Separation of Powers in Administrative Law - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Separation of Powers in Administrative Law

Description:

Concurrent resolution ('be it resolved') --both houses vote, present to ... One house veto (either house pass a resolution of disapproval), no presentment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1191
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: boy8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Separation of Powers in Administrative Law


1
Separation of Powers in Administrative Law
  • Delegation and Oversight

2
Two views of separation of powers Separate
Spheres
Legislative
Executive
Categorize function Minimize overlap Formalist
interpretation
Judicial
3
Two views of separation of powers overlapping
powers
Legislative
Executive
Functions overlapdeal with it Protect core
functions Functionalist interpretation
Judicial
4
Which approach produces more checks and balances,
accountability?
5
Delegating legislative power
  • Legislature hands over power to Executive
  • Moral hazard (blaming the other branch)
  • Undermines judicial review
  • Risk that Executive may be captured or get
    sloppy

6
Private delegations and the contracting-out
state
  • Hoovers Associational State
  • Great Depressions Blue Eagle codes
  • Advisory committees
  • Professional self-regulation (Medicare PROs,
    occupational licensing)
  • Welfare state
  • Privatized prisons

7
The dark side of nondelegation
  • Wipes out a regulatory program that may be
    necessary (can a political consensus be generated
    again?)
  • May cut a broad swath through other regulatory
    programs (copycat legislation)
  • Gives courts a roving commission to zap
    legislation

8
How much is too much?
  • Brig Aurora named contingency
  • Naming contingencies is discretionary
  • Rulemaking not an if-then situation
  • JW Hampton intelligible principle
  • Is be fair or be safe really intelligible?
  • Procedures rather than standards
  • How effective are procedures without standards?

9
  • Mistretta is it impossible to tell whether the
    will of Congress is being obeyed
  • Is it ever impossible to say that some
    hypothesized action is not beyond the scope of
    the delegation?
  • Lockout/Tagout, Benzene, Cotton Dust agency or
    court interpret statute to create a standard (but
    cf. American Trucking)

10
Having a vague, rarely used nondelegation
doctrine as a club in the closet may be the
best we can do, for now.
11
Delegations of Judicial Power
  • Crowell v. Benson, Schor v. CFTC can you take
    adjudicative decisions wholly out of Article III
    courts?
  • Private common-law rights the most concern
  • Core functions, functionalist approach
  • Problems may grow with popularity of ADR

12
Levels of oversight
  • Constituent Problem
  • Buck slip/forwarded e-mail
  • Phone call
  • Formal inquiry
  • Oversight hearing
  • Systemic Problem
  • Oversight hearing
  • Appropriations hearing
  • Appropriations Rider
  • Legislative amendment

13
Legislative Oversight and the One-House Veto
14
How Congress acts
  • Legislation (be it enacted)both houses vote,
    present to President for signature or veto
  • Concurrent resolution (be it resolved)
    --both houses vote, present to President for
    signature or veto
  • Joint resolution (be it resolved)both houses
    vote, no presentment
  • One house veto (either house pass a resolution of
    disapproval), no presentment

15
Life after Chadha
  • One-house vetoes are clearly unconstitutional,
    and most probably so are two-house vetoes without
    presentment
  • Report and wait with an option to override
    legislatively is still viable
  • Corrections Day and appropriations riders are
    common legislative tools
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com