Main Effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Main Effects

Description:

we recruit 20 children, 10 boys and 10 girls from one school ... we give the 5 boys and 5 girls in the control group a group-based game playing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: unc
Category:
Tags: boys | effects | main

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Main Effects


1
Main Effects Interactions
2
Consider the following hypothetical study
--we are interested in evaluating a new treatment
for aggression.
--we recruit 20 children, 10 boys and 10 girls
from one school
--we randomly assign half of the boys to a
therapy group the other half to a control
group, and we do the same with the girls
--we give the 5 boys and 5 girls a group-based
therapy for aggression
--we give the 5 boys and 5 girls in the control
group a group-based game playing task that has
nothing to do with aggression
--after one month we evaluate all of the children
on a 1 to 5 scale of aggressive behavior in the
classroom
3
In what research questions might we be interested?
--ignoring treatment condition, are there gender
differences in aggressive behavior? This is the
main effect of gender.
--ignoring gender, is there evidence that the
therapy condition decreases aggressive behavior
compared to the control condition? This is the
main effect of treatment.
--do boys and girls respond differently to the
same therapy? This is the interaction between
gender and treatment.
--when there are differences among the levels of
a single factor, ignoring the other factor, we
say there is a main effect of that factor
--The term interaction means that factor 2
affects the different levels of factor 1
differently, or vice versa. For this the therapy
affects boys and girls differently. It depends
is another way of describing an interaction the
effect of factor 1 depends on the level of factor
2.
4
A main effect of gender, ignoring treatment
5
A main effect of treatment, ignoring gender
6
A complete lack of effects of gender or
treatment no interaction
7
A main effect of gender, no effect of treatment
no interaction
8
A main effect of treatment, no main effect of
gender, and no interaction between treatment
gender
9
A main effect of treatment, a main effect of
gender, and no interaction between treatment
gender
10
An interaction between treatment and gender main
effect of treatment no main effect of gender
11
An interaction between treatment and gender no
main effect of treatment or gender
12
More on interactions
Interaction of A and B If the effect of one
factor depends on the different levels of a
second factor, then there is an interaction
between the factors
See also this supplemental handout on interactions
13
(9)
Differences in the differences
14
3-way interactions
  • Now lets say youd like to compare two different
    age groups of boys and girls on treatment for
    aggression.
  • Perhaps the difference in aggression between boys
    and girls is minimized in middle school, and
    maximized in adulthood. If you administer a
    treatment for aggression to both genders at both
    age groups, and find that the interaction between
    treatment and gender is different at adolescence
    and at adulthood, then you have a 3-way
    interaction.

15
Is there a 3-way interaction here?
16
Variables with more than 2 levels
  • A researcher wants to determine the most
    effective treatments for clinical anxiety
    disorders. The most common anxiety disorders can
    be classified as either simple phobias or
    complex phobias. The researcher plans to
    compare anxiety scores of patients diagnosed with
    some type of phobia after they have received
    either systematic desensitization (behavioral
    therapy), cognitive-emotional therapy, or a
    placebo treatment.

17
(No Transcript)
18
Project 2
  • According to DeNeys (2006), we make decisions in
    two ways
  • Relying on knowledge and beliefs (also called a
    heuristic system)
  • Is considered effortless, rapid, and automatic
  • Relying on logical standards (also called an
    analytic system)
  • Is effortful, slow, and makes high demands on
    computational resources.
  • Therefore, the more resources that are available,
    the more likely youll be able to engage this
    system

19
DeNeys (2006), cont
  • Sometimes, these two processes conflict.
  • Lets say youre given the following syllogism,
    and your task is to evaluate whether the
    conclusion follows validly from the first two
    statements
  • All mammals can walk. Whales are mammals.
    Therefore, whales can walk.

20
DeNeys (2006), cant
  • The idea that whales can walk clearly conflicts
    with your knowledge about the world. But, if you
    have the computational resources available, you
    will be able to rely on your logical standards
    and reason that it still follows validly from the
    first two assumptions.
  • But what if you do not have the computational
    resources available?
  • For instance, what if at the same time that you
    were asked to evaluate the syllogism, you were
    also instructed to remember complicated patterns?
  • DeNeys measured error rate on the syllogisms as a
    consequence of concurrent cognitive demand, and
    he later indicated that looking at reaction time
    may be an additional consequence to investigate.

21
Furthermore
  • Whether someone has a high or low working memory
    capacity may moderate the effect of cognitive
    load on error rate.
  • How? What do you expect to change?
  • Think in steps
  • How would working memory capacity affect response
    on the easy/automatic questions?
  • How would it affect response on the
    difficult/resource-demanding questions?
  • How would it affect cognitive loads effect on
    the easy questions?
  • How would it affect cognitive loads effect on
    the difficult questions?

22
Project 2 goals
  • For project 2, we conducted an experiment very
    similar to that used by DeNeys (2006). We are
    ultimately interested in the following questions
  • Is performance on the reasoning task related to
    individual difference measures of working
    memory?
  • Does cognitive load affect error rate? What
    about reaction time?
  • Does the effect of cognitive load on error
    rate/reaction time depend on a subject's working
    memory capacity?
  • Is there evidence for two separate reasoning
    processes?

23
Project 2 Next steps
  • Come to class on Tuesday (3/6) having read DeNeys
    (2006), having reviewed the slides on
    interactions, and with a strong understanding of
    the goals and predictions of project 2
  • On Tuesday, well look at the data and do
    analyses. Your ability to interpret the data
    relies entirely on your understanding of
    interactions and of what differences we expect to
    find, so please come prepared.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com