Title: COMMERCIAL POLICY
1COMMERCIAL POLICY
- BY
- ALEJANDRO VELEZ, PH.D.
2COMMERCIAL POLICY
- A WHOLE HOST OF ACTIONS BY SOVEREIGN GOVERNMENTS
WHICH TRADITIONALLY HAVE CENTERED ON REGULATING
IMPORTS (AND SOMETIMES EXPORTS, E.G., US SUPER
COMPUTERS) BUT WHICH CAN ALSO INCLUDE POLICIES ON
INVESTMENTS, THE ENVIRONMENT. LABOR, ETC. -
3COMMERCIAL POLICY
- HOW DOES THE US PROPOSE AND
- AND ENACT COMMERCIAL POLICY LEGISLATION?
- DIFFERENTLY FROM OTHER DMES!
- HOW?
- ______ AUTHORITY
4COMMERCIAL POLICY
- POLITICAL PARTIES AND PRESIDENTS HAVE VARIED IN
APPROACHES BUT THERE HAS BEEN UNEXPECTED
COMMONALITIES. I THINK ECONOMISTS HAVE BEEN A
MAJOR REASON. CEA MAGNIFIED OUR INFLUENCE. GOOD
RESEARCH AND PRESTIGE OF PROFESSION, ETC.
5COMMERCIAL POLICY
- THE STRANGE CONVERSION OF WILLIAM J. CLINTON TO A
FREE TRADER. - AL GORE MAY NOT BE SO CONVINCED??
- NADER, BUCHANAN MAY BODE POORLY FOR FREE TRADE?
6US COMMERCIAL POLICY
7US COMMERCIAL POLICY
- GATT UP TO COLLAPSE OF SOVIET UNION
8US COMMERCIAL POLICY
9US COMMERCIAL POLICY
- WTO
- URUGUAY ROUND
- ISSUES (INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, SERVICE TRADE,
BANKING/INVESTMENT, AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES,
STEEL-CHEMICALS, - ACCOMPLISHMENTS
10REFORM OF IMF, WORLD BANK A CASE STUDY
- MELTZER REPORT
- BACKGROUND (R.V.,R.A.,L.C.,T.P.)
- PROPOSALS (E.G.,S.H.,D.B.)
- PROS AND CONS(J.H.,K.C.,D.S.,J.M.)
- CONCLUSIONS (S.T., A.V.)
11Meltzer Commission (Background)
12International Financial Institution Advisory
Commission
- Established in 1998 to oversee American funding
in International Financial Institutions - Had a very short life (6 months) and made many
findings
13Reasons for Establishment
- Congress wanted to know what good was coming from
money that was used for Foreign Aid - Assessment of International Financial
Institutions was wanted for the financing of
future Foreign Aid Programs
14Reasons for Establishment (cont.)
- Oversee roles of seven international financial
institutions - IMF
- World Bank
- Inter-American Dev. Bank
- Asian Dev. Bank
- African Dev. Bank
- WTO
- Bank for International Settlements
15Votes of the Commission
- Write-off all claims against HIPCS(heavily
indebted poor countries) - End practice of extending long-term loans for
poverty reduction
16Exchange Types
- Bretton Woods (Fixed on the Dollar)
- Establishes the IMF and World Bank to help in the
redevelopment of torn countries from WWII - Aid was based on a fixed rate system
- Dirty Float (No more fixed rates)
- Causes problems with initial plans of IMF and
World Bank- they were established to work with a
fixed exchange rate - GATT established in 1948 to reduce tariff
barriers. - WTO replaces GATT in 1995
17Problems of Institutions
- High Cost with Low Effectiveness
18REFORM OF IMF, WORLD BANK
19REFORM OF IMF, WORLD BANK
20Major Proposals of the Bank for International
Settlements
- Proposals for Change and Growth
21Three Categories of the BISs Tasks
- International Monetary and Financial Cooperation
- Agent and Trustee activities
- Financial Assistance to Central Banks
22Role of the BIS
- Acts as secretariat for several committees who
propose international standards and offer
guidance on so called best practices.
23BIS Proposals
- The Capital Accord, set minimum capital standards
for international banks. - It called for linking capital requirements to a
crude measure of the banks risk by assigning
different risk weights for different categories
of bank assets or commitments.
24Capital Adequacy Framework
- Expected to give banks more choice in assessing
credit risk by allowing them to adopt an internal
rating system. - This is used to set capital requirements and by
linking required capital, where possible, to
credit-rating agencies ratings of bank
borrowers.
25Basal Committee on Banking Supervisions 25 Core
Principles for Effective Banking Supervision
(Principles Covered)
- Conditions for Supervision
- Licensing
- Structure of the Banking System
- Prudential Regulation
- Methods of ongoing supervision
-
- Information gathering and use
- Powers of Supervisors
- Cross-border Banking
26Other Proposals of the BIS
- The Commission recommends that the BIS remain a
financial standard setter. - Implementation of standards, and decisions to
adopt them should be left to domestic regulators
or legislatures. - The Basel Committee on Bank Supervision should
align its risk measures more closely with credit
and market risk. Current practice encourages
misallocation of lending.
