The Literature Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

The Literature Review

Description:

Look for research articles and avoid as much as possible 'opinion' pieces ... Includes major/seminar research articles pertaining to study. Written in an ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:6140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: marceloc6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Literature Review


1
The Literature Review

2
What is a Literature Review?
  • According to Creswell (2005), a review of the
    literature is a written summary of journal
    articles, books and other documents that
    describes the past and current state of
    information, organizes the literature into topics
    and documents a need for a proposed study. (pp.
    79)

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
3
Focusing on Empirical Research
  • What does Empirical Mean?
  • Primary Sources
  • Original Research Article
  • Secondary Sources
  • Newspapers
  • Book chapters
  • Television/Radio
  • Magazines
  • Wikepedia

4
Empirical Research
  • All empirical research is inherently flawed
  • Limitations
  • Sampling
  • Generalizability
  • Representative
  • Measurement
  • Measurement Error
  • Social Desirability
  • Problem Identification
  • Grasping the Whole Problem

5
Literature Reviews
  • Well-written analytical narrative that brings a
    reader up-to-date on what is known on a given
    topic, but also provide fresh insights that
    advance knowledge
  • Resolve conflicts between studies
  • Identify new ways to interpret research results
  • Creating a path for future research

6
Anecdotal Reports
  • A description of an event or experience that
    happened to be noticed
  • No control
  • No comparison

7
Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
  • The LR is a summary of research
  • It is not a list of found research but a
    coherent and articulate account of past and
    current research findings
  • Suggestion read 2 or 3 LRs in order to become
    familiar with summary styles

8
Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
(contd)
  • The sources typically are journal articles, books
    and other documents that describe past and
    present status of research in a given field
  • The LR should be exhaustive and as current as
    possible.
  • How many articles?
  • There is no set number. As long as the search is
    exhaustive and focused on the research topic, the
    review will be acceptable.

9
Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
(contd)
  • How far back should one search?
  • A reasonable and widely accepted timeframe
    includes research conducted during the past 10
    years. Important studies (i.e., studies that had
    a significant impact on the field of study)
    should also be mentioned even if these go beyond
    the mentioned timeframe.

10
Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
(contd)
  • The LR should be organized
  • The review should not only be coherent, but
    should organize the studies reviewed under themes
    or topics.
  • The reviewer is a guide and should be able to
    provide readers with an in-depth and current
    status of research in a given area.
  • This aspect is essential for readers to
    understand what the reviewer found during the
    search.

11
Review of Key Elements of Previous Definition
(contd)
  • The LR should document the need for a proposed
    study
  • Studies should not duplicate research that has
    been already done.
  • Even in cases when research is duplicated
    (replicated is the appropriate term), one is
    responsible for documenting the need for
    replication, e.g., need to explore the same
    methodology with a different group or population,
    or need to change methodology with the same group.

12
Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
  • Step 1 Identify Key Terms or Descriptors
  • Extract key words from your title (remember, you
    may decide to change the title later)
  • Use some of the words other authors reported in
    the literature

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
13
Step 1 Identify Key Terms or Descriptors
(contd)
  • Use the Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors to look
    for terms that match your topic go to
    www.eric.ed.gov and in Search select
    Descriptors (from Thesaurus)
  • Scan both electronic and library journals from
    the past 10 years and look for key terms in the
    articles

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
14
Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
(contd)
  • Step 2 Locate Literature
  • Use academic libraries, do not limit your search
    to an electronic search of articles
  • Use primary and secondary sources. A primary
    source is research reported by the researcher
    that conducted the study. A secondary source is
    research that summarizes or reports findings that
    come from primary sources

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
15
Step 2 Locate Literature (contd)
  • It is best to report mostly primary sources (p.
    82)
  • Search different types of literature summaries,
    encyclopedias, dictionaries and glossaries of
    terms, handbooks, statistical indexes, reviews
    and syntheses, books, journals, indexed
    publications, electronic sources, abstract
    series, and databases

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
16
Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
(contd)
  • Step 3 Critically Evaluate and Select Literature
  • Rely on journal articles published in national
    journals
  • Prioritize your search first look for refereed
    journal articles, then, non-refereed articles,
    then books, then conference papers, dissertations
    and theses and then papers posted to websites

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
17
Step 3 Critically Evaluate and Select Literature
(contd)
  • Look for research articles and avoid as much as
    possible opinion pieces
  • Blend qualitative and quantitative research in
    your review

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
18
Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
(contd)
  • Step 4 Organize the Literature
  • Create a file or abstract system to keep
    track of what you read. Each article you read
    should be summarized in one page containing
  • Title (use APA to type the title so that you can
    later copy-paste this into the References section
    of your paper)
  • Source journal article, book, glossary, etc.

