Title: Resolving the Problems
1Resolving the Problems
- Dealing with Conflicts on
- Natural Resource Issues
Dr. Martin Beutler Dr. James Johnson SDSU West
River Ag Center Rapid City, SD
2Resolving the Problems
- Do you ever have conflicts dealing with natural
resource issues?
- Water
- Domestic livestock vs Wildlife
- Pollution
- Ownership and/or control
3Resolving the Problems
How do we deal with conflicts, potential and
realized?
- Ignore them
- Fight from afar write letters
- Butt heads
- Try to resolve face to face
- Litigate
4Resolving the Problems
What happens when everyone does not agree?
- People harbor bad feelings
- Rumors run rampant name calling
- Trust is destroyed
- Community is not built
- Potential for violence exists
5Resolving the Problems
What happens to the resource when conflicts
occur?
- Nothing gets done
- Resource may decline
- Resource may improve
- Opportunities may be lost
- Unless resolved the conflict does not go away!
6Resolving the Problems
What do you need to help resolve conflicts in
your area?
- An understanding of the issue
- Identity and personality of the persons involved
- Knowledge about how problems can be solved
7Resolving the Problems
- You cant manage resources sensibly in
CONFLICT LITIGATION or LEGISLATION
8Getting Results From Public Involvement
- Another Meeting
- to do what,
- by when,
- with whom?
South Dakota Coordinated Resource Management
Technical Advisory Committee December 1999
9Getting Results From Public Involvement
Introduction
- Provides an introduction to the manual and
discusses why it is important to involve the
public in making decisions when they have an
opinion.
10Getting Results From Public Involvement
Introduction
- If public has an opinion, best to include them.
- Too many issues never resolved or projects
completed because of a lack of public support. - Tools needed to help bring people and their ideas
together.
11Getting Results From Public Involvement
iii
How to Use this Manual
- Manual provides methods for analyzing the need
for public participation and assessing the
situation. - Consider and Reconsider using a process. (lots
of energy required)
12Getting Results From Public Involvement
iii
How to Use this Manual
- When using a process, evaluate the status often
to determine - Appropriate parties present?
- Tools selected are the most appropriate ones to
use? - Overall goals are being met?
13Getting Results From Public Involvement
v
Glossary of Terms
- Gives definitions to major words in the manual.
- Action Plan
- Advisory Group
- Agenda
- Audience Participation
- Etc
14Getting Results From Public Involvement
Contents
- How to Use This Manual
- Glossary
- Chapter 1 What Process am I Going to Use?
- Chapter 2 What Should I Know About Meeting
Management
15Getting Results From Public Involvement
Contents
- Chapter 3 What Tools Will Be Most Effective
During the Meeting? - Chapter 4 When and How Should I Obtain
Facilitation Assistance? - Appendix
- For More Information
- Useful References
- Literature Used
16Getting Results From Public Involvement
Chapter 1 What Process Am I Going To
Use?
- Overview
- Methods to analyze a situation and determine the
most appropriate process. - A menu of processes.
17Getting Results From Public Involvement
Ensuring Integrity of a Process
1-1
- Purpose of the process
- Good faith participation
- The parties must view it as in their interest to
use the chosen process - If a collaborative process is chosen, it should
not be used as a charade for democracy - Results how are they to be used
18Getting Results From Public Involvement
Choosing a Process - Nine Recommendations
1-3
- An agency should undertake an assessment prior to
decision which process to use. - An Agencys choice of a process should reflect
the purpose of the process.
19Getting Results From Public Involvement
Choosing a Process - Nine Recommendations
1- 4
- Sponsoring agency leaders should endorse and
support the process. - Stakeholder representation must be all-inclusive,
balanced and fair.
20Getting Results From Public Involvement
Choosing a Process - Nine Recommendations
1- 4
- When applicable, the sponsoring agency should
ensure the facilitators neutrality and
accountability to all participants. - Standards of Conduct must be mutually agreed upon
by all participants, and not established solely
by the sponsoring agency.
21Getting Results From Public Involvement
Choosing a Process - Nine Recommendations
1- 5
- Sponsoring agency should ensure resources are
available to enable full participation and
completion of the process. - Where applicable, both the participants and
agency should plan for eventual implementation of
the agreement.
