22.416 Lecture 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

22.416 Lecture 4

Description:

recall H & H's V-clamp data yielded curves showing how the membrane's ... prob of short, brown-eyed, brunette boy baby= p1.p2.p3.p4) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: theodor1
Category:
Tags: brunette | lecture

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 22.416 Lecture 4


1
22.416 Lecture 4
  • Hodgkin and HuxleysMathematical Analysis and
    Reconstruction
  • of the Action Potential
  • - recall H Hs V-clamp data yielded curves
    showing how the membranes conductances to Na K
    (gNa gK) changed with time after any voltage
    step to a new VC gNa(t) INa(t) / (VC - ENa),
    and gK(t) IK(t) / (VC - EK)

2
H Hs mathematical fitting of g(t) curves
  • HH showed both curves could be fitted as
    products of exponential decay functions of form
    e-t /? and 1- e-t /?
  • for K gK(t) 1- e-t/? 4 x constant
    gK(max)   n4 x gK(max)

3
n is a f(V,t) with value between 0 and 1
  • n 0 when channels are all closed at -ve VM
  • n 1 when channels are all open at very ve VM
  • - at any intermediate voltage (V1, ...), n1,
    ... reaches a steady-state value between 0 and 1
  • Upon step from V1 to V2, ns value changes from
    n1 to n2 with an exponential time course as shown
    above n2 n1 ? (1 e -t/ ?n)

4
HHs biological interpretation of gK(V,t)
equation
  • H H knew that a simple exponential time course
    like this describes a first-order transition,
    when ? Unreacted substrate U ?
    Reacted product R ?
  • If R is 0 at first, then U decreases
    exponentially as R grows, both with time
    constant ? (which depends on the forward and
    backward rate constants, ? and ?)
  • When forward and backward transitions occur at
    same rate, a steady state exists
  • final reacted fraction, R / (UR), depends on ?
    ?
  • so can calculate ? ? from measured ? R /
    (UR)

5
Application to membrane's K conductance
  • So how might (1-e -t/?)4 dependence of gK(t)
    arise?
  • suggests that probability of K channel being
    open is the product of four identical 1st-order
    transition probabilities
  • ( prob of short, brown-eyed, brunette boy baby
    p1.p2.p3.p4)
  • H H suggested 4 independent gates in a K path
    must ALL shift from resting to activated
    state to open the path
  • if only 1, 2 or 3 of the 4 gates shift, K
    cannot pass through
  • Nowadays, gates current path are considered
    parts of the K channel protein, a concept not
    yet developed in1950

6
Interpretation of n
  • So n prob that any single gate in a channel is
    open
  • n4 prob that all 4 channel gates have
    opened at once prob that the channel is
    open to K flow
  • With strong depoln ( 100 mV), prob n ? 1, so
    n4 ? 1 i.e., all K channels will open
  • - with smaller VC step, n8(VC) ? plateau value
    ( 0) so only a fraction ( n4 ) of
    K channels will open
  • prob n moves exponentially to new value after VM
    changes
  • so (N.B) prob n does not change instantaneously
    with VC (only ?, ? ? do)

7
But closing the K channel only requires any one
of the 4 gates to return to the closed state ...
  • so the decline in gK at the end of the step
    follows a simple exponential decay function, e
    -t/?n (NeuroSim, HH, file clamp7

8
Equation for gNa and its interpretation
  • more complex gNa curves also fit product of 4
    exponentials
  • one (h) decreases during a depoln step, as e-t/
    ?h, while
  • the other three (all m), increase, as 1 - e -
    t/ ?m (like n)
  • gNa gNa(max) x m3 x h, with 0 ? m,h ? 1

9
Interpretation of m and h
  • m ? 0 near VMR, but increases to 1 upon
    strong depolarization
  • m represents probability that any one of 3
    independent activation gates in the Na path is
    open
  • m3 prob that all 3 of these m gates are open
    at once
  • h probability that a single inactivation gate
    is open
  • h 0 during strong depolarization (total
    inactivation) 1 at very negative VM,
    (no inactivation) ? 0.6 at VMR
    in squid axon Fig. 6.6 (40 inactivation)
  • note (Fig. 6.6) that a hyperpolarizing clamp
    prepulse before the depolarizing step removes
    inactivation (? h)
  • so prob that all 4 gates in the Na path are open
    to Na m3h