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
19
Step 4 Organize the Literature (contd)
  • Research problem one or two lines will suffice
  • Research Questions or Hypotheses
  • Data collection procedure (a description of
    sample characteristics can be very handy as well)
  • Results or findings of the study
  • Sort these abstracts into groups of related
    topics or areas which can then become the
    different sections of your review

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
20
Creswells 5 steps to Conduct a Literature Review
(contd)
  • Step 5 Write a Literature Review
  • Types of Reviews
  • Thematic Review a theme is identified and
    studies found under this theme are described.
    Major ideas and findings are reported rather than
    details.

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
21
Step 5 Write a Literature Review(contd)
  • Study-by-study Review a detailed summary of each
    study under a broad theme is provided. Link
    summaries (or abstracts) using transitional
    sentences. Must be organized and flow coherently
    under various subheadings. Avoid string
    quotations (i.e., lengthy chunks of text directly
    quoted from a source)

Creswell, J.W. (2005) Educational Research
Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research
22
Preliminary Literature Review
  • This succinct review of current literature
    should
  • Provide further contextual background
  • Reveal issues related to your study
  • Describe similar problems in other organizations
  • Provide significance to your approach to the
    study

23
Guidelines on Style, Mechanics, and Language Usage
  • Does your draft follow the logic or idea that is
    presented in your intro and title?
  • Avoid overusing direct quotations, especially
    long ones
  • Check style manual for correct use of citations
  • (Doe, 2005) Doe (2005) (Doe Smith, 2005) Doe
    and Smith (2005) (Black, 2005 Brown, 2006
    Yellow, 2007)

24
Guidelines on Style, Mechanics, and Language Usage
  • Avoid using synonyms for recurring words
  • This is not creative writing and stay consistent
    with terminology
  • Group I, Phoenix Cohort, Experimental Group
  • Spell out all acronyms when first using them
  • Traditional - American Psychological Association
    (APA)
  • Non-traditional - Collective Efficacy (CE)
  • Yes - Do NOT use contractions No Dont use
    contractions
  • Coined terms should be set off by quotes

25
Guidelines on Style, Mechanics, and Language Usage
  • Avoid the following
  • Slang cool
  • Colloquialisms thing gtgt item or feature
  • Idioms rise to the pinnacle gtgt to become
    prominent
  • Use great care to avoid Plagiarism

26
Activity
  • Please Read page 119-121, from the Galvan book.
    Then answer the following questions on page 9.
  • Have the reviewers clearly identified the topic
    of review? Have they indicated its delimitations?
    Does it deal only with certain aspects of the
    problem
  • Have the reviewers writing a cohesive essay that
    guides you thorough the literature from subtopics
    to subtopic? Explain.
  • Have the reviewers interpreted and critique the
    literature, or have they merely summarized it?
  • Overall, do you think the reviewers make an
    imporatnt contribution to knowledge through their
    synthesis of the literature? Explain.

27
What needs to be included in the Literature
review.
  • Provides contextual background
  • Reveals related issues
  • Reviews similar problems elsewhere
  • Provides significance to your approach to the
    study
  • Includes major/seminar research articles
    pertaining to study
  • Written in an integrated manner
  • Uses peer-reviewed research
  • Includes a Reference section

28
Writing Your Research Question(s)
  • Reflect the problem that the researcher wants to
    investigate
  • Can be formulated based on theories, past
    research, previous experience, or the practical
    need to make data-driven decisions in a work
    environment

29
Writing Your Research Question(s) (contd)
  • Are vitally important because they, in large
    part, dictate what type of statistical analysis
    is needed, as well as what type of research
    design may be employed
  • A research question should address only 1 concept
  • Question must be measurable

30
Types of Questions Asked
  • Once you have identified the topic of study, you
    will need to consider the type of question you
    want answered and how it will be answered
  • Two paradigms
  • Quantitative Paradigm
  • Generally attempt to quantify variables of
    interest. Questions frequently address how well
    or how much.

31
Types of Questions Asked
  • Qualitative Paradigm
  • there are times when we wish to know not how
    many or how well, but simply how. (Shulman,
    1988, pg. 7)

32
Class Exercise
  • Now youre ready to formulate your own research
    question(s)
  • Sample questions
  • Is there a relationship between participation in
    an Elluminate chat session and course grade?
  • How do 5th grade students experience the
    anticipation of standardized testing?

33
Research Questions
  • From Topic to Research Question A good research
    topic asks a clear, concise question. Asking a
    research question helps you keep a tight focus on
    your topic.
  • Tweaking Your Research Question
  • A good research topic is broad enough to allow
    you to find plenty of material, but narrow enough
    to fit within the size and time constraints of
    your paper.
  • If your topic is either too broad or too narrow,
    consider adding or eliminating the following
    elements
  • Time Period, century, decade, future, Population
    Type, age, gender, nationality, species,
    Geographic Location country, state, region, Point
    of View economic, social, cultural, biological

34
Assignment 2 Components (see syllabus for
details)
  • Title Page
  • Nature of the Problem
  • Background and Significance of the Problem
  • Literature Review
  • Research Questions
  • References
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com