Ash SOC 331 Entire Course

1
Ash SOC 331 Entire Course

• Check this A tutorial guideline at
• http//www.assignmentcloud.com/soc-331-ash/soc-331
  -entire-course
• SOC 331 Week 1 Quiz
• SOC 331 Week 2 Quiz
• SOC 331 Week 3 Quiz
• SOC 331 Week 4 Quiz
• SOC 331 Week 5 Quiz
• SOC 331 Week 1 DQ 1 Moral, Legal, and Religious
  Perspectives on Social Justice
• Moral, Legal, and Religious Perspectives on
  Social Justice. In Chapter 1 of your textbook,
  justice is analyzed from three perspectives, each
  with its own set of relevant concepts. The text
  includes three case studies for consideration
  from each perspective. Select one (only one) of
  these case studies as the focus of your initial
  post in this discussion. Then analyze the
  selected case study from the justice perspective
  which accompanies it and answer the following
  questions. If you select Case Study 1.1 Jacob
  Little and Walmart, analyze it from the
  perspective of justice as a moral concept. Your
  analysis must address the following
  questionsDid Walmart offer Jacob a just wage?
  Why or why not?Was the aldermans decision to
  let Walmart operate in the city just? Why or why
  not?If you were the alderman, what would you do
  to more fully promote justice in the situation?
  Why?If you select Case Study 1.2 Just
  Desserts?, analyze it from the perspective of
  justice as a legal concept.Was the courts
  sentence for Mr. Allen just? Why or why not?

2

• Was the courts sentence for Mr. Brown just? Why
  or why not?If you were the judge presiding over
  both of these trials, what would you do to more
  fully promote justice in them? Why?If you select
  Case Study 1.3 Honor the Sabbath or Keep Your
  Job, analyze it from the perspective of justice
  as a religious concept.Did Chief Gerst treat
  Corporal Brown justly? Why or why not?Did
  Corporal Brown act justly after his agreement
  with Chief Gerst? Why or why not?If you were the
  Chief of TSUs Police department, what would you
  do to more fully promote justice in the
  situation? Why?
• SOC 331 Week 1 DQ 2 The Justice of Climate Change
• The Justice of Climate Change. In Chapter 1 of
  your textbook, the author identifies the possible
  causes and consequences of global warming/climate
  change as emerging issues loaded with
  implications for justice. He also analyzes the
  concepts of distributive justice, commutative
  justice, and retributive justice and suggests
  their relevance to conversations about how
  individuals, businesses, and nations should
  respond justly to evidence of global warming.
  These conversations are made more difficult by
  acrimonious debates about the quality of the
  scientific evidence that supports global warming
  hypotheses as well as the motives and integrity
  of various scientists on both sides of the issue.
  Case Study 1.4 Getting Warmer? illustrates
  this problem.
• Familiarize yourself with the debate highlighted
  in Case Study 1.4 by reviewing the required
  resources for this discussion. Then apply
  concepts of distributive justice, commutative
  justice, and retributive justice to answer the
  following questions.
• How should the concept of distributive justice
  influence the response of the United States to
  evidence of global warming? Why?How should the
  concept of commutative justice influence your
  response, as an individual, to evidence of global
  warming? Why?How should the concept of
  retributive justice influence governmental and
  individual responses to business activities which
  emit substantial amounts of carbon dioxide and
  other greenhouse gases. Why?
• SOC 331 Week 2 DQ 1 Justice from Four
  Perspectives Family, Community, State, and Nation
• For more classes visit
•  
• www.assignmentcloud.com
•