27Continuation of BIS Proposals
- Some streamlining of the BIS organizational
structure would be desirable - The Commission recommends that any expansion of
membership in the BIS or its committees or groups
be undertaken gradually and deliberately to avoid
disruption of the information exchange that
central bakers find valuable.
28The Development Banks
- Created from the Bretton Woods system, the World
Bank is an institution where rich industrialized
nations gather money in markets to distribute
funds as loans to emerging members.
- The eventual goal the Alleviation of Poverty
Worldwide
29Multilateral Banks
- World Bank Group, Asian Development Bank,
Inter-American Development Bank, and African
Development Bank - World Bank thought that three banks could serve
their constituencies better than a distant
institution dominated by industrial countries. - Served as a dominant source of international
resources to emerging economies up until the
1980s.
30Problems with Development Banks
- Cold War ended, strategic gesture became outmoded
- New generation of public and private leadership
arose in developing nations. - Dev. Banks differ in financial size Africa is
the smallest with 5-10 of the total amount. - Relative importance of banks has been declining.
- In past 7 years, WB has lent 18 billion to
LDCs, as compared to the private sectors 1,450
billion. - WB must accept fact that they are no longer a
significant source of funds to emerging economies.
31Problems continued
- Developing banks claim they lend to countries
with denied access to market financing and
private investorsbut, all of the banks lend
mainly to most credit-worthy countries basically
those that have private investors there already. - International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (IBRD) lending to LDCs has fallen
from 40 to 1 in six years. - 70 of the WB money is loaned out to a dozen
economies, while the remaining 30 is divided up
by 145 developing countries.
32Problems continued
- Crisis lending is IMF responsibility, not the
WBs. - Regional banks repeat the WB organizational
structure. Recently, WB expanded its offices in
some of the Regional bank areas only creating
conflict, competition, and confusion. - Their patterns of lending in past 3 years are
very similar to the same countries and for the
same purposes. - WB doesnt need to pump in more money, the local
banks and private investors can recover by
themselves.
33Recommendations
- Development Banks should be renamed as
Development Agencies it would define their role
as the alleviators of poverty world wide. - Resource transfers to countries with a per capita
income of years Starting at 2500, funding will be
limited. - Funds expended based on user fees. User fees
consist of working projects such as vaccinated
children, kilowatts of electricity delivered,
cubic meters of water treated, passing literacy
tests, miles of functioning roadsetc.
34Recommendations continued
- If the countries show improvement in specific
areas, the money will be granted. No results, no
funds. - The supplier of the service receives the money,
not the government. - An obligation to meet the user fees imposes the
discipline on the country receiving assistance.
This replaces the deferred 20-50 yr payment
schedule. - If grants are given instead of loans, receiver
countries would not have to pay back the
principal and interest.
35Recommendations continued
- The grants may consume large quantities of money
of the Development Agencies and they would have
to ask member countries for more money. But this
has a positive aspect. It forces the Dev.
Agencies to have better performance and
credibility to ask for more funding. - Services would be performed by outside
private-sector providers (NGOs and charitable
org.) or public-sector entities, and awarded on
competitive bid. - Loans would be conditional upon a precise set of
reforms, and disbursement would begin after
institutional reforms are enacted.
36Recommendations continued
- Regional programs should be the primary
responsibility of their Regional Agencies Asian,
Inter-American, and African Agencies. No overlap
from the World Bank and its regional partners. - WB is principal source of aid for ADB until it
can manage on its own. WB should be the
responsible for the Mid-East and few remaining
European countries. - Should concentrate on production of world goods
such as treatment for AIDS, safeguard natural
resources, inter-country infrastructure
systemsetc.
37Recommendations continued
- World Development Agency should reduce its role
in the private-sector, only giving technical
assistance and setting practice standards.
Investment, guarantees, and lending to private
sector should be eliminated. - Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
should be eliminated. Many countries already
have their own political insurance agencies. - WB and Regional Banks should write-off entirely
their claims against all heavily indebted poor
countries - The United States should spend more to alleviate
poverty.
38The Meltzer Commission
- Chapter 5
- The World Trade Organization
39World Trade Organization-GATT
- Formerly known as GATT, the General Agreement on
Tariff and Trade. - Two principle activities agreements on
nondiscriminatory reductions in tariff duties,
quotas and other quantitative restrictions on
trade in goods. - Managed dispute settlement procedures arising
under the agreements.
40WTO
- WTO replaced GATT January 1, 1995.
- WTO agreement incorporated and extended earlier
GATT agreements. - It also made two important additions
41WTO Commission Recommendations
- Two general areas
- General Principles of operation
- The role of the WTO in promoting financial
stability, safety, and soundness.
42General Principles
- Two main functions
- administers the process by which trade rules
change - the WTO serves as a quasi-judicial body to settle
disputes.
