, 1000 a year for five years
    in consideration of the fine work that Dave had
    performed for Carol on a recent project that
    resulted in Carols receiving a much sought after
    promotion.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com