Title: Varieties of English
1Varieties of English
- Language and social class
2Basil Bernstein
- British sociologist and linguist
- b.1924, d. 2000
- Worked as a teacher and social worker before
becoming an academic at U London Institute of
Education - Most famous for his theory on codes in speech
and language, in particular restricted vs
elaborated code, and how these relate to social
class
3Background
- Experience of teaching working-class children
- Differences in performance between working-class
and middle-class children in language-based
subjects, when performance in maths (etc) was
comparable - Access to and use of different styles of language
both limits and defines - Language used in everyday conversation both
reflects and shapes the assumptions of a certain
social group - Relationships established within the social group
affect the way that group uses language, and the
type of speech that is used - Bernstein wanted to point this out and have it
compensated for, but was misunderstood
4Codes
- Distinguished varieties of language use, called
codes - Restricted code (RC)
- speakers draw on background knowledge and shared
understanding - creates a sense of includedness, a feeling of
belonging to a certain group. - can be found among friends and families and other
intimately knit groups. - Elaborated code (EC)
- spells everything out, so that everyone can
understand it because the circumstances do not
allow the speaker to condense - used in situations where there is no prior or
shared understanding and knowledge, where more
thorough explanation is required - We are concerned here with speech rather than
written language
5Elaborated and restricted code - misconceptions
- Elaborated code does NOT mean better, more
eloquent language - Restricted code does NOT mean restricted
vocabulary, simplified grammar - The difference is about explicitness and shared
background knowledge - Use of terms elaborated and restricted
somewhat unfortunate, and lead to
misunderstandings and even vilification of
Bernstein
6Example
- a group of children were shown a strip cartoon
and asked to say what it depicted. - (based on Bernstein, 1971 p 203)
They're playing football and he kicks it and it
goes through there.It breaks the window and
they're looking at it and he comes out and
shouts at them because they've broken it.So they
run away and then she looks out and she tells
them off.
Three boys are playing football and one boy kicks
the balland it goes through the window.The ball
breaks the window and the boys are looking at it
and a man comes out and shouts at them because
they've broken the window.So they run away and
then a lady looks out of her window and she tells
the boys off.
7Differences in code
- Syntax
- more varied in EC also more formal
- more subordinate clauses in EC fewer unfinished
sentences - EC uses more logical connectives like if and
unless RC uses more simple coordinations eg and,
but - RC has short phrases interjected into the middle
or end of a thought to confirm understanding (eg
you know, I mean, right?) EC has less (or highly
disguised) padding or filler (eg elaboration and
explanation) - More originality in EC more clichés in RC
- Reference more explicit in EC, more implicit in
RC use of pronouns and deixis - Meaning is universalistic in EC,
particularistic in RC - Lexis more restricted in RC
- Its about use of rather than access to different
codes
8Consequences
- Restricted code
- appropriate for expressing shared, established
and static meanings, - draws on a store of shared meanings and
background knowledge - carries a social message of inclusion
- Some people assume BB was saying middle-classes
use EC, working-classes use RC - Actually he never said this
- Middle-class children also use RC when
appropriate - But they have greater access to EC through
socilaization - Problem is of reduced access to EC among
working-class children
9Elaborated code
- Necessary if you want to break out to say
something new, particularly something which
questions the received wisdom - Fundamental in schooling, where the introduction
of new knowledge goes beyond existing shared
meanings - So if you can't handle elaborated code, you are
not going to succeed in the educational system
10Socialization
- Reciprocal nature of language and culture
- Whorfian view that language determines (or at
least conditions) the speakers view of the world - This is the case with social structure
- A particular social structure leads to a
particular linguistic behaviour - In turn, this behaviour reinforces the social
structure
11Social-class constraints
- 5-yr-olds telling a story based on pictures
- WC children used fewer expressions of uncertainty
- MC children less good at role playing
- What is the man saying? ?
- What do you think the man might be saying? ?
- When invited to make up stories
- WC childrens stories freer, longer, more
imaginative - MC childrens stories more constrained within
strong narrative frame - form vs content
12Other studies
Several studies of how mothers talk to
children MC mothers WC
mothers
- use more abstract ideas
- point out consequences of actions rather than
just forbid or tell off - answer wh-questions with genuine explanation,
involving causes, analogies etc. - better at explaining verbally how to do something
- Encourage verbal interaction
- Use language to induce desired behavioural changes
- use more direct commands
- cite authority figures (themselves or outsiders)
to get their own way - answer wh-questions with Because it is
- more likely to explain by demonstration
- More likely to avoid answering difficult
questions - punishments less likely to be explained, and more
frequent than rewards
13Comments and criticism
- Many criticisms, perhaps through
misunderstanding - That this is a deficit theory
- Whorfian angle
- Elitist
14Deficit theory
- RC is inferior, and by extension WC people have
lesser language ability - BB stresses that difference is in language use,
not language competence - But he often speaks of codes as having distinct
"linguistic rule systems," and attributes to
these codes radically different expressive
capacities
15Whorfian interpretation
- Whorf language and culture reciprocally
condition and determine each other - If so then the culture of RC speakers reflects
the language - Logically simpler
- Lacking in sophisticated structures
- Unable to abstract and generalize
- Less creative and original
16Elitism
- Lack of access to EC is a problem for WC children
which must be addressed or corrected - The notion that the poor require a remedy in
order to be more like their oppressors reinforces
the myth that there really is something special
about the educated classes, that the language
spoken by its members is superior in some
interesting way - The academically successful are not merely
perceived as smarter or more capable. Rather, it
implies that they really are smarter, ready to
engage in a discourse capable of expressing
universal meaning, eschewing the fragmentation
and logical simplicity of the underclass
17Final word
- Bernstein has probably been misunderstood and his
ideas misappropriated - His background and interests (Marxist, working
class, worked as a social worker and teacher in
WC areas) would suggest just the opposite of what
he is accused of - His style is sometimes a bit woolly, and there
are inconsistencies - He had (and took advantage of) many opportunities
to explain what he meant - His later work was on language and education
18Sources and references
- B Bernstein (1966) Elaborated and Restricted
Codes An Outline. Sociological Inquiry 36
254-261 - B Bernstein (1970) Social class, language and
socialization. In PP Giglioli (ed) Language and
social context, Harmondsworth (1972) Penguin,
157-178 - R Wardhaugh (1986) An introduction to
sociolinguistics, Oxford Basil Blackwell, pages
316-323 - R Young (2002) Basil Bernsteins Sociolinguistic
Theory of Language Codes. http//zimmer.csufresno.
edu/johnca/spch100/3-3-bernstein.htm - http//www.doceo.co.uk/background/language_codes.h
tm - http//www.putlearningfirst.com/language/research/
bernstein.html - http//brj.asu.edu/articles/ar6.html