Upgraded SEM System by Anderson Materials Evaluation, Inc. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Upgraded SEM System by Anderson Materials Evaluation, Inc.

Description:

AME is offering materials analysis and testing, failure analysis, quality control, and materials and process research and development services. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Upgraded SEM System by Anderson Materials Evaluation, Inc.


1
Upgraded SEM/EDX Systemby Anderson Materials
Evaluation, Inc.
  • We recently replaced our Topcon SM-300 SEM/EDX
    system with a Topcon ABT-32 SEM/EDX system with
    an Evex EDX and imaging computer program.  Our
    present system is shown below

2
  • We have realized a number of improvements as a
    result.  Among these areImage digitization at
    256 x 256, 512 x 512, 1024 x 1024, 2048 x 2048,
    4096 x 4096, and 8192 x 8192 pixels.  The old
    system only digitized SEM secondary electron
    (SED) and backscatter (BSD) images at 1024 x 1024
    pixels.  Most of our SED and BSD images will now
    be taken at higher pixel resolution, while 512 x
    512 is often the best resolution for EDX
    elemental mapping, since the x-ray emission
    volume beneath the surface is much larger than
    the surface beam entrance cross section.  EDX
    samples about 1 to 2 micrometers deep into a
    sample and the emission volume is about 1
    micrometer wide, so the resolution is much lower
    in EDX mode than in SED mode.
  • We can now map up to 8 elements at one time in
    the EDX mapping mode, or while making line
    scans.  We were previously only able to perform
    the mapping of one element at time.  This greatly
    reduces the time it takes to produce a map of
    several elements.  We can now easily color code
    each characteristic x-ray emission map and
    combine them in various ways, including as
    superpositions on a SED surface topography image.

3
  • The EDX energy dispersive detector is on the same
    side of the chamber that the secondary electron
    detector is on, which means both modes image the
    sample optimally without having to rotate the
    sample with respect to the incoming electron beam
    as we had to do on the SM-300 system.  Electron
    beam shadowing effects are now similar in both
    the SED and EDX images.
  • The EDX x-ray count rates are slightly higher
    with the new detector, especially at the lower
    mass element end of the spectrum.  We are getting
    a slightly higher energy resolution also with
    this detector.
  • The new Robinson Back Scatter detector has a
    slightly higher count rate than our previous
    detector did.  The back-scatter detector allows
    one to see higher mass element concentration
    areas as slightly brighter than lower mass
    elements.  Because one is only detecting high
    energy electrons from the sample, the volume
    emitting the signal is substantially deeper into
    the sample than in a SED image.  The resolution
    is somewhat less in the BSD mode than in the SED
    mode due to sub-surface spreading of the electron
    beam before many of the high energy electrons are
    back-scattered. 

4
  • SED images can generally be made at higher
    resolution than on the SM-300 system. The
    resolution specification is 5 nm.  The SM-300 had
    a specification of 4 nm, but this was impractical
    because achieving that resolution required such
    small apertures in the electron beam column that
    they quickly became dirty with carbon
    accumulations.  For practical use, we therefore
    had to replace the really small apertures with
    larger apertures and our resolution was degraded
    to about 7 nm.   The ABT-32 system is based on a
    very different aperture geometry which allows
    larger apertures placed differently.  Practical
    operation at up to 40,000 times magnification is
    now reasonable.
  • All the data is acquired with one computer now,
    rather than one for SED and BSD images and
    another for EDX analysis.  Export of data and
    images into reports is also more easily
    accomplished now.
  • The sample chamber is slightly larger now than it
    was in the SM-300, though that was also a large
    chamber.

5
  • We have a wider variety of sample holders and
    clamps.
  • The belt sample manipulation controls are
    tighter on this system.  Those on the SM-300 had
    more hysteresis than one would like.
  • Dr. Lorrie A. Krebs and Dr. Kevin A. Wepasnick
    are the primary SEM/EDX users and both of them
    are very much enjoying using the improved
    system.  Please feel free to talk to them
    directly about any SEM/EDX analysis projects you
    may have.

6
Contact Us Anderson Materials Evaluation,
Inc. 9051 Red Branch Road, Suite C, Columbia, MD
21045 Ph (410) 740-8562 Toll Free (866)
350-8882 Fax (410) 740-8201 Email
contactus_at_andersonmaterials.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com