Students metacognition, strategy, and affective anxiety while executing a spreadsheet activity PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 16
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Students metacognition, strategy, and affective anxiety while executing a spreadsheet activity


1
Students metacognition, strategy, and affective
anxiety while executing a spreadsheet activity
  • Authors Trang Nguyen
  • Dr. Lyn Henderson

2
Introduction
  • Vocational Education and Training students at
    Technical and Further Education in Australia
  • differed in learning strategies ? different
    perceptions in learning computer software
  • The need to understand students thinking skills

Participants 2 males, 2 females, ICT entry level
I knew I had to try to figure out how to do
this.
I do not know how to do that
3
Spreadsheets
  • Spreadsheet Mind tools
  • valuable ? critical thinking skills and
    strategies
  • (Jonassen , 1995 Rowe 1988 1993 1996
    Salomon, Perkins, Globerson 1991)
  • Spreadsheets in this study combines technical
    and cognitive skills
  • Critical thinking includes metacognition

4
Metacognition, strategy, and affective
  • Metacognition thinking about thinking, and then
    employing
  • strategies to
    enhance and problem solve solutions
  • when there is
    understanding failure
  • (Henderson
    Tallman, 2006)
  • Well developed metacognition vs Low levels of
    metacognition
  • Affective states can influence cognitive
    processing
  • (Picard, 1997)
  • Metacognition links to strategy (Marland,
    Patching, Putt, 1992)

Every time I made a mistake and knew I was
wrong, I was frozen and couldnt do anything
I dont understand the question, so I make sure
to read it again
Source of image www.isaacmao.com/
works/images/ME_LD.1.gif
5
Research questions
  • In what ways do metacognition, strategy, and
    affective anxiety interact and affect each other?

Metacognition
?
?
Anxiety
Strategy
?
6
Methodology
7
Data categorisation
8
Findings
?
?
9
Findings Metacognition
  • Control type Metacognition (Males 20 Females
    7)
  • Males generate effective strategies to solve
    problems
  • Monitor, plan, and modify thinking
  • Awareness metacognition(Males 6 Females 25)
  • Females aware of difficulties in understanding
    spreadsheet
  • tasks, inability to
    recall.
  • Males aware of ability ? keep focusing on topic
  • ? comprehension of
    overall concepts

Well-directed metacognitive control enhanced the
performances by helping to maximize
studentscapabilities and optimized their
strategies
10
Findings Strategy
  • Males (37), females (10)
  • Males made better metacognitive use of strategies
  • Females inadequate control metacognition

11
Findings Affective anxiety
12
Conclusions and Implications
  • Cannot generalise but results are such that
    warrants further research to see if these results
    can be confirmed
  • metacognition played a major role in the
    selection of strategy
  • affective anxiety affects both metacognition and
    strategy

Metacognition
Anxiety
Strategy
13
References
  • 1 Joanssen, D. (1996). Computers in the
    classroom. Mindtools for critical thinking.
    Retrieved 01 December, 2004, from
    http//www.quasar.ualberta.ca/edpy485/edtech/mindt
    ool.htm
  • 2 Henderson, L., Putt, I., Coombs, G. (2002).
    Mental models of teaching and learning with the
    WWW. Retrieved 01 December, 2004, from
    http//www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/
    proceedings/papers/063.pdf
  • 3 Maiorana, V.P. (1992). Critical thinking
    across the curriculum Buiding the analytical
    classroom. Retrieved 25 May, 2005, from
    http//www.kcmetro.cc.mo.us/longview/ctac/defintio
    ns.htm
  • 4 Phelps, R. Graham, A. (2004). Teachers and
    ICT Exploring a metacognitive approach to
    professional development. Australian Journal of
    Educational Technology, 20(1), 49-68.
  • 5 Bohlin, R.M. (2002). Avoiding computer
    avoidance. Retrieved 19 July, 2004, from
    http//it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper35/paper35.html

14
References
  • 6 Lyle, L. (2003). Stimulated recall a report
    on its use in naturalistic research. British
    Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861-878.
  • 7 Stough, L. Palmer, D. (2003). Special
    thinking in special settings A qualitative study
    of special educators. Journal of Special
    Education, 36(4), 206-222.
  • 8 Henderson, M. (1996). Multimedia
    interactivity An investigation into learners'
    mediating processes during click-drag activities.
    B.Ed. Hons James Cook University, Townsville.
  • 9 Picard, R.W. (1997). Affective computing.
    Cambridge MIT Press.
  • 10 Desai, M.S. Richards, T. (1998). Computer
    anxiety, training and education A meta analysis.
    Journal of Information Systems Education, 9(12),
    49-54.
  • 11 Mikulincer, Mario, Peri Kedem, Paz, D.
    (1990). Anxiety and categorisation-I The
    structure and boundaries of mental categories.
    Personal and Individual Differences, 11(8),
    805-814.

15
References
  • 12 Gravill, J.I., D.R. Compeau, and B.L.
    Marcloin. (2002). Metacognition in IT The
    influence of self-efficacy and self-awareness.
  • 13 Marland, P.W., W.G. Patching, and I. Putt.
    (1992). Learning form text. Glimpses inside the
    minds of distance learners. James Cook University
    of North Queensland
  • 14Picard, R.W. (1997). Affective computing.
    Cambridge MIT Press.

16
  • Thank you for your interest
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com