Environmental and Biosafety issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Environmental and Biosafety issues

Description:

The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) Entered into force on 29th December 1993 ... Basic Premises of CPB 'Advance Informed Agreement' between Parties (AIA) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:604
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Val189
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental and Biosafety issues


1
Environmental and Biosafety issues in modern
Biotechnology Dr Veena Chhotray, IAS Senior
Fellow, TERI 6th February, 2006
2
BIOSAFETY
  • Biosafety means the need to protect human
    and animal health and environment from the
    possible adverse effects of the products of
    modern biotechnology

3
  • Environmentalism emerged as a distinct
    development in the last forty years.
  • Emergence of pressure groups in the sixties
  • First Earth Day (1970)
  • The United Nations Conference on the Human
    Environment and Development (1972)
  • The Brundtland Report our Common Future (1987)
  • The Rio Earth Summit (1992)
  • Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) 1992
  • Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) 1993

International Evolution
4
  • Convention of Biodiversity (CBD) 1992
  • Focus conservation and sustainable use of
    biodiversity
  • Recognized the potential of modern biotechnology
    for human well being
  • Took cognizance that modern biotechnology could
    have serious effects on environment and health
  • Article 8(g) emphasized the need to regulate the
    risks associated with the use of LMOS.
  • Article 19(3) set the stage for a legally binding
    international instrument about biosafety.

5
  • The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB)
  • Entered into force on 29th December 1993
  • Focus on transboundary movement of the LMOS.
  • Seeks to lay down an internationally acceptable
    framework to provide for an adequate level of
    protection against the possible adverse affects
    of LMOS on biodiversity and human health.

6
  • Basic Premises of CPB
  • Advance Informed Agreement between Parties
    (AIA)
  • Decision on the basis of scientific risk
    assessment
  • Precautionary Principle

7
  • How is Genetic Engineering (GE) different from
    conventional breeding (CB)?
  • Combining DNA in new combinations and introducing
    it into a new organism are the GE tools.
  • Main differences between CB and GE
  • Ability to move across sexual barriers
  • Amount of change a specific gene embodying a
    particular trait or thousands of genes embodying
    desirable and undesirable traits
  • Occurrence of change in one or several
    generations.

8
(No Transcript)
9
Genetic engineeringRecombinant DNA technology
10
Is GE inherently unsafe?
  • Two diametrically opposite trends of thought
  • US-Canada
  • No new risks associated with GM crops
  • New regulations not considered necessary
  • Safety assessments
  • Product rather than process based
  • In comparison and contrast to their familiarity
    and substantial equivalence to conventional
    crops

11
Is GE inherently unsafe?
  • EU
  • GE crops considered new and special
  • Existing legislation not considered sufficient
  • Safety assessment
  • Process based
  • Principle of substantial equivalence beginning
    rather than the end
  • Adoption of Precautionary Principle as guide

12
.Is GE inherently unsafe?
  • GE technology carries certain inherent
    unpredictability
  • Some facts
  • Isolation of a gene from its natural environment
    and integration into entirely different organism
  • Possible transgenic instability due to triggering
    of the inbuilt defense mechanisms of the host
    organism leading to inactivation or silencing of
    foreign genes.

13
.Is GE inherently unsafe?
  • Possibilities of integration of foreign gene at
    a site predisposed to silencing of genes
    (position effect).
  • Variance in the levels of expression of the
    transgene in different environmental conditions
    (heat, humidity, light..)
  • Possibilities of silencing of genes arising in
    subsequent generations

Case by case sound scientific assessment is of
utmost significance
14
  • Relate to environmental, human and animal health
    consequences
  • Both can have short and long term implications
  • Biosafety risks involve the entire spectrum of
    biodiversity
  • A universal true for all approach may not be
    applicable

Biosafety issues in transgenic crops
Risks
Known Probability
Unknown Probability
  • Rigorous Scientific Assessment
  • Risk Mitigation
  • Precautionary Principle

15
..Biosafety issues in transgenic crops -
  • Biosafety concerns arise from
  • Horizontal gene transfer
  • Genetic contamination
  • Transfer of allergens and toxins from one life
    form to another and creation of new toxins and
    allergenic compounds

