Title: Corporate restructuring
1Corporate restructuring
- The Banks experience in Bolivia
2The FSAP diagnosis of 2002 highlighted deep
fragilities in bank loan portfolios
3 which banks had addressed with loan
reprogramming exclusively
- Incentivized by government programs supporting
loan reprogramming - By Feb. 2002, 36 of loans had been reprogrammed
(up to 50 for some banks) - 20 of them were non-performing soon after (up to
65 for some banks), compared to 21 NPLs in
total loan portfolios - Yet, new regulation allowed for better risk
classification.
4 because their tight capital situation did not
enable any loss taking
And, relaxation of prudential norms enabled them
to hide inevitable losses
5As to corporations, they had no incentives to
restructure
- Strong over-leveraging of balance sheets due to
over-optimism during boom - Most firms with limited prospects, low management
skills and obsolete technologies hence most
should exit the market - But, bankruptcy process entails stigma of fraud,
and banks cannot afford the associated losses - In addition, history of government bail out
- And, fear of loss of control over family
businesses. - Hence, stand-still situation where everyone waits
for a bail out and refuses to take its share of
losses - Leads to no new lending, and thus to low economic
growth, in turn penalizing performing companies
6The government hoped that economic re-activation
would do the trick
- The GoB hoped that higher economic growth would
save most companies, improve loan quality and
bank health - Hence, they offered incentives for banks to grow
their loan portfolios - more time to meet provisioning standards
- This had a perverse impact on banks
- Well managed banks find no healthy new loan
opportunities and therefore had to provision
fully - Ailing banks increased their loan portfolios
(with ailing borrowers) and were granted more
time to adequately provision their bad loans - and on companies
- Ailing companies found new loans, delaying
bankruptcy treats.
7Instead, the WB proposed a systemic crisis
management framework
8 based on a comprehensive package of reforms
(part of a FSAC)
- Establishment of Systemic Restructuring Team at
highest level - Ongoing reform of bankruptcy code, to allow
faster company exits - Remove presumption of fraud
- Remove need to obtain unanimous approval of a
reorganization plan by all privileged creditors
(tax, labor, and secured claimants) - Fasten bankruptcy process
- Train judges.
- New law passed in July 2003 to enable voluntary
workouts - Creation of two funds
- For bank re-capitalization available when
capital inadequacy results from - The absorption of a failed bank
- Loan losses resulting from corporate
restructuring - For corporate re-capitalization and lending (with
CAF) available to viable companies participating
to corporate restructuring process. - Creation of Superintendence of Companies in
August 2003
9Despite these significant efforts, corporate
restructuring is slow to start
- Less than 10 cases of voluntary corporate
restructuring processes - Less than half involving viable companies
(including the largest employer in Bolivia) - But, all banks are involved.
- Remaining obstacles
- Lack of incentives to motivate the start of
negotiations among parties - Unwillingness by companies to become transparent
- Inability to restructure the debt of individuals
and unregistered small businesses - Remaining uncertainties in legal framework
- Inadequate training of judges and arbitrators
- Insufficient publicity on capitalization funds.
10To encourage more corporate restructuring, the
Bank will sponsor a dedicated workshop
- Targeted at all parties involved in corporate
restructuring processes (borrowers, banks,
minority creditors, judges, arbitrators,
authorities, labor representatives, ) - With international experts
- With concrete successful examples from the region
(Colombia, Peru) - With dedicated sessions for each group of
attendees, addressing in particular the remaining
obstacles - With TA sessions for banks and the authorities.