Title: The Literature Review
1The Literature Review
2What is a Literature Review?
- According to Creswell (2005), a review of the
literature is a written summary of journal
articles, books and other documents that
describes the past and current state of
information, organizes the literature into topics
and documents a need for a proposed study. (pp.
79)
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
3Focusing on Empirical Research
- What does Empirical Mean?
- Primary Sources
- Original Research Article
- Secondary Sources
- Newspapers
- Book chapters
- Television/Radio
- Magazines
- Wikepedia
4Empirical Research
- All empirical research is inherently flawed
- Limitations
- Sampling
- Generalizability
- Representative
- Measurement
- Measurement Error
- Social Desirability
- Problem Identification
- Grasping the Whole Problem
5Literature Reviews
- Well-written analytical narrative that brings a
reader up-to-date on what is known on a given
topic, but also provide fresh insights that
advance knowledge - Resolve conflicts between studies
- Identify new ways to interpret research results
- Creating a path for future research
6Anecdotal Reports
- A description of an event or experience that
happened to be noticed - No control
- No comparison
7Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
- The LR is a summary of research
- It is not a list of found research but a
coherent and articulate account of past and
current research findings - Suggestion read 2 or 3 LRs in order to become
familiar with summary styles
8Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
(contd)
- The sources typically are journal articles, books
and other documents that describe past and
present status of research in a given field - The LR should be exhaustive and as current as
possible. - How many articles?
- There is no set number. As long as the search is
exhaustive and focused on the research topic, the
review will be acceptable.
9Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
(contd)
- How far back should one search?
- A reasonable and widely accepted timeframe
includes research conducted during the past 10
years. Important studies (i.e., studies that had
a significant impact on the field of study)
should also be mentioned even if these go beyond
the mentioned timeframe.
10Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
(contd)
- The LR should be organized
- The review should not only be coherent, but
should organize the studies reviewed under themes
or topics. - The reviewer is a guide and should be able to
provide readers with an in-depth and current
status of research in a given area. - This aspect is essential for readers to
understand what the reviewer found during the
search.
11Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
(contd)
- The LR should document the need for a proposed
study - Studies should not duplicate research that has
been already done. - Even in cases when research is duplicated
(replicated is the appropriate term), one is
responsible for documenting the need for
replication, e.g., need to explore the same
methodology with a different group or population,
or need to change methodology with the same group.
12Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
- Step 1 Identify Key Terms or Descriptors
- Extract key words from your title (remember, you
may decide to change the title later) - Use some of the words other authors reported in
the literature
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
13Step 1 Identify Key Terms or Descriptors
(contd)
- Use the Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors to look
for terms that match your topic go to
www.eric.ed.gov and in Search select
Descriptors (from Thesaurus) - Scan both electronic and library journals from
the past 10 years and look for key terms in the
articles
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
14Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
(contd)
- Step 2 Locate Literature
- Use academic libraries, do not limit your search
to an electronic search of articles - Use primary and secondary sources. A primary
source is research reported by the researcher
that conducted the study. A secondary source is
research that summarizes or reports findings that
come from primary sources
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
15Step 2 Locate Literature (contd)
- It is best to report mostly primary sources (p.
82) - Search different types of literature summaries,
encyclopedias, dictionaries and glossaries of
terms, handbooks, statistical indexes, reviews
and syntheses, books, journals, indexed
publications, electronic sources, abstract
series, and databases
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
16Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
(contd)
- Step 3 Critically Evaluate and Select Literature
- Rely on journal articles published in national
journals - Prioritize your search first look for refereed
journal articles, then, non-refereed articles,
then books, then conference papers, dissertations
and theses and then papers posted to websites
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
17Step 3 Critically Evaluate and Select Literature
(contd)
- Look for research articles and avoid as much as
possible opinion pieces - Blend qualitative and quantitative research in
your review
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
18Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
(contd)
- Step 4 Organize the Literature
- Create a file or abstract system to keep
track of what you read. Each article you read
should be summarized in one page containing - Title (use APA to type the title so that you can
later copy-paste this into the References section
of your paper) - Source journal article, book, glossary, etc.
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
19Step 4 Organize the Literature (contd)
- Research problem one or two lines will suffice
- Research Questions or Hypotheses
- Data collection procedure (a description of
sample characteristics can be very handy as well) - Results or findings of the study
- Sort these abstracts into groups of related
topics or areas which can then become the
different sections of your review
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
20Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
(contd)
- Step 5 Write a Literature Review
- Types of Reviews
- Thematic Review a theme is identified and
studies found under this theme are described.
