Title: Microphysical Processes in the UTLS
1Microphysical Processes in the UTLS
2Recommended reading
- Pruppacher and Klett, Microphysics of clouds and
precipitation. Contains almost everything. - Fletcher, Physics of Rainclouds (my favourite,
albeit old). - Young, Microphysical Processes in Clouds.
- Atkins, Physical Chemistry.
3Contents
- Classical nucleation theory (basics)
- Koops theory of water activity controlled
homogeneous freezing of aqueous solution droplets - Some issues with Koops theory
- Heterogeneous nucleation
- Ice supersaturation within clouds
- Volume vs. surface dominated homogeneous
nucleation
4Some outstanding problems(see Cantrell and
Heymsfield, BAMS, June 2005)
- Homogeneous nucleation
- what role do collective fluctuations in water
play? - is freezing only a function of the water
activity? - what is the structure of the ice embryo and where
does it form? - Heterogeneous nucleation
- what are the most important properties of the
heterogeneous IN? - what are the mechanisms underlying contact and
evaporation nucleation? - what role do organic compounds play in ice
nucleation?
5Classical nucleation theory
?G(r) ? (4?/3) r3 nLkT ln(e/e) 4?r2?
6Classical nucleation theory
- Number of critical nuclei Boltzmann distribution
- N(r)N0 exp(??G(r)/kT)
- ?G(r) energy required to form a critical
nucleus - ?G(r) 16??3/3(nLkT ln(e/e)2 (4?/3) r2?
- e, e saturation vapour pressure, actual vapour
pressure - ? surface tension or interfacial energy between
droplet and vapour - nL number concentration of water molecules in
the liquid - r radius of a critical germ
- Note the strong dependence on surface tension and
temperature.
7Classical nucleation theory, contd
- Nucleation rate rate at which critical germs
are impinged by single molecules (or larger
clusters) to form supercritical clusters. -
- J B N0 exp(??G(r)/kT),
- where BN0 is of the order 1025 cm-3sec-1.
- An accurate value of B is not really required
since the process is controlled totally by the
exponential function. - Note the even stronger dependence of J on T!
8Classical theory of homogeneous freezing
- Similarly as before
- ?G(r) 16??SL3?/3nSkT ln(1/awi)2
16??SL3?/3(?S ?T)2 - with geometrical factor ?,
- entropy of fusion per unit volume of ice ?S
- supercooling of the liquid ?T
- awieliq/eice.
- Here B(kt/h) exp(-?g/kT) with activation energy
g for self-diffusion, - hence
- J ? (nLkT/h) exp(-?g/kT) exp (??G(r)/kT)
9Supercooling and freezing of pure water
- Water can be cooled below its equilibrium melting
point Tm. - Supercooled water is in a metastable state.
- The maximum possible supercooling (Tf) can be
achieved when the water is free of any solid
particles that can catalyse ice germ formation. - At about Tf freezing happens as a kinetic (i.e.
stochastic) nucleation process, homogeneous
nucleation. - Heterogeneous nucleation occurs at TgtTf, actual
temperature depends on properties of the solid
particles. - Tf is a genuine property of the liquid water
alone (not classically). - For pure water, arranged in µ-sized droplets, Tf
is about 235 K. - When supercooled water is in equilibrium with its
vapour, the vapour must have 100 RH (wrt liquid
water). - Solution droplets have both lower Tm and lower Tf
than pure water.
10Concept of homogeneous nucleation in the UTLS
- pure water cannot exist at Tlt-38C (supercooling
limit) - ice formation via homogeneous freezing of
solution droplets - foreign molecules (e.g. H2SO4) in the droplets
impede formation of ice lattice - ... until droplets are grown to sufficient size
in supersaturated air (rarefies the foreign
molecules) - hence solution droplets freeze at RHigt140 (this
threshold increasing with decreasing T) - freezing threshold independent of chemical
composition of the droplets - homogeneous nucleation is driven by
thermodynamics - if homogeneous nucleation is the prevalent
pathway to cirrus, then high ice-supersaturation
must exist in the clear and cloudy atmosphere
11Solutions melting and freezing points
- Rasmussen suggested a linear relation between
melting point depression and supercooling
required for homogeneous nucleation of aqueous
solution droplets - ?Tf ? ?Tm
- ?Tf Tf0Tf
- Tf0 is the supercooling limit of pure water (235
K), - ?Tm Tm0Tm
- Tm0 273.15 K.
- The constant ? is independent of concentration,
but depends on the chemical composition of the
solute - ? is an empirical constant and cannot be derived
from first principles.
12Classical treatment of solution freezing
- Jsolution(T) Jpure water(T ?Tf)
13Water activity-based nucleation theory (1)
Koop, 2004
When melting and freezing temperatures of water
and various aqueous solutions are plotted vs.
water activity, the data collapse on two single
curves, with little scatter in the case of the
freezing temperature. This implies that
homogeneous freezing is independent of the
chemical nature of the solute.