43Effects of Quasi-judicial
- There is some risk that WTO rulings will override
national legislation in areas of health, safety,
environment, and other regulatory policies. - The commission believes that quasi-judicial
decisions of international organizations should
not supplement legislative decisions.
44More recommendations
- Rulings or decisions by the WTO under treaties or
international agreements must remain subject to
explicit legislative enactment by the US Congress
or by the national legislative authority.
45- This would limit the WTOs authority to impose
sanctions on a country for violation of rules. - Benefits strengthens democratic accountability
and precludes delegation and erosion the
legislative function.
- Instead of retaliation, countries guilty of
illegal trade practices should pay an annual fine
equal to the value of the damages assessed by the
panel or provide equivalent trade liberalization.
46Rules for financial stability
- Commission recommends rules to enhance financial
stability. - Such rules can reduce risk, spread best
managerial practices, increase competition, and
reduce the role of govt in the allocation of
bank loans.
- Commission also recommends that explicit min.
financial standards be phased in as a condition
for assistance from the IMF in a financial
crisis. - Enforcement of the preconditions should remain
the IMFs responsibility.
47In the end...
- Proposals and recommendations should be the
responsibility of the groups on banking and
financial standards.
48Conclusion
- The WTO has proved effective in settling disputes
about tariffs and trade restrictions. - It should not extend its procedures to set
domestic policies and regulations, including
regulation of banking services, accounting
practices, or financial standards.
- These should remain the responsibility of
specialized agencies.
49International Monetary Fund
50Beginnings
- Established at the Bretton Woods Conference after
WWII to prevent a reoccurrence of monetary
financial instability. - The founders expected the IMF to make short-term
loans to assist countries with payment deficits
and to advise countries that failed to remove
controls on currents accounts.
51Some Problems
- IMF assistance postponed debt reduction.
- IMF assistance delayed renegotiation of the debt
the resumption of capital inflows, investment
and economic recovery. - IMF control often undermined the sovereignty and
democratic processes of member govts. - IMF is deficient in providing liquidity during
crises.
52The Mission of the New IMF
- The commission recommends that the IMF
- ?act as a quasi-lender of last resort to
solvent emerging economies by providing
short-term liquidity. - --IMF loans should have a short maturity (max
120 days) - --IMF loans should have a penalty rate
- --IMF would be considered a stand-by lender
- --in a crisis, the Fund should borrow
convertible currencies - as needed to finance short-term liquidity
loans. -
-
-
53(Continued)
- ? collect and publish financial economic data
from - member countries, and
disseminate those data in a timely
uniform manner. - ? provide advice (but not impose conditions)
- relating to economic policy.
- ?should uphold that if member countries
default on their loan debs that they
would not be eligible for help
from other multilateral agencies or other
member countries. -
54REFORM OF IMF, WORLD BANK
- MELTZER REPORT
- PRO AND CON IN THE PRESS
55World Opinion on Meltzer Commission
- Fernando Lopez
- chema Monterey
56Treasury Reply to IMF/World Bank Reform
Commission Report
- The U.S. Department of the Treasury has rejected
core recommendations of the Congressional-appointe
d International Financial Institution Advisory
Commission report, saying they would so weaken
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
multilateral development banks that these
institutions could no longer serve vital U.S.
interests.
57Financial Dailyfrom THE HINDU group of
publications on indiaserver.comMonday, March 27,
2000
- Now, the Meltzer Commission has recommended a
drastic change in the scope and size of
operations of the Bretton Wood twins. These
recommendations show sensitivity to policy
failures of the IMF/IBRD, both in the South-East
Asian crisis and in Russia. Perhaps, these
changes, suggested by the Meltzer group, are
inevitable. Many other experts also believed that
the IMF was becoming too powerful for its own
good. The suggested changes would, however,
reduce the IMF's role to essentially a vendor of
short-term loans. No longer can it try to cross
over to a larger-than-life vision of taking part
in the long-term development of the world.
58The Meltzer ReportJ. Bradford DeLongMay 2000
- Last March the Meltzer Commission--established by
the U.S. Congress as part and parcel of the
legislation adding 18 billion to the U.S.'s
capital contribution to the IMF--issued its
Report. The press registered that the Commission
had called for thorough-going reforms of the
World Bank and IMF. But it quickly dropped from
sight the Report was more than 100 pages long.
Much of it was written in economese, that
peculiar language that only academic economists
speak with fluency.
59Reshaping IMF and World Bank Meltzer Commission
ReportApril 8-14, 2000
- The report has a broad remit, extending, besides
the IMF and the World Bank to the regional
development banks, the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS) and the World Trade
Organization. But the last two are peripheral to
the main thrust of the report. The focus of the
report is on the IMF and the World Bank. The
commission has tried to reassess their role in
the new economic environment which has changed
the conditions governing their functioning.
60The Meltzer Commission And the G-7
- The commissions reforms will no doubt challenge
vested interests, whether they be the internal
bureaucracies of the institutions which would
lose their empires or the ruling elites in the
developing countries which in the past have
acquired squatters rights on the funds of the
IMF and the World Bank or the industrial
countries which influence these international
institutions, particularly the IMF, to provide
slush funds to support the decisions of the G-7
finance ministers or other groups of powerful
members.
61MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- Three issues in the commissions report debt
forgiveness, capital controls, and development
policies warrant further consideration. The
first of these involves debt forgiveness. The
commission agrees that debt forgiveness for
highly indebted poor countries (HIPCs) should be
one of the first steps in reforming the global
financial system
62MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- As for the second issue capital controls the
commission does not seem to recognize these as
useful public policy tools, but its
recommendations, when examined closely, are
contradictory. The final issue involves the
parameters of the development debate, which the
commission defines too narrowly. The commission
encourages fiscal and monetary restraint and
financial deregulation which have been shown to
be harmful to working people and continues to
ignore the growing criticism of increased labor
market flexibility
63MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- Redesigning the international financial
institutionsThe IMF and World Bank have been
criticized for their mishandling of financial
crises and the ineffective design and
implementation of development projects, providing
an impetus to reform these and other
international financial institutions (IFIs).
Fortunately, the issue is no longer whether, but
how these institutions should be reformed.
64Congressionally-appointed Panel Acknowledges
Failures of IMF and World Bank to Help the
World's Poor, But Lack of Accountability Remains
Unanswered
- WASHINGTON, DC, March 7, 2000 - A coalition of
development and environmental advocates today
said a new report by a Congressionally appointed
commission is a welcome acknowledgement that the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank
Group are largely failing in their mission to
address world poverty and economic stability, and
need major overhaul. However, the groups say that
while the report contains some laudable
recommendations, it fails to address other key
fundamental problems
65Congressionally-appointed Panel Acknowledges
Failures of IMF and World Bank to Help the
World's Poor, But Lack of Accountability Remains
Unanswered
- According to the report, written by a panel of
economists headed by Allan Meltzer, the failures
of the World Bank Group and IMF can be traced to
"overlapping missions," "ineffectiveness,
corruption, and waste of resources," and failure
to develop successful regional programs in
agriculture, forestry, environment, health care,
and other sectors - among other problems. But
while the Commission also said "lack of
transparency and accountability" contributed to
this failure, it did not offer any reforms to
address this problem.
66Meltzer report wants WTO powers reined in
- The only unanimous recommendations of the Meltzer
Commission are those that (1) the IMF, the World
Bank and the regional development banks write off
in their entirety all claims against the heavily
indebted poor countries (HIPCs), and (2) the IMF
should restrict its lending to the provision of
short-term liquidity and end its current practice
of extending long-term loans for poverty
reduction and other purposes
67Limiting the Scope of the World Bankby James D.
Wolfensohn
- We are, of course, pleased that the issue of
poverty reduction should be headline news. We
share the commissions concern that more must be
done by all the players in the fight against
poverty, and we applaud all who broach this
difficult subject. We also welcome the
commissions call for debt relief, and we hope
that funding support from Congress will follow
it. This is crucial. - We nevertheless believe that a number of the
commissions proposals are based on a fundamental
misreading of the development challenges we face
today. Poor people in developing countries will
be the losers if these proposals are implemented.
If the World Bank were to withdraw entirely from
Asia and from Latin America if it were to stop
lending to countries with a per capita income
above 4,000 a year, it would cut out the
marginalized, the poorest, the excluded who live
in these countries.
68Commission report has IMF, WB shakingMarch 6,
2000
- US COMMISSION REPORT ON IMF, WORLD BANK REFORMS
DUE SHORTLY. As if the IMF needed some more bad
news, it is about to be told by a new report that
it should engage in some serious downsizing, says
the FT's "Observer" column (p.17). The thoughts
of the report's chief authors are poised to come
out on Wednesday, when a US congressional
commission on international financial
institutions makes its own views known. Among
other big changes it is likely to recommend, it
wants to make the IMF just a provider of
emergency finance and turn the World Bank into a
provider of grants, not loans.
69World Opinion on Meltzer Commission
- Fernando Lopez
- chema Monterey
70Treasury Reply to IMF/World Bank Reform
Commission Report
- The U.S. Department of the Treasury has rejected
core recommendations of the Congressional-appointe
d International Financial Institution Advisory
Commission report, saying they would so weaken
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
multilateral development banks that these
institutions could no longer serve vital U.S.
interests.
71Financial Dailyfrom THE HINDU group of
publications on indiaserver.comMonday, March 27,
2000
- Now, the Meltzer Commission has recommended a
drastic change in the scope and size of
operations of the Bretton Woods twins. These
recommendations show sensitivity to policy
failures of the IMF/IBRD, both in the South-East
Asian crisis and in Russia. Perhaps, these
changes, suggested by the Meltzer group, are
inevitable. Many other experts also believed that
the IMF was becoming too powerful for its own
good. The suggested changes would, however,
reduce the IMF's role to essentially a vendor of
short-term loans. No longer can it try to cross
over to a larger-than-life vision of taking part
in the long-term development of the world.
