POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor/ uophelp - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor/ uophelp

Description:

For more course tutorials visit www.uophelp.com POL 303 Week 1 DQ 1 Judicial Review POL 303 Week 1 DQ 2 Congress and Federalism POL 303 Week 2 DQ 1 Religious Liberty POL 303 Week 2 DQ 2 Freedom of Expression POL 303 Week 2 Teaching “Intelligent Design” in the Public Schools POL 303 Week 3 DQ 1 Equal Protection and Gender Discrimination POL 303 Week 3 DQ 2 Constitutional Issues Related to Same-gender Marriage POL 303 Week 3 Research Paper Draft POL 303 Week 4 DQ 1 Suspicion-less Strip Searches POL 303 Week 4 DQ 2 Cruel and Unusual Punishment – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Slides: 10
Provided by: welloffice3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor/ uophelp


1
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
  • For more course tutorials visit
  • www.uophelp.com

2
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
  • POL 303 Entire Course
  • POL 303 Week 1 DQ 1 Judicial Review (Ash)
  • POL 303 Week 1 DQ 1 Judicial Review
  •  
  • POL 303 Week 1 DQ 2 Congress and Federalism
  •  
  • POL 303 Week 2 DQ 1 Religious Liberty
  •  
  • POL 303 Week 2 DQ 2 Freedom of Expression
  •  
  • POL 303 Week 2 Teaching Intelli
  • Judicial Review. Respond to this 2-part question
    in your initial post
  • a.  What is the Supreme Court's justification for
    its claim to the power of judicial review in the
    American system of government? Fully explain
    Chief Justice Marshalls rationale in Marbury v.
    Madison.
  • b.  Do you find this rationale persuasive,
    especially in light

3
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
  • POL 303 Week 1 DQ 2 Congress and Federalismv(Ash)
  • POL 303 Week 2 DQ 1 Religious Liberty (Ash)
  • Congress and Federalism. Respond to this 2-part
    question in your initial post
  • a.  What is the Supreme Court's justification for
    recognizing broad and expansive national power in
    Congress to address what some view as "local"
    problems? Fully explain
  • Religious Liberty. Respond to this 3-part
    question in your initial post
  • Explain the Supreme Court's reasons, in Edwards
    v. Aguillard (the majority opinion by Justice
    Brennan), for holding that a law mandating the
    teaching of creationism in public schools
    violates the Constitutions ban on establishment
    of religion.

4
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
  • POL 303 Week 2 DQ 2 Freedom of Expression (Ash)
  • POL 303 Week 2 Teaching Intelligent Design in the
    Public Schools (Ash)
  • DQ 2 Freedom of Expression. In 2010 the Supreme
    Court, in a 5-4 decision, held that certain
    government restrictions on corporate funding of
    independent political broadcasts in candidate
    elections were unconstitutional (Citizens United
    v. Federal Election Commission). This
    controversial decision
  • Teaching Intelligent Design in the Public
    Schools. Write your paper about a hypothetical
    proposal that is before the elected school board
    for the public schools in your city. The proposal
    stirs deep controversy in the community. Opponents

5
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
  • POL 303 Week 3 DQ 1 Equal Protection and Gender
    Discrimination (Ash)
  • POL 303 Week 3 DQ 2 Constitutional Issues Related
    to Same-gender Marriage (Ash)
  • Equal Protection and Gender Discrimination. In
    recent years opportunities for women in the U.S.
    military have been expanding. But 200,000 jobs
    may remain closed to women for a variety of
    reasons. Recently two female Army Reserve
    officers sued the government for excluding them
    from formal assignment to specific Army combat
    units and other positions solely because of their
    gender (Sampson
  • Constitutional Issues Related to Same-gender
    Marriage. In 2012 the Armed Services Committee of
    the House of Representatives adopted, by a
    party-line vote, an amendment to the military
    defense budget for 2013 that would prohibit
    same-gender marriage ceremonies in base chapels
    serving members of the U.S. Armed

6
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
  • POL 303 Week 3 Research Paper Draft (Ash)
  • POL 303 Week 4 DQ 1 Suspicion-less Strip Searches
    (Ash)
  • Research Paper Draft. This is an opportunity to
    submit a draft or outline of the Research Paper
    for review and feedback from your instructor.
    Read the instructions for the Week Five Research
    Paper and create an outline for the structure of
    the paper. For information regarding writing an
    outline, reference to the Ashford Writing Center
    within the Learning Resources tab on the left
    navigation toolbar.
  • Suspicion-less Strip Searches. In 2012 the
    Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, upheld the
    constitutionality of routine (without probable
    cause) strip searches of persons arrested and
    detained, even briefly, in a jail (Florence v.
    Board of Chosen Freeholders of the Country of
    Burlington). Respond to this 3-part question in
    your initial post
  • Explain the rationale of the Supreme Court's
    decision

7
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
  • POL 303 Week 4 DQ 2 Cruel and Unusual Punishment
    (Ash)
  • POL 303 Week 5 DQ 1 Eminent Domain (Ash)
  • Cruel and Unusual Punishment. During the last
    decade, the Supreme Court has applied the 8th
    Amendments prohibition against cruel and unusual
    punishments against some of the harsher
    sentencing policies implemented by various
    states. Three cases dealing with juvenile
    offenders Roper v. Simmons (2005), Graham
  • Eminent Domain. In 2005 the Supreme Court, in a
    5-4 decision, upheld the constitutionality of a
    city taking private property, while paying the
    owner just compensation, and selling it to a
    private developer as part of a plan to stimulate
    the city's weak economy (Kelo v. City of New
    London). Respond to this 3-part question in your
    initial post
  • Explain the rationale of the Supreme

8
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
  • POL 303 Week 5 DQ 2 Right to Bear Arms (Ash)
  • POL 303 Week 5 Final Paper (Ash)
  • Right to Bear Arms. In 2010 the Supreme Courts
    novel and controversial interpretation of the 2nd
    Amendment greatly limited governments power to
    restrict gun possession. The case McDonald v.
    Chicago sparked widespread debate across the
    political and legal community, some of which is
    expressed in the articles you read for this
    discussion. Read the summary of
    McDonaldv.Chicago, then choose and read two
    articles pertaining to the McDonald v Chicago
    case from the Recommended Resources for POL303
    PDF file located in your online
  • Focus of the Research Paper
  • In this essay you will research a case that is
    actively pending before the Supreme Court of the
    United States (not yet decided by the Court when
    you submit your essay at the end of Week Five).
    It must be a case that raises significant issues
    involving the interpretation of the Constitution.
    The thesis of your essay will be

9
POL 303 (ASH) expert tutor
For more course tutorials visit www.uophelp.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com