16
  • Main Concerns
  • Development of aggressive weeds/ wild relatives
    by transfer of transgenic traits
  • Erosion of land races/wild relatives by genetic
    pollution in centres of origin/ diversity
  • Harm to the non-target organisms
  • Development of pest resistance by prolonged use
  • Monoculture and limitations to farmers choice in
    crop management
  • Hazard to human and animal health by transfer of
    toxins and allergens and by creation of new
    toxins and allergenic compounds

..Biosafety issues in transgenic crops -
17
..Biosafety issues in transgenic crops
  • Assessment
  • GE venturing into an unknown biological territory
  • ASILOMAR Conference (1975) No research till
    safety guidelines in place
  • Initially, focus on laboratory safety procedures
  • Wider definition of biosafety with possibilities
    of commercialization of GM products
  • The broad format of biosafety parametres
    essentially the same in all regulations

18
..Biosafety issues in transgenic crops
  • Two main stages
  • Laboratory/green house stage
  • Confined Trial Stage

IMPORTANT Prevention of the spread of
genetically engineered material outside lab/field
19
  • Laboratory/green house stage
  • Different biosafety levels as per the degree of
    risk involved
  • Two methods of containment
  • Physical
  • Biological

20
A confined trial is a small scale release of a
transgenic plant species for research purposes
conducted under conditions that prevent spread of
the organism and mitigate its impact on the
surrounding environment Objective is to collect
data to evaluate the crops performance
Confined Trial Stage
21
Focus on Risk Mitigation
  • Risk mitigation the terms and conditions that
    are necessary to conduct the trial safely.
  • Prevent Gene Flow
  • Prevent entry of GMOs into food chain
  • Prevent Persistence of GMOs in the field

22
Bio-pharmaceutical therapeutics
  • Biosafety risk
  • Survival, multiplication and dissemination of
    GMOs in contained/ open environment
  • Interaction of GMOs with biological systems
  • Routes of dissemination physical biological
  • Risk depends upon
  • Nature of organism invovled
  • Extent of use of LMOs
  • End product LMO or not?

23
Bio-pharmaceutical therapeutics
  • Risk categorization of micro organisms
  • determining factors
  • Capability to cause disease
  • Hazard to laboratory workers
  • Risk of spread to community
  • Availability of effective treatment
  • Health risks
  • Toxigenicity Pathogenicity
  • Allergenicity Antibiotic resistance

24
..Bio-pharmaceutical therapeutics
  • Environmental risks
  • Outcrossing between GMOs and pathogens
  • Negative effects on populations of non target
    organisms
  • Risk assessment
  • Access
  • Expression
  • Damage
  • Risk management and communication
  • Physical
  • Biological

25
GM foods need for safety assessment
  • Expressed proteins generally not a part of
    regular food supply
  • Food complex mixtures e.g. nutrients,
    anti-nutrients and natural toxins
  • Directly enter human system
  • Assume different forms
  • Involve storage, processing, transportation

26
.. Safety assessment of GM foods comprise
  • Guidelines by Codex Alimentarius Commission
  • Assessment of possible allergenicity
  • Assessment of possible toxicity
  • Compositional analysis of key components
  • Food processing
  • Nutritional modification

27
.GM foods Allergenicity Toxicity
  • Allergy
  • It is a hypersensitive reaction initiated by
    immunologic mechanisms caused by specific
    substances called allergens.
  • Assessment
  • Is the gene source allergenic?
  • Expression level of introduced gene
  • Unintended effect
  • Digestibility and heat stability
  • Toxicity
  • New proteins as a result of intended modification
  • Unintended new proteins as a result of the
    modification
  • Natural constituents beyond their level of normal
    variation

28
.GM foods nutritional aspects unintended
effects
  • Intended and unintended changes in nutrient
    levels
  • Bioavailability of nutrients, stability and
    processing
  • Presence and effect of anti-nutrients
  • Impact of individual changes on overall
    nutritional profile
  • Unintended effects
  • Random integration of transgenes
  • Insertional mutagenesis
  • Disruption of gene functions
  • Production of new proteins
  • Changes in
  • Phenotype Metabolites
  • Enzymes Toxins
  • Genotype

29
Concluding Note
  • Biosafety is integral to modern biotechnology
  • The adoption of modern biotech products needs to
    be balanced with adequate biosafety safeguards
  • Case by case scientific risk assessment and cost
    benefit analysis
  • Greater acceptance of health care applications
  • Need based adoption in GM crops and foods
  • Participation of various stakeholders
  • Dissemination of knowledge and information

30
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com