Intellectual Property Implications on Pharmaceutical Innovation and Investment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Intellectual Property Implications on Pharmaceutical Innovation and Investment

Description:

to develop a process to mass-produce insulin. ... Bolar Provision. X. X. X. X. Regulatory Delay of 3 Years. 153.59. 143.23. 150,82. 173.09. 133.59 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:340
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: imraan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intellectual Property Implications on Pharmaceutical Innovation and Investment


1
Intellectual Property Implications on
Pharmaceutical Innovation and Investment
  • Presented by
  • James Ringer
  • CEO, Lilly South Africa
  • Chairperson IMSA Regulatory and Patent Team
  • 14 August 2007

2
Innovation benefits the patient
Lilly researchers collaborated with scientists at
the University of Toronto to develop a process
to mass-produce insulin. The work resulted in
the introduction of the worlds first commercial
insulin product in 1923 by Eli Lilly and Company.
Patient with diabetes before and after insulin
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Pharmaceutical Research and Development (R D)
Process
Definitions IND Investigational New Drug
Application FDA U.S. Food and Drug
Administration NDA New Drug Application
Source www.Innovation.org
8
Economics of Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property
(IP) Best Case
Patent Filing
Marketing Authorisation Granted
?
Exclusivity Period (11.5 Years)
Elapsed Time (8.5 Years)
9
Why Patent Protection?
  • Govt gives exclusivity for fixed period in return
    for transparency open use afterwards 20 years
    in SA
  • Pharma industry does not get full 20-year benefit
    due to nature of industry and regulatory
    realities
  • Fairness appropriate reward for innovation
    should underpin the system

10
South African patent life compared to individual
countries
Grant Thornton Patent life country comparator
analysis 2007.
11
Regulatory processes take time
12
SA market realities versus proposed pricing
benchmarking countries
1 Grant Thornton Patent life country comparator
analysis 2007. 2 5 years based on Simvastatin
IMS model 2 years based on Simvastatin IMS
model.
13
Public Health and Policy Considerations
  • Compulsory licensing /parallel importation
  • Provisions of Medicines Act (giving Govt autonomy
    to grant licenses where pressing need arises) to
    apply even with SPC in place
  • Voluntary licensing has been successfully used in
    South Africa
  • Development of medicine vs. Profits
  • Put measures in place to protect investment so
    that more focus can be put on RD in developing
    world

14
IP Innovation Investment
  • Virtually all of the inventions which ultimately
    hastened economic development and lifted living
    standards especially new technologies and
    manufacturing processes were developed in
    societies with strong intellectual property
    protections.
  • Countries with weak IP protections receive less
    direct foreign investment and the investment
    they receive is less technologically
    sophisticated
  • Source Robert Shapiro and Kevin Hassett, The
    Economic Value of Intellectual Property, October
    2005.

15
Value of IP
  • Research shows positive link between IP and
    economic growth
  • New drug development can benefit developing
    countries, e.g. in unique disease areas,
    technology transfer, skills development
  • Innovative research leads to better health
    outcomes, skills development and increased
    investment.
  • A scientific base is critical for long-term
    growth which goes beyond manufacturing
    duplication
  • Discourages counterfeit drugs that can pose
    public health risk

16
Economic Benefits of IPJordan Case Study
Source US PhRMA 2005
5
17
Economic Benefits of IPMexico Case Study
Source US PhRMA 2005
5
18
Economic Benefits of IPSingapore Case Study
Source US PhRMA 2005
5
19
Multinational Pharmaceutical Sector Contribution
to SA
Contribution (Rand bn)
Source Deloitte Touche
Significant Direct Pharmaceutical Manufacturer
Contribution To SA Economy
20
Multinational Pharmaceutical Sector Contribution
To SA Greater Than Direct Economic Contributions
Alone - 2006
Skills Development Double The
Statutory Requirement Of 1 Of Payroll
Total Export 2006 R 414 million (Growth
of 240 Last 3 Years)
CSI Investment Of 4.8 Net Profit After Tax gt
1 Required By BBBEE
Contribution (Rand bn)
Source Deloitte Touche
Further Pharma Contributions Greater Than
Statutory Requirements Codes
21
R D in Pharma Benefits to SA and its Patients
22
Proposed solutions for Pharmaceutical
Intellectual Property Protection in South Africa
  • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPC)
  • Extends patent protection to account for longer
    pharmaceutical development and registration
    period
  • Patent application to time of marketing approval
    less 5 years
  • Data Package Exclusivity (DPE)
  • 8 years from date of marketing authorisation
    before agency can use confidential information to
    grant another application
  • 2 years of additional protection for
    authorisation of a new indication
  • 1 year for additional work done on pediatric
    populations
  • Based on current EU practices

23
What is at stake for South Africa ?
  • Opportunities for increased investment
    into R D
  • Access to innovative drugs to treat more
    conditions and improve a patients quality of
    life
  • Increase the eventual availability of generics
    that can enter the market

24
Innovation benefits the Patient
Patient with diabetes before and after insulin
25
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com