72The Meltzer ReportJ. Bradford DeLongMay 2000
- Last March the Meltzer Commission--established by
the U.S. Congress as part and parcel of the
legislation adding 18 billion to the U.S.'s
capital contribution to the IMF--issued its
Report. The press registered that the Commission
had called for thorough-going reforms of the
World Bank and IMF. But it quickly dropped from
sight the Report was more than 100 pages long.
Much of it was written in economese, that
peculiar language that only academic economists
speak with fluency.
73Reshaping IMF and World Bank Meltzer Commission
ReportApril 8-14, 2000
- The report has a broad remit, extending, besides
the IMF and the World Bank to the regional
development banks, the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS) and the World Trade
Organization. But the last two are peripheral to
the main thrust of the report. The focus of the
report is on the IMF and the World Bank. The
commission has tried to reassess their role in
the new economic environment which has changed
the conditions governing their functioning.
74The Meltzer Commission And the G-7
- The commissions reforms will no doubt challenge
vested interests, whether they be the internal
bureaucracies of the institutions which would
lose their empires or the ruling elites in the
developing countries which in the past have
acquired squatters rights on the funds of the
IMF and the World Bank or the industrial
countries which influence these international
institutions, particularly the IMF, to provide
slush funds to support the decisions of the G-7
finance ministers or other groups of powerful
members.
75MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- Three issues in the commissions report debt
forgiveness, capital controls, and development
policies warrant further consideration. The
first of these involves debt forgiveness. The
commission agrees that debt forgiveness for
highly indebted poor countries (HIPCs) should be
one of the first steps in reforming the global
financial system
76MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- As for the second issue capital controls the
commission does not seem to recognize these as
useful public policy tools, but its
recommendations, when examined closely, are
contradictory. The final issue involves the
parameters of the development debate, which the
commission defines too narrowly. The commission
encourages fiscal and monetary restraint and
financial deregulation which have been shown to
be harmful to working people and continues to
ignore the growing criticism of increased labor
market flexibility
77MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- Redesigning the international financial
institutionsThe IMF and World Bank have been
criticized for their mishandling of financial
crises and the ineffective design and
implementation of development projects, providing
an impetus to reform these and other
international financial institutions (IFIs).
Fortunately, the issue is no longer whether, but
how these institutions should be reformed.
78Congressionally-appointed Panel Acknowledges
Failures of IMF and World Bank to Help the
World's Poor, But Lack of Accountability Remains
Unanswered
- WASHINGTON, DC, March 7, 2000 - A coalition of
development and environmental advocates today
said a new report by a Congressionally appointed
commission is a welcome acknowledgement that the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank
Group are largely failing in their mission to
address world poverty and economic stability, and
need major overhaul. However, the groups say that
while the report contains some laudable
recommendations, it fails to address other key
fundamental problems
79Congressionally-appointed Panel Acknowledges
Failures of IMF and World Bank to Help the
World's Poor, But Lack of Accountability Remains
Unanswered
- According to the report, written by a panel of
economists headed by Allan Meltzer, the failures
of the World Bank Group and IMF can be traced to
"overlapping missions," "ineffectiveness,
corruption, and waste of resources," and failure
to develop successful regional programs in
agriculture, forestry, environment, health care,
and other sectors - among other problems. But
while the Commission also said "lack of
transparency and accountability" contributed to
this failure, it did not offer any reforms to
address this problem.
80Meltzer report wants WTO powers reined in
- The only unanimous recommendations of the Meltzer
Commission are those that (1) the IMF, the World
Bank and the regional development banks write off
in their entirety all claims against the heavily
indebted poor countries (HIPCs), and (2) the IMF
should restrict its lending to the provision of
short-term liquidity and end its current practice
of extending long-term loans for poverty
reduction and other purposes
81Limiting the Scope of the World Bankby James D.
Wolfensohn
- We are, of course, pleased that the issue of
poverty reduction should be headline news. We
share the commissions concern that more must be
done by all the players in the fight against
poverty, and we applaud all who broach this
difficult subject. We also welcome the
commissions call for debt relief, and we hope
that funding support from Congress will follow
it. This is crucial. - We nevertheless believe that a number of the
commissions proposals are based on a fundamental
misreading of the development challenges we face
today. Poor people in developing countries will
be the losers if these proposals are implemented.
If the World Bank were to withdraw entirely from
Asia and from Latin America if it were to stop
lending to countries with a per capita income
above 4,000 a year, it would cut out the
marginalized, the poorest, the excluded who live
in these countries.
82Commission report has IMF, WB shakingMarch 6,
2000
- US COMMISSION REPORT ON IMF, WORLD BANK REFORMS
DUE SHORTLY. As if the IMF needed some more bad
news, it is about to be told by a new report that
it should engage in some serious downsizing, says
the FT's "Observer" column (p.17). The thoughts
of the report's chief authors are poised to come
out on Wednesday, when a US congressional
commission on international financial
institutions makes its own views known. Among
other big changes it is likely to recommend, it
wants to make the IMF just a provider of
emergency finance and turn the World Bank into a
provider of grants, not loans.
