Title: Source
1(No Transcript)
2Source
- Kapral MK, Hall RE, Silver FL, Robertson AC, Fang
J. Registry of - the Canadian Stroke Network. Report on the
2004/05 Ontario - Stroke Audit. Toronto Institute for Clinical
Evaluative Sciences - 2009.
3Table of Contents
Slides
- Background....4-5
- Methodology ..6-7
- Key Findings
- Pre-hospital and emergency stroke
care......8-18 - Emergency and in-hospital management....19-3
2 - Length of stay, discharge status and destination
and - 30-day mortality33-53
- Interpretive Cautions..54-55
4Background
- Stroke is the fourth leading cause of death and a
leading cause of adult disability in Canada. - Previous studies in Ontario reveal variations in
availability of stroke care resources as well as
variations in treatment of stroke patients in
facilities with similar resources. - Beginning in 2000, Ontario developed a
coordinated stroke strategy to address
inconsistencies and improve access to and quality
of stroke care resources. - By 2005, the strategy was fully implemented and
is known as the Ontario Stroke System (OSS).
5Background (contd)
- Within the OSS, ongoing monitoring and evaluation
are considered essential to ensure implementation
of best practices and evidence-based stroke care. - The Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network
(RCSN), established in 2001, performs a
province-wide audit of stroke care in Ontario
every two years, a process which began in
2002/03. - The purpose of the RCSN Ontario Stroke Audit data
is to evaluate the characteristics, management
and outcomes of stroke patients in Ontario and to
make comparisons by Local Health Integration
Network (LHIN), Ontario Stroke System region and
by institutional designation with the Stroke
System (Regional Stroke Centre, District Stroke
Centre, non-designated hospital). - This report presents data for fiscal year
2004/05, with comparisons to the previous audit
performed in fiscal year 2002/03.
6Methodology
- All Ontario acute care institutions, excluding
childrens and mental health care hospitals and
those with fewer than 10 stroke or transient
ischemic attack (TIA) separations per year, were
invited to participate. - All patients seen in the hospital emergency
department or admitted to hospital with a most
responsible diagnosis of stroke or TIA were
eligible for inclusion in the audit, as
identified from the Discharge Abstract Database
(DAD) and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting
System (NACRS) maintained by the Canadian
Institute for Health Information (CIHI). - Overall, 153 acute care institutions (with 154
individual hospital sites) were eligible all
agreed to participate in the 2004/05 audit.
7Methodology (contd)
- Based on this audit, there were 23,800
hospitalizations or emergency department visits
for acute stroke or TIA in Ontario in fiscal year
2004/05. - For individuals with more than one stroke or TIA
during the sampling timeframe, only the first
stroke or TIA event was included. - The audit sample included a total of 4,913
patients, or approximately 21 percent of all
cases.
8Key FindingsPre-hospital and Emergency Stroke
CareOntario
- Similar to the first audit in 2002/03, in
2004/05, almost a third (32.5) of all stroke or
TIA patients arrived at hospital within 2.5 hours
of stroke onset. - In 2004/05, more than half (55.2) of stroke or
TIA patients were transported to hospital by
ambulance. Almost two-thirds (65.2) were
admitted to hospital. - In 2004/05, rates of neuroimaging (CT/MRI) within
25 minutes of hospital arrival was almost 6,
compared to almost 3 in 2002/03.
9Key FindingsPre-hospital and Emergency Stroke
CareOntario
- In 2004/05, thrombolysis was administered to
almost 4 of patients with acute ischemic stroke,
an increase from 3 observed in 2002/03. In the
subgroup of patients presenting within 2.5 hours
of stroke symptom onset, 14 received
thrombolysis, significantly improving from almost
10 observed in 2002/03. - Among patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis
in 2004/05, the median door-to-needle time was
84.2 minutes, with no significant change from
2002/03.
10Key FindingsPre-hospital and Emergency Stroke
CareOntario Stroke System (OSS) designation
- The proportion of patients who arrived at the
emergency department within 2.5 hours of stroke
onset increased significantly at regional stroke
centres from 23 in 2002/03 to 33 in 2004/05. - Patients seen at regional stroke centres were
more likely than those seen at other hospital
types to be transported by ambulance and to be
admitted to hospital. - Between 2002/03 and 2004/05, there were
significant increases in neuroimaging rates
(within 25 minutes of hospital arrival). Rates of
neuroimaging were highest at regional stroke
centres and lowest at non-designated hospitals.
11Key FindingsPre-hospital and Emergency Stroke
CareOntario Stroke System (OSS) designation
- Rates of thrombolysis administration (overall or
within 2.5 hours of symptom onset) were highest
at regional stroke centres compared to other
hospital types. - Among patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis
in 2004/05, the median door-to-needle times were
shortest at regional stroke centres (73.1
minutes), followed by district stroke centres
(95.5 minutes) and non-designated hospitals
(119.8 minutes).
12Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack who arrived in the emergency
department (ED) within 2.5 hours of stroke onset,
2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
13Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack transported to hospital by
ambulance, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
14Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack admitted to hospital, 2002/03 and
2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
15Percentage of patients with ischemic stroke
receiving neuroimaging within 25 minutes of
hospital arrival, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
16Percentage of patients with ischemic
stroke receiving thrombolysis, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
17Percentage of patients with ischemic stroke
receiving thrombolysis among those presenting
within 2.5 hours of symptom onset, 2002/03 and
2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
18Median door-to-needle time among patients with
ischemic stroke receiving intravenous
thrombolysis, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
19Key Findings (contd)Emergency and in-hospital
managementOntario
- Increases were observed among stroke patients for
the following indicators in 2004/05 - Almost 69 of patients underwent neuroimaging (CT
and/or MRI of the brain) within 24 hours of
hospital arrival. A significant improvement from
47 observed in 2002/03. Neuroimaging at any time
before hospital discharge, was almost 82, an
increase from 77 in 2002/03. - Carotid imaging (performed or scheduled) was 55,
up from from 44 in 2002/03. - Dysphagia assessment (a swallowing assessment)
was 51, an increase from 47 in 2002/03. - Drug therapy at discharge (i.e.,antithrombotic
therapy, warfarin for atrial fibrillation, ACE
inhibitors and lipid-lowering therapy)
significantly increased from 2002/03, with the
exception of warfarin for atrial fibrillation. - Stroke unit admission was 11, an increase from
almost 3 observed in 2002/03. - Referrals to stroke secondary prevention clinics
was 29, up from 14 in 2002/03.
20Key Findings (contd)Emergency and in-hospital
managementOntario Stroke System (OSS)
designation
- There were statistically significant improvements
in neuroimaging rates (within 24 hours of
hospital arrival or at any time before hospital
discharge) at all types of hospital between
2002/03 and 2004/05. - In 2004/05, neuroimaging rates were markedly
higher at regional stroke centres compared to
other types of hospitals, with imaging rates
prior to hospital discharge of 96, 84 and 77
at regional stroke centres, district stroke
centres and non-designated hospitals,
respectively. - In 2004/05, rates of carotid imaging (performed
or scheduled), were higher at regional stroke
centres compared to other types of hospitals,
with rates of almost 70, 61 and 49 at regional
stroke centres, district stroke centres and
non-designated hospitals, respectively.
21Key Findings (contd)Emergency and in-hospital
managementOntario Stroke System (OSS)
designation
- In 2004/05, dysphagia screening rates were
highest at regional stroke centres (56 of
patients), followed by district stroke centres
(54 of patients) and non-designated hospitals
(48 of patients). - In 2004/05, there were variations in rates of
prescribing ACE inhibitors and lipid-lowering
therapy after hospital discharge across hospital
types, but no significant variations in
prescribing of antithrombotic agents or warfarin
for atrial fibrillation. Between 2002/03 and
2004/05, increases in rates of prescribing of
antithrombotic therapy, ACE inhibitors and
lipid-lowering medications for secondary
prevention of stroke, were observed across all
hospital types.
22Key Findings (contd)Emergency and in-hospital
managementOntario Stroke System (OSS)
designation
- Direct admission to stroke unit increased
markedly at regional stroke centres, from almost
4 in 2002/03 to 41 in 2004/05. Increases were
also observed at district stroke centres from
almost 2 in 2002/03 to 7 in 2004/05. Rates of
stroke unit admission were lowest at
non-designated hospitals (ranging between 2-3)
in 2002/03 and 2004/05. - Referral rates to stroke secondary prevention
clinics were highest at regional stroke centres
(67) compared to district stroke centres (27)
and non-designated hospitals (21). However, the
largest increase in referral rates was observed
at non-designated hospitals, at 7 in 2002/03 to
21 in 2004/05.
23Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack undergoing neuroimaging within 24
hours of arrival in the emergency department
(ED), 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
24Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack undergoing neuroimaging at any
time before discharge, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
25Percentage of patients with ischemic stroke or
transient ischemic attack receiving carotid
imaging, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
26Percentage of patients with ischemic stroke or
transient ischemic attack receiving
antithrombotic therapy at discharge, 2002/03 and
2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
27Percentage of patients with ischemic stroke or
transient ischemic attack receiving warfarin for
atrial fibrillation at discharge, 2002/03 and
2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
28Percentage of patients with ischemic stroke or
transient ischemic attack receiving ACE
inhibitors at discharge, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
29Percentage of patients with ischemic stroke or
transient ischemic attack receiving
lipid-lowering therapy at discharge, 2002/03 and
2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
30Percentage of patients with stroke or
transient ischemic attack who underwent dysphagia
screening, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
31Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack admitted directly to stroke
unit, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
32Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack referred to a Secondary
Prevention Clinic, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
33Key Findings (contd)Length of stay, discharge
status and destination and 30-day
mortalityOntario
- In 2004/05, the median inpatient length of
hospital stay for patients with stroke/TIA was
6.5 daysa decrease from 7.6 days observed in
2002/03. - In 2004/05, the majority (55) of stroke patients
were discharged home and almost 16 were
discharged to inpatient rehabilitation
facilities. In the subgroup of patients with
moderate to severe disability after stroke
(Rankin score 3 to 5), the majority (35) were
discharged to inpatient rehabilitation. This was
a significant decrease compared to 42 observed
in 2002/03. - In 2004/05, the age- and sex-adjusted 30-day
ischemic stroke mortality rate was almost 15
this did not significantly change from 2002/03.