14Water activity-based nucleation theory (2)
water activity aw saturation vapour pressure
over solution saturation vapour pressure over
pure water the vapour pressure over the
solution equals that of pure ice at the melting
temperature Tm eice (Tm) eliq (Tm) aw or
awi (Tm) aw Tf (aw) Tm (aw - ? aw) ? aw
independent of chemistry. ? aw 1 - awi (Tsc,
max) 0.305
The locus of the Tf curve is probably a
determined by the perturbation to the hydrogen
bonding network induced by the foreign molecules.
(Koop 2004)
15Water activity-based nucleation theory (3)
saturation vapour pressure over water
saturation vapour pressure over ice e liq (Tm)
/ e ice (Tm) (upper inverse aw scale)
melting curve (lower aw scale) eice (Tm) /
eliq (Tm) awi
critical supersaturation for homogeneous
freezing (upper inverse aw scale), red curve ?
blue curve e liq (Tm) / e ice (Tm) ? aw (Tf)
freezing curve
16Water activity-based nucleation theory (4)
water saturation
critical supersaturation
fit Si,crit 2.352 - 3.883?10-3 T J 5.5 ?109
cm-3 s-1 e-folding freezing time 43 s for 1 µ
droplets, or 1 s for 3.5 µ droplets
Threshold supersaturation for homogeneous
nucleation increases with decreasing temperature
17Why does water activity control hom. freezing ?
- Solutes affect the equilibrium and
non-equilibrium properties of water substance. - Ice nucleation is affected by the solute
molecules, - increasing solute concentration ? increasing
supercooling necessary for freezing. - Peculiar properties of supercooled water
- interactions between water molecules via hygrogen
bonds. - nearly tetrahedal arrangement of the two H atoms
and the two free electron pairs around the
central O atom - preference of tetrahedral co-ordination in the
local water structure. - Mechanical pressure and foreign (solute)
molecules change the preferred interatomic
distances, hence the water structure.
18How can the state of waters hydrogen bonding
network define the locus of the Tf curve?
- There are several theories
- Stability limit theory (Rasmussen and coworkers)
- Proximity of the freezing curve to a postulated
stability limit bounding a region where
isothermal compressibility is positive. - The singularity-free scenario (Archer and Carter)
- Existence of a second critical point (Baker and
Baker)
19Theory of the 2nd critical point
- initiation of freezing in pure water
- liquid compressibility and density fluctuations
reach maxima. - Temperature of the onset of freezing is an
equilibrium property of the liquid phase alone.
(Remember strong influence of surface tensions in
classical theory. Not so here!) - Analytic model of liquid water thermodynamic
response functions have extrema at atmospheric
pressure and 235Â K. - predominance of weak H-bonds at higher
temperatures - predominance of strong H-bonds at lower
temperatures - locus of the extrema is a region of a significant
change in the character of the H-bonding network - loci of the compressibility maxima and the
freezing curve are nearly the same at atmospheric
pressures.
20Heuristic argument and However..
- As T approaches Tf density fluctuations rise. So
the probability rises to find in the liquid
regions where the density approaches that of ice.
- However, as a function of T at atmospheric
pressure the extrema of compressibility etc. are
much weaker then the sharpness of the sudden
increase of the freezing rate. This makes this
explanation somewhat unconvincing. - See Baker and Baker, GRL, 2004
21test of Koops theory in the AIDA cloud chamber
Good agreement between measurements and model
results show that Koops parameterisation is able
to predict correctly homogeneous nucleation of
H2SO4/H2O solutions in the AIDA chamber.
Non-equilibrium effects lead to slightly higher
critical supersaturations as in Koops
equilibrium theory.
Haag et al., ACP, 2003
22Some issues with Koops theory
- derivation of Tf(aw) needs assumption that aw
does not depend on temperature. This is indeed
often the case above Tm where the water activity
can easily be measured. - Below Tm, aw must often be determined using
models or extrapolations. - For sulphuric acid, aw is nearly T-independent.
- However, there are exceptions, e.g. ammonium
nitrate NH4NO3. - aw(NH4NO3) increases with decreasing T
- decreasing interaction of NH4NO3 with H2O at
lower T - more and more ion-ion recombination (NH4 with
NO3?), which makes it invisible for the water
molecules. - decreasing solubility of ammonium nitrate in
water upon cooling.
23issues with Koops theory ammonium sulfate
behaves differently
from Paul DeMott
24measurements of very large supersaturation,
influence of organics?
no organics
with organics
Jensen et al., ACP, 2005, report on measurements
of very large supersaturations in very cold air,
Si being much larger than Si,crit
De Mott et al., PNAS, 2003
25Kärcher Koop, 2005, show that organic material
within the solution droplets is able to impede
nucleation such that the peak supersaturation can
be much higher than Si,crit
26possible impedence of freezing by organic
materials or surfactants
Kärcher Koop, 2005
- At a certain temperature it needs a certain
activity for freezing (big dots). - Different solutions reach that activity at
different solute mass fractions (W). - Solutions containing organics generally have
higher solute mass fractions than inorganic
solutions when the critical activity is reached. - This implies
- less water,
- smaller particle volume (?1/W),
- smaller freezing nucleation rates.
