CFRP REINFORCEMENTS AND RETROFITTINGS OF RC STRUCTURES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

CFRP REINFORCEMENTS AND RETROFITTINGS OF RC STRUCTURES

Description:

CFRP REINFORCEMENTS AND RETROFITTINGS OF RC STRUCTURES – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:541
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: xavierm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CFRP REINFORCEMENTS AND RETROFITTINGS OF RC STRUCTURES


1
CFRP REINFORCEMENTS AND RETROFITTINGS OF RC
STRUCTURES
Barcelona, December 2006
2
Introduction
  • Structural reinforcement and retrofitting of RC
    structures using CFRP has become one of the main
    applications of composites in civil engineering.
  • The finite element code PLCD is used to develop
    structural simulations of CFRP reinforcements and
    retrofittings of RC structures. These simulations
    allow
  • Obtain a better understanding of the strength
    mechanisms of CFRP reinforcements.
  • Develop different simulations to obtain the
    better CFRP configuration for the structure to be
    reinforced.

Three different simulations are herein
presented 1. Beam reinforcement ? Used to
validate the code 2. Beam retrofitting ? Used
to compare structural performance 3. Framed
structure ? In which different CFRP
configurations are tested to obtain which one
offers a better performance
CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures
3
Code Validation Beam Reinforcement
Geometry and reinforcements of the beam used to
validate the code Spadea et al. (1998)
Component materials used to simulate the beam
CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures CODE VALIDATION
4
Finite Element Models Developed
  • Two different models have been developed
  • Sp3D-R0 Beam without CFRP reinforcement
  • Sp3D-R1 Beam with CFRP reinforcement
  • Finite element discretization and composite
    materials defined

CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures CODE VALIDATION
5
Results Obtained Numerical vs. Experimental
The results obtained are compared with the
experimental ones obtained by Spadea et al.
Comparison is done with a capacity curve (force
applied vs. displacement of the beam where the
force is applied). Results show the ability of
the code to simulate these sort of reinforcements.
Agreement is also found in the failure modes.
Experimental failure modes are No Reinforced
Tension steel yielding and concrete
crushing Reiniforced Sudden and total loss of
load capacity explosive debonding of
CFRP Numerical failure modes
Sp3D-R0 model All concrete is damaged Steel
has yield
Sp3D-R1 model The most damaged section is as the
non-reinforced one
Explosive debounding does not occur because the
model supposes perfect bonding of the CFRP
CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures CODE VALIDATION
6
Results Obtained Materials Performance
CFRP REINFORCEMENT Matrix material has reached
its yielding value and is damaged Fibre material
is steel under elastic conditions (stress lt 30
of its maximum value)
SERIAL/PARALLEL MIXING THEORY PERFORMANCE The
performance of the S/P mixing theory is studied
with the steel stirrups. Transversal stresses in
transversal stirrups must be larger than
longitudinal stresses (which must be the same
obtained in concrete)
Long Stress in Steel
Long Stress in Concrete
CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures CODE VALIDATION
7
Retrofitting Simulation
The retrofitting simulation has been done with
the beam used for the code validation.
  • Two different models are developed, depending on
    when the CFRP is applied
  • Sp3D-Rt2 CFRP is applied when damage starts in
    concrete
  • Sp3D-Rt3 CFRP is applied when damage starts in
    steel
  • Structural stiffness does not depend on when the
    structure is retrofitted
  • Retrofit a structure implies that, when the CFRP
    reinforcement starts collaborating, the structure
    has a deformation and damage larger than if it
    had been reinforced from the beginning. Damage
    reduces the load capacity of the beam while
    deformation can make the serviceability state
    unacceptable.
  • Load of 25kN ? Deformation is 45 larger in
    Sp3D-Rt3 model than in Sp3D-Rt2.

CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures RETROFITTING SIMULATION
8
Framed Structure Simulation
GEOMETRY AND REINFORCEMENTS
2D and 3D simulations 3 different models,
according to the CFRP reinforcement applied 1.
No reinforcement (noR) 2. Upper and Lower reinf.
(R) 3. Upper, Lower and Lateral reinf. (LR)
CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures FRAMED STRUCTURE SIMULATION
9
Composite Materials Definition
CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures FRAMED STRUCTURE SIMULATION
10
Results Obtained 2D models
Structural performance obtained with each
reinforcement
  • Results obtained with Upper and Lower
    reinforcements (2DF-R) are very similar to the
    ones obtained when no reinforcement is applied
    (2DF-noR)
  • The formation of plastic hinge appears for a
    load 25 larger if the Lateral reinforcement
    (2DF-LR) Is applied to the structure.

Failure criteria obtained with each reinforcement
  • Failure criteria in 2DF-R model is nearly the
    same than in 2DF-noR model.
  • The plastic hinge appears afterwards in 2DF-LR
    model because it is displaced form the concrete
    joint to a section where no reinforcement is
    applied.

CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures FRAMED STRUCTURE SIMULATION
11
Results Obtained 3D models
Structural performance obtained with each
reinforcement
  • The behaviour of the models is similar to the
    one found in 2D simulation
  • Models are stiffer as concrete confinement by
    steel stirrups is better represented
  • Plastic hinge in 3DF-R model appears before than
    in 3DF-noR model. This is because the failure
    criteria

Failure criteria obtained with each reinforcement
No reinforced model (3DF-noR)
Upper and Lower reinforced model (3DF-R)
Plastic hinge occurs before in 3DF-R model
because the section where it appears is closer to
the section where damage starts
CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures FRAMED STRUCTURE SIMULATION
12
Results Obtained 3D models
When the failure criteria in the Lateral
reinforced model is studied (3DF-LR), it shows
that 2D simulations can provide wrong results in
some cases
Figure - a - show a behaviour similar to the one
obtained with 2D models Damage is larger in the
section where no reinforcement is applied.
However, an internal view shows that the crack
still appears in the frame joint. This can be
seen better in a zenith view.
CFRP Reinforcements and Retrofittings of RC
Structures FRAMED STRUCTURE SIMULATION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com