TOGA PanPacific Surface Current Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

TOGA PanPacific Surface Current Study

Description:

In the late 80s, both TOGA and the World Ocean ... Since the programs were bound to overlap, it would be cost-effective to ... Raw ARGOS data sampled daily. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: marina8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TOGA PanPacific Surface Current Study


1
TOGA Pan-Pacific Surface Current Study
  • NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological
    Laboratory (AOML)
  • 25-26 April 1988
  • Miami, Florida

2
Background WOCE and TOGA
  • In the late 80s, both TOGA and the World Ocean
    Circulation Experiment (WOCE) were incorporating
    drifters as part of their programs.
  • Since the programs were bound to overlap, it
    would be cost-effective to coordinate their
    strategies.
  • In April 1988, the WOCE Planning Committee and
    all Principal Investigators of the TOGA
    Pan-Pacific Surface Current study met at
    AOML/NOAA in Miami, Florida.

3
Proposed Plan
  • Deploy 450 drifters over 2 years
  • Spatial coverage 15N-15S, 80W-126E
  • Desired sampling density 2 deg. latitude by 10
    deg. longitude

4
General Scientific Objectives
5
Technical Objectives
6
Some specific questions
  • What are the causes of SST warming? Why, in some
    years, does cold water fail to surface in the
    eastern tropical Pacific from September to
    January?

7
Competing Hypotheses
  • SST variations are caused by surface heat
    advection. Warming events occur when normal
    surface circulation patterns are disrupted.
  • SST variations are driven by local air-sea
    interactions. Warming events occur when vertical
    mixing in a region is reduced, and colder, deeper
    waters cannot be brought to the surface.

8
  • Which hypothesis is correct?
  • How can they be tested using drifter data?

9
The surface advection hypothesis
Flow component parallel to T gradient advects
heat.
10
  • Actual flow in the region is in opposite
    direction to geostrophic flow.
  • The accuracy of the ship-drift derived flow is
    unknown.
  • Not enough data at the time to compute the heat
    advection during the warming episodes.

11
  • Time-varying flow component also advects
    significant amount of heat.
  • Higher frequency and smaller spatial scales than
    the mean flow.
  • Again, direct measurements needed to fully
    resolve the head advection.

12
The vertical mixing hypothesis
  • Look at heat content of very near-surface layer
    of depth h.
  • Newell (1986) hypothesizes that warming events
    happen when, over a monthly time scale, net
    surface heat flux approaches 0, average
    temperature over h is close to constant, and
    turbulent flux at base of the layer is
    significantly reduced from its normal value.
  • Accurate measurements of daily temperature change
    following the water are needed the temporal and
    spatial turbulent flux variability.

13
Additional objectives Regional circulation
studies
  • Testing the competing heat advection hypotheses
    requires a pan-Pacific data set.
  • Same data can be used to study local phenomena.
  • To address the potential issues in detail, the
    plan divides the Pacific basin into 3 parts
    eastern, central and western.

14
Eastern Pacific
  • Heat advection in the Cold Tongue
  • Why does the Cold Tongue fail to develop during
    El Nino events?
  • Equatorial divergence
  • Develop a time series of estimates of Ekman
    transport divergence near the equator.
  • Shear-instability of waves
  • Shear instability between equatorial currents
    generates cusp-shaped waves that lead to an
    equatorially-convergent heat transport.
  • Drifters can detect the presence or absence of
    these waves.
  • Eastern Pacific warm pool
  • Shallower and more variable than the Western
    Pacific Warm Pool.
  • Generation region for eastern Pacific hurricanes.

15
Central Pacific
  • SST anomalies during ENSO events
  • Can they be observed in the central Pacific?
  • Equatorial mixing
  • No data on horizontal eddy energy in central
    tropical Pacific
  • Provide direct measurements to verify model
    results
  • Wind-driven currents
  • Subtracting geostrophic flow from
    drifter-measured actual flow produces estimates
    of wind-driven component.

16
Western Pacific
  • Large-scale circulation
  • multiple current systems with large seasonal and
    interannual variations
  • Historical ship drift data is insufficient to
    resolve the temporal variations and mesoscale
    spatial features. Drifters provide better
    resolution.
  • Cross-equatorial flow
  • What are the seasonal patterns? Where does the
    flow in the New Guinea Current and SECC go? Is
    there a mean flow across the equator in the West?
  • Western Pacific Warm Pool
  • Present (as of 1988) techniques only reserved the
    temperature structure in the pool to within 0.7o
    C. TOGA requirements are within 0.3o C.
  • Westerly wind bursts and eastward jets
  • How far east do these jets carry Western water?
    What is the equatorial convergence in the surface
    layer in these jets.

17
Drifter design and calibration
  • Two drogue designs to be assesseed during
    calibration stage.
  • Test survivability and water-following
    characteristics.
  • Determine which type of drifter will be used for
    the program in the 90s.

18
Deployment strategy
  • Area of interest 15oS-15oN, 80oW-126oE
  • Area is divided into approx. 230 2o x 10o boxes
  • Objective build an array of drifters over 2
    years
  • Minimum of drifters 230 conservative maximum
    450
  • Common drifter lifetime 9months-1year
  • Start with 50-60 deployments a month, work to
    desired density.
  • Australia, France and Japan also involved in
    contributing drifters.

19
Ship of opportunity tracks available for drifter
deployment.
20
Data management
  • Main data center at AOML/NOAA in Miami
  • Raw ARGOS data sampled daily. Maps based on
    weekly drifts will be regularly distributed to
    participants.
  • Monthly data reported to Climate Analysis
    Bulletin and made available to all countries
    participating in TOGA.

http//www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/dac/gdp.html
21
Current status
22
(No Transcript)
23
Discussion Questions
  • Which of the two competing hypotheses for SST
    variability do you think is right? What other
    technologies developed over the past 20 years
    would you use to test them?
  • In addition to the pan-Pacific and regional
    studies listed in the plan, what other purposes
    would the drifter data be useful (or has been
    useful for)?
  • Before the plan was formed, there was strong
    debate about 15m vs. 100m drogue depth for the
    drifters. Why did the 15m drogue win? What are
    the advantages and disadvantages of the shallower
    drogue?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com