22Getting Results From Public Involvement
Choosing a Process - Nine Recommendations
1- 5
- Policies governing the process should not be
overly prescriptive.
23Getting Results From Public Involvement
Problem Solving Model (steps)
1- 6
- Define the problem
- Establish what, where, why, when, who and how
problems occurs - Determine criteria for evaluating options
- Generate alternative options
- Evaluate alternative options
24Getting Results From Public Involvement
Problem Solving Model (steps)
1- 7
- Select the best option in accordance with the
criteria and interest of all parties. - Develop an action plan
- Implement the action plan
- Evaluate outcomes
- Evaluate the process
25Getting Results From Public Involvement
Process Matrix
1- 9
P U R P O S E
P R O C E S S
26Getting Results From Public Involvement
Open House
1-10
Purpose
An Open House is used to
- Provide factual information
- Allow two-way communications to obtain public
viewpoints and perceptions
27Getting Results From Public Involvement
Open House
1-10
Definition
- An informational process which usually extends
over several evenings and/or part of a weekend.
Agency personnel engage in one-on-one
conversations with concerned and/or interested
persons.
28Getting Results From Public Involvement
Focus Groups
1-12
Purpose
A Focus Group is used to
- Gather meaningful, qualitative information
- Determine what public has to say
- Create an environment of dialogue
- Focus participants efforts on issue
29Getting Results From Public Involvement
Focus Group
1-12
Definition
- Group of individuals with exposure to a
particular idea or issue are brought together by
an organization or researcher to engage in
free-flowing lateral communication. Participants
talk to each other while a facilitator gathers
basic information and records changes or new
understandings.
30Getting Results From Public Involvement
Forums
1-15
Purpose
A Forum is a public meeting designed to
- Gather public input in an open, but monitored
discussion - Provide or gather factual info from public
- Brings out all views of interest groups
- Allows a group to hear anothers view
- Gives sponsors opportunity to hear all
31Getting Results From Public Involvement
Forums
1-15
Definition
- Public meeting designed to hear differing points
of view, air the issues, and gain a greater
understanding of groups concerns and comments.
32Getting Results From Public Involvement
Advisory Groups
1-17
Purpose
Advisory Groups are designed to
- Gather factual information about a topic
- Gather public input regarding the topic
- Discuss issues that arise in attempting to reach
an agreement on specific advice to be given to an
agency - Report the groups findings
33Getting Results From Public Involvement
Advisory Groups
1-17
Definition
- Group of individuals representing the full range
of opinions regarding a problem or proposed
action brought together to collectively analyze a
situation and advise the agency of their
recommendations.
34Getting Results From Public Involvement
Negotiated Rulemaking
1-20
Purpose
- The purpose of Negotiated Rulemaking is to allow
interested parties the opportunity to provide
input into draft rules or regulations in an
attempt to avoid opposition to the final proposed
rule or regulation.
35Getting Results From Public Involvement
Negotiated Rulemaking
1-20
Definition
- Formal or informal process through which a
regulatory agency seeks to negotiate potential
rules with interested parties prior to
development and formal proposal of the rules.
The same process may be used for proposed
regulations.
36Getting Results From Public Involvement
Coordinated Resource Management (CRM)
1-22
Purpose
- CRM is designed to help stakeholders reach
consensus-based decisions regarding the
utilization and/or management of natural
resources.
37Getting Results From Public Involvement
1-22
Coordinated Resource Management (CRM)
Definition
- Collaborative process which utilizes the direct
involvement of interested stakeholders for
planning, reaching management decisions, or
resolving disputes about natural resources.
38Coordinated Resource Management
- A process for bringing people together to avoid
conflicts in the use of natural resources
- Developed as a result of natural resource
conflicts on public lands - Uses local people to solve local problems
39Coordinated Resource Management
- Works through the principle that
- None of us know as much about something as all
of us
40Coordinated Resource Management
CRM is
- Voluntary
- Non regulatory
- Can work through Cons. Districts
- Explores common ground through common interest
- Works through consensus
41Coordinated Resource Management
- A decision made through consensus benefits from
the support of all involved everyone works for
its success.