The age- and sex-adjust hemorrhagic stroke
mortality rate was almost 42 again, similar to
that observed in 2002/03.
34Key Findings (contd)Length of stay, discharge
status and destination and 30-day
mortalityOntario Stroke System (OSS)
designation
- In both 2002/03 and 2004/05, the median inpatient
length of hospital stay for patients with
stroke/TIA was greater at regional stroke centres
compared to other hospital types. For all three
OSS designations, the median inpatient length of
stay decreased between 2002/03 and 2004/05. - In 2004/05, patients seen at regional and
district stroke centres were more likely to be
transferred to inpatient rehabilitation, compared
to patients seen at non-designated hospitals. At
regional stroke centres, there was a decrease in
the proportion of stroke patients discharged to
inpatient rehabilitationfrom 25 in 2002/03 to
almost 19 in 2004/05.
35Key Findings (contd)Length of stay, discharge
status and destination and 30-day
mortalityOntario Stroke System (OSS) designation
- Discharge destinations were similar among the
subgroup of patients with moderate to severe
disability (Rankin score 3-5), with the exception
of discharge to inpatient rehabilitation. These
rates were highest at regional stroke centres
(40), followed by district stroke centres (38)
and non-designated hospitals (almost 33). - Compared to 2002/03, there was a significant
decrease in the proportion of patients with
moderate to severe disability discharged to
inpatient rehabilitation from both regional and
district stroke centres.
36Key Findings (contd)Length of stay, discharge
status and destination and 30-day
mortalityOntario Stroke System (OSS) designation
- In 2004/05, age- and sex-adjusted 30-day ischemic
stroke mortality rates were lower at regional
stroke centres compared to those at
non-designated hospitals. There were no
statistically significant variations in the age-
and sex-adjusted 30-day hemorrhagic stroke
mortality rates across hospital types.
37Median length of stay for patients with stroke
or transient ischemic attack, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
38Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack discharged home, 2002/03 and
2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
39Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack discharged to an inpatient
rehabilitation facility, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
40Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack discharged to home care, 2002/03
and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
41Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack discharged to a long-term care
facility, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
42Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack discharged to an acute facility,
2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
43Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack discharged to other facility,
2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
44Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack with a Rankin Score of 02 and
discharged home, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
45Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack with a Rankin Score of 02 and
discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation
facility, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
46Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack with a Rankin Score of 02 and
discharged to home care, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
47Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack with a Rankin Score of 02 and
discharged to a long-term care facility, 2002/03
and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
48Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack with a Rankin Score of 35 and
discharged home, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
49Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack with a Rankin Score of 35 and
discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation
facility, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
50Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack with a Rankin Score of 35 and
discharged to home care, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
51Percentage of patients with stroke or transient
ischemic attack with a Rankin Score of 35 and
discharged to a long-term care facility, 2002/03
and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
52Age- and sex-adjusted 30-day ischemic stroke
mortality rate for patients with ischemic stroke
seen in the emergency department (ED) or admitted
to hospital, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
53Age- and sex-adjusted 30-day intracranial
hemorrhagic stroke mortality rate for patients
with intracranial hemorrhage seen in
the emergency department (ED) or admitted to
hospital, 2002/03 and 2004/05
By Ontario Stroke System (OSS) designation
54Interpretive Cautions
- Overall rates of key quality indicators for acute
stroke care are presented. Benchmarks have not
been established for most of these indicators. - Low rates of some indicators may be partially
explained and/or related to the lack of timely
neuroimaging or interpretation of test results in
smaller treatment centres or by the limited
number of physicians and other health care
workers with stroke care expertise in certain
facilities and geographic areas.
55Interpretive Cautions (contd)
- Significant improvements in the use of
evidence-based practices and interventions
occurred between the 2002/03 and 2004/05 audits.
Although the analysis does not allow one to
evaluate the reasons for the observed
improvements in care, there is a temporal
association between the implementation of the
Ontario Stroke System and improved stroke care
delivery. However, variations in care delivery
among hospital types continue to exist, with
lower rates of many stroke care interventions at
small community hospitals compared to other
hospital types. - LHIN-level analyses are based on where the
patient received treatment and not where the
patient resided. Therefore analyses in this
report are facility based.