Varieties of English - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Varieties of English

Description:

Worked as a teacher and social worker before becoming an academic at U London ... Reference more explicit in EC, more implicit in RC use of pronouns and deixis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: MCus2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Varieties of English


1
Varieties of English
  • Language and social class

2
Basil Bernstein
  • British sociologist and linguist
  • b.1924, d. 2000
  • Worked as a teacher and social worker before
    becoming an academic at U London Institute of
    Education
  • Most famous for his theory on codes in speech
    and language, in particular restricted vs
    elaborated code, and how these relate to social
    class

3
Background
  • Experience of teaching working-class children
  • Differences in performance between working-class
    and middle-class children in language-based
    subjects, when performance in maths (etc) was
    comparable
  • Access to and use of different styles of language
    both limits and defines
  • Language used in everyday conversation both
    reflects and shapes the assumptions of a certain
    social group
  • Relationships established within the social group
    affect the way that group uses language, and the
    type of speech that is used
  • Bernstein wanted to point this out and have it
    compensated for, but was misunderstood

4
Codes
  • Distinguished varieties of language use, called
    codes
  • Restricted code (RC)
  • speakers draw on background knowledge and shared
    understanding
  • creates a sense of includedness, a feeling of
    belonging to a certain group.
  • can be found among friends and families and other
    intimately knit groups.
  • Elaborated code (EC)
  • spells everything out, so that everyone can
    understand it because the circumstances do not
    allow the speaker to condense
  • used in situations where there is no prior or
    shared understanding and knowledge, where more
    thorough explanation is required
  • We are concerned here with speech rather than
    written language

5
Elaborated and restricted code - misconceptions
  • Elaborated code does NOT mean better, more
    eloquent language
  • Restricted code does NOT mean restricted
    vocabulary, simplified grammar
  • The difference is about explicitness and shared
    background knowledge
  • Use of terms elaborated and restricted
    somewhat unfortunate, and lead to
    misunderstandings and even vilification of
    Bernstein

6
Example
  • a group of children were shown a strip cartoon
    and asked to say what it depicted.
  • (based on Bernstein, 1971 p 203)

They're playing football and he kicks it and it
goes through there.It breaks the window and
they're looking at it and he comes out and
shouts at them because they've broken it.So they
run away and then she looks out and she tells
them off.
Three boys are playing football and one boy kicks
the balland it goes through the window.The ball
breaks the window and the boys are looking at it
and a man comes out and shouts at them because
they've broken the window.So they run away and
then a lady looks out of her window and she tells
the boys off.
7
Differences in code
  • Syntax
  • more varied in EC also more formal
  • more subordinate clauses in EC fewer unfinished
    sentences
  • EC uses more logical connectives like if and
    unless RC uses more simple coordinations eg and,
    but
  • RC has short phrases interjected into the middle
    or end of a thought to confirm understanding (eg
    you know, I mean, right?) EC has less (or highly
    disguised) padding or filler (eg elaboration and
    explanation)
  • More originality in EC more clichés in RC
  • Reference more explicit in EC, more implicit in
    RC use of pronouns and deixis
  • Meaning is universalistic in EC,
    particularistic in RC
  • Lexis more restricted in RC
  • Its about use of rather than access to different
    codes

8
Consequences
  • Restricted code
  • appropriate for expressing shared, established
    and static meanings,
  • draws on a store of shared meanings and
    background knowledge
  • carries a social message of inclusion
  • Some people assume BB was saying middle-classes
    use EC, working-classes use RC
  • Actually he never said this
  • Middle-class children also use RC when
    appropriate
  • But they have greater access to EC through
    socilaization
  • Problem is of reduced access to EC among
    working-class children

9
Elaborated code
  • Necessary if you want to break out to say
    something new, particularly something which
    questions the received wisdom
  • Fundamental in schooling, where the introduction
    of new knowledge goes beyond existing shared
    meanings
  • So if you can't handle elaborated code, you are
    not going to succeed in the educational system

10
Socialization
  • Reciprocal nature of language and culture
  • Whorfian view that language determines (or at
    least conditions) the speakers view of the world
  • This is the case with social structure
  • A particular social structure leads to a
    particular linguistic behaviour
  • In turn, this behaviour reinforces the social
    structure

11
Social-class constraints
  • 5-yr-olds telling a story based on pictures
  • WC children used fewer expressions of uncertainty
  • MC children less good at role playing
  • What is the man saying? ?
  • What do you think the man might be saying? ?
  • When invited to make up stories
  • WC childrens stories freer, longer, more
    imaginative
  • MC childrens stories more constrained within
    strong narrative frame
  • form vs content

12
Other studies
Several studies of how mothers talk to
children MC mothers WC
mothers
  • use more abstract ideas
  • point out consequences of actions rather than
    just forbid or tell off
  • answer wh-questions with genuine explanation,
    involving causes, analogies etc.
  • better at explaining verbally how to do something
  • Encourage verbal interaction
  • Use language to induce desired behavioural changes
  • use more direct commands
  • cite authority figures (themselves or outsiders)
    to get their own way
  • answer wh-questions with Because it is
  • more likely to explain by demonstration
  • More likely to avoid answering difficult
    questions
  • punishments less likely to be explained, and more
    frequent than rewards

13
Comments and criticism
  • Many criticisms, perhaps through
    misunderstanding
  • That this is a deficit theory
  • Whorfian angle
  • Elitist

14
Deficit theory
  • RC is inferior, and by extension WC people have
    lesser language ability
  • BB stresses that difference is in language use,
    not language competence
  • But he often speaks of codes as having distinct
    "linguistic rule systems," and attributes to
    these codes radically different expressive
    capacities

15
Whorfian interpretation
  • Whorf language and culture reciprocally
    condition and determine each other
  • If so then the culture of RC speakers reflects
    the language
  • Logically simpler
  • Lacking in sophisticated structures
  • Unable to abstract and generalize
  • Less creative and original

16
Elitism
  • Lack of access to EC is a problem for WC children
    which must be addressed or corrected
  • The notion that the poor require a remedy in
    order to be more like their oppressors reinforces
    the myth that there really is something special
    about the educated classes, that the language
    spoken by its members is superior in some
    interesting way
  • The academically successful are not merely
    perceived as smarter or more capable. Rather, it
    implies that they really are smarter, ready to
    engage in a discourse capable of expressing
    universal meaning, eschewing the fragmentation
    and logical simplicity of the underclass

17
Final word
  • Bernstein has probably been misunderstood and his
    ideas misappropriated
  • His background and interests (Marxist, working
    class, worked as a social worker and teacher in
    WC areas) would suggest just the opposite of what
    he is accused of
  • His style is sometimes a bit woolly, and there
    are inconsistencies
  • He had (and took advantage of) many opportunities
    to explain what he meant
  • His later work was on language and education

18
Sources and references
  • B Bernstein (1966) Elaborated and Restricted
    Codes An Outline. Sociological Inquiry 36
    254-261
  • B Bernstein (1970) Social class, language and
    socialization. In PP Giglioli (ed) Language and
    social context, Harmondsworth (1972) Penguin,
    157-178
  • R Wardhaugh (1986) An introduction to
    sociolinguistics, Oxford Basil Blackwell, pages
    316-323
  • R Young (2002) Basil Bernsteins Sociolinguistic
    Theory of Language Codes. http//zimmer.csufresno.
    edu/johnca/spch100/3-3-bernstein.htm
  • http//www.doceo.co.uk/background/language_codes.h
    tm
  • http//www.putlearningfirst.com/language/research/
    bernstein.html
  • http//brj.asu.edu/articles/ar6.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com