Title: SipuleucelT
1Sipuleucel-T BLA 125197 FDA Clinical Review and
Findings Ke Liu, MD, PhD Clinical
Reviewer Division of Clinical Evaluation,
Pharmacology and Toxicology (DCEPT), OCTGT,
CBER, FDA March 29, 2007 Cellular, Tissue and
Gene Therapies Advisory Committee Meeting
1
2Outline of Presentation
- Efficacy findings
- Study design
- Results
- Safety findings
- Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse
Events (AEs) - Cerebrovascular Accidents (CVAs) --- Sponsors
updated information
2
3Terminology of Presentation
- Study Names
- Study 1 D9901
- Study 2 D9902A
- Study agents
- Sipuleucel-T APC8015
- Placebo APC-Placebo
- APC8015F Frozen and thawed PBMC as source
material, then prepared similarly as Sipuleucel T
3
4Basis for BLA submissionOverall Survival
- Proposed Indication
- Treatment of men with asymptomatic metastatic
androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC) - Basis of claim
- D9901 a 4.5-month overall survival difference
- D9902A a 3.3-month overall survival difference
(not significant)
4
5D9901 and D9902A
- Similarly designed randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trials in men with
asymptomatic metastatic androgen independent
prostate cancer. - Primary Endpoint Time To Disease Progression
- D9901 enrolled 127 subjects, 82 in Sipuleucel-T
arm, 45 in Placebo - D9902A planned 120 subjects, but terminated
early 65 in Sipuleucel-T arm, 33 in Placebo - Study Period
- D9901, 01/00-09/04
- D9902A, 05/00-09/04
5
6Key Eligibility Criteria
- Histologically documented adenocarcinoma of the
prostate - Metastatic disease as evidenced by soft tissue
and/or bony metastases. - PSA 5 ng/mL.
- Tumor or PSA progression after hormonal therapy.
- Castrate levels of testosterone (lt50 ng/dl)
- No cancer-related pain
6
7Treatment Schema
P R O G R E S S I O N
R A N D O M I Z E 21
Sipuleucel-T Q 2 wks x 3 (N 82)
Follow-up
Asymptomatic Metastatic AIPC (N 127)
(Optional use of APC8015F Q 2 wks x 3) Follow-up
Placebo Q 2wks x 3 (N 45)
Post progression chemotherapy /- other options
allowed
7
8Treatment Regimen
- Apheresis to harvest PBMCs, 2 to 3 days
- prior to the infusion date
- Sipuleucel-T or Placebo 3 doses, q 2 wks, i.v.
- The cell counts in each individual dose varied
- depending on the apheresis yield.
- Minimum for each dose of Sipuleucel-T was
- approximately 3 X 106 CD54 cells.
- The dose for Placebo was 1/3 of the
- total cells harvested from the apheresis.
- Bisphosphonate allowed
- Continued hormonal treatment
8
9Primary Endpoint
- Time to disease progression, as defined by
time from randomization to the first observation
of disease progression - Radiological Progression (Bone Scan q 8 wks,
CT/MRI q 8 wks if baseline ) - New Cancer Related Pain (X-ray correlation
required) - Clinical Events
- Pathological Fracture, Cord or Nerve Root
Compression - Other Clinically-significant disease-specific
events
9
10Secondary Endpoints
- Overall time from randomization to the
development of disease-related pain - Overall time from randomization to earliest
evidence of clinical progression - Rate of objective response
- Duration of response
- Time to treatment failure
10
11Statistical Assumptions
- Median Time to Progression
- Based on the sponsors past experience and a
review of the literature - Placebo 16 weeks Sipuleucel-T 31 weeks
(HR 1.92) - Alpha 5 two-sided 80 power
- 21 Randomization
-
11
12D9901 Efficacy Results
12
13D9901 Patient Demographic and Baseline
Characteristics
Sipuleucel-T
Placebo (n 82)
(n 45) Median age (range) 73
yrs (4785) 71 yrs (5086) Ethnicity Caucasian
73 (89) 42 (93.3) African-American
