Title: Tarun J Tejpal – The Missionary Position
 1 The Missionary Position 
 2Tarun J Tejpal - We all love sentimental trash, 
especially if it can masquerade as something 
artistic and meaningful. Often it needn't even do 
that  in an act of self-affirmation we invest it 
with these virtues. Slumdog Millionaire is one 
more representation of India as the white man 
sees it, not as we do. It's a five-hundred-year 
old tradition. Look carefully, the triumphant 
picture in the papers could be the enlightened 
missionary with the tribal boys. The tradition 
is strong we've always been cosy with the 
representations. It's worthwhile to remember we 
did not tell an Indian story and force the world 
to recognise it. They told us an Indian story and 
forced us to applaud it. 
 3A bit like Thomas Babington Macaulay, who 
declared from behind the musketry of the colonial 
conqueror that a "single shelf of a good European 
library was worth the whole native literature of 
India and Arabia". Looking up a long barrel with 
gunpowder at its end, we quietly acquiesced. 
 Quietly turned our backs on hundreds of 
classical and medieval texts, including the great 
epics, the Vedas, the Puranas, the Upanishads, 
the medical, ethical, linguistic, erotic and 
political treatises of dozens of pathbreaking 
thinkers, the plays of Kalidasa, the deeply 
humanist and philosophic poetry of the sufi and 
bhakti singers, and the luminous memoirs of 
emperors and commoners. And having acquiesced in 
our classification by another  ill-informed at 
that  proceeded to spend the next nearly two 
hundred years hunting for approval. 
 4The argument does not proceed from narrowness, 
from a bristling us and them. Artistic domain, 
and license, is boundless  even if the art is 
only commerce. Everyone has the right to tell 
anyone's story, in whichever way they choose. But 
if the story is specious and yet is taken for a 
master tale, it's reason to wonder at the state 
of cultural discourse. From a distance, through 
the refractions of many media lenses, I like 
Danny Boyle. He exudes great energy and humility. 
Qualities that make astonishing things possible, 
qualities that are on display in his 
rollercoaster film set in Mumbai, his Concorde 
ride to showbiz stardom. Yet, from a distance, 
through the rapturous din of critics and viewers, 
I wonder at the film. Setting aside AR Rahman's 
ever-enchanting music and the visceral brilliance 
of the little kids, I try and understand why a 
reasonably entertaining, mildly inconsistent, 
mildly incoherent, mildly sloppy in its casting, 
mildly sloppy on its facts film, with a banal 
narrative trajectory, and dodgy politics at its 
heart, becomes such a phenomenon. 
 5One feels awe not for the film, but for its 
miraculous journey. Clearly, in an increasingly 
low-brow ocean of publicity and hype, the idea of 
true excellence is a drowned raft. Not shorn of 
the hype, but because of it, to an Indian, the 
film ought to disappoint. It tells me nothing 
that I don't already know and it tells me things 
I know to be not true. Unlike Amitabh Bachchan I 
have no problems with the film focusing on 
India's abject poverty. That focus is salutary, 
and crying out for further exploration. My 
problem is the opposite that it trivialises it. 
Uses its excreta and chopped limbs to tell a 
dubious story that leaves the viewer not 
disturbed but cheerfully smug. You leave the seat 
exhilarated, not in pain. 
 6The film tells a very big lie that India's poor 
have a happy shot at leaping out of their misery 
into affluence and joy. One day you can be in the 
crap heap  diving into excreta  and the next 
running down a slum girl who may have failed to 
make school but seems to have managed to walk 
through Vogue's offices on her way to teenage. 
With a stunning lack of plausibility you see the 
slum child Jamaal grow into a refined public 
schoolboy who must surely be eating cucumber 
sandwiches for lunch. India's wannabe wealthy  
billionaires among them  would slice their 
fingers to boast such a sophisticated son. For 
that accent alone, they would throw in their toes 
too. As many cooing admirers have remarked, the 
director is on a lickety-split run, pacing his 
film like a Kobe Bryant fast-break in an NBA 
finals. Throw, catch, feint, weave, leap, dunk 
turn and start running again. Aw! Gee! The camera 
is shaking, the story is sprinting  there is no 
way anyone can tell if a few chapters have fallen 
out, several links of logic lost. 
