The Bobo Doll experiments: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

The Bobo Doll experiments:

Description:

Implications of the Bobo Doll experiment. Research on the impact of TV: ... need no longer delude itself into thinking that it is making mental states the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:4153
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Psy102
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Bobo Doll experiments:


1
The Bobo Doll experiments
  • Banduras social modelling approach to aggression

2
Context and implications
  • Bobo doll experiment

TV and violence -Williams (1986) -Huessmann
Eron -Parke et al. 1977
  • Behaviourism
  • Theory
  • Method

Aggression -Instinct theories (Freud,
Lorenz) -Frustration-aggression hypothesis
(Dollard et al.)
3
Outline
  • Theoretical background behaviourism
  • The behaviourist approach to experimentation
  • Main theorists Pavlov, Watson, Skinner, Bandura
  • The Bobo Doll experiment
  • Evaluation
  • Implications of the Bobo Doll experiment
  • Research on the impact of TV tackling
    confounding variables

4
Behaviourism a response to Freud
  • Watson, J.B. (1913) Psychology as the
    behaviorist views it
  • (Behaviourist Manifesto)
  • Psychology failed signally, I believe, during
    the fifty-odd years of its existence as an
    experimental discipline to make its place in the
    world as an undisputed natural science....
  • The time seems to have come when psychology must
    discard all reference to consciousness when it
    need no longer delude itself into thinking that
    it is making mental states the object of
    observation.
  • I believe we can write a new psychology and
    never go back upon our definition never use the
    terms consciousness, mental states, mind,
    content, introspectively verifiable, imagery, and
    the like.
  • It can be done in terms of stimulus and response,
    in terms of habit formation, habit integrations
    and the like.
  • What we need to do is to start work upon
    psychology, making behavior, not consciousness,
    the objective point of our attack.

5
Behaviourist assumptions
  • Focus on the observable (behaviour)
  • All that cannot be observed is ignored
  • Nearly all behaviour is learned
  • Focus on experimentation rather than speculation
  • Commitment to discovery, not dogma
  • Parsimony
  • Environmental determinism tabula rasa, little
    importance attached to genes
  • Animal research can be generalized to humans

6
Evolution of behaviourism
  • Pavlov Classical conditioning
  • Unconditioned Stimulus (food) gt unconditioned
    response (dog salivates)
  • Conditioning US paired with CS (bell) gt UR
    (salivation)
  • CS (bell) gt CR (salivation)
  • Skinner Operant conditioning
  • Behaviour is not always learned on the basis of
    an unconditioned stimulus
  • Behaviour is determined by past history of
    reinforcement
  • Stimulus gt Response
  • Shaping / Chaining
  • Nothing that is learned cant be unlearned
    implication for therapy
  • Bandura Social modelling

7
Albert Bandura Social Modelling approach
  • S-O-R
  • Acquisition ? performance
  • Behaviour can be learned in absence of
    reinforcement, by means of imitating others
  • Social Modelling can account for learning complex
    behaviours such as language

8
Design of the Bobo doll experiment
  • Sample / Subjects / Participants
  • 36 boys and 36 girls, from Stanford Nursery, mean
    age 4 years 4 months
  • Independent Variable
  • Exposure to aggressive model or non-aggressive
    model
  • Dependent variable
  • Imitation / behaviour after the exposure (clearly
    operationalised)
  • Imitation of physical aggression striking
    the Bobo doll with the mallet, sitting on the
    doll and punching it in the nose, kicking the
    doll, and tossing it in the air.
  • Imitative verbal aggression Subject repeats the
    phrases, "Sock him," "Hit him down," "Kick him,"
    "Throw him in the air," or "Pow"
  • Imitative nonaggressive verbal responses Subject
    repeats, "He keeps coming back for more," or "He
    sure is a tough fella."
  • Mallet aggression Subject strikes objects other
    than the Bobo doll aggressively with the mallet.
  • Sits on Bobo doll Subject lays the Bobo doll on
    its side and sits on it, but does not aggress
    toward it.
  • Control group