10
m h gates also differ in speed
  • m gates open much faster than h closes during
    depoln i.e., ?m
  • but all 3 m gates must open before h closes, to
    pass Na
  • so only a fraction of Na channels can open
    during 1 ap- most V-gated Na channels never
    open during an ap, because h gate cuts off path
    before all 3 m gates open (NeuroSim exercises
    demonstrate this)

11
Consequence of above -- rebound excitation
  • - if we hyperpolarize the membrane so h ? 1
    (removing inactivation),
  • - then when hyperpolarizing current ceases, ap
    may be set off spontaneously, below VMR, as VM
    returns to VMR
  • Why? 3 reasons
  • a) removing inactivation raises h ? ? gNa (?
    m3h)
  • b) greater speed of m gates lets more Na
    channels get open before h falls too far
  • c) hyperpoln ? ?n ? ? gK
  • All 3 effects help to lower the ap threshold
    below VMR

12
Reconstructing ap from g(t) equations
  • H H now predicted precise shape of giant
    axon's ap. Began with Q CV, so dQ/dt CdV/dt,
    and I dQ/dt
  • - Q (membrane charge) C (membrane capacitance)
    x VM
  • - membrane current I ( INa IK ILeak) changes
    Q I dQ/dt C dVM/dT INa IK IL
  • At any membrane voltage VM, they could calculate
  • INa gNa (VM, t) x (VM - ENa), from known gNa
    (t) curves
  • IK likewise
  • IL leakage current due to Cl, etc. from
    measured gL (constant leakage conductance)
    equilibrium voltage EL

13
To calculate aps time course,
  • HH started at resting VM,
  • calculated n, m h from measured ?s ?s at
    that VM
  • displaced VM(t) above threshold at time t (?
    stimulus),
  • calculated new n, m, h at new VM
  • calculated new gs from new n, m and h
  • calculated Is from gs, hence dVM/dt (INa
    IK IL ) / C
  • calculated ?VM (change in VM over brief ?t, say
    0.01 ms) dVM /dt x ?t, and hence new VM(t
    ?t) VM((t) ?VM
  • then found new ?s and ?s for new VM and
    iterated above thousands of times (by hand) ?
    graph of VM against time

14
What Hodgkin and Huxley achieved
  • accurately predicted shape of recorded ap, as
    well as all aps observed properties
    (refractoriness, etc.)
  • proved ap resulted from separate voltage-induced
    changes in conductance to Na and K
  • inferred gating particles, whose stochastic
    but V-induced openings must coincide to open Na
    K pathways
  • these findings led to idea of V-gated ion
    channel proteins, later supported by
    biochemistry, em, molecular biology,...(one of
    the most fruitful concepts in the history of
    biology)
  • mathematical analysis still holds up (forms the
    basis for the NeuroSim ap simulation)

15
4. Patch clamp reveals channel behaviour
  • Fig. 6.10 patch is repeatedly stepped from
    "holding VM" of -100 mV (to remove inactivation)
    to -60 mV for 23 ms
  • brief inward current pulses (mean 0.7 ms
    duration) occur randomly during each step, as
    channel flips open closed
  • Most channel openings occur near the beginning
    of the step, as 300 traces added together (bottom
    trace) show
  • opening probability ?abruptly at onset of
    depoln (as m ?),
  • then ? gradually over 4 msec (as h ?)
  • illustrates randomness of gate openings
    closings, with probabilities m h -- chance that
    all 4 are open at once is low (NeuroSims "Model"
    feature illustrates this point well)

16
Just out of interest ....
  • Note how same data in 4th Edition have sharpened
    with age( fudging) over those in the 3rd
    Edition (on the overhead)!
  • - both based on same figure in Sigworth and Neher
    (1980)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com