83World Opinion on Meltzer Commission
- Fernando Lopez
- chema Monterey
84Treasury Reply to IMF/World Bank Reform
Commission Report
- The U.S. Department of the Treasury has rejected
core recommendations of the Congressional-appointe
d International Financial Institution Advisory
Commission report, saying they would so weaken
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
multilateral development banks that these
institutions could no longer serve vital U.S.
interests.
85Financial Dailyfrom THE HINDU group of
publications on indiaserver.comMonday, March 27,
2000
- Now, the Meltzer Commission has recommended a
drastic change in the scope and size of
operations of the Bretton Woods twins. These
recommendations show sensitivity to policy
failures of the IMF/IBRD, both in the South-East
Asian crisis and in Russia. Perhaps, these
changes, suggested by the Meltzer group, are
inevitable. Many other experts also believed that
the IMF was becoming too powerful for its own
good. The suggested changes would, however,
reduce the IMF's role to essentially a vendor of
short-term loans. No longer can it try to cross
over to a larger-than-life vision of taking part
in the long-term development of the world.
86The Meltzer ReportJ. Bradford DeLongMay 2000
- Last March the Meltzer Commission--established by
the U.S. Congress as part and parcel of the
legislation adding 18 billion to the U.S.'s
capital contribution to the IMF--issued its
Report. The press registered that the Commission
had called for thorough-going reforms of the
World Bank and IMF. But it quickly dropped from
sight the Report was more than 100 pages long.
Much of it was written in economese, that
peculiar language that only academic economists
speak with fluency.
87Reshaping IMF and World Bank Meltzer Commission
ReportApril 8-14, 2000
- The report has a broad remit, extending, besides
the IMF and the World Bank to the regional
development banks, the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS) and the World Trade
Organization. But the last two are peripheral to
the main thrust of the report. The focus of the
report is on the IMF and the World Bank. The
commission has tried to reassess their role in
the new economic environment which has changed
the conditions governing their functioning.
88The Meltzer Commission And the G-7
- The commissions reforms will no doubt challenge
vested interests, whether they be the internal
bureaucracies of the institutions which would
lose their empires or the ruling elites in the
developing countries which in the past have
acquired squatters rights on the funds of the
IMF and the World Bank or the industrial
countries which influence these international
institutions, particularly the IMF, to provide
slush funds to support the decisions of the G-7
finance ministers or other groups of powerful
members.
89MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- Three issues in the commissions report debt
forgiveness, capital controls, and development
policies warrant further consideration. The
first of these involves debt forgiveness. The
commission agrees that debt forgiveness for
highly indebted poor countries (HIPCs) should be
one of the first steps in reforming the global
financial system
90MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- As for the second issue capital controls the
commission does not seem to recognize these as
useful public policy tools, but its
recommendations, when examined closely, are
contradictory. The final issue involves the
parameters of the development debate, which the
commission defines too narrowly. The commission
encourages fiscal and monetary restraint and
financial deregulation which have been shown to
be harmful to working people and continues to
ignore the growing criticism of increased labor
market flexibility
91MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- Redesigning the international financial
institutionsThe IMF and World Bank have been
criticized for their mishandling of financial
crises and the ineffective design and
implementation of development projects, providing
an impetus to reform these and other
international financial institutions (IFIs).
Fortunately, the issue is no longer whether, but
how these institutions should be reformed.
92Congressionally-appointed Panel Acknowledges
Failures of IMF and World Bank to Help the
World's Poor, But Lack of Accountability Remains
Unanswered
- WASHINGTON, DC, March 7, 2000 - A coalition of
development and environmental advocates today
said a new report by a Congressionally appointed
commission is a welcome acknowledgement that the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank
Group are largely failing in their mission to
address world poverty and economic stability, and
need major overhaul. However, the groups say that
while the report contains some laudable
recommendations, it fails to address other key
fundamental problems
93Congressionally-appointed Panel Acknowledges
Failures of IMF and World Bank to Help the
World's Poor, But Lack of Accountability Remains
Unanswered
- According to the report, written by a panel of
economists headed by Allan Meltzer, the failures
of the World Bank Group and IMF can be traced to
"overlapping missions," "ineffectiveness,
corruption, and waste of resources," and failure
to develop successful regional programs in
agriculture, forestry, environment, health care,
and other sectors - among other problems. But
while the Commission also said "lack of
transparency and accountability" contributed to
this failure, it did not offer any reforms to
address this problem.
94Meltzer report wants WTO powers reined in
- The only unanimous recommendations of the Meltzer
Commission are those that (1) the IMF, the World
Bank and the regional development banks write off
in their entirety all claims against the heavily
indebted poor countries (HIPCs), and (2) the IMF
should restrict its lending to the provision of
short-term liquidity and end its current practice
of extending long-term loans for poverty
reduction and other purposes
95Limiting the Scope of the World Bankby James D.