9
Design of the Bobo doll experiment
Total 72 boys and girls
Aggressive condition 24
Non- aggressive condition 24
Control group 24
10
Design of the Bobo doll experiment
Control group 24 participants
11
Design of the Bobo doll experiment
  • Inter-rater reliability
  • In order to provide an estimate of interscorer
    agreement, the performance of half the subjects
    were also scored independently by second
    observer.
  • Rater blind to the condition
  • The male model scored the experimental sessions
    for all 72 children. Except for the cases in
    which he, served as the model, he did hot have
    knowledge of the subjects' group assignments.
  • Matched-pairs design
  • subjects in the experimental and control groups
    were matched individually on the basis of ratings
    of their aggressive behavior in social
    interactions in the nursery school.
  • Pretest
  • During the pretest, a number of the subjects
    imitated the essential components of the model's
    behavior but did not perform the complete act, or
    they directed the imitative aggressive response
    to some object other than the Bobo doll. Two
    responses of this type were therefore scored and
    were interpreted as partially imitative behavior.

12
Hypotheses
  • H1.Subjects exposed to aggressive models would
    reproduce aggressive acts resembling those of
    their models and would differ in this respect
    both from subjects who served nonaggressive
    models and from those who had no prior exposure
    to any models.
  • H2. It was further predicted that observation of
    subdued nonaggressive models would have
    generalized inhibiting effect on the subjects'
    subsequent behavior, and this effect would be
    reflected in a difference between the
    nonaggressive and the control groups, with
    subjects in the latter group displaying
    significantly more aggression.
  • H3. One would expect, on this basis, subjects to
    imitate the behavior of a same-sex model to a
    greater degree than a model of the opposite sex.
  • H4. Since aggression, however, is a highly
    masculine-typed behavior, boys should be more
    predisposed than girls toward imitating
    aggression, the difference being most marked for
    subjects exposed to the male aggressive model.

13
Results
  • Scores of children in the aggressive condition
    were significantly higher than those of either
    the non-aggressive or control groups.
  • Significance level
  • H1 supported or rejected?

14
(No Transcript)
15
Conclusions
  • Aggression is a learned behaviour, not an
    in-built instinct
  • Learning can take place in absence of any
    reinforcement, only via observation and modelling
  • Modelling is a powerful and fast way of learning
  • Implications for parents, teachers,
    psychotherapists (treatment of phobias)

16
Banduras further research
  • Bandura, Ross Ross (1963) children watched
    films with either an aggressive or non-aggressive
    model
  • Filmed model produced even more aggression than
    live model
  • Model rewarded or punished for aggression
  • Children imitated the rewarded aggresive model
    the most
  • Banduras research as the first generation of
    scientific research on the effects of media
    violence on children

http//www.topics-mag.com/edition02/images/tv_kids
yuki.jpeg
17
Implications of Banduras research
  • January 15, 2007
  • Saddam Video Is Blamed for Deaths of More
    Children, by Tom Zeller Jr
  • According to the American Psychological
    Association, theres no question that a daily
    diet of violent media becomes part of the
    psycho-social mix in an individual. This is based
    largely on the work of psychologist Albert
    Bandura, who highlighted the important role
    social modeling and observational learning plays
    in human motivation and action. (Before that,
    psychologists had largely focused on a sort of
    Pavlovian model of learning, based on actions and
    consequences.)
  • Dr. Banduras classic Bodo Doll Experiment , in
    which children who were shown film of an adult
    aggressively beating an inflatable doll were more
    likely to imitate and repeat that behavior when
    exposed to a Bobo Doll themselves, is often cited
    in describing the power of violence in the media.
  • Of course, the science isnt exactly settled on
    all this. An essay at the Museum of Broadcast
    Communications, while acknowledging the
    groundbreaking work of Dr. Bandura, and the
    complex relationship between mind and media,
    suggests even among researchers who are
    convinced of a causal link between television and
    violence, explanations of when and why this
    occurs are varied.