 7You have to be grateful Jamal only grows up to be 
Dev Patel. Given the absence of any need to 
explain the miraculous transformation, he could 
well have become Brad Pitt or Prince Charles. To 
further celebrate the carnival of implausibility, 
Master Dev acts with the cool flatness of the 
cucumber sandwich (that he surely must be eating) 
 no neuroses of the slums tarnishing his 
soul. For those celebrating the authenticity of 
the film, here's a secret the makers clearly had 
no interest in verisimilitude. It's been the 
rough approach of artists working the India 
material for the last hundred years. It arises 
from a clear understanding of "audience". The 
awgee mobs filling theatres around the world, and 
paying in dollars or some such muscular currency, 
cannot tell the difference between Hindi and 
Hindu or the vast distance between Mumbai and 
Agra. Much like the American tourists at the Taj 
Mahal, who cannot distinguish between an 
unlettered, ignorant urchin and a licensed 
guide. 
 8The awgee mobs  which include vast swathes of 
awgee India  will not be held back by the 
remarkable metamorphosis of Hindi-speaking slum 
children into English-speaking teenagers  
smoothly accomplished whilst riding the roofs of 
trains, without the intervention of any forms of 
schooling. Nor will they wonder by what divine 
principle some of the desperately destitute speak 
Hindi and others English. In the happy world of 
air-conditioning and popcorn  and fountain Pepsi 
 the poor can be made to do whatever we wish. 
Dance, sing, love, win quiz contests, murder with 
a Webley  Scott, die in a tub full of currency 
notes. What is the meaning of being rich if you 
cannot make the poor do whatever you wish? What 
is the meaning of being Hollywood if you cannot 
make India whatever you wish? Aptly then, the 
awgee army will not be detained by the 
representation of the police either. It knows 
Mumbai's police have vanquished murder, rape, 
riot, theft and arson. 
 9All its working on now is nabbing crooked quiz 
contestants and torturing them through the night 
with electrical shocks to evoke the correct 
answer. If the art direction is right  squalid 
files and furniture  and the cop is fat enough, 
there is no reason for further doubt. It also 
knows behind the fatness and toughness the police 
hide the soul of Mother Teresa. Once the boy who 
eats cool cucumber sandwiches begins to talk, his 
heart will melt, and the empathy flows like 
faeces in the slums. THE AWGEE sociologists also 
know that the grand hosts of India's grandest 
shows all come from the slums. Amitabh Bachchan, 
Shah Rukh Khan  the only two who've ever hosted 
the Hindi version of Who Wants To Be A 
Millionaire? And, of course, now Anil Kapoor in 
this fast-break film  who chooses to host it in 
English, because the slum boy has lost his Hindi 
as he grew up (just as Kapoor himself did  the 
upward mobility from the slums is a veritable 
avalanche!). 
 10Awgee and awgee also know that these grand hosts 
play sinister games, like planting wrong answers 
and summarily handing over contestants to the fat 
and tough police (for electrocution and 
empathy). The media tells us the film is about 
hope. And hope, as we all know, is greater than 
inconsistency, inaccuracy, implausibility, dodgy 
politics, and party pooper critics. And since the 
film is about the triumph of impossible hope, it 
is impossibly greater than all of the above. QED. 
And yes, of course it is also a fantasy, a 
fairytale. And since, for these poor sods, hope 
too is a fantasy, it all coheres, hangs together 
beautifully. The awgee readers of awgee media 
know that this is the crucial difference between 
people like Satyajit Ray, Mira Nair and the 
Slumdog millionaires. Their films were about 
poverty and street children this one's about 
fantastic hope. In their heart of hearts, the 
awgee readers know the poor are desperately in 
need of hope. 
 11They also know that hope is all they can  and 
will  give them. And let's be honest  false or 
true, fantastic hope is still hope. The media 
knows something even more fundamental. Never 
criticise the celebrity whose interview keeps 
your shop alive. The road to poverty is paved 
with robust criticism. The world of 
entertainment is studded with shining pyramids of 
implausibility. Each one's true reward is a 
singing cash register. But great awards, fools 
argue, must go to the fragile hutments of truth 
and excellence. The wise, on the other hand, know 
the wages at the Oscars better. They know they 
have a rare gift (as in the film) for turning 
ordinary shit into tasty chocolate and peanut 
butter. 
 12It's Written by Tarun J Tejpal. Some rides are so 
giddy you can't see the truth, says Tarun J 
Tejpal. According to Tarun Tejpal sorrow must 
not be cultivated it is a poor lifestyle 
choice. Tarun Tejpal is a journalist, publisher, 
and novelist. In a 26-year career, Tarun Tejpal 
has been an editor with the India Today and the 
Indian Express groups, and the managing editor of 
Outlook, Indias premier newsmagazine. In March 
2000, he started Tehelka, a news organisation 
that has earned a global reputation for its 
aggressive public interest journalism. Also you 
can check Tarun J Tejpal.