Estimating the NAIRU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Estimating the NAIRU

Description:

S = supply-side factors. Some Algebra. Redefine the mark-up equation in terms of wage inflation. ... Supply-Side Effects. President Nixon's wage & price ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: unkn652
Category:
Tags: nairu | estimating

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Estimating the NAIRU


1
Estimating the NAIRU
  • A Case Study in Economic Policy
  • EC134 Macroeconomic Principles

2
Potential Output theNon Accelerating Inflation
Rate of Unemployment
P
LRAS
SRAS(Pe)
P
AD(PG,T,Ms)
Y
Y
3
Analytical Framework
  • Construct a Phillips Curve equation from which we
    can estimate the NAIRU for the United States.
  • If we know the NAIRU, we can make inferences
    about the appropriate direction of fiscal and
    monetary policy.

4
Phillips Curve 1
w a0 pe a1UR a2PROD
w wage inflation pe expected inflation UR
unemployment rate PROD productivity growth
5
Define a Mark-up Equation
  • Assume that the rate of price inflation is
    determined by the rate of change in unit labor
    costs and other supply-side factors.
  • These factors can take the form of import price
    shocks and wage price controls.

6
Unit Labor Costs
  • Define unit labor costs as the difference between
    wage inflation and the growth in labor
    productivity.
  • Intuition high productivity growth implies lower
    per unit costs of labor.

7
Mark-up Equation
  • p w PROD S
  • p price inflation
  • w wage inflation
  • PROD rate of growth of labor productivity
  • S supply-side factors

8
Some Algebra
  • Redefine the mark-up equation in terms of wage
    inflation.
  • Then substitute that into the wage-price Phillips
    Curve.
  • To produce a price-price Phillips Curve that can
    be estimated econometrically.

9
Phillips Curve 2
  • p a0 pe a1UR b1PROD b2S e
  • Hypotheses
  • a1 lt 0 Unemployment/Inflation tradeoff.
  • b1 lt 0 Productivity-enhancing technical change
    lowers structural inflation.
  • Supply shocks correspond to upward adjustments to
    SRAS.

10
Long-run
  • No supply shocks.
  • There is some trend rate of growth for labor
    productivity.
  • p pe, i.e., inflationary expectations are borne
    out.
  • Long-run Phillips Curve is inelastic.

11
Solving for NAIRU
  • Steady-stating this equation means setting p
    pe and solving our price-price Phillips Curve
    equation for the long-run value of UR.
  • UR (a0 b1PROD) / -a1

12
Estimation Issues
  • Sample period.
  • Measuring inflation.
  • Measuring labor productivity.
  • Identifying supply-side phenomena.
  • Modeling expectations.

13
Sample Period Issues
  • Structural changes to the economy alter the trend
    rate of growth of productivity.
  • Most recent productivity enhancements have
    occurred too recently to provide enough
    historical experience to produce reliable
    estimates.
  • Use as much historical data as possible.

14
Measuring Inflation
  • PCE price index
  • 2000 100
  • Broad measure of consumer price inflation

15
Measuring Productivity
  • BLS has made recent efforts to improve
    productivity estimates.
  • Service sector productivity very difficult
    conceptually and from a practical standpoint.
  • Use total non-farm business sector.
  • An index 1992 100.

16
Supply-Side Effects
  • President Nixons wage price controls.
  • Oil price shocks.
  • Import price inflation less core CPI inflation.
  • Assume all are equal to zero in the long-run.

17
Expected Inflation
  • Assume a simple, adaptive expectations model.
  • Weighted average of past inflation rates.
  • People predict inflation based on past
    experience.

Weights (gi) sum to 1.02.
18
Econometric Results
p 2.105 1.0pe 0.035PROD 0.079(pm- pc)
1.366NIXON 0.279NIXOFF 0.350UR
  • Check interpretation of coefficients
  • Check statistical significance
  • Calculate implied NAIRU estimates

19
NAIRU Estimate
  • Depends on your assumption about the trend rate
    of growth of labor productivity.
  • Use CEA 2004 ERP forecast of 2.1
  • NAIRU 5.8
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com