Title: Introduction to ESDS International
1Introduction to ESDS International
Licensing International Macro Datasets The ESDS
Experience
- Celia Russell
- Economic and Social Data Service
- MIMAS
- April 14th 2004
- University of Manchester
Celia Russell Keith Cole Economic and Social
Data Service MIMAS, University of
Manchester IASSIST 2004 University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, USA
2Structure of Talk
- The ESDS International Data Service
- The international macro data portfolio
- Negotiating data licences keys to success
- Problems and challenges
- Key achievements
3ESDS International
- Led by MIMAS at the Manchester University in
partnership with the UK Data Archive and is
funded for five years. - Provides the UK academic community with free
web-based access to a range of key international
macro databanks produced by organisations such as
the United Nations, the IMF, the OECD and the
World Bank - Helps users to locate and acquire international
micro level datasets - Promotes the use of international datasets in
research and teaching across a range of
disciplines
4ESDS International Data Portfolio
IMF Direction of Trade Statistics Balance of Payments Statistics Government Finance Statistics International Financial Statistics OECD Main Economic Indicators International Development International Direct Investment International Migration Statistics Main Science and Technology Indicators Measuring Globalisation Statistics Statistics in International Trade in Services Statistics on Value Added and Employment Social Expenditure Statistics Quarterly Labour Force Statistics UN Common Database ILO Key Indicators of the Labour Market World Bank World Development Indicators World Bank Global Development Finance Eurostat New Cronos UNIDO Industrial Statistics Databases Demand Supply Databases
5Agreements with international data providers
- During 2003, UK wide data redistribution
agreements were put in place with the following
organisations - the International Monetary Fund
- the OECD
- the United Nations
- the World Bank
- Eurostat (being signed)
- the International Labour Organisation
- What were the keys to success?
6Keys to success I
- Establishing a data acquisition budget for
international macro datasets - UK falling behind relative to US in terms of
access to international macro data - Cost of institutional licences a major barrier to
use - Phase 1 Providing continuing access to existing
portfolio of datasets available (January 2003) - Phase 2 Enhancing portfolio to extend topic
coverage (July 2003) - Employing professional negotiation agent
(Databeuro) - Established network of contacts
- Experience of working with IGOs
- Excellent negotiation skills
- Increased credibility with IGOs
- Cost effective (paid by results!)
- Minimised travel (3 deals brokered in one day at
2003 London Book Fair)
7Keys to success II
- Proven expertise in providing secure access to
commercial datasets - MIMAS a national data centre for UK HE FE (e.g.
Web of Knowledge, JSTOR) - Interfaces integrated with national access
management system (ATHENS) - Providing a clear definition of the scope and
operation of the service - Access restricted to UK Higher Further
Education sectors (reflects funding) - Data to be used for academic purposes only
- Commercial use explicitly excluded
- User required to complete an End User Licence
agreement - User registration database important for
auditing purposes
8Keys to success III
- Development of a Model Licence
- Based on an existing model licence used for the
licensing of commercial datasets for academic
purposes - Formed the basis of the agreement where an IGO
did not have a existing licence model that could
be used for a consortium purchase - Sets out the key terms and conditions of use and
obligations of the data provider - Provided scope for insertion of IGO specific
clauses - Facilitated integration of service into ESDS
registration system and national access
management system - But, required significant support of the
University of Manchester Contracts Officers
9Keys to success IV
- Enthusiasm of the IGOs
- Desire to see data being used in academic
research and teaching - Desire for greater transparency and
accountability - Considerable interest in the vision of a common
user interface - Snowball effect with other IGOs after the
signing of the agreement with the IMF
10Problems and challenges I
- Convincing IGOs that they were not going to loose
out financially by agreeing to a consortium
purchase. - Getting IGOs to agreeing to a reduced periodicity
of supply to reduce costs (e.g. twice a year
instead of monthly) - Where an IGO had a model licence (e.g. OECD) it
was necessary to get it modified to put it in
line with the other agreements - Obtaining agreement on data supply formats. Not
all IGOs (e.g. UN) had systems in place for bulk
export
11Problems and challenges II
- Minimising the risk to the University of
Manchester - Aggregate liability limited to licence fee
- Not being liable for a breach caused by an user
providing UoM has not caused the breach and takes
action against the user - Removal of legal jurisdiction clause (due scale
of punitive damages in North America). Replaced
with an arbitration procedure (UNICTRAL rules) - Impact of IGO special conditions
- Restricting number of series in a single download
(OECD) required interface modifications - Required modification to ESDS registration
system. Agreeing to special conditions an
additional one off step - The unexpected!
- Eurostat financial scandal
- Negotiations had to start again in Nov 2003
12Key achievements
- By the end of 2003 all agreements (except
Eurostat) signed including phase 2 data
acquisition - For many IGOs it is the first time they have
agreed to country wide level agreements for
current releases of their databanks. Consortium
approach now being extended to other countries
(e.g. Brazil OECD) - Consortium approach has delivered significant
savings (90 discount) and provided access to
data for a five year period. Free at the end
point of use! - Removing a key barrier to use has established a
new user community and facilitated capacity
building - 1,465 users from 129 institutions in under 12
months - 60 of users postgraduate/undergraduate students
- Users from a wide range of social science
disciplines