Title: The Bobo Doll experiments:
1The Bobo Doll experiments
- Banduras social modelling approach to aggression
2Context and implications
TV and violence -Williams (1986) -Huessmann
Eron -Parke et al. 1977
- Behaviourism
- Theory
- Method
Aggression -Instinct theories (Freud,
Lorenz) -Frustration-aggression hypothesis
(Dollard et al.)
3Outline
- Theoretical background behaviourism
- The behaviourist approach to experimentation
- Main theorists Pavlov, Watson, Skinner, Bandura
- The Bobo Doll experiment
- Evaluation
- Implications of the Bobo Doll experiment
- Research on the impact of TV tackling
confounding variables
4Behaviourism a response to Freud
- Watson, J.B. (1913) Psychology as the
behaviorist views it - (Behaviourist Manifesto)
- Psychology failed signally, I believe, during
the fifty-odd years of its existence as an
experimental discipline to make its place in the
world as an undisputed natural science.... - The time seems to have come when psychology must
discard all reference to consciousness when it
need no longer delude itself into thinking that
it is making mental states the object of
observation. - I believe we can write a new psychology and
never go back upon our definition never use the
terms consciousness, mental states, mind,
content, introspectively verifiable, imagery, and
the like. - It can be done in terms of stimulus and response,
in terms of habit formation, habit integrations
and the like. - What we need to do is to start work upon
psychology, making behavior, not consciousness,
the objective point of our attack.
5Behaviourist assumptions
- Focus on the observable (behaviour)
- All that cannot be observed is ignored
- Nearly all behaviour is learned
- Focus on experimentation rather than speculation
- Commitment to discovery, not dogma
- Parsimony
- Environmental determinism tabula rasa, little
importance attached to genes - Animal research can be generalized to humans
6Evolution of behaviourism
- Pavlov Classical conditioning
- Unconditioned Stimulus (food) gt unconditioned
response (dog salivates) - Conditioning US paired with CS (bell) gt UR
(salivation) - CS (bell) gt CR (salivation)
- Skinner Operant conditioning
- Behaviour is not always learned on the basis of
an unconditioned stimulus - Behaviour is determined by past history of
reinforcement - Stimulus gt Response
- Shaping / Chaining
- Nothing that is learned cant be unlearned
implication for therapy - Bandura Social modelling
-
7Albert Bandura Social Modelling approach
- S-O-R
- Acquisition ? performance
- Behaviour can be learned in absence of
reinforcement, by means of imitating others - Social Modelling can account for learning complex
behaviours such as language
8Design of the Bobo doll experiment
- Sample / Subjects / Participants
- 36 boys and 36 girls, from Stanford Nursery, mean
age 4 years 4 months - Independent Variable
- Exposure to aggressive model or non-aggressive
model - Dependent variable
- Imitation / behaviour after the exposure (clearly
operationalised) - Imitation of physical aggression striking
the Bobo doll with the mallet, sitting on the
doll and punching it in the nose, kicking the
doll, and tossing it in the air. - Imitative verbal aggression Subject repeats the
phrases, "Sock him," "Hit him down," "Kick him,"
"Throw him in the air," or "Pow" - Imitative nonaggressive verbal responses Subject
repeats, "He keeps coming back for more," or "He
sure is a tough fella." - Mallet aggression Subject strikes objects other
than the Bobo doll aggressively with the mallet. - Sits on Bobo doll Subject lays the Bobo doll on
its side and sits on it, but does not aggress
toward it. -
- Control group
9Design of the Bobo doll experiment
Total 72 boys and girls
Aggressive condition 24
Non- aggressive condition 24
Control group 24
10Design of the Bobo doll experiment
Control group 24 participants
11Design of the Bobo doll experiment
- Inter-rater reliability
- In order to provide an estimate of interscorer
agreement, the performance of half the subjects
were also scored independently by second
observer. - Rater blind to the condition
- The male model scored the experimental sessions
for all 72 children. Except for the cases in
which he, served as the model, he did hot have
knowledge of the subjects' group assignments. - Matched-pairs design
- subjects in the experimental and control groups
were matched individually on the basis of ratings
of their aggressive behavior in social
interactions in the nursery school. - Pretest
- During the pretest, a number of the subjects
imitated the essential components of the model's
behavior but did not perform the complete act, or
they directed the imitative aggressive response
to some object other than the Bobo doll. Two
responses of this type were therefore scored and
were interpreted as partially imitative behavior.
12Hypotheses
- H1.Subjects exposed to aggressive models would
reproduce aggressive acts resembling those of
their models and would differ in this respect
both from subjects who served nonaggressive
models and from those who had no prior exposure
to any models. - H2. It was further predicted that observation of
subdued nonaggressive models would have
generalized inhibiting effect on the subjects'
subsequent behavior, and this effect would be
reflected in a difference between the
nonaggressive and the control groups, with
subjects in the latter group displaying
significantly more aggression. - H3. One would expect, on this basis, subjects to
imitate the behavior of a same-sex model to a
greater degree than a model of the opposite sex. - H4. Since aggression, however, is a highly
masculine-typed behavior, boys should be more
predisposed than girls toward imitating
aggression, the difference being most marked for
subjects exposed to the male aggressive model.
13Results
- Scores of children in the aggressive condition
were significantly higher than those of either
the non-aggressive or control groups. - Significance level
- H1 supported or rejected?
