Women - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Women

Description:

Early Sociology and Criminology dominated by men doing science = 'women are ... as affective', maternal and conformist' see Merton's theory of anomic crime. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:285
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: hopeliv
Category:
Tags: anomic | women

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Women


1
Women Crime
  • Mike Keating 2006

2
Hidden from History
  • Early Sociology and Criminology dominated by men
    doing science women are hidden from history
  • (Dale Spender)
  • Malestream Sociology / Criminology
  • Men dominate University Departments
  • Men dominate top posts/ control funding
  • Men determine research priorities
  • - areas of study
  • - methodology
  • - publishing
  • Men determine the curriculum
  • e.g. Founding Fathers as basis of sociological
    / criminological knowledge.
  • Male orientation may so colour the organisation
    of sociology as a discipline that the
    invisibility of women is a structured male view
    rather than a superficial flaw. The male focus,
    incorporated into the definitions of subject
    areas, reduces women to a side issue from the
    start.
  • Oakley (1974) quoted in Abbott and Wallace
    (19971).

3
Feminist Critique of Sociology
  • It is mainly concerned with research by men, on
    men using theories for men.
  • Generalisation based upon samples of men.
  • Womens concerns overlooked.
  • Women who do feature are presented in a distorted
    manner.
  • Sex / gender rarely offered as explanatory
    variables.
  • Any treatment of sex / gender is marginal
    reinforcing the idea that it is unimportant
    justifying the dominance of other perspectives.
  • (Abbot Wallace 19976)

4
and Criminology
  • The history of criminology has been largely a
    history of men but one in which the maleness of
    crime, crime control and crime analysis has been
    so taken for granted as to be rendered invisible
  • Smith (2005346)

5
The Feminist attack on malestream sociology
  • 1) The gendering of society.
  • 2) Feminist research methods.
  • 3) Feminist Theory.
  • See pages 3-4 in handout.
  • See also
  • Simone de Beauvoir
  • Anne Oakley
  • Sue Sharp

6
In the 1970s 80s writers such as Smart and
Heidensohn led the charge in criminology
  • Carol Smart wrote Women, Crime and Criminology in
    1976 and went on to become Professor of Sociology
    at Leeds and is now Director of the Morgan Centre
    at Manchester University. In 1985 Frances
    Heidensohn published Women Crime and has
    written extensively on the topic since. She is
    now Professor of Social Policy at University of
    London and visiting Professor at the Mannheim
    Centre for Criminology at the LSE.

7
Feminist Criminology
  • Rejection of Malestream criminology as gender
    blind
  • (Laws are) man made in the interests of men, in
    accordance with a paternalistic attitude towards
    women... The innumerable studies of criminality
    and delinquency that exist do not include women
    and girls in their subject matter. They are
    written by men, on the subject of men for an
    audience of men
  • Smart (1977)

8
Hidden from Criminology
  • INVISIBLE WOMEN statistically rare therefore
    hard to access.
  • MALESTREAM CRIMINOLOGY almost everything we
    know about crime is from a male perspective
    (which ignores or marginalises women)
  • FUNCTIONALISM - very conservative view of family
    and gender roles women seen as affective,
    maternal and conformist see Mertons theory
    of anomic crime.
  • MARXISM - class based and gender blind
  • SUB-CULTURAL THEORY- mainly interested in
    disaffected juvenile males (girls as marginal to
    the male gang)
  • LABELLING - apart from W.I. Thomas (The
    Unadjusted Girl 1923) very little interest in
    gender
  • See Madeleine Leonard Masculinity, femininity
    crime in Sociology Review September 1995.

9
Feminist Criminology raises specific issues
  • i) What are the gendered patterns of crime?
  • ii) Why do women commit so few crimes relative to
    men?
  • iii) What explanations are offered for female
    criminals?
  • iv) Women as victims of crime.
  • v) Women in the CJS discriminatory practices in
    courts prisons.
  • vi) Rethinking the links between masculinity
    crime

10
and three key questions
  • The Woman Question taking female offending
    seriously. Challenging simplistic stereotypes.
  • The Man Question - The maleness of crime has
    been so taken for granted as to be rendered
    invisiblestudies have tended to be on men as
    offenders rather than offenders as men.
  • (Smith 2005353)
  • The Convergence Question are women becoming
    more promiscuous and predatory?
  • Can increasing female criminality be accounted
    for by the liberation thesis?

11
The Woman Question
  • Problematic nature
  • i) Criminology as gender blind or gender
    neutral.
  • ii) Real crime in defined as male crime.
  • This has been referred to as the stag effect
  • It has attracted male scholars who wanted to
    study and understand outlaw men, hoping perhaps
    that some of the romance and fascination of this
    role will rub off. Among the disciplines it is
    quintessentially male
  • (Chesney Lind quoted in Rafter and Heidensohn)
  • iii) The limitations on theorising of the
    ideology of femininity and stereotypical
    thinking. E.g. Deviant women as double damned
    deviants.
  • iv) Failure to recognise the changing nature of
    society and criminology.

