PostDarwinian Facts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

PostDarwinian Facts

Description:

DNA similarity implies a common source of this DNA common ancestry. ... patterns are caused by common ancestry (and evolution), then they should be the SAME ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Compu2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PostDarwinian Facts


1
Post-Darwinian Facts I. Physics II.
Geology/Paleontology III. Genetics
2
III. Genetics obviously, the most direct way to
test hypotheses of biological relatedness is to
compare DNA.
3
III. Genetics obviously, the most direct way to
test hypotheses of biological relatedness is to
compare DNA. - DNA comes ONLY from ancestors,
and we now how it is replicated and passed to
offspring.
4
III. Genetics obviously, the most direct way to
test hypotheses of biological relatedness is to
compare DNA. - DNA comes ONLY from ancestors,
and we now how it is replicated and passed to
offspring. - DNA similarity implies a common
source of this DNA common ancestry. - within
a species paternity tests
5
III. Genetics obviously, the most direct way to
test hypotheses of biological relatedness is to
compare DNA. - DNA comes ONLY from ancestors,
and we now how it is replicated and passed to
offspring. - DNA similarity implies a common
source of this DNA common ancestry. - within
a species paternity tests - Patterns between
species? 1. GROSS CHROMOSOMAL SIMILARITIES
6
(No Transcript)
7
2. SEQUENCE ANALYSES - Human and chimp DNA is
98.4 similar in nitrogenous base sequence.
8
2. SEQUENCE ANALYSES - Human and chimp DNA is
98.4 similar in nitrogenous base sequence. -
well, we are similar (mammals, primates, etc.)
So, to be similar, dont we need similar recipes?
9
2. SEQUENCE ANALYSES - Human and chimp DNA is
98.4 similar in nitrogenous base sequence. -
well, we are similar (mammals, primates, etc.)
So, to be similar, dont we need similar
recipes? - But, only 10 of the genome is a
recipe. Even the 90 that does not code for
protein, that is random sequence, still shows
this similarity. Even non-functional DNA is
similar, so functional similarity (ie., ANALOGY)
cant be the answerthe similarity is HOMOLOGOUS.
10
3. Corroborating Independent Tests of Evolution
- We build family trees with paleontology
11
3. Corroborating Independent Tests of Evolution
- We build family trees with paleontology - We
build family trees with genetic similarity.
12
3. Corroborating Independent Tests of Evolution
- We build family trees with paleontology - We
build family trees with genetic similarity. If
both these patterns are caused by common ancestry
(and evolution), then they should be the SAME
pattern.
13
3. Corroborating Independent Tests of Evolution
Testing Evolutionary Theory (yet again) IF
species are descended from common ancestors (like
people in a family), and IF we know the rate of
genetic change (mutation), THEN we should be
able to compare genetic similarity and predict
where in the fossil record common ancestors
should be.
14
3. Corroborating Independent Tests of Evolution
15
3. Corroborating Independent Tests of Evolution
16
3. Corroborating Independent Tests of Evolution
17
4. Conclusions - We can compare the DNA in
existing species and predict where, in the
sedimentary layers of the Earths crust, a third
DIFFERENT species should be. - No explanation
other than evolution predicts and explains this
ability. Evolution by Common Descent is a tested
theory.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com