14(No Transcript)
15Conclusions
- Aggression is a learned behaviour, not an
in-built instinct - Learning can take place in absence of any
reinforcement, only via observation and modelling - Modelling is a powerful and fast way of learning
- Implications for parents, teachers,
psychotherapists (treatment of phobias)
16Banduras further research
- Bandura, Ross Ross (1963) children watched
films with either an aggressive or non-aggressive
model - Filmed model produced even more aggression than
live model - Model rewarded or punished for aggression
- Children imitated the rewarded aggresive model
the most - Banduras research as the first generation of
scientific research on the effects of media
violence on children
http//www.topics-mag.com/edition02/images/tv_kids
yuki.jpeg
17Implications of Banduras research
- January 15, 2007
- Saddam Video Is Blamed for Deaths of More
Children, by Tom Zeller Jr - According to the American Psychological
Association, theres no question that a daily
diet of violent media becomes part of the
psycho-social mix in an individual. This is based
largely on the work of psychologist Albert
Bandura, who highlighted the important role
social modeling and observational learning plays
in human motivation and action. (Before that,
psychologists had largely focused on a sort of
Pavlovian model of learning, based on actions and
consequences.) - Dr. Banduras classic Bodo Doll Experiment , in
which children who were shown film of an adult
aggressively beating an inflatable doll were more
likely to imitate and repeat that behavior when
exposed to a Bobo Doll themselves, is often cited
in describing the power of violence in the media.
- Of course, the science isnt exactly settled on
all this. An essay at the Museum of Broadcast
Communications, while acknowledging the
groundbreaking work of Dr. Bandura, and the
complex relationship between mind and media,
suggests even among researchers who are
convinced of a causal link between television and
violence, explanations of when and why this
occurs are varied.
18Implications of Banduras research
- What do the Bobo doll studies really tell us
about the effects of TV on children? - Films used in the study differ markedly from real
movies (no plot, no causal justification for the
models behaviour, which is quite bizzare) - Participants in an experiment know they are
expected to play a particular role Look, Mummy,
this is the doll we have to hit (Nobel, 1975) - Does not test long-term effects
- Aggresion towards an inanimate toy only, not a
living being - What else can you do with the Bobo doll?
- Children in the experiment are not punished for
their behaviour - Problems with ecological validity and hence
generalization - Led to phase 2 research on the effects of media
violence
19Research on effects of media exposure on children
- There has been a tremendous amount of research on
the effects of media violence on children and
adolescents over the past 40 years. - Yet theorists still do not agree on this. Why?
- September 17, 2000
- Hollow Claims about Fantasy Violence by Richard
Rhodes - Is there really a link between entertainment
and violent behavior? - The American Medical Association, the American
Psychological Association, the American Academy
of Pediatrics and the National Institute of
Mental Health all say yes. They base their claims
on social science research that has been sharply
criticized and disputed within the social science
profession, especially outside the United States.
In fact, no direct, causal link between exposure
to mock violence in the media and subsequent
violent behavior has ever been demonstrated, and
the few claims of modest correlation have been
contradicted by other findings, sometimes in the
same studies.
20Research on effects of media exposure on children
- Brainstorming What effects would you like to
test? - Formulate hypothesis
- How would you test this hypothesis?
- Who would be your participants?
- How would you define your independent variable?
- How would you define and measure your dependent
variable? - How would you test long-term effects?
- Would it be a laboratory experiment or a field
(real life) study? - How would you establish a causal relationship?
21Research on effects of media exposure problems
- Correlational studies do not establish causation
- The importance of other variables difficult to
assess - Weaknesses of laboratory experiments
- Difficulties with field experiments
- Difficulties with defining and measuring
aggression reliably - Studies use different measures, difficult to
compare - Little known about the mechanism
- Even if media violence can cause aggression, how
do you reduce the violence?
22Readings
- Key reading
- Bandura, Ross Ross (1961). Transmission of
aggression through imitation of aggressive
models. Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 63, 575-582 - To view vide footage from the experiment, go to
http//www.youtube.com/watch?vpDtBz_1dkuk
23Readings
- Additional reading
- Watson, J.B. (1913). Psychology as the
behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20,
158-177. Available at http//psychclassics.yorku.
ca/Watson/views.htm - Murray, J.P. (1994). Impact of televised
Violence. Hofstra Law Review, 22(4), 809-825.
Available at http//www.johnmurray.org/murray_a.h
tm - Anderson, et al. (2003). The influence of media
violence on youth. Psychological Science in the
Public Interest, 4(3), 81-110. - Freedman, J.L. (2001) Evaluating the Research on
Violent Video Games. Paper devlivered at Playing
By the Rules The cultural policy challenges of
video games. University of Chicago. (Available
online at http//culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/conf
2001/papers/freedman.html - Zeller, T. Jr (September 15 2007). Saddams Video
is Blamed for Deaths of More Children. New York
Times. Available at http//thelede.blogs.nytimes.
com/2007/01/15/saddam-video-is-blamed-for-deaths-o
f-more-children/ - Rhodes, R. (September 17, 2000). Hollow claims
about fantasy fiolence. New York Times, Section
4, p 19. Available at http//query.nytimes.com/gs
t/fullpage.html?res9F02EFD81138F934A2575AC0A9669C
8B63nTop/Reference/Times20Topics/Organizations/
A/American20Academy20of20Pediatrics