CPL AND DEVELOPMENTTHE CASE OF THE COMESA REGION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

CPL AND DEVELOPMENTTHE CASE OF THE COMESA REGION

Description:

Reliance on Governments to provide essential services for the majority: ... have competition advocacy provisions within apposite regions e.g COMESA, EAC rules. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: compc1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CPL AND DEVELOPMENTTHE CASE OF THE COMESA REGION


1
CPL AND DEVELOPMENT-THE CASE OF THE COMESA REGION
  • By
  • Peter Muchoki Njoroge
  • Chairperson
  • COMESA Competition Commission

2
CHARACTERISTICS WITH REGARD TO COMPETITION IN THE
COMESA REGION
  • Government involvement in many sectors.
  • Reliance on Governments to provide essential
    services for the majority education, health,
    water etc.
  • Supremacy of the Executive vis a vis other
    government arms.
  • Lack of Strong Competition Culture

3
CHARACTERISTICS OF COMESA STATES contd
  • Generally there is weak regulation. Probability
    of regulatory capture is high both industrial
    and political.
  • High poverty levels associated T/Os.
  • Policy Makers are also BOs or are highly
    intertwined with BOs. Vested interests have high
    propensities to converge.
  • High Concentration of economic power.
  • Lack of CPL in most countries eg in the COMESA
    region out of 19 member states there are only 2,
    3 or 4 fairly active CAs. CL has been promulgated
    in about 7 States.

4
EXAMPLES OF RTPs IN THE COMESA REGION
  • Trade agreements geographical market sharing,
    price fixing, economies of scope provisions,
    production quantities provisions ets.
  • Cartelization through trade associations.
  • Refusal or discrimination in supply.
  • Predatory practices to repress
    competition.
  • Collusive tendering BR.
  • Collusive bidding at auctions BR

5
NEED FOR CPL IN THE COMESA REGION
  • The environment is conducive for proliferation of
    RTPs.
  • RTP will spawn transparency and accountability
    which will go a long way towards controlling
    corruption.
  • Promotion of good governance by introduction of
    enforceable rules. As already stated governments
    are involved in many sectors of the economy.
  • As the majority of the people are poor, CPL will
    speak on their behalf. Consumer Welfare will be
    enhanced.

6
NEED FOR CPL contd.
  • Trade Associations are used to promote RTPs in
    key sectors such as Insurance, Banking,
    Manufacturing, Oil, Construction, Pharmacy,
    Medical etc. Some claim to embrace safety and
    best standards. CPL is needed to tame them.
  • As stated earlier vested interests control many
    sectors of COMESA States economies. CPL is
    needed to tame these interests

7
NEED FOR CPL contd.
  • Enterprises, especially Multinationals, abhor
    adverse publicity. Any indication, therefore,
    that a Public Agency is investigating them spawns
    positive effects. The enterprise being
    investigated, and other enterprises, will desist
    from conduct involving RTPs.
  • Competition Policy may be more important in
    developing countries than in developed countries.
    In many developing and least developed
    countries, many people subsist on less than one
    dollar per day.

8
NEED FOR CPL contd
  • That dollar when taken away, through
    uncompetitive practices, from the poor person
    disproportionately affects him more than it would
    affect people from richer countries.
  • In situations where public funds are involved,
    for example in bid-rigging and collusive
    tendering, the dollar which would go to assist
    the poor in state provision of medicine or in
    providing universal primary education ends up in
    private pockets. This is anti-development.

9
OVERARCHING NEED FOR CPL
  • We subscribe to the view that Competition Policy
    may be more important in developing countries
    than in developed countries. In many developing
    and least developed countries, many people
    subsist on less than one dollar per day. That
    dollar when taken away, through uncompetitive
    practices, from the poor person
    disproportionately affects him more than it would
    affect a better-off person.

10
OVERARCHING NEED cont
  • In situations where public funds are involved,
    for example in bid-rigging and collusive
    tendering, the dollar which would go to assist
    the poor in state provision of medicine or in
    providing universal primary education ends up in
    private pockets. This is anti-development.

11
OVERARCHING NEED contd
  • Enterprises, especially Multinationals, abhor
    adverse publicity. Any indication, therefore,
    that a Governmental Agency is investigating them
    spawns positive effects. The company being
    investigated, and many other such companies, will
    desist from conduct involving RTPs.

12
REGIONAL COMPETITION AUTHORITIES
  • Will capture extra territorial violations on
    behalf of regions in more effective and
    coordinated methods.
  • Treaties establishing regional economic
    cooperation initiatives normally have competition
    adherance provisions. Regional CAs are best
    placed to enforce obligations arising out of such
    provisions especially with regard to member
    states lacking CAs.
  • Regional CAs have competition advocacy provisions
    within apposite regions e.g COMESA, EAC rules.
  • Regional CAs may be less amenable to Industrial
    and Political capture.

13
CONCLUSION
  • CPL promotes development whether at regional or
    national levels.
  • The characteristics (broached in Slide 1 etc)
    require taming by effective enforcement of CPL.
  • CPL may be required more urgently in the COMESA
    region ( and in other comparable regions) than
    perhaps would be required in more developed
    regions. Money saved through enforcement of CPL
    will go into important services such as water,
    health and education.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com