Title: Women
1Women Crime
2Hidden from History
- Early Sociology and Criminology dominated by men
doing science women are hidden from history - (Dale Spender)
- Malestream Sociology / Criminology
- Men dominate University Departments
- Men dominate top posts/ control funding
- Men determine research priorities
- - areas of study
- - methodology
- - publishing
- Men determine the curriculum
- e.g. Founding Fathers as basis of sociological
/ criminological knowledge. - Male orientation may so colour the organisation
of sociology as a discipline that the
invisibility of women is a structured male view
rather than a superficial flaw. The male focus,
incorporated into the definitions of subject
areas, reduces women to a side issue from the
start. - Oakley (1974) quoted in Abbott and Wallace
(19971).
3Feminist Critique of Sociology
- It is mainly concerned with research by men, on
men using theories for men. - Generalisation based upon samples of men.
- Womens concerns overlooked.
- Women who do feature are presented in a distorted
manner. - Sex / gender rarely offered as explanatory
variables. - Any treatment of sex / gender is marginal
reinforcing the idea that it is unimportant
justifying the dominance of other perspectives. - (Abbot Wallace 19976)
4and Criminology
- The history of criminology has been largely a
history of men but one in which the maleness of
crime, crime control and crime analysis has been
so taken for granted as to be rendered invisible - Smith (2005346)
5The Feminist attack on malestream sociology
- 1) The gendering of society.
- 2) Feminist research methods.
- 3) Feminist Theory.
- See pages 3-4 in handout.
- See also
- Simone de Beauvoir
- Anne Oakley
- Sue Sharp
6In the 1970s 80s writers such as Smart and
Heidensohn led the charge in criminology
- Carol Smart wrote Women, Crime and Criminology in
1976 and went on to become Professor of Sociology
at Leeds and is now Director of the Morgan Centre
at Manchester University. In 1985 Frances
Heidensohn published Women Crime and has
written extensively on the topic since. She is
now Professor of Social Policy at University of
London and visiting Professor at the Mannheim
Centre for Criminology at the LSE.
7Feminist Criminology
- Rejection of Malestream criminology as gender
blind - (Laws are) man made in the interests of men, in
accordance with a paternalistic attitude towards
women... The innumerable studies of criminality
and delinquency that exist do not include women
and girls in their subject matter. They are
written by men, on the subject of men for an
audience of men - Smart (1977)
8Hidden from Criminology
- INVISIBLE WOMEN statistically rare therefore
hard to access. - MALESTREAM CRIMINOLOGY almost everything we
know about crime is from a male perspective
(which ignores or marginalises women) - FUNCTIONALISM - very conservative view of family
and gender roles women seen as affective,
maternal and conformist see Mertons theory
of anomic crime. - MARXISM - class based and gender blind
- SUB-CULTURAL THEORY- mainly interested in
disaffected juvenile males (girls as marginal to
the male gang) - LABELLING - apart from W.I. Thomas (The
Unadjusted Girl 1923) very little interest in
gender - See Madeleine Leonard Masculinity, femininity
crime in Sociology Review September 1995.
9Feminist Criminology raises specific issues
- i) What are the gendered patterns of crime?
- ii) Why do women commit so few crimes relative to
men? - iii) What explanations are offered for female
criminals? - iv) Women as victims of crime.
- v) Women in the CJS discriminatory practices in
courts prisons. - vi) Rethinking the links between masculinity
crime
10and three key questions
- The Woman Question taking female offending
seriously. Challenging simplistic stereotypes. - The Man Question - The maleness of crime has
been so taken for granted as to be rendered
invisiblestudies have tended to be on men as
offenders rather than offenders as men. - (Smith 2005353)
- The Convergence Question are women becoming
more promiscuous and predatory? - Can increasing female criminality be accounted
for by the liberation thesis? -
11The Woman Question
- Problematic nature
- i) Criminology as gender blind or gender
neutral. - ii) Real crime in defined as male crime.
- This has been referred to as the stag effect
- It has attracted male scholars who wanted to
study and understand outlaw men, hoping perhaps
that some of the romance and fascination of this
role will rub off. Among the disciplines it is
quintessentially male - (Chesney Lind quoted in Rafter and Heidensohn)
- iii) The limitations on theorising of the
ideology of femininity and stereotypical
thinking. E.g. Deviant women as double damned
deviants. - iv) Failure to recognise the changing nature of
society and criminology.
12NATURALISTIC VIEW OF WOMEN.