8 (9.8) 1
(2.2) Hispanic
1 (1.2) 1 (2.2)
Unknown 0
1 (2.2) ECOG PS
0 62 (75.6) 37 (82.2)
1 20 (24.4) 8 (17.8)
13
14D9901 Patient Demographic and Baseline
Characteristics (continued)
Sipuleucel-T
Placebo (n 82)
(n 45) Gleason Score 6 n () 22
(26.8) 7 (15.6) 7
n () 28 (34.1) 18 (40) 8 n
() 32 (39) 20 (44.4) Disease
location Bone only 34 (42.0)
10 (23.8) Soft tissue only 5 (6.2)
3 (7.1) Bone and soft
tissue 42 (51.9) 29 (69) No. of bone
metastases/subject 0 5
(6.1) 4 (8.9) 1-5
31 (37.8) 17
(37.8) 6-10 12 (14.6)
12 (26.7) gt 10 34
(41.5) 12 (26.7)
14
15D9901 Primary Endpoint ---Time to Progression
- 127 subjects randomized
- 114 had progression event
- 0 deaths prior to progression event
- Progression documented by
- Imaging 97
- Clinical event 10
- Onset of disease related pain correlated with
imaging 7
15
16D9901 Time to Disease Progression
- No statistical difference by Log-rank test p
0.085, HR 1.39, 95 CI 0.95, 2.03 - Median TTP
- Sipuleucel-T 11.1 weeks (range 2.1 to 57.4)
- Placebo 9.1 weeks (range 3.9 to 52.1)
16
17Discussion --- D9901 Primary Endpoint (TTP)
Result
- After unblinding, the 1st analysis showed a log
rank p-value for time to progression 0.085 - Changed from 0.085 to 0.052
- Unblinded audit of clinical data
- Primarily driven by two subjects
17
18Discussion continued ---D9901 Primary Endpoint
(TTP) Result
- Difficulties in interpretation of TTP results
- Overestimation of TTP
- Assumption 16 weeks for placebo and 31 weeks for
Sipuleucel-T - Actual observation 9-11 weeks for both arms
- Median progression prior to scheduled second
assessment for progression - Lack of scans to detect soft tissue progressions
in some bone only subjects according to the study
design - Un-interpretable progression dates in some
subjects due to protocol violations
18
19Conclusion --- D9901 Primary Endpoint (TTP)
- FDA considers the p-value of 0.085 by log-rank
test to be the result from the primary analysis
specified in the protocol and the p-value of
0.052 to be derived from an exploratory analysis. - The study failed to show a Sipuleucel-T treatment
effect on the primary endpoint, TTP.
19
20D9901 Secondary Endpoints
- No difference observed between two arms for any
of the following - Overall time to the development of
disease-related pain - Overall time to earliest evidence of clinical
progression - Rate of objective response
- Duration of response
- Time to treatment failure
20
21D9901 Overall Survival
21
22D9901 Overall Survival
All subjects were followed for 36 months or
until death From available data
22
23Therapy After Progression D9901
- Placebo subjects cross-over to
- APC8015F 34/45 (75.6)
23
24Potential Chemotherapy Confounding Effects on
Overall Survival
- Analysis of the time from randomization to 1st
chemotherapy use did not suggest an earlier
initiation of chemotherapy in Sipuleucel-T
subjects - The dose and cycles of chemotherapy were not
collected - Potential chemotherapy confounding effects on
overall survival are unlikely, but cannot be
ruled out
24
25D9901 Efficacy Summary
- N 127, randomized 21 to Sipuleucel-T
(Sipuleucel-T) Placebo - A small sample size
- No difference between two arms in the
pre-specified efficacy endpoints - Overall Survival
- 4.5-month difference in median survival in
Sipuleucel-T arm (p 0.010, HR 1.7)
25
26CD54 Upregulation and Survival
Above the mean
Below the mean
26
27Interpretation of CD54 Results
- Intrinsic property of individual patients
- Intrinsic property of individual products
- after manufacturing process. (Placebo did not
undergo the same process as Sipuleucel-T) - Other factors?
