Symposium LEADERSHIP, LEARNING AND INCLUSION: exploring innovative approaches to school improvement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Symposium LEADERSHIP, LEARNING AND INCLUSION: exploring innovative approaches to school improvement

Description:

Judy Durrant, Alison Ekins, Peter Grimes, Robin Precey. Department for Professional Development ... Peter Grimes and Alison Ekins. Inclusion in Action: A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:173
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: rp991
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Symposium LEADERSHIP, LEARNING AND INCLUSION: exploring innovative approaches to school improvement


1
SymposiumLEADERSHIP, LEARNING AND
INCLUSIONexploring innovative approaches to
school improvement
  • Judy Durrant, Alison Ekins, Peter Grimes, Robin
    Precey
  • Department for Professional Development

2
Our work
research
teaching
schools Local Authorities (districts)
consultancy
3
Exploring links between
LEADERSHIP
LEARNING
INCLUSION
4
Structure of the symposium
  • Welcome and introductions
  • Exploring key themes and perspectives
  • Papers
  • Discussion and summary

5
What knowledge and understanding do we bring?
6
Leadership for inclusion a whole school
approach Peter Grimes and Alison Ekins

7
Inclusion in Action
  • A dynamic model of whole school development.
  • See p8 of paper.

8
Inclusion in Action
  • The model draws together 3 broad educational
    fields
  • Inclusion
  • Self Evaluation
  • School Development
  • These then link in with systems and processes at
    a whole school level- aimed at analysing and
    understanding the particular learning needs of
    individuals and cohorts.

9
The Three Stages of Inclusive School Development
  • Our work with hundreds of schools has
    demonstrated that schools can be at a different
    stage of inclusive school development.
  • Our paper provides case studies of schools at
    each of the stages.

10
Stage 1
  • p13
  • Self Evaluation Target setting
  • Headteacher SENCO
  • September Sept/ Jan/ April

11
Stage 2
  • P16
  • A whole school improvement cycle.
  • Moving whole school development forward in a more
    engaging and proactive way.
  • Engaging staff
  • Considering monitoring and evaluation

12
Stage 3
  • P18 INCLUSION IN ACTION
  • Interlinking the fields of Inclusion, School
    Development and Self Evaluation simultaneously in
    a dynamic way.
  • Formulation of shared values and vision, through
    meaningful self evaluation.
  • Reflection and sharing translated into concrete
    action which supports all pupils.
  • Ensuring that whole school systems are embedded
    and meaningful.

13
  • Leadership for Inclusion Developing Inclusive
    Leaders
  • Dr Robin Precey

14
A VIEW ON THE EDUCATION LEADERSHIP CONTEXT IN
ENGLAND
  • Limitations of current approach
  • Need to broaden our approach
  • Our structures and systems promote exclusivity
  • Leaders can have impact
  • Need for transformational leaders

15
Transactional learning
Transformational
learning
Adapted from John West-Burnham (2005)
16
Transformation Leadership Development (adapted
from Greenan Dieckmann (2004)
Unique course structure that meets the needs of
learners (community, meaning, criticality,
democratic informality, flexible)
Praxis Application of theory/concepts/models to
practice and vice versa
Awakenings Challenge light bulb moments,
sense-making
Identity As a person and as a professional
Agency Ideas into action
17
Erasmus Intensive Programme
  • Aims
  • To widen and deepen participants understanding
    and expertise with respect to the opportunities
    and challenges relating to leadership of
    inclusive education within an increasingly
    diverse European community
  • To encourage international links that foster
    innovative approaches to the professional
    development of school leaders

18
Erasmus IP
  • Aims (contd)
  • To encourage the formation of strong
    collaborative teams that will focus on conducting
    research on key areas of inclusive education
  • For participants to disseminate and refine
    insights gained on the Programme through the
    practice they lead in schools and elsewhere

19
Erasmus IP
  • Aims (contd)
  • To produce a range of collaborative publications
    based on research and the shared debate on the
    key issues identified
  • To do so within a programme that is itself
    inclusive (planning, teaching, learning,
    evaluation)
  • To enable participants to gain Masters level
    accreditation focussed on the 2 week IP

20
......and so we want to
  • To create an intensive, enjoyable, challenging
    programme that increases and deepens your
    knowledge, understanding and skills as a critical
    reflective practioner and researcher with regard
    to leading and managing inclusive education
  • To enable the you to return to your country with
    confidence and moral courage to be an agent of
    change to improve the quality of learning,
    teaching and inclusion within your own settings

