Title: Main Effects
1Main Effects Interactions
2Consider the following hypothetical study
--we are interested in evaluating a new treatment
for aggression.
--we recruit 20 children, 10 boys and 10 girls
from one school
--we randomly assign half of the boys to a
therapy group the other half to a control
group, and we do the same with the girls
--we give the 5 boys and 5 girls a group-based
therapy for aggression
--we give the 5 boys and 5 girls in the control
group a group-based game playing task that has
nothing to do with aggression
--after one month we evaluate all of the children
on a 1 to 5 scale of aggressive behavior in the
classroom
3In what research questions might we be interested?
--ignoring treatment condition, are there gender
differences in aggressive behavior? This is the
main effect of gender.
--ignoring gender, is there evidence that the
therapy condition decreases aggressive behavior
compared to the control condition? This is the
main effect of treatment.
--do boys and girls respond differently to the
same therapy? This is the interaction between
gender and treatment.
--when there are differences among the levels of
a single factor, ignoring the other factor, we
say there is a main effect of that factor
--The term interaction means that factor 2
affects the different levels of factor 1
differently, or vice versa. For this the therapy
affects boys and girls differently. It depends
is another way of describing an interaction the
effect of factor 1 depends on the level of factor
2.
4A main effect of gender, ignoring treatment
5A main effect of treatment, ignoring gender
6A complete lack of effects of gender or
treatment no interaction
7A main effect of gender, no effect of treatment
no interaction
8A main effect of treatment, no main effect of
gender, and no interaction between treatment
gender
9A main effect of treatment, a main effect of
gender, and no interaction between treatment
gender
10An interaction between treatment and gender main
effect of treatment no main effect of gender
11An interaction between treatment and gender no
main effect of treatment or gender
12More on interactions
Interaction of A and B If the effect of one
factor depends on the different levels of a
second factor, then there is an interaction
between the factors
See also this supplemental handout on interactions
13(9)
Differences in the differences
143-way interactions
- Now lets say youd like to compare two different
age groups of boys and girls on treatment for
aggression. - Perhaps the difference in aggression between boys
and girls is minimized in middle school, and
maximized in adulthood. If you administer a
treatment for aggression to both genders at both
age groups, and find that the interaction between
treatment and gender is different at adolescence
and at adulthood, then you have a 3-way
interaction.
15Is there a 3-way interaction here?
16Variables with more than 2 levels
- A researcher wants to determine the most
effective treatments for clinical anxiety
disorders. The most common anxiety disorders can
be classified as either simple phobias or
complex phobias. The researcher plans to
compare anxiety scores of patients diagnosed with
some type of phobia after they have received
either systematic desensitization (behavioral
therapy), cognitive-emotional therapy, or a
placebo treatment.
17(No Transcript)
18Project 2
- According to DeNeys (2006), we make decisions in
two ways - Relying on knowledge and beliefs (also called a
heuristic system) - Is considered effortless, rapid, and automatic
- Relying on logical standards (also called an
analytic system) - Is effortful, slow, and makes high demands on
computational resources. - Therefore, the more resources that are available,
the more likely youll be able to engage this
system
19DeNeys (2006), cont
- Sometimes, these two processes conflict.
- Lets say youre given the following syllogism,
and your task is to evaluate whether the
conclusion follows validly from the first two
statements - All mammals can walk. Whales are mammals.
Therefore, whales can walk.
20DeNeys (2006), cant
- The idea that whales can walk clearly conflicts
with your knowledge about the world. But, if you
have the computational resources available, you
will be able to rely on your logical standards
and reason that it still follows validly from the
first two assumptions. - But what if you do not have the computational
resources available? - For instance, what if at the same time that you
were asked to evaluate the syllogism, you were
also instructed to remember complicated patterns?
- DeNeys measured error rate on the syllogisms as a
consequence of concurrent cognitive demand, and
he later indicated that looking at reaction time
may be an additional consequence to investigate.
21Furthermore
- Whether someone has a high or low working memory
capacity may moderate the effect of cognitive
load on error rate. - How? What do you expect to change?
- Think in steps
- How would working memory capacity affect response
on the easy/automatic questions? - How would it affect response on the
difficult/resource-demanding questions? - How would it affect cognitive loads effect on
the easy questions? - How would it affect cognitive loads effect on
the difficult questions?
22Project 2 goals
- For project 2, we conducted an experiment very
similar to that used by DeNeys (2006). We are
ultimately interested in the following questions - Is performance on the reasoning task related to
individual difference measures of working
memory? - Does cognitive load affect error rate? What
about reaction time? - Does the effect of cognitive load on error
rate/reaction time depend on a subject's working
memory capacity? - Is there evidence for two separate reasoning
processes?
23Project 2 Next steps
- Come to class on Tuesday (3/6) having read DeNeys
(2006), having reviewed the slides on
interactions, and with a strong understanding of
the goals and predictions of project 2 - On Tuesday, well look at the data and do
analyses. Your ability to interpret the data
relies entirely on your understanding of
interactions and of what differences we expect to
find, so please come prepared.