- ACCEPTABLE FEMALE NORM IS CLOSELY RELATED TO
BIOLOGY - WOMEN CLOSER TO NATURE THEY GIVE BIRTH,
MENSTRUAL CYCLE, CARERS - GIRLS SUGAR AND SPICE AND ALL THINGS NICE
- THEREFORE WOMEN CRIMINALS ARE UNNATURAL /EVIL
(MYRA HINDLEY ULTIMATE TRANSGRESSOR AS SHE
KILLED CHILDREN)
13Naturalistic explanations of female criminal
- Biological / Psychological - often related to
sexual deviance - LOMBROSO AND FERRERO Women less biologically
evolved But Criminal women like men (Atavism) - THOMAS 1907 - early work suggests female
criminals are pathological - OTTO POLLACK (1950s) Womens true nature
(deceitful, vengeful and emotional) protected
by male chivalry in the CJS - PMT (Dalton 1961 and Moire Jessel 1997)
14Naturalism simplistic and stereotypical
explanations
- "In the first place, the delinquent girl is much
less frequent than her male counterpart, and she
is less interesting. Her offenses take
predominantly the form of sexual misbehavior, of
a kind to call for care and protection rather
than punishment. Delinquency in the male at an
equivalent age is very much more varied,
dangerous and dramatic - (Cowie 1968)
15Sociological explanations of conformity
- Not a biological trait but the consequence of
differential socialisation and cultural
expectations (Oakley 1972) - Heidensohn (1996)uses Hirschis control theory
to explain female conformity - girls more closely
monitored by family while boys encouraged to take
risks. - Therefore girls get less opportunity to learn
about deviant and criminal behaviour (Smart 1976)
and are rewarded for conformity to traditional
gender roles. - Carlen (1988) argues that girls / women are more
likely to be attracted by the rewards of work and
home and less likely to be tempted into crime.
Also moral sanctions against female criminality
are greater.
16Sociological explanations of female criminality
- W.I. Thomas (1923) - social disorganisation
breakdown of traditional society led to less
social control for women increasing desire for
excitement. Women more likely to define their
aspirations in terms of risk (and crime). - In the 1970s this idea of social change and
female criminality became known as the
liberation thesis - EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN THE FIELDS OF LEGITIMATE
ENDEAVOR RUNS PARALLEL TO THE FACT THAT WOMEN ARE
FORCING THEIR WAY INTO THE WORLD OF MAJOR CRIMES
(Adler 1975) - Womens participation in financial and white
collar offencesshould increase as their
opportunities for employment in higher status
occupations extend (Simon 1975) - CASE STUDY Martha Stewart (look her up)
17and lack of opportunities.
- MARGINALISATION THESIS / ECONOMIC RATIONALITY
(SIMON AND LANDIS 1991) - The feminisation of poverty and the
criminalisation of poor women (CARLEN 1988) - E.G. PROSTITUTION (MCLEOD 1982)
- Maybe exacerbated by chivalry and paternalism
in CJS especially when it comes to sentencing
women with family responsibilities but - Those who reject gender roles and
responsibilities are condemned as doubly deviant
and doubly damned (Lloyd 1995) -
18The Man Question
- The statistics support the traditional view of
the problem as a male one. - This tends to be supported by a naturalistic view
of the aggressive male which comes from
socio-biology.
19The masculine turn
- Socialisation processes gender is learned and
so are the behaviours which lead boys into
trouble. - Power Control men exert their dominance
through violence, intimidation, abuse as Smith
says the one emotion men do allow themselves is
anger. - Masculinity and identity work writers such as
Connell (1995) have argued that there is an
hegemonic masculinity which is based upon notions
of dominance and toughness and which criminal
activity and risk taking are closely linked with
traditional notions of being a man. Doing crime
can be seen as a form of identity work. - In certain situations, men are likely to engage
in criminal behaviour as a mechanism for
constructing their masculinity - (Copes and Hochstetler 2003)
20Male Violence
- What we know about the nature of violent crime
is that males predominate as both offenders and
victims, at all levels (from the working class
man on the street to the powerful world leaders
who wage war). It is almost as if violence
belongs to men. Women very rarely use violence to
the same extent, or arguably, for the same sorts
of reasons as their male counterparts. As Collier
(1998, p.2) notes Sex difference explains more
variance in crime across nations and cultures
than any other variable. - (Fiona Brookman 2000)
21A Question of Convergence?
- It has been suggested that the gap between male
and female offending is narrowing. This may be as
result of increased female offending especially
violence as well as the growing awareness of the
authorities to female crime as a social
problem. Although there may be some truth in the
argument that this is a socially constructed
issue following moral panics about liberated
women losing control, there is also hard
evidence that the changes are real with the Home
Office reporting increases in female offending
rates for serious crimes such as robbery,
burglary, drugs and violence. This is replicated
in the dramatic and unprecedented increase in
the female prison population - (Smith 2005351)