21
ModellingContent what issues/ideas we pay
attention toProcess- what behaviours we choose
to display and value
22
Developing inclusive schools - a complex,
cumulative process
professional development programme
Leaders behaviours
community behaviours
inclusion
teachers behaviours
student behaviours
23
Programme themes
  • Leading Inclusive Learning
  • National Perspectives on Inclusion (Special
    Education Needs)
  • Leading and Managing Change for Inclusion
  • Sharing Leadership for Inclusion
  • Democratic Schools and Citizenship
  • Impact Accountability for Inclusion

24
Transformation Leadership Development (adapted
from Greenan Dieckmann (2004)
A) Unique course structure that meets the needs
of learners (1 community, 2 meaning, 3
criticality, 4 democratic informality, 5 flexible)
C) Praxis Application of theory/concepts/models
to practice and vice versa
B) Awakenings 1 Challenge 2 Confirmation light
bulb moments, sense-making
D) Identity Changed/Confirmed As a person and as
a professional
E) Agency Ideas into action
25
EXAMPLE FROM EVALUATION  WHILST BEING ENGAGED
WITH THIS ERASMUS IP (SO FAR!)
A) UNIQUE COURSE STRUCTURE 1 DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU
HAVE BEEN A MEMBER OF A COMMUNITY OF
LEARNERS? YES/NO?_____ WHY (NOT)?
26
(No Transcript)
27
CONCLUSIONS
  • The transformational learning model is rooted in
    inclusion.
  • Its application in the design, facilitation and
    evaluation of leadership development programmes
    can deepen participants understanding of
    inclusion
  • International dialogue adds depth
  • It is hoped that this will impact on practice but
    this needs further longitudinal research

28
  • Teacher Leadership agency, enquiry and inclusion
    in school improvement
  • Judy Durrant

29
What are the links between leadership, learning
and inclusion?
30
My own background
  • Teachers Leading Change
  • Teacher-led enquiry and development
  • The impact of teacher-led development
  • Teacher professionalism and identity
  • Teacher agency and voice
  • and this increasingly includes a much wider
    workforce.
  • What does the inclusion discourse offer?

31
Inclusion a developmental process
towards improvement
inclusive policy
inclusive practice
inclusive culture
(Booth and Ainscow, 2002)
32
Injecting attitude into school improvement
(Ainscow et al., 2006)
  • Inclusive approaches
  • collaboration
  • enquiry
  • active engagement
  • participation in decision making
  • recognising and accepting diversity
  • valuing education in community

challenges to curriculum, pedagogy, relationships
Inclusive values and principles
33
Good teachers are educationally subversive,
have asense of agency and can both envisage
and leadradical change within their own
classrooms and schools.Schools learn and change
from the bottom up.
  • (Galton and MacBeath, 2008, see also Durrant and
    Holden, 2006)

34
Tensions between three worlds of inclusion
(Galton and MacBeath, 2008)
  • Teachers usually agree in principle.
  • In practice inclusion relies on
  • supportive culture
  • adequate resources
  • adequate experti se
  • reduced resistance
  • effective approaches
  • appreciation for teachers efforts

aspirational practice
policy
existing practice
35
Research in the field of inclusion has found
that more inclusive leadership practices and
structures lead to inclusion and improvement
(Ainscow et al, 2006, Corbett, 2001 Hart, 2003).
  • Concepts of leadership capacity, sharing and
    distribution of leadership, conjoint agency and
    leadership density are prevalent in the
    leadership discourse
  • (Durrant Holden, 2006 Frost Harris, 2003
    Gronn, 2003 Sergiovanni, 2000 Spillane, 2003)
  • The fields are often considered separately
  • is it useful to link them?

36
Evidence from projects supporting teacher
leadership and enquiry
  • A school-based MA programme supporting
    teacher-led development and enquiry
    (Canterbury Christ Church University)
  • Teachers as Readers Building Communities of
    Readers research and development programme in
    primary schools
    (United Kingdom Literacy Association)
  • Creative Partnership Hastings / East Sussex
    (DCSF / Arts Council)

37
Common approaches emerge where projects are
effective
  • collaboration and collegiality
  • enquiry to support change
  • active engagement in learning and leadership
  • agency and voice
  • participation of all school community
  • recognising and valuing diversity
  • working with families and communities

38
From leadership of inclusion to leadership as
inclusion
Challenge and disturbance that leads to real
change
Integrity and coherence of development
Culture change for sustainable improvement
39
How do we remove barriers to both learning and
participationand leadership and participation?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com