27freezing temperature and nucleation rates
- Koops theory is able to predict freezing
temperatures or critical supersaturation for
homogeneous freezing. - it is not able to predict freezing rates.
- Freezing rates are parameterised in Koops paper
as a function of aw?awi. - In the classical theory it is relatively
straightforward to envisage - critical germ
- attack frequency by single molecules
- ? nucleation rate.
- The notion of an ice germ does not exist in
Koops theory. - Hence difficult to see how a nucleation rate
could be derived within the framework of this
theory.
28heterogeneous nucleation
- Classical framework
- Energy for germ formation (contact angle ?)
- ?G(het) ?G(hom) f(cos ?) with 0 ? f(cos ?)
? 1 - ? ?G(het) ? ?G(hom),
- i.e.
- lower critical supersaturation or higher critical
temperatures (less supercooling) for
heterogeneous nucleation.
29heterogeneous nucleation
- Water activity based framework
- Zuberi at al. 2002
- it may be possible to compute freezing
temperatures for solution droplets with insoluble
inclusions in a way analogous to the description
of homogeneous nucleation by Koop et al. 2000. - However, the scatter in the measured freezing
temperature in the aw-T diagram is large and the
fit is not perfect. - It could be that such an analogy is indeed
there, but if there is not a single value of ?aw
(a single value of maximum supercooling of pure
water drops with insoluble inclusions) such an
analogy does not help much.
30Measurements of het. freezing in the AIDA chamber
The AIDA chamber at IMK in Karlsruhe is a large
(84 m3) cloud chamber. Freezing is initiated by
quasi- adiabatic expansion. Ice crystals appear
and start to grow as soon as the critical
supersaturation characteristic for the IN is
reached. Different species have different
thresholds.
See Stefanie Schlichts poster!
31observations of nucleation thresholds in data of
RHi
ambient RHi
in cloud RHi
Haag and Kärcher, 2003
onset of heterogeneous freezing
onset of homogeneous freezing
32Ice supersaturation within clouds
- The usual thinking is that after a (short) while
the relative humidity in a cloud should approach
saturation. However, this while, the so-called
relaxation time, can last very long, depending on
temperature and crystal number concentration. - ? g (4?/3) N D(T,p)-1
- When the updraught goes on after cloud formation,
saturation is not reached because of the ongoing
decrease of the saturation pressure. Instead a
residual supersaturation of a few percent will be
the stable situation. - sasympt. ?g/(?u? ?g)
- with updraft time scale ?u (Rv cp T2) / (Lgw),
provided ?u gt ?g
33- Sometimes the relaxation time is longer than
other relevant time scales within a cloud, e.g.
the sedimentation time scale. Then saturation
will never be reached within a cloud.
Altitude (m)
Ni 5L-1, w 4.5 cm/s, RHihet 130
Time (min)
34Ice supersaturation within clouds examples
Comstock et al. (ARM data)
Ovarlez et al. (INCA data)
35All CRYSTAL-FACE RHi within clouds
Physical-chemical effects may also cause
persistent supersaturation within clouds, e.g.
Delta-ice or cubic ice.
Mean RHi binned by T open circles. 13 July 2002
contrail triangles. 19 July 2002 contrail
diamonds. (taken from Figure 1 of R. S. Gao et
al., Science, 2004)
From R. Herman, 2004
36Where does homogeneous nucleation occur?Drop
Volume or Surface?
- Traditionally the homogeneous nucleation process
is described as a process that occurs somewhere
in the bulk of the droplet that then freezes
completely. - Freezing rate is then proportional to the droplet
volume - Freezing of an ensemble obeys
- Punfrozen at time t exp(-JVt) with J
cm-3s-1 - Djikaev et al. (JPCA, 2002) and Tabazadeh et al.
(PNAS, 2002) have found indications and given
arguments that homogeneous nucleation (germ
formation) should instead proceed close to the
droplet surface.
37wetting criterion
- Condition at least one facet of the crystal is
only partly wetted by liquid water (could be
valid for the ice-water system). - ?vs? ?vl lt ?ls
- surface energies extrapolated to T ?40C
- ?vs 102 to 111 mJ/m2
- ?vl ? 87 mJ/m2
- ?ls 15 to 25 mJ/m2
- Hence ?vs? ?vl is approximately in the range 15
to 26 mJ/m2. - The surface energies are only measured for
systems with macroscopic dimensions, not for the
small clusters containing only some tens of
molecules.
38If homogeneous nucleation is a surface process,
freezing experiments with droplets in
oil-emulsions can be affected by the oil. Is
this also relevant for droplets in an atmospheric
environment?
Tabazadeh et al., PNAS, 2002
39- Duft and Leisner (ACP, 2004)
- Test of the surface nucleation hypothesis using
an electrodynamic - droplet levitation apparatus.
- droplets of 19 and 49 µm radius have the same
(volume-) nucleation rates. - At least for such large droplets freezing seems
to occur preferentially in the bulk. - Relevant for freezing of droplets in Cb or fog.
- Experiments do not exclude that in sub-micron
droplets ice germs form preferentially at the
surface.