Wolfensohn
- We are, of course, pleased that the issue of
poverty reduction should be headline news. We
share the commissions concern that more must be
done by all the players in the fight against
poverty, and we applaud all who broach this
difficult subject. We also welcome the
commissions call for debt relief, and we hope
that funding support from Congress will follow
it. This is crucial. - We nevertheless believe that a number of the
commissions proposals are based on a fundamental
misreading of the development challenges we face
today. Poor people in developing countries will
be the losers if these proposals are implemented.
If the World Bank were to withdraw entirely from
Asia and from Latin America if it were to stop
lending to countries with a per capita income
above 4,000 a year, it would cut out the
marginalized, the poorest, the excluded who live
in these countries.
96Commission report has IMF, WB shakingMarch 6,
2000
- US COMMISSION REPORT ON IMF, WORLD BANK REFORMS
DUE SHORTLY. As if the IMF needed some more bad
news, it is about to be told by a new report that
it should engage in some serious downsizing, says
the FT's "Observer" column (p.17). The thoughts
of the report's chief authors are poised to come
out on Wednesday, when a US congressional
commission on international financial
institutions makes its own views known. Among
other big changes it is likely to recommend, it
wants to make the IMF just a provider of
emergency finance and turn the World Bank into a
provider of grants, not loans.
97Meltzer ReportPros and Cons
Dennis Stanko Keely Collins
98Pros
- Report recognizes the pitfalls of the current IMF
system- cause of social and environmental damage,
IMF and World Banks inability to address world
poverty and economic stability - Finds correctly that the World Bank should
restrict financial support to sectors that have a
direct and demonstrable connection to poverty
alleviation and sustainable development. - Makes valid recommendations
- IMF should restrict lending to the provision of
short-term liquidity countries in financial
difficulties. - Loans should only be made to countries that have
met preconditions for financial soundness. - World Bank should focus efforts on low-income
countries that lack access to capital markets.
99Cons
- Doesnt address the need to develop
accountability and democracy in the IMF. - Doesnt address changes in society- move from
fixed exchange, absence of cold-war concerns. - Doesnt specifically address how to aid the
countries that dont qualify/ - Fails to address greater need for attention to
the environmental and social implications through
assessments. - For example- it overlooks a number of important
sectors that can help fulfill this mandate to
benefit the social and environmental aspects such
as investments in renewable energy, education,
and improved urban living.
100Sources
- www.igc.org/trac/headlines/2000
- Press Release- Friends of the Earth/Center of
Concern. USA Congressional Panel Says IMF,
World Bank Fail to Help Poor. March 7, 2000 - Wolf, Martin. USA Between Revolution and
Reform-The Meltzer Commissions Vision.
Financial Times. March 8, 2000.
101US COMMERCIAL POLICY
- SOME KEY IDEAS
- CONCLUSIONS
- THESE COULD BE VERY INTERESTING TIMES AHEAD!
102World Opinion on Meltzer Commission
- Fernando Lopez
- chema Monterey
103Treasury Reply to IMF/World Bank Reform
Commission Report
- The U.S. Department of the Treasury has rejected
core recommendations of the Congressional-appointe
d International Financial Institution Advisory
Commission report, saying they would so weaken
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
multilateral development banks that these
institutions could no longer serve vital U.S.
interests.
104Financial Dailyfrom THE HINDU group of
publications on indiaserver.comMonday, March 27,
2000
- Now, the Meltzer Commission has recommended a
drastic change in the scope and size of
operations of the Bretton Woods twins. These
recommendations show sensitivity to policy
failures of the IMF/IBRD, both in the South-East
Asian crisis and in Russia. Perhaps, these
changes, suggested by the Meltzer group, are
inevitable. Many other experts also believed that
the IMF was becoming too powerful for its own
good. The suggested changes would, however,
reduce the IMF's role to essentially a vendor of
short-term loans. No longer can it try to cross
over to a larger-than-life vision of taking part
in the long-term development of the world.
105The Meltzer ReportJ. Bradford DeLongMay 2000
- Last March the Meltzer Commission--established by
the U.S. Congress as part and parcel of the
legislation adding 18 billion to the U.S.'s
capital contribution to the IMF--issued its
Report. The press registered that the Commission
had called for thorough-going reforms of the
World Bank and IMF. But it quickly dropped from
sight the Report was more than 100 pages long.
Much of it was written in economese, that
peculiar language that only academic economists
speak with fluency.
106Reshaping IMF and World Bank Meltzer Commission
ReportApril 8-14, 2000
- The report has a broad remit, extending, besides
the IMF and the World Bank to the regional
development banks, the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS) and the World Trade
Organization. But the last two are peripheral to
the main thrust of the report. The focus of the
report is on the IMF and the World Bank. The
commission has tried to reassess their role in
the new economic environment which has changed
the conditions governing their functioning.
