Simulation of Measurement of Transverse Coherence 21 April 2005 Sven Reiche

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Simulation of Measurement of Transverse Coherence 21 April 2005 Sven Reiche

Description:

Precision of position and width in Angstrom regime ... Point-like sources for scattered photons (Huygens principle) Far-field zone, small angle: ... –

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: johnga68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Simulation of Measurement of Transverse Coherence 21 April 2005 Sven Reiche


1
Simulation of Measurement ofTransverse
Coherence21 April 2005Sven Reiche
  • Schematic Layout of Experiment
  • Numerical Modeling
  • Results - Single Wavefront
  • Results - Full Radiation Profile

2
Experimental Consideration
  • Standard method with slits/holes is unpractical
  • Precision of position and width in Angstrom
    regime
  • Thick mask to absorbed radiation, not going
    through slits/holes
  • Huge background signal from spontaneous
    radiation.
  • Small slit/hole separation (d150 ?rad correspond
    to 1 ?rad for angle of observation of the first
    maximum)
  • No single-shot measurement of transverse
    coherence.
  • Measurement should fit in single experimental
    station.
  • Scattering on single crystal with well-known
    properties.

3
The Generic Method
  • Based on structure analysis with coherent light
    source
  • Phase reconstruction possible due to 2D
    oversampling theorem (e.g. used in FROG).
  • With structure known the incident field can be
    reconstructed.

Because the process cannot a time-resolving
radiation wave it would reconstruct an equivalent
steady-state field with limited coherence.
4
Modeling Problems
  • Exposed area 1 mm2
  • Crystal grid size 5 Ångstrom
  • 3D Crystal generates many Bragg-Peaks with a lot
    of empty space of deflect radiation.
  • Strongly deflecting Bragg-Peaks mix longitudinal
    and transverse coherence

Grid plane
Interference plane
5
Model Assumption
  • 2D Grid only (selects only one Bragg Peak)
  • Point-like sources for scattered photons (Huygens
    principle)
  • Far-field zone, small angle
  • Analytical solution of scattered field As for
    small sub-domain of grid with constant incident
    field Ai

6
Testing of Algorithm
  • Generic Gauss-mode as incident field with waist
    position on grid (d4 Å, ?1.5 Å)
  • Dependence of rms width of Bragg peak on waist
    size of incident field.

Width is inversely proportional to incident beam
size, as expected from this Fourier-like
transformation.
23.77 / w0
7
Waist Position
  • With waist of Gaussian mode placed on grid the
    curvature of the wavefront is excluded.
  • No dependence on waist position, confirming the
    Fourier-like dependence between input and
    scattered field.

With wavelength known, the rms width is a measure
for the mode size at its waist position.
8
LCLS - Single Wavefront
  • Steady-state run of LCLS with saturation at
    around 100 m (undulator length is 130 m)
  • Propagation of the wave front till the
    experimental station (120 m), using Fresnel
    integration of wavefront.

Scattered Field
Incident Field
9
Coherence - Single Slice
  • RMS size of incident field 120 ?m.
  • RMS size of scattered Bragg peak 0.85 ?rad
  • Equivalent RMS size of Gaussian mode 27.9 ?m
  • However radiation is diffracting from the end of
    the undulator (and even before in the saturation
    regime).

Undulator exit
The RMS size at the undulator exit is 29.3 ?m.
Comparing with an equivalent Gaussian mode the
coherence is 95
10
LCLS - Full Pulse
  • Time-dependent run of full LCLS profiles
    (start-end simulation) with 15000 slices
  • Calculation of diffraction pattern took 3 days on
    a 11 Node Beowulf cluster -gt only one calculation
    done

Scattered Field
Incident Field
11
Coherence - Full Pulse
  • Comparison to single slice results

Undulator exit
Strong asymmetry in near field profile with
second wide distribution, centered around x100
?m.
12
The Time-Dependent Run
profile
spectrum
centroid
Initial centroid in x
20 ?m 50 ?m 62 ?m
13
Initial Discussion of Results
  • Higher-Mode content
  • Pedestal level of radiation profile
  • Larger radiation size at grid (115 m downstream)
  • Larger opening angle of Bragg Peak
  • Background signal in near field distribution at
    undulator exit.
  • Possible caused by centroid motion of electron
    slices
  • Method of equivalent fundamental Gaussian mode is
    error-prone. A high mode (e.g. Gauss-Hermite Hmn)
    would yield an equivalent waist size of
  • Need better method to define transverse coherence
    (reconstruction of incident radiation field)

14
Conclusion
  • Slits/holes method is unpractical due to its
    extreme dimensions, stringent tolerance on the
    mask, the background signal from the spontaneous
    radiation
  • Measurement of transverse coherence is similar to
    structural analysis of 3D objects.
  • Reconstruction of incident radiation wavefront
    with recursive algorithm based on 2D oversampling
    theorem.
  • Method of equivalent Gaussian only of limited
    value if higher mode content is present.
  • Simulation needs to be continued and further
    developped to include the reconstruction
    algorithm.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com