Title: Baldwins Rules for Ring Closure
1Baldwins Rules for Ring Closure
- Dr Fabienne Pradaux
- Wednesday 2nd February 2005
2Baldwins Rules
- Qualitative set of generalization on the
probability of a ring closure (RC) - Empirical rules formulated from observations
and stereoelectronic reasoning - Describe kinetic feasibility of ring closure
- Physical basis lie in stereochemical
- The rules do not apply to second row elements and
to pericyclic reactions
3Terminology/Classification (1)
- Prefix exo when the breaking bond is exocyclic to
the smallest ring formed. - Prefix endo when the breaking bond is endocyclic
to the smallest ring formed.
4Terminology/Classification (2)
- Numerical prefix describe the size of formed
ring. - Sufixes Tet, Trig and Dig indicate the geometry
of the carbon undergoing the RC. - Tetrahedral for sp3 carbon
- Trigonal for sp2 carbon
- Digonal for sp carbon
5Rules for Ring Closure (1)
- Tetrahedral Systems
- 3 to 7-exo-Tet are all favoured processes
- 5 to 6-endo-Tet are disfavoured
6Rules for Ring Closure (2)
- Trigonal systems
- 3 to 7-exo-Trig are all favoured processes
- 3 to 5-endo-Trig are disfavoured 6 to
7-endo-Trig are favoured
7Rules for Ring Closure (3)
- Digonal Systems
- 3 to 4-exo-Dig are disfavoured processes 5 to
7-exo-Dig are favoured - 3 to 7-endo-Dig are favoured
8Other Than Nucleophilic Cases
- Radical Processes (homolitic)
- Cationic Processes
9Attack Trajectories
- Favoured paths to transition states are
Tetrahedral Systems
Trigonal Systems
Digonal Systems
10Favoured and Disfavoured
- Favoured RC will be those in which length and
nature of linking chain enables terminal atoms to
achieve required trajectory to form final ring
bond - Disfavoured RC would require severe bond angle
and distances distortion, so the desired RC will
be difficult (if available, alternative pathways
will dominate)
11Tetrahedral carbon (1)
- All exo-Tet cyclisations are favoured
12Tetrahedral carbon (2)
- Why all endo-Tet cyclisations are disfavoured?
13Trigonal Carbon (1)
- Why all exo-Trig cyclisations are favoured?
14Trigonal Carbon (2)
- Example of disfavoured 5-endo-Trig
15Trigonal Carbon (3)
- 5-endo-Trig versus 5-exo-Trig
16Trigonal Carbon (4)
17Trigonal Carbon (5)
- 5-endo-Trig versus 5-exo-Trig Nitrogen analogue
18Trigonal Carbon (6)
- 5-endo-Trig versus 5-exo-Trig Nitrogen
analogue (MO explanation)
19Digonal carbon
- All endo-Dig cyclizations are favoured
- 3- and 4-exo-Dig cyclisations are disfavoured
20Intramolecular Alkylations of Ketone Enolates (1)
- 6- to 7- membered RC
- Favoured
- 3- to 5- membered RC
- Disfavoured
- 3- to 7- membered RC
- Favoured
21Intramolecular Aldol Condensations (1)
- 3- to 5- membered RC
- Disfavoured
- 6- to 7- membered RC
- Favoured
- 3- to 7- membered RC
- Favoured
22Stereoelectronic Constraints
Intramolecular alkylations of ketone enolates
Intramolecular aldol condensations
23Intramolecular Alkylations of Ketone Enolates (1)
- Why 5-(Enolendo)-exo-tet disfavoured?
24Intramolecular Alkylations of Ketone Enolates (2)
- Why 6-(enolendo)-exo-tet favoured?
25Intramolecular Aldol Condensations (2)
6-(enolendo)-exo-trig versus 5-(enolendo)-exo-trig
Statistics 4 possibilities to form a 5 membered
ring 2 possibilities to form a
6 membered ring Previsions 6 membered ring
would be predominant or exclusive
26Intramolecular Aldol Condensations (3)
Formation of cyclohexanone totally dominates over
even statistically preferred cyclopentanones
production.
27Baldwin Rules in Harrity Group (1)
- Formation of cyclohexanones
28Baldwin Rules in Harrity Group(2)
- Formation of cyclobutane ketones
29Conclusion
- Only give information about whether processes are
favoured or disfavoured and not allowed and
forbidden. - Nucleophilic RC feasibility strongly depends on
ring size, geometry of reacting atom and exo or
endo nature of reaction. - Structural modification can dramatically affect
the cyclization mode. - If favoured trajectory of attack valid, then
reaction will follow the Baldwins rules.
30Summary (1)
31Summary (2)
32References
- J. E. Baldwin, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976,
734. - J. E. Baldwin, J. Cutting, W. Dupont, L. Kruse,
L. Silberman, R. C. Thomas, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1976, 736. - J. E. Baldwin, R. C. Thomas, L. Kruse, L.
Silberman, J. Org. Chem, 1977, 42, 3846. - J. E. Baldwin, L. Kruse, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1977, 233. - J. E. Baldwin, M. J. Lusch, Tetrahedron, 1982,
38, 2939. - C. D. Johnson, Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 476.
- J. Clayden, N. Greeves, S. Warren, P. Wothers,
Oxford, chapter 42, p 1140. - D. A. Evans, internet course.