Goal and scope definition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Goal and scope definition

Description:

Human. health. Impact Assessment. The environmental mechanism (impact pathway) ... Industrial Ecology Winter 2006 Session 5 January 27. Human toxicity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: roland2
Category:
Tags: definition | goal | scope

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Goal and scope definition


1
Life Cycle Impact Assessment
Goal and scopedefinition
Interpretation
Inventoryanalysis
Impactassessment
2
Life Cycle Impact Assessment
Impact Assessment is aimed at understanding and
evaluating the magnitude and significance of the
potential environmental impacts of a product
system (ISO14040).
Life Cycle Inventories (LCIs) by themselves do
not characterize the environmental performance
of a product system. Impact Assessment (IA) aims
at connecting, to the extent possible, emissions
and extractions listed in LCIs on the basis of
impact pathways to their potential environmental
damages.
Life Cycle Inventory results
Classification
Impact categories
Characterization
Category indicator results
Normalization
Environmental profile
Weighting
One-dimensional environmental score
3
Elements of LCIA according to ISO 14042
Mandatory elements
Selection of impact categories, category
indicators and characterization models
Assignment of LCI results (classification)
Calculation of category indicator results
(characterization)
Category indicator results (LCIA profile)
Optional elements Normalization of category
indicator results relative to reference
information Grouping Weighting Data quality
analysis
4
Impact Assessment The environmental mechanism
(impact pathway)
Impact pathways consist of linked environmental
processes, and they express the causalchain of
subsequent effects originating from an emission
or extraction (environmental intervention).
Examples
Increase in effectiveness of communication of
results (generally)
SO2 emissions
Acidrain
Acidifiedlake
Dead fish
Loss ofbiodiversity
Source
Midpoint
Endpoint
CFC emissions
Tropospheric OD
Stratospheric OD
UVBexposure
Humanhealth
Increase in uncertainty for predicting the
environmental impact from the initial
interventions
5
Impact Assessment Impact Categories
According to ISO14042, LCI results are first
classified into impact categories that are
relevant and appropriate for the scope and goal
of the LCA study.
Example
Carbon dioxide
Climate change
Methane
Stratospheric ozone depletion
CFCs
Photochemical oxidant formation
Nitrogen oxides
Sulphur dioxide
Acidification
  • A category indicator, representing the amount of
    impact potential, can be located at any place
    between the LCI results and the category
    endpoints. There are currently two main Impact
    Assessment methods
  • Problem oriented IA methods stop quantitative
    modeling before the end of the impact pathway
    and link LCI results to so-defined midpoint
    categories (or environmental problems), like
    acidification and ozone depletion.
  • Damage oriented IA methods, which model the
    cause-effect chain up to the endpoints or
    environmental damages, link LCI results to
    endpoint categories.

6
Impact AssessmentImpact categories proposed by
UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative in 2003
Midpoint categories (environmental problems)
Endpoint categories (environmental damages)
Photochemical oxidant formation
Human toxicity
Human Health
Ozone depletion
Climate change
Biotic abiotic natural environment
Acidification
LCI results
Eutrophication
Biotic abiotic natural resources
Ecotoxicity
Land use impacts
Biotic abiotic manmade resources
Species organism dispersal
Abiotic resources depletion
Missing Casualties Noise
Biotic resources depletion
Source Int J of LCA 9(6) 2004
7
Impact AssessmentClassification and
characterization
  • Practical guide to classification and
    characterization
  • Choose impact categories
  • Define a category indicator for each impact
    category
  • Identify those LCI results that contribute to
    the indicator
  • choose characterization model and
    characterization factor

Characterization model
The chain of physical, chemical and biological
events in the natural environmentthat link a
particular environmental intervention to a
particular impact is called an environmental
process. For each impact category, the
characterization model should model all relevant
environmental processes (to a greater or lesser
extent).
8
Impact AssessmentClassification and
characterization
Example
In general
LCI results
Cd, CO2, NOX, SO2, etc. (kg/functional unit)
Impact category
Acidification
Acidifying emissions NOX, SO2, etc. (kg/functional
unit)
LCI results assigned to Impact category
Characterization model
Category indicator results
Proton release (H aq)
  • Forests
  • Fish populations
  • etc.

