Estimation, Calibration, and Validation of Structural Simulation Models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Estimation, Calibration, and Validation of Structural Simulation Models

Description:

In standard econometric practice, model estimation and validation are done together. ... Advances in software, econometrics, and theory are narrowing the gaps and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: IFP979
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Estimation, Calibration, and Validation of Structural Simulation Models


1
Estimation, Calibration, and Validation of
Structural Simulation Models
  • Sherman Robinson
  • IFPRI
  • July 2002

2
Papers
  • C. Arndt, S. Robinson, and F. Tarp (2002).
    Parameter estimation for a computable general
    equilibrium model a maximum entropy approch.
    Economic Modeling, Vol 19.
  • S. Robinson, A. Cattaneo, and M. El-Said (2000).
    Updating and Estimating a Social Accounting
    Matrix Using Cross Entropy Methods. Economic
    Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 1.

3
Papers
  • S. Devarajan and S. Robinson (2002). The Impact
    of Computable General Equilibrium Models on
    Policy. Presented at a conference on Frontiers
    of Applied General Equilibrium Modeling at Yale
    University, April 5-6, 2002.

4
Outline
  • Model motivation and Design
  • Policy focus
  • Domain of applicability
  • Model use
  • Static/dynamic
  • Dated/timeless
  • Estimation, calibration, and validation
  • Maximum entropy econometrics

5
Desiderata for Policy Models
  • Relevance
  • Link policy variables to outcomes
  • Transparency
  • Timeliness
  • Validation and estimation
  • Diversity of approaches

6
Domain of Applicability
  • The domain of exogenous and endogenous variables
    for which the model is valid.
  • Defined by choices in model design.
  • Stylized models
  • Applied models

7
Structural versus Reduced Form Models
  • Desiderata argue for structural models
  • Linking policy variables to outcomes
  • Aggregate and structural indicators identifying
    winners and losers
  • Transparency
  • Black-box syndrome

8
Model Use
  • Static versus Dynamic
  • Comparative static
  • Recursive versus forward-looking dynamic
  • Timeless versus dated
  • Timeless counterfactuals not intended to match
    actual data
  • Dated projections that can be compared with
    actual data

9
Timeless Static Mode
  • Standard usage comparative static
  • Change a few exogenous variables and compare
    results to base solution.
  • Counterfactual question
  • What would the economy have looked like in the
    base year given the particular shocks under
    consideration?

10
Dated Static Mode
  • Solve model for a second year some periods away
    from base year
  • Comparative static
  • Incorporate actual or forecast changes in many
    exogenous variables and parameters
  • Historical or forward projection
  • Results are identified with particular year

11
Timeless Dynamic Mode
  • Steady-state equilibrium growth models
  • Shock model and compare new steady-state path
    with initial steade-state path
  • Analogous to timeless static Do not associate
    time path with historical time
  • Examples
  • Rational expectations dynamic CGE models
  • Real business cycle models

12
Dated Dynamic Mode
  • Projection models
  • Recursive dynamic
  • Forward-looking dynamic
  • Results can be tested agains historical data
  • Similar to dynamic macro-econometric models

13
Validation
  • Validation by comparing explicit results with
    historical data can only be done for dated models
  • Timeless models must be validated heuristically
  • Rough comparision with historic episodes
  • Reasonableness of specification and parameters

14
Parameter Estimation
  • Two kinds of parameters
  • Share parameters cost shares, expenditure
    shares, savings rates, tax rates, import and
    export shares
  • Elasticity parameters describe the curvature of
    various structural functions (e.g., production,
    utility, import demand, export supply)

15
Parameter Estimation
  • Share parameters can be estimated from a based
    SAM
  • Benchmark calibration base data are assumed to
    be a solution of the model
  • Estimating elasticities requires additional
    information
  • Validation requires good estimation

16
Estimation and Validation
  • In standard econometric practice, model
    estimation and validation are done together.
  • Estimate parameters so that model tracks
    historical data as closely as possible
  • Issue of domain of applicability
  • Historical data must include information relevant
    for shocks to be analyzed

