Title: Presentation on MPL to ATAC Nov 05
1Ist European Congresson Training for Pilots
Barcelona, 5-7 March 2008 ICAO status on Pilot
licences andTraining Programmes Henry
Defalque Technical Officer, Flight Safety ICAO
2Plan of the presentation
- A few words on ICAO Objectives Role
- Status of ICAO pilot licensing provisions
- Recent developments and upgrade
- Annex 1 update
- PANS-TRG and guidance material
- Planned future work
- Upcoming challenges
- Conclusion
3A few words on ICAO
- Part of the UN System but independent
- Created in December 1944 by the Convention on
International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention) - Membership 190 States
4A few words on ICAO
- Objectives (preamble to the Convention)
- To promote cooperation between nations and people
- To agree on certain principles and arrangements
in order that international civil aviation may be
developed in a safe and orderly manner and that
international air services may be established on
the basis of equality of opportunity and operated
soundly and economically
5A few words on ICAO
- Role of ICAO
- Limited in the Air Transport field
- Facilitation
- Essential in the Air Navigation field
- Personnel, Operations, Maintenance, Airport,
Communication, Air Traffic Management,
Meteorology, Aeronautical Information, Accident
Investigation, etc - Security
6 ICAO SARPs
Non-compliant States must file a difference!
- Standard
- Doc 8143 specification must be such that its
uniform application by all Contracting States is
necessary in the interest of safety or regularity
of international civil aviation. - Recommended Practice
- Doc 8143 application by all Contracting States
is desirable, but not essential in the interests
of safety, regularity or efficiency of
international civil aviation.
SARPs are adopted by the ICAO Council and form
the core of the ICAO Annexes
7Annex 1
- Compliance with Annex 1 prerequisite for
international recognitionof licenses! - Without recognition,no international
airtransport as we know it
8The need for change
- The Annex 1 format was relatively unchanged since
adoption of 1st edition in 1948 - Training curricula did not take into account the
modern training technologies and methodologies - Standards were, in some instances, an obstacle to
industry best practices - No explicit performance criteria
- No requirements on criteria for the approval of
training - Majority of national regulations follow a similar
pattern - The need for change was expressed during a
meeting with States and industry in October 2000
in Madrid
9The need for change
- The ICAO Air Navigation Commission agreed in
October 2001 to establish a panel of experts to
review the situation and make recommendations,
the Flight Crew Licensing and Training Panel
(FCLTP). - Its mandate was to
- Review the flight crew licensing and training
Standards
10The need for change
- Mandate (contd)
- Develop provisions on the approval of training
organizations, including the quality system
needed to ensure that training objectives are
maintained - Determine whether competency based Standards
should replace and/or complement existing
requirements - Review the structure of licences and ratings
- Assess the use of synthetic devices (e.g. flight
simulators) and determine the level of credits to
be awarded for the use of such device
11FCLTP Results
- The Panel work took place between October 2002
and February 2005 - All Panel recommendations were unanimous
- The proposal of the Panel included an update for
all flight crew licences, an increase to 65 years
for PIC and Standards for approval of flight crew
training organization - Provisions for the approval of flight crew
training organisations - New pilot licence Multi-crew Pilot Licence (MPL)
12 MPL Main features
- MPL focuses on ab initio airline pilot
- Competency-based training assessment
- Approved training programme in a multi-crew
environment, based on modern instructional
systems design methodology - Greater emphasis on flight simulation training
devices - Additional to existing requirements (No State
becoming non-compliant if not adopted) - Medical Standards/Theory knowledge as for ATPL
- Bridging provisions to the privileges for single
pilot ops
13(No Transcript)
14Implementing the MPL
- The tyranny of Article 33 of the Chicago
Convention - No possibility of a proofing for the concept
before adopting the Standards - In view of this, the ANC required
- A complete risk assessment before the adoption of
the MPL - The development of implementation guidelines,
discussed later - A close oversight by ICAO and States of the
implementation of MPL programmes, discussed later - MPL is not a cheaper alternative to pilot
training nor a response to pilot shortage, but
enable more focused training. - Adoption by the ICAO Council on 10 March 2006,
for applicability on 23 November 2006
15 PANS-TRG
- Procedures for Air Navigation Services (PANS)
- operating practices as well as material
considered too detailed for SARPs thatamplify
the basic principles in the corresponding SARPs - PANS do not have the same status as the Standards
and Recommended Practices. PANS are approved by
the Council and recommended to Contracting States
for worldwide application.
16 PANS-TRG - Content
- Competency-based training and assessment
- MPL specific details
- Training scheme
- Competency units and elements
- Performance criteria
- Competencies of the instructor, examiner,
inspector, course developper
17 Guidance material
- Guidance material (Attachments to Annex 1 and
PANS-TRG and a Manual) - Manual on the Approval of Flight Crew Training
Organizations (Doc. 9841) - Technical manuals provide guidance and
information in amplification of the provisions of
Annexes and PANS, and are intended to facilitate
uniform application of these documents.
18MPL Implementation oversight
Requested by State Letter
- MPL programmes oversight by States
- ICAO data collection on MPL programmes
- State MPL regulations and oversight
- Approved MPL training programmes data
- Individual MPL graduate data
- Individual MPL holder initial operational
training and line-check data - Ensure corrective actionis taken if necessary
19Doc.9625 update
- Annex 1 high level requirements for Flight
Simulation Training Devices for each MPL phase of
training - ??? - Update of Doc.9625, the Manual of Criteria for
the Qualification of Flight Simulators, driven by
the RAeS - Existing manual apply only to aeroplane level D
FSTD 75 pages - Definition of simulation fidelity characteristics
required for each training task for all pilot
licenses aeroplane - Definition of 7 standard levels of FSTD
- Inclusion of ATC Environment simulation
- tailoring of FSTD to a specific training task,
outside the 7 standard levels is possible - Draft available by fourth quarter 2008 300
pages - Will be extended to helicopter in 2009
NEW
20Other work
- Extending scope of the Manual on the Approval of
Flight Crew Training Organizations, to other
types of ATOs - Requirement for SMS in ATO from November 2009,
for those ATOs exposed to operational safety
risks - MPL worldwide meeting in 2009/2010, organized by
ICAO
21Upcoming Challenges
- Pilot Shortage need to train 18,000 to 19,000
pilots/year for the next 20 years. - Language proficiency
- All pilots and Air Traffic Controllers must
demonstrate competency in the language(s) used
for radio telephony communications by 5 March
2008. - If not demonstrated Article 39 b) requires an
endorsement on the licence, and Article 40
requires permission from all States whose
territory is entered - Assembly Resolution A36-11 urges Contracting
States to waive the permission requirement, for a
period of 3 years if the State of issuance makes
public its implementation plan
22Training Capacity Shortage (Airbus)
23Ist European Congresson Training for Pilots
Barcelona, 5-7 March 2008 Conclusion Thank
you
24Integrated TEM principles
- CBT
- E-learning
- Part Task Trainer
- Classroom