- A decision made by voting garners support from
those who voted for it, while those who voted
against it may lobby for its failure.
42Coordinated Resource Management
CRM is not
- Threatening to private property
- Mandatory
- Is not to be used as a leaver to achieve resource
management - Magic
43Coordinated Resource Management
Key Elements of CRM
- Consensus rather than voting. All will publicly
support the decision of the group. - Commitment to the CRM process and plans which are
developed. - Involvement of all interested parties.
44Coordinated Resource Management
Key Elements of CRM
- Needs not Positions are addressed. Needs can be
met. Positions are solutions. - Voluntary participation by all.
- Authority to speak for your group.
45Coordinated Resource Management
CRM takes time!
- Why is there never enough time to do things right
but always enough time to do things over?
46Getting Results From Public Involvement
Citizen Task Force
1-27
Purpose
The purpose of a Citizens Task Force is
- Consider all interests prior to final
recommendations and implementation. - Implement the steps necessary to complete the
task(s).
47Getting Results From Public Involvement
Citizen Task Force
1-27
Definition
- Group of selected citizens representing various
interests that were invited by an agency or other
organization to work on a clear defined task with
sideboards defined by that agency or
organization.
48Getting Results From Public Involvement
Mediation
1-29
Purpose
- Mediation allows parties in conflict to present
facts, identify issues, and evaluate options in a
controlled environment before a neutral party.
The primary goal is to reach agreement that
resolves the issues.
49Getting Results From Public Involvement
Mediation
1-29
Definition
- Confidential process by which parties who
perceive there is a conflict present, discuss and
explore practical alternatives with the aid of a
neutral third party.
50Getting Results From Public Involvement
Process Matrix
1- 9
P U R P O S E
P R O C E S S
51Getting Results From Public Involvement
Chapter 2 What Should I Know
About Meeting Management?
- Overview
- Pre-meeting considerations.
- Planning the meeting.
- Conducting the meeting.
- After the meeting.
52Getting Results From Public Involvement
What Should I Know About Meeting Management?
- Critical Steps For A Better Meeting
- To Meet Or Not To Meet
- Pre-Meeting Planning
- Meeting Checklist
- Sample Public Service Announcement
53Getting Results From Public Involvement
What Should I Know About Meeting Management?
- Room Arrangement
- Agenda Planning
- Conducting the Meeting
- Group Memory
- Standards of Conduct
- Audience Participation
54Getting Results From Public Involvement
What Should I Know About Meeting Management?
- Problem Prevention and Intervention
- Action Planning
- Evaluations
- Group Report
- Sample Media Release
55Getting Results From Public Involvement
Chapter 3 What Tools Will Be Most Effective
During the Meeting?
- Overview
- Tool to
- Establish group goals
- Exchange information
- Develop ideas
- Evaluate ideas
- Make decisions
56Getting Results From Public Involvement
What Tools Will Be Most Effective During the
Meeting?
- Tool Matrix
- Mission Statement Overview
- Information Sharing
- Listening/Learning Model
- Brainstorming
- Nominal Group Technique
57Getting Results From Public Involvement
What Tools Will Be Most Effective During the
Meeting?
- Storyboarding
- Ideawriting
- Criteria Development
- Options Evaluation Model
- Consensus
- Parliamentary Procedure 3- 40, 41
58Getting Results From Public Involvement
Tools Matrix
3-2
O B J E C T I V E S
X Best Use of Tool O Can also be used
59Getting Results From Public Involvement
Chapter 4 When and How Should I Get
Facilitation Assistance?
- Overview
- What is facilitation?
- What are the roles of the facilitator?
- What is involved in selecting a facilitator
60Getting Results From Public Involvement
When and How Should I Get Facilitation
Assistance?
- Facilitation
- Role of the Facilitator
- Selecting a Facilitator
- Cofacilitation
- Contracting
- Sample Agreement for Facilitation Services
61Getting Results From Public Involvement
Appendix
- Lists sources of help on public involvement
processes. - Lists References Literature Used.
62Resolving the Problems
- You cant manage resources sensibly in
CONFLICT LITIGATION or LEGISLATION