27
28Immunological Analyses --- T cell Stimulation
Index
28
29Interpretation of Stimulation Assays
- Proliferation assay not a direct assay for T cell
response - Assays performed only in a small subset of
patients - No response to human PAP
29
30D9902A Efficacy Results
30
31Study D9902
- Same design as D9901
- Planned 120 subjects
- Time To Disease Progression
- as 10 endpoint
Terminated (3/2003) Because
of D9901 overall negative efficacy
Renamed D9902A 98 subjects already enrolled
- D9902A
- Insufficient sample size
- Not powered to see a difference
- in TTP or overall survival
31
32D9902A Patient Demographic and Baseline
Characteristics
Sipuleucel-T
Placebo (n 65)
(n 33) Median age (range) 70.0 yrs
(5184) 71.0 yrs (5787) Ethnicity Caucasian
59 (90.8) 31(93.9) African-American
2 (3.1) 2
(6.1) Hispanic
1 (1.5) 0 Other
3 (4.6)
0 ECOG PS 0 51 (78.5) 23
(69.7) 1 14 (21.5) 10
(30.3)
32
33D9902A Patient Demographic and Baseline
Characteristics (continued)
Sipuleucel-T
Placebo (n 65)
(n 33) Gleason Score 6 n () 15
(23.4) 9 (27.3) 7
n () 29 (45.3) 8 (24.2) 8 n
() 20 (31.3) 16 (48.5) Disease
location Bone only 31 (47.7)
10 (30.3) Soft tissue only 7
(10.8) 7 (21.2) Bone and soft tissue 27
(41.5) 16 (48.5) No. of bone
metastases/subject N 61
N 32 0 5 (8.2)
4 (8.9) 1-5 19
(31.1) 11 (34.4) 6-10
6 (9.8) 2 (6.3) gt
10 31 (50.8) 12
(37.5)
33
34D9902A Time to Disease Progression
- The estimated median TTP
- 10.9 weeks in the Sipuleucel-T arm (Range 3.4
to 106.6 wks) - 9.9 weeks in the APC placebo arm (Range 1.7
to 130.1 wks)
34
35D9902A Overall Survival
Median survival time (MST) Estimates
Sipuleucel-T 19.0 months (13.6, 31.9) Placebo
15.7 months (12.8, 25.4)
35
36D9902A Efficacy Summary
- N 98, randomized 21 to Sipuleucel-T Placebo
- Similar trial design and execution as D9901
- Stopped early. Insufficient sample size to detect
a difference in TTP or overall survival - No statistical difference in time to progression,
overall survival between treatment arms
36
37Safety Evaluation
- Main analyses from D9901and D9902A database
- 146 subjects received Sipuleucel-T
- 76 subjects received Placebo
- Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) events from an
updated database including other phase 3 trials,
D9902B and P-11 - Complete safety database update was submitted
last week to include a total of 461 subjects who
received Sipuleucel T and 231 subjects who
received Placebo
37
38Infusion Exposure (D9901 and D9902A)
38
39 Death (D9901 and D9902A)
Included one death from each of the following
in Sipuleucel-T arm Cardiac Arrest Dementia
Glioblastoma Met. Esophageal Ca Orthopedic
Complication Renal Failure Sepsis and ARDS
UTI one death from Small Cell Carcinoma In
Placebo
39
40SAEs ( 2, D9901 and D9902A)
Other than Death
40
41Common Adverse Events in D9901 and D9902A
gt10 in Sipuleucel T subjects Adverse
events that occurred more often in Sipuleucel-T
subjects _at_ Subjects who had at least one
leukapheresis
41
42Trials Subjects for CVA Analyses
42
43CVA Events
43
44Safety Conclusions
- Almost all Sipuleucel-T treated subjects
developed Adverse Events (98.6 Sipuleucel-T
versus 96.1 placebo). - Most AEs were grade 1 to 2 and resolved within 48
hours. - 24 Sipuleucel-T subjects developed SAEs, not
different from 23 of Placebo treated subjects. - Although the differences did not reach
statistical significance, the increased CVA
events observed in Sipuleucel-T subjects is a
potential safety signal.
44
45Conclusions --- Efficacy
- Neither study met pre-specified efficacy endpoint
- Survival analyses
- D9901 a 4.5-month overall survival difference.
Statistically significant by log-rank test - D9902A a 3.3-month overall survival difference
--- Not statistically significant
45
46Discussion --- Overall Survival in Cancer
Clinical Trials
- The most reliable cancer endpoint
- Usually the preferred endpoint when studies can
be conducted to adequately assess it. - An improvement in survival is a clinical benefit.
- The endpoint is precise and easy to measure,
documented by the date of death. Bias is not a
factor in endpoint measurement. - Demonstration of a statistically significant
improvement in overall survival has supported new
drug approvals
46
47Discussion --- Overall Survival Difference in
D9901
- 4.5 month median survival difference is
Clinically meaningful - Limitations of survival result
- Post hoc analyses
- Survival not the pre-specified endpoint
- Primary method for survival analysis not
pre-specified - One study with a small sample size
- Difference could be due to chance
47