107The Meltzer Commission And the G-7
- The commissions reforms will no doubt challenge
vested interests, whether they be the internal
bureaucracies of the institutions which would
lose their empires or the ruling elites in the
developing countries which in the past have
acquired squatters rights on the funds of the
IMF and the World Bank or the industrial
countries which influence these international
institutions, particularly the IMF, to provide
slush funds to support the decisions of the G-7
finance ministers or other groups of powerful
members.
108MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- Three issues in the commissions report debt
forgiveness, capital controls, and development
policies warrant further consideration. The
first of these involves debt forgiveness. The
commission agrees that debt forgiveness for
highly indebted poor countries (HIPCs) should be
one of the first steps in reforming the global
financial system
109MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- As for the second issue capital controls the
commission does not seem to recognize these as
useful public policy tools, but its
recommendations, when examined closely, are
contradictory. The final issue involves the
parameters of the development debate, which the
commission defines too narrowly. The commission
encourages fiscal and monetary restraint and
financial deregulation which have been shown to
be harmful to working people and continues to
ignore the growing criticism of increased labor
market flexibility
110MELTZER REPORT MISSES THE MARKCommissions
recommendations for World Bank, IMF need further
consideration
- Redesigning the international financial
institutionsThe IMF and World Bank have been
criticized for their mishandling of financial
crises and the ineffective design and
implementation of development projects, providing
an impetus to reform these and other
international financial institutions (IFIs).
Fortunately, the issue is no longer whether, but
how these institutions should be reformed.
111Congressionally-appointed Panel Acknowledges
Failures of IMF and World Bank to Help the
World's Poor, But Lack of Accountability Remains
Unanswered
- WASHINGTON, DC, March 7, 2000 - A coalition of
development and environmental advocates today
said a new report by a Congressionally appointed
commission is a welcome acknowledgement that the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank
Group are largely failing in their mission to
address world poverty and economic stability, and
need major overhaul. However, the groups say that
while the report contains some laudable
recommendations, it fails to address other key
fundamental problems
112Congressionally-appointed Panel Acknowledges
Failures of IMF and World Bank to Help the
World's Poor, But Lack of Accountability Remains
Unanswered
- According to the report, written by a panel of
economists headed by Allan Meltzer, the failures
of the World Bank Group and IMF can be traced to
"overlapping missions," "ineffectiveness,
corruption, and waste of resources," and failure
to develop successful regional programs in
agriculture, forestry, environment, health care,
and other sectors - among other problems. But
while the Commission also said "lack of
transparency and accountability" contributed to
this failure, it did not offer any reforms to
address this problem.
113Meltzer report wants WTO powers reined in
- The only unanimous recommendations of the Meltzer
Commission are those that (1) the IMF, the World
Bank and the regional development banks write off
in their entirety all claims against the heavily
indebted poor countries (HIPCs), and (2) the IMF
should restrict its lending to the provision of
short-term liquidity and end its current practice
of extending long-term loans for poverty
reduction and other purposes
114Limiting the Scope of the World Bankby James D.
Wolfensohn
- We are, of course, pleased that the issue of
poverty reduction should be headline news. We
share the commissions concern that more must be
done by all the players in the fight against
poverty, and we applaud all who broach this
difficult subject. We also welcome the
commissions call for debt relief, and we hope
that funding support from Congress will follow
it. This is crucial. - We nevertheless believe that a number of the
commissions proposals are based on a fundamental
misreading of the development challenges we face
today. Poor people in developing countries will
be the losers if these proposals are implemented.
If the World Bank were to withdraw entirely from
Asia and from Latin America if it were to stop
lending to countries with a per capita income
above 4,000 a year, it would cut out the
marginalized, the poorest, the excluded who live
in these countries.
115Commission report has IMF, WB shakingMarch 6,
2000
- US COMMISSION REPORT ON IMF, WORLD BANK REFORMS
DUE SHORTLY. As if the IMF needed some more bad
news, it is about to be told by a new report that
it should engage in some serious downsizing, says
the FT's "Observer" column (p.17). The thoughts
of the report's chief authors are poised to come
out on Wednesday, when a US congressional
commission on international financial
institutions makes its own views known. Among
other big changes it is likely to recommend, it
wants to make the IMF just a provider of
emergency finance and turn the World Bank into a
provider of grants, not loans.
116Conclusions
117Conclusions
118Meltzer Commission
- Established to oversee how American funds were
being spent by international financial
institutions. - Lobbied for reform within international financial
institutions (e.g. World Bank, IMF, and WTO). - These Reforms would enhance global financial
stability - Commission can monitor the world economy and
focus on diminishing the probability of crises
occurring. - Created the Bank for International Settlements to
encourage efficiency and growth in world banking.
119Meltzer Commission
- Transparency about IMF, WB operations
- Deficiencies in IMF-WB projects
- Need to respect countries sovereignty
- Green Agenda has been partly included
- Poor PR job on part of reformers
- Media has contributed to radicalizing debate
- Foreign press supportive but pessimistic
- IMF/WB on defensive, defending its scalp
120Meltzer Commission
- Need for WB/IMF administrative overhaul
- WTO partial overhaul
- More sensitivity to nationalism
- Sharper mission statements