12
NATURALISTIC VIEW OF WOMEN.
  • ACCEPTABLE FEMALE NORM IS CLOSELY RELATED TO
    BIOLOGY
  • WOMEN CLOSER TO NATURE THEY GIVE BIRTH,
    MENSTRUAL CYCLE, CARERS
  • GIRLS SUGAR AND SPICE AND ALL THINGS NICE
  • THEREFORE WOMEN CRIMINALS ARE UNNATURAL /EVIL
    (MYRA HINDLEY ULTIMATE TRANSGRESSOR AS SHE
    KILLED CHILDREN)

13
Naturalistic explanations of female criminal
  • Biological / Psychological - often related to
    sexual deviance
  • LOMBROSO AND FERRERO Women less biologically
    evolved But Criminal women like men (Atavism)
  • THOMAS 1907 - early work suggests female
    criminals are pathological
  • OTTO POLLACK (1950s) Womens true nature
    (deceitful, vengeful and emotional) protected
    by male chivalry in the CJS
  • PMT (Dalton 1961 and Moire Jessel 1997)

14
Naturalism simplistic and stereotypical
explanations
  • "In the first place, the delinquent girl is much
    less frequent than her male counterpart, and she
    is less interesting. Her offenses take
    predominantly the form of sexual misbehavior, of
    a kind to call for care and protection rather
    than punishment. Delinquency in the male at an
    equivalent age is very much more varied,
    dangerous and dramatic
  • (Cowie 1968)

15
Sociological explanations of conformity
  • Not a biological trait but the consequence of
    differential socialisation and cultural
    expectations (Oakley 1972)
  • Heidensohn (1996)uses Hirschis control theory
    to explain female conformity - girls more closely
    monitored by family while boys encouraged to take
    risks.
  • Therefore girls get less opportunity to learn
    about deviant and criminal behaviour (Smart 1976)
    and are rewarded for conformity to traditional
    gender roles.
  • Carlen (1988) argues that girls / women are more
    likely to be attracted by the rewards of work and
    home and less likely to be tempted into crime.
    Also moral sanctions against female criminality
    are greater.

16
Sociological explanations of female criminality
  • W.I. Thomas (1923) - social disorganisation
    breakdown of traditional society led to less
    social control for women increasing desire for
    excitement. Women more likely to define their
    aspirations in terms of risk (and crime).
  • In the 1970s this idea of social change and
    female criminality became known as the
    liberation thesis
  • EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN THE FIELDS OF LEGITIMATE
    ENDEAVOR RUNS PARALLEL TO THE FACT THAT WOMEN ARE
    FORCING THEIR WAY INTO THE WORLD OF MAJOR CRIMES
    (Adler 1975)
  • Womens participation in financial and white
    collar offencesshould increase as their
    opportunities for employment in higher status
    occupations extend (Simon 1975)
  • CASE STUDY Martha Stewart (look her up)

17
and lack of opportunities.
  • MARGINALISATION THESIS / ECONOMIC RATIONALITY
    (SIMON AND LANDIS 1991)
  • The feminisation of poverty and the
    criminalisation of poor women (CARLEN 1988)
  • E.G. PROSTITUTION (MCLEOD 1982)
  • Maybe exacerbated by chivalry and paternalism
    in CJS especially when it comes to sentencing
    women with family responsibilities but
  • Those who reject gender roles and
    responsibilities are condemned as doubly deviant
    and doubly damned (Lloyd 1995)

18
The Man Question
  • The statistics support the traditional view of
    the problem as a male one.
  • This tends to be supported by a naturalistic view
    of the aggressive male which comes from
    socio-biology.

19
The masculine turn
  • Socialisation processes gender is learned and
    so are the behaviours which lead boys into
    trouble.
  • Power Control men exert their dominance
    through violence, intimidation, abuse as Smith
    says the one emotion men do allow themselves is
    anger.
  • Masculinity and identity work writers such as
    Connell (1995) have argued that there is an
    hegemonic masculinity which is based upon notions
    of dominance and toughness and which criminal
    activity and risk taking are closely linked with
    traditional notions of being a man. Doing crime
    can be seen as a form of identity work.
  • In certain situations, men are likely to engage
    in criminal behaviour as a mechanism for
    constructing their masculinity
  • (Copes and Hochstetler 2003)

20
Male Violence
  • What we know about the nature of violent crime
    is that males predominate as both offenders and
    victims, at all levels (from the working class
    man on the street to the powerful world leaders
    who wage war). It is almost as if violence
    belongs to men. Women very rarely use violence to
    the same extent, or arguably, for the same sorts
    of reasons as their male counterparts. As Collier
    (1998, p.2) notes Sex difference explains more
    variance in crime across nations and cultures
    than any other variable.
  • (Fiona Brookman 2000)

21
A Question of Convergence?
  • It has been suggested that the gap between male
    and female offending is narrowing. This may be as
    result of increased female offending especially
    violence as well as the growing awareness of the
    authorities to female crime as a social
    problem. Although there may be some truth in the
    argument that this is a socially constructed
    issue following moral panics about liberated
    women losing control, there is also hard
    evidence that the changes are real with the Home
    Office reporting increases in female offending
    rates for serious crimes such as robbery,
    burglary, drugs and violence. This is replicated
    in the dramatic and unprecedented increase in
    the female prison population
  • (Smith 2005351)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com