17
Estimation SAM
  • SAM estimation
  • Share parameters
  • Timeliness
  • Accounts define model structure
  • Historical data versus average SAM for
    parameter estimation
  • Issue of agriculture typical year

18
Estimation/Calibration
  • Kehoe et al. Spanish economy
  • Gehlhar backcasting with GTAP model
  • Dixon et al. two-period calibration with Orani
    model
  • Dervis, de Melo, and Robinson Turkish structural
    adjustment model

19
Validation Questions
  • Can the model track historical flows?
  • Which parameter values enable the model to track
    historical flows best?
  • Trade parameters (import demand and export
    supply)
  • Production functions
  • Demand system

20
CGE Model
  • A CGE model F(X,Z,B) 0 where
  • F is a vector valued function
  • X is a vector of endogenous variables
  • Z is a vector of exogenous variables
  • B is a vector of behavioral parameters
  • number of equations number of unknowns.

21
Standard Econometrics
22
Standard Environment
  • Lots of data relative to number of parameters
    being estimated.
  • Strong assumptions about distribution of errors.
  • Normal, mean of zero, single unknown parameter
    (variance).
  • Assume no knowledge of parameter values. This is
    a moral imperative.

23
Standard Estimation
  • Estimation criterion is to maximize within-sample
    prediction of various variables (Y).
  • For efficient estimation, it is sufficient to
    represent the data by moments
  • X'X and X'Y.
  • Moments summarize all information needed for
    estimation.

24
Information Theory Approach
  • Goal is to recover parameters that generated the
    data we observe. Focus is on parameter estimation
    rather than prediction.
  • Assume very little information about the error
    generating process and nothing about the
    functional form of the error distribution.

25
Estimation Principle
  • Use all the information you have.
  • Do not use or assume any information you do not
    have.
  • Zellner estimation using an efficient
    information processing rule.

26
Cross-Entropy Estimation
  • View the model in the following form
  • F(Xt , Zt , B) 0
  • where t is a time subscript and
  • Yt G(Xt , Zt , B) et
  • where G(X0 , Z0 , B) e0 0,
  • Yt is a vector of historical targets, and
  • G(.) calculates target values from model results.

27
Cross-Entropy Estimation
  • Impose most elements of Zt.
  • Choose B (and some elements of Zt, particularly
    technical change) such that
  • 1) The errors are small and
  • 2) We are entropy close to our prior values on
    the elements of B.
  • Choose the relative importance of the errors and
    our prior values.

28
Trade-off Between Error and Parameter Priors
  • GDPt actual GDP tpredicted et
  • B must fall within some (reasonable) bound with a
    priordistribution
  • Blow lt B lt Bhigh
  • The maximum entropy procedure attempts to choose
    errors close to zero and parameters, B, close to
    center of the prior distributions.
  • Can choose the relative weights of the two
    criteria.

29
CGE Model Estimation
30
CGE Model Estimation
31
CGE Model Estimation
32
CGE Model Estimation
33
Cross-Entropy Measure
34
Lagrangian
35
First Order Conditions
36
Solution
37
Application to Mozambique
  • Single country CGE model
  • Six commodities and a commerce activity
  • Two households rural and urban
  • Rural and urban labor types
  • Cobb-Douglas technology
  • LES demand system
  • Home consumption
  • Armington import functions
  • CET function on exports

38
Estimated Parameter Values
  • Armington import elasticities by commodity.
  • CET export elasticities by commodity.
  • LES parameters by commodity and household.
  • Technical change parameters by activity.
  • Implicit subsidies to state owned enterprises
    during the period 1992-94.

39
Conclusion
  • ME/CE estimation supports use of information in
    many forms and from many sources in estimating
    structural parameters
  • Very powerful and flexible approach
  • Particularly well suited for estimation of
    structural models

40
Conclusion
  • Productive tension between policy applications
    and developments in theory, econometrics, and
    data.
  • Advances in software, econometrics, and theory
    are narrowing the gaps and supporting productive
    collaboration between theorists, applied
    econometricians, and policy modelers.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com