Category endpoint
Source ISO14042
9
Impact AssessmentClassification and
characterization Example 1
Impact category Acidification LCI
results Emissions of acidifying substances to
the air (in kg) Characterization model RAINS10
model, developed by IIASA, describing the fate
and deposition of acidifying substances,
adapted to LCA Category indicator Deposition/acidi
fication critical load Characterization
factor Acidification potential (AP) for each
acidifying emission to the air (in kg SO2
equivalents/kg emission) Unit of indicator
result kg SO2 eq
Substance AP (in kg SO2 equivalents/kg
emission) ammonia 1.88 hydrogen
chloride 0.88 hydrogen fluoride 1.60 hydrogen
sulfide 1.88 nitric acid 0.51 Nitrogen
dioxide 0.70 Nitrogen monoxide 1.07 Sulfur
dioxide 1.00 Sulphuric acid 0.65
Source (Guinée et al., 2002)
10
Impact AssessmentClassification and
characterization Example 2
Impact category Stratospheric ozone
depletion LCI results Emissions of
ozone-depleting gases to the air (in
kg) Characterization model The model developed by
WMO, defining the ozone depletion potential
of different gases Category indicator Stratospheri
c ozone breakdown Characterization factor Ozone
depletion potential in the steady state (ODP8)
for each emission (in kg CFC-11 equivalents/kg
emission) Unit of indicator result kg CFC-11 eq
Substance ODP8 (in kg CFC-11 equivalents/kg
emission) Halon-1301 12 Halon-1211 5.11 Halon-12
02 1.25 Tetrachloromethane 1.2 CFC-11 1 CFC-12
0.82 HCFC-123 0.012 HFC-142b 0.043 Methyl
Bromide 0.37
Source (Guinée et al., 2002)
11
Impact AssessmentClassification and
characterization Example 3
Impact category Climate change LCI
results Emissions of greenhouse gases to the air
(in kg) Characterization model the model
developed by the IPCC defining the global
warming potential of different gases Category
indicator Infrared radiative forcing
(W/m2) Characterization factor Global warming
potential for a 100-year time horizon
(GWP100) for each GHG emission to the air
(in kg CO2 equivalents/kg emission) Unit of
indicator result kg CO2 eq
Substance GWP100 (in kg CO2 equivalents/kg
emission) Carbon dioxide 1 Methane 21 CFC-11
4000 CFC-13 11700 HCFC-123 93 HCFC-142b 2000 P
erfluoroethane 9200 Perfluoromethane 6500 Sulphu
r hexafluoride 23900
Source (Guinée et al., 2002)
12
Impact AssessmentSummary
  • At present, there is no agreement on one
    standard format for LCIA.
  • ISO14042 contains guidelines and recommendation
    for LCIA.
  • According to ISO14042, mandatory elements of
    LCIAs are selection of impact categories,
    category indicators and characterization models,
    classification and characterization.
  • A very popular method is the so-called
    problem-oriented (midpoint) approach that has
    been developed, amongst others, at CML,
    University of Leiden, in The Netherlands.
  • Other currently used LCIA methods include
    damage-oriented (endpoint) methods, like EPS
    and Eco-Indicator99 (both Dutch), and
    distance-to-target methods like the Critical
    Volumes approach of BUWAL, the Swiss EPA.
  • All examples in this introduction are based on
    the problem oriented approach
  • Normalization is generally recommended and helps
    to better understand the relative importance
    and magnitude of the indicator results.
  • Weighting is much debated and ISO14042
    explicitly mentions that they are based on
    value choices and not on natural science.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com