Title: Mooremans Hardware B
1Mooremans Hardware B
- Group 8
- Jeremy Archibald
- Catherine Angel
- Jerry Bell
- Alison Moss
2Introduction
- Privately owned hardware stores
- 7 rural locations
- Central IL and IN
- Based out of centralized warehouse
3Case Background
- Mooremans lacks standardized system for returns
- 30 days
- Full Refund
- Original Box
- Cash for cash, etc.
- Returned merchandise recorded in inventory
- IBM (POS) terminals
- Exchange defective merchandise
4Company Strategy
5Company Strategy
- Overall Strategy
- To build and maintain long-term customer
relationships through quality customer service - Merchandise Return Strategy
- Create customer loyalty through a practical and
simple merchandise return system
6Merchandise Return Control Objectives
7Merchandise Return Control Objectives
- Reduce Total Amount of Returns
- Reduce Customer Loss
- Reduce fraudulent returns
- Keep track of returned inventory (POS)
8Risks Associated with Minimizing Returns
9Risks Associated with Minimizing Returns
- Merchandise may be damaged during delivery
process - Customer vandalism and accidental damage
- Customer dissatisfaction of product selection
10Controls for Reducing Amount of Returns
11Controls for Reducing Amount of Returns
- Pre-approved vendor list based on quality
- Warehouse receiver breaks shipments down into
skus and inspects quality - Inventory shipped directly to stores inspected by
store managers
12Risks Associated With Reducing Customer Loss
13Risks Associated With Reducing Customer Loss
- Angering the customer by selling inferior goods
- Confusing customers with lack of specifics in
return policy - Inconsistent return policy due to employee
discretion
14Controls for Reducing Customer Loss
15Controls for Reducing Customer Loss
- Refund the same type of payment as original sale
- i.e. cash for cash
- 30 days time period, giving customers ample
chance to return
16Risks Associated with Fraudulent Returns
17Risks Associated with Fraudulent Returns
- Customers might return items not purchased at
Mooreman locations - Shoplifters may steal items and return them
- Customers may create defect themselves and then
return them - Ex Worn out drill bit
18Controls for Reducing Fraudulent Returns
19Controls for Reducing Fraudulent Returns
- Customers must return merchandise in same box
- SKU system keeps track of sold and returned
inventory
20Risks Associated with Keeping Track of Returned
Inventory
21Risks Associated with Keeping Track of Returned
Inventory
- System crash
- Incorrect data entry
- Employee manipulation
22Controls for keeping track of returned inventory
23Controls for keeping track of returned inventory
- Password sensitive intranet
- Business management software
- POS System
24Similarities to Fashion Retailer
25Similarities to Fashion Retailer
- Both want to maintain customer relations
- Prevent fraudulent returns
- SKUS
- Updated inventory accounts
26Differences to Fashion Retail
27Differences to Fashion Retail
- Returns minimized through fitting rooms
- Fraudulent returns easier to detect with store
specific designs and marked tags - Fashion retail does not have different outside
venders - Inventory turnover rates
- i.e. seasonal fashion
28Recommendations
29Recommendations
- Receipt requirement
- In-store credit if no receipt
- Easily accessible return policy
- Return policy sign for customers
- Print return policy on receipt
- Sales staff knowledgeable of products
- Periodically check store for damaged inventory
- Cant return perishable products
- I.E. caulk, paint, oil
- Entering defect reason to keep track of problems
- Hard copy and backup drive for returns system
30FPC
31FPC
32Costs of Recommendations
33Costs of Recommendations
- Prevention
- Signs stating policy
- Printing policy on receipt
- Training employees
- Hard copy and backup drive
- Inspection
- Labors cost of periodic checks
- External Failure Costs
- Shipping products back to warehouse vendor
34Benefits
- PreventionFailure
- An ounce of prevention a pound of cure
- Our recommendations will help minimize total costs
35Questions?