Major ideas and findings are reported rather than
details.
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
21Step 5 Write a Literature Review(contd)
- Study-by-study Review a detailed summary of each
study under a broad theme is provided. Link
summaries (or abstracts) using transitional
sentences. Must be organized and flow coherently
under various subheadings. Avoid string
quotations (i.e., lengthy chunks of text directly
quoted from a source)
Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
22Preliminary Literature Review
- This succinct review of current literature
should - Provide further contextual background
- Reveal issues related to your study
- Describe similar problems in other organizations
- Provide significance to your approach to the
study
23Guidelines on Style, Mechanics, and Language Usage
- Does your draft follow the logic or idea that is
presented in your intro and title? - Avoid overusing direct quotations, especially
long ones - Check style manual for correct use of citations
- (Doe, 2005) Doe (2005) (Doe Smith, 2005) Doe
and Smith (2005) (Black, 2005 Brown, 2006
Yellow, 2007)
24Guidelines on Style, Mechanics, and Language Usage
- Avoid using synonyms for recurring words
- This is not creative writing and stay consistent
with terminology - Group I, Phoenix Cohort, Experimental Group
- Spell out all acronyms when first using them
- Traditional - American Psychological Association
(APA) - Non-traditional - Collective Efficacy (CE)
- Yes - Do NOT use contractions No Dont use
contractions - Coined terms should be set off by quotes
25Guidelines on Style, Mechanics, and Language Usage
- Avoid the following
- Slang cool
- Colloquialisms thing gtgt item or feature
- Idioms rise to the pinnacle gtgt to become
prominent - Use great care to avoid Plagiarism
26Activity
- Please Read page 119-121, from the Galvan book.
Then answer the following questions on page 9. - Have the reviewers clearly identified the topic
of review? Have they indicated its delimitations?
Does it deal only with certain aspects of the
problem - Have the reviewers writing a cohesive essay that
guides you thorough the literature from subtopics
to subtopic? Explain. - Have the reviewers interpreted and critique the
literature, or have they merely summarized it? - Overall, do you think the reviewers make an
imporatnt contribution to knowledge through their
synthesis of the literature? Explain.
27What needs to be included in the Literature
review.
- Provides contextual background
- Reveals related issues
- Reviews similar problems elsewhere
- Provides significance to your approach to the
study - Includes major/seminar research articles
pertaining to study - Written in an integrated manner
- Uses peer-reviewed research
- Includes a Reference section
28Writing Your Research Question(s)
- Reflect the problem that the researcher wants to
investigate - Can be formulated based on theories, past
research, previous experience, or the practical
need to make data-driven decisions in a work
environment
29Writing Your Research Question(s) (contd)
- Are vitally important because they, in large
part, dictate what type of statistical analysis
is needed, as well as what type of research
design may be employed - A research question should address only 1 concept
- Question must be measurable
30Types of Questions Asked
- Once you have identified the topic of study, you
will need to consider the type of question you
want answered and how it will be answered - Two paradigms
- Quantitative Paradigm
- Generally attempt to quantify variables of
interest. Questions frequently address how well
or how much.
31Types of Questions Asked
- Qualitative Paradigm
- there are times when we wish to know not how
many or how well, but simply how. (Shulman,
1988, pg. 7)
32Class Exercise
- Now youre ready to formulate your own research
question(s) - Sample questions
- Is there a relationship between participation in
an Elluminate chat session and course grade? - How do 5th grade students experience the
anticipation of standardized testing?
33Research Questions
- From Topic to Research Question A good research
topic asks a clear, concise question. Asking a
research question helps you keep a tight focus on
your topic. - Tweaking Your Research Question
- A good research topic is broad enough to allow
you to find plenty of material, but narrow enough
to fit within the size and time constraints of
your paper. - If your topic is either too broad or too narrow,
consider adding or eliminating the following
elements - Time Period, century, decade, future, Population
Type, age, gender, nationality, species,
Geographic Location country, state, region, Point
of View economic, social, cultural, biological
34Assignment 2 Components (see syllabus for
details)
- Title Page
- Nature of the Problem
- Background and Significance of the Problem
- Literature Review
- Research Questions
- References