18
Implications of Banduras research
  • What do the Bobo doll studies really tell us
    about the effects of TV on children?
  • Films used in the study differ markedly from real
    movies (no plot, no causal justification for the
    models behaviour, which is quite bizzare)
  • Participants in an experiment know they are
    expected to play a particular role Look, Mummy,
    this is the doll we have to hit (Nobel, 1975)
  • Does not test long-term effects
  • Aggresion towards an inanimate toy only, not a
    living being
  • What else can you do with the Bobo doll?
  • Children in the experiment are not punished for
    their behaviour
  • Problems with ecological validity and hence
    generalization
  • Led to phase 2 research on the effects of media
    violence

19
Research on effects of media exposure on children
  • There has been a tremendous amount of research on
    the effects of media violence on children and
    adolescents over the past 40 years.
  • Yet theorists still do not agree on this. Why?
  • September 17, 2000
  • Hollow Claims about Fantasy Violence by Richard
    Rhodes
  • Is there really a link between entertainment
    and violent behavior?
  • The American Medical Association, the American
    Psychological Association, the American Academy
    of Pediatrics and the National Institute of
    Mental Health all say yes. They base their claims
    on social science research that has been sharply
    criticized and disputed within the social science
    profession, especially outside the United States.
    In fact, no direct, causal link between exposure
    to mock violence in the media and subsequent
    violent behavior has ever been demonstrated, and
    the few claims of modest correlation have been
    contradicted by other findings, sometimes in the
    same studies.

20
Research on effects of media exposure on children
  • Brainstorming What effects would you like to
    test?
  • Formulate hypothesis
  • How would you test this hypothesis?
  • Who would be your participants?
  • How would you define your independent variable?
  • How would you define and measure your dependent
    variable?
  • How would you test long-term effects?
  • Would it be a laboratory experiment or a field
    (real life) study?
  • How would you establish a causal relationship?

21
Research on effects of media exposure problems
  • Correlational studies do not establish causation
  • The importance of other variables difficult to
    assess
  • Weaknesses of laboratory experiments
  • Difficulties with field experiments
  • Difficulties with defining and measuring
    aggression reliably
  • Studies use different measures, difficult to
    compare
  • Little known about the mechanism
  • Even if media violence can cause aggression, how
    do you reduce the violence?

22
Readings
  • Key reading
  • Bandura, Ross Ross (1961). Transmission of
    aggression through imitation of aggressive
    models. Journal of Abnormal and Social
    Psychology, 63, 575-582
  • To view vide footage from the experiment, go to
    http//www.youtube.com/watch?vpDtBz_1dkuk

23
Readings
  • Additional reading
  • Watson, J.B. (1913). Psychology as the
    behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20,
    158-177. Available at http//psychclassics.yorku.
    ca/Watson/views.htm
  • Murray, J.P. (1994). Impact of televised
    Violence. Hofstra Law Review, 22(4), 809-825.
    Available at http//www.johnmurray.org/murray_a.h
    tm
  • Anderson, et al. (2003). The influence of media
    violence on youth. Psychological Science in the
    Public Interest, 4(3), 81-110.
  • Freedman, J.L. (2001) Evaluating the Research on
    Violent Video Games. Paper devlivered at Playing
    By the Rules The cultural policy challenges of
    video games. University of Chicago. (Available
    online at http//culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/conf
    2001/papers/freedman.html
  • Zeller, T. Jr (September 15 2007). Saddams Video
    is Blamed for Deaths of More Children. New York
    Times. Available at http//thelede.blogs.nytimes.
    com/2007/01/15/saddam-video-is-blamed-for-deaths-o
    f-more-children/
  • Rhodes, R. (September 17, 2000). Hollow claims
    about fantasy fiolence. New York Times, Section
    4, p 19. Available at http//query.nytimes.com/gs
    t/fullpage.html?res9F02EFD81138F934A2575AC0A9669C
    8B63nTop/Reference/Times20Topics/Organizations/
    